sr-users August 2005

sr-users@lists.kamailio.org

220 participants
558 discussions

by Dmitry Isakbayev

Hi, When I process an Invite, is there a way to check if the originating UI is registered with the proxy? Thanks, Dmitry

19 years, 3 months

[Serusers] dbtext module

by Carlos

Hi, I'm trying to use dbtetx module, i've written the ser.cfg with the necesaries changes, also i do a directory /tmp/serdb with those files(location, aliases, version & subscriber), but when i run my ser i have this problem: /* 0(0) fixing /usr/lib/ser/modules/maxfwd.so mf_process_maxfwd_header 0(0) fixing /usr/lib/ser/modules/sl.so sl_send_reply 0(0) fixing /usr/lib/ser/modules/sl.so sl_send_reply 0(0) fixing /usr/lib/ser/modules/rr.so record_route 0(0) fixing /usr/lib/ser/modules/rr.so loose_route 0(0) fixing /usr/lib/ser/modules/tm.so t_relay 0(0) fixing /usr/lib/ser/modules/registrar.so save 0(0) DBT:dbt_load_file: request for table [location] 0(0) DBT:dbt_load_file: db is [/tmp/serdb] 0(0) DBT:dbt_load_file: loading file [/tmp/serdb/location] 0(0) DBT: column[0] is STR! 0(0) DBT: column[1] is STR! 0(0) DBT: column[2] is STR! 0(0) DTB:dbt_db_get_table: --------------- 0(0) DBT:db_query: table not loaded! 0(0) DBT:db_query: error while quering table! 0(0) preload_udomain(): Error while doing db_query 0(0) register_udomain(): Error while preloading domain 'location' 0(0) domain_fixup(): Error while registering domain ERROR: error ffffffff while trying to fix configuration 0(0) DEBUG: tm_shutdown : start 0(0) DEBUG: tm_shutdown : empting DELETE list 0(0) DEBUG: tm_shutdown : empting hash table 0(0) DEBUG: tm_shutdown: releasing timers 0(0) DEBUG: tm_shutdown : removing semaphores 0(0) DEBUG: tm_shutdown : done 0(0) DBT:destroy ... 0(1410) shm_mem_destroy 0(1410) destroying the shared memory lock */ I don`t know if i have to create any table, or something like that, i supose location file is something like this: /* username(str) domain(str,null) password(str) garcia:iptel.org:1234 */ Thanks, Carlos

19 years, 3 months

RE: [Serusers] Routing multiple numbers to 1 account

by Igor Balk

The idea is not to query any tables as they are at different server but use radius to provision aliases and then use lookup("aliases") I believe there was a patch a way back for 8.12 but seems it did not found it way to CVS -----Original Message----- From: Chris St Denis [mailto:chris@aebc.com] Sent: Wednesday, August 24, 2005 3:44 PM To: Igor Balk; serusers(a)lists.iptel.org Subject: RE: [Serusers] Routing multiple numbers to 1 account This is basically the same as aliases. Query the registration table. If its not found there push the AVP alias into the ruri/username and lookup based on that. All aliases are is a static registration table anyway I believe. -----Original Message----- From: serusers-bounces(a)iptel.org [mailto:serusers-bounces@lists.iptel.org] On Behalf Of Igor Balk Sent: Wednesday, August 24, 2005 11:59 AM To: serusers(a)lists.iptel.org Subject: RE: [Serusers] Routing multiple numbers to 1 account Guys, do any of you know if there is a way in SER to dynamically set up aliases using radius? I'm trying to achieve similar results but with aliases. Thank you. -----Original Message----- From: serusers-bounces(a)iptel.org [mailto:serusers-bounces@lists.iptel.org] On Behalf Of Chris St Denis Sent: Wednesday, August 24, 2005 1:26 PM To: 'Erik Versaevel'; 'SER Users' Subject: RE: [Serusers] Routing multiple numbers to 1 account I am doing this by pulling the translation out of a database using radius AVP (could be done direct to database too) and sticking it as the destination. It looks like this # Try to lookup the number directly registered. if(!lookup("ser_location")) { #Number isn't found, so try to do an avp translation on it avp_pushto("$ruri/username", "s:callee_vdid"); if(!lookup("ser_location")) { #Look up the new value #Still can't find the user. Give up. sl_send_reply("404", "I can't find 'em"); break; } } -----Original Message----- From: serusers-bounces(a)iptel.org [mailto:serusers-bounces@lists.iptel.org] On Behalf Of Erik Versaevel Sent: Wednesday, August 24, 2005 6:49 AM To: SER Users Subject: [Serusers] Routing multiple numbers to 1 account Hello all, At this moment i'm using the full e164 numbers as account's in ser, that is for every number someone wants delivered to them they would have to register it using the account details. This however poses a problem with a 100 bock of numbers for example while a device can only register a few of them so what i would like to do is mimic the asterisk like dial(SIP/number@sipppeer) in SER. That way the devices only has to register once and recieves the number dialed in the incomming INVITE. If i use aliases to alias numbers to 1 account the account allways recieves it's own registered contact instead of the number dialed, is there any way to support number blocks in this way? For example: Device registeres as device_1@sipserver with contact device_1@device_ip:port SER gets invite for number in the block of device_1 and sends the invite as dialed_number@device_ip:port instead of device_1@device_ip:port Kind reagards, Erik Versaevel _______________________________________________ Serusers mailing list serusers(a)lists.iptel.org http://lists.iptel.org/mailman/listinfo/serusers _______________________________________________ Serusers mailing list serusers(a)lists.iptel.org http://lists.iptel.org/mailman/listinfo/serusers _______________________________________________ Serusers mailing list serusers(a)lists.iptel.org http://lists.iptel.org/mailman/listinfo/serusers

