sr-users August 2005

sr-users@lists.kamailio.org

220 participants
558 discussions

Start a nNew thread

[Serusers] ip based auth and billing

by Iqbal

Hi Has anyone attempted this, to see if it works, where the UA is using IP address only, Iqbal

19 years, 2 months

[Serusers] forward breaks URI rewrite?

by Chris Roberts

Heya, This might be an obvious answer, but when I forward a packet to another box using the forward() method, this seems to break the URI? rewriteuri("sip:test@test.co.uk"); forward(x.x.x.x, 5060); Now on my asterisk box and looking at ngrep, the test(a)test.co.uk has disappeared, and asterisk takes the SIPDOMAIN as 'x.x.x.x', rather than 'test.com'. Is this the desired behaviour? Is there a way to do what I want to do? I need to be able to pick out the original SIPDOMAIN in asterisk even after the packet has been forwarded by SER. People seem to have talked about doing this, but I'm not sure how I can forward it without obliterating the URI. Cheers, Chris. -- No virus found in this outgoing message. Checked by AVG Anti-Virus. Version: 7.0.344 / Virus Database: 267.10.16/83 - Release Date: 26/08/2005

19 years, 2 months

[Serusers] xmlrpc calls

by zkeatts

I am currently trying to do an xml-rpc call to usrloc.show_contacts. The xml packet I am sending is the following POST /RPC2 HTTP/1.0 User-Agent: Radio UserLand/7.1b7 (WinNT) Host: localhost:5060 Content-Type: text/xml Content-length: 131 <?xml version=\"1.0\"?> <methodCall> <methodName>usrloc.show_contacts</methodName> <params> </params> </methodCall> As a return packet I am getting HTTP/1.0 200 OK Via: SIP/2.0/UDP 127.0.0.1:32769 Server: Sip EXpress router (0.10.99-janakj_experimental (i386/linux)) Content-Length: 303 Warning: 392 127.0.0.1:5060 "Noisy feedback tells: pid=5820 req_src_ip=127.0.0.1 req_src_port=32769 in_uri=/RPC2 out_uri=/RPC2 via_cnt==1" <?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?> <methodResponse> <fault> <value><struct> <member><name>faultCode</name> <value><i4>400</i4></value></member> <member><name>faultString</name> <value><string>More Parameters Expected</string></value></member> </struct></value> </fault> </methodResponse> This tells me that I am not entering the correct information, but I am at a loss to exactly what else I should be inserting. I did a search for rpc_show_contacts and found in ./sip_router/modules/usrloc/ul_rpc.c static void rpc_show_contacts(rpc_t* rpc) After searching some more I could not find the rpc_t structure. Does anyone know what values I should be passing via XML? Thanks, Zach Keatts Software Engineer Nuvio.com

19 years, 2 months

[Serusers] URGENT:Authenitcation Mode

by Ashutosh Kumar

Hi, IF I set auth_db:calculate_ha1=no, will the radius authentication also be in non-digest (plaintext/basic) mode?? Reply