19 years, 3 months

Re: [Serusers] Checking URI

by Ryan Pagquil

Hi Steve, Here is what happens with my current configuration. When I call from my iptel.org account going to my local users it prompts me "407, Proxy Authenctication Required". So what I like to do is to allow those calls going to my local users from other domain. BTW, here is my ser.cfg's INVITE message handler. ##INVITE message Handler## route[3] { if (client_nat_test("3")) { setflag(7); force_rport(); fix_nated_contact(); }; # if (!proxy_authorize("", "subscriber")) { # proxy_challenge("", "0"); # break; # } else if (!check_from() && method=="INVITE") { sl_send_reply("403", "User From=ID"); break; }; lookup("aliases"); if (uri!=myself) { route(1); break; }; if (!lookup("location")) { sl_send_reply("404", "User not found"); break; }; if (method=="CANCEL") { route(1); break; }; consume_credentials(); if (isflagset(6) || isflagset(7)) { use_media_proxy(); }; route(1); } I misse call with your SIP phone, just testing it. =) Thanks, Ryan Steve Blair wrote: > > Set the alias=<your sip domain> parameter then use if (uri==myself) > construct. > > -Steve > > Ryan Pagquil wrote: > >> Hello, >> How can I check if the call is for my domain? What specific >> module should I use? >> >> Thanks, >> > -- Ryan Pagquil Infodyne Inc. - PhilOnline.com 3603 Antel Global Corporate Center Doña Julia Vargas Ave. Ortigas Center Pasig City Tel: 687-0715 Web: www.philonline.com

19 years, 3 months

[Serusers] failure_route question

by Java Rockx

Hi All. I'm using t_check_status() to do call forwarding on 486 Busy responses. I have an odd thing happening where SER receives the 486 Busy message (for which SER properly sends an ACK response) and then the failure_route calls append_branch() and t_relay() to try another destination. After the new leg of the call is setup and then torn down, the original 486 Busy seems to be hung in the tm module, because it magically appears in ngrep, which shows it being sent back to the caller as if the append_branch() never took place. Is there anything special that I should be doing to "swallow" the 486 Busy response to prevent it from being sent to the caller UA? Regards, Paul

19 years, 3 months

[Serusers] is that compliant?

by Olivier Taylor

Hi all, I have a problem with ringing message coming from our provider. Associate with the message, i find a SDP. Some UACs doesn't like that and doesn't give a ringback (Snom and Grandstream ata 486) SIP/2.0 180 Ringing..Via: SIP/2.0/UDP 192.168.2.101;rport=1039;received=81.247.182.42;branch=z9hG4bKfeb085ba0caf55 99..To: <sip:0495283361@finalcut.be>;tag=507b8a49..From: " Family Taylor" <sip:7321073@finalcut.be>;tag=cf8413e3df61a5a5..Call-ID: ae6f02682bb43efd@192.168.2.101..CSeq: 4667 INVITE..Record-Route: <sip:82.146.123.252>..Content-Type: application/sdp..Content-Length: 217....v=0..o=VoipSwitch 7772 7772 IN IP4 213.246.41.194..s=VoipSIP..i=Audio Session..c=IN IP4 213.246.41.194..t=0 0..m=audio 6772 RTP/AVP 18 101..a=rtpmap:18 G729/8000/1..a=rtpmap:101 telephone-event/8000..a=fmtp:101 0-15.. Is that correct and compliant? Thanks, Olivier

19 years, 3 months

[Serusers] Forward to busy and no answer

by Hernando Maisano

I need its aid, like setting the SER, I have still the problem with call forwarding on busy or no answer? ....I am to use a module AVPOP, but it does not walk. Please help Me..... Thanks

19 years, 3 months

[Users] printer friendly documentation

by Gary Mart

First, I like what you are doing, but is their a better way to get printed copies of the documentation than to individually display and print the documentation for each module? Gary

19 years, 3 months

[Users] Faster to do avp_printf();avp_check OR search()?

by Kanakatti M. Subramanya

e.g., if I want to do something if there is a Refer-To header in the message, am I better off doing avp_printf("$someAvp", "$rt"); avp_check("$rt", "re/.../i"); or search("/.../"); Just want ot know whether to get started rewriting all the "search()" strings i have in my ser.cfg.... cheers

19 years, 3 months

[Users] LCR module

by Ozan Blotter

Dear List, I cannot find enough documentation about LCR Module, anyone using and successful SER.CFG for it ? Thanks, Ozan

19 years, 3 months

← Newer
1
...
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
...
56
Older →

Jump to page:

2024

2023

2022

2021

2020

2019

2018

2017

2016

2015

2014

2013

2012

2011

2010

2009

2008

2007

2006

2005

2004

2003

2002

sr-users August 2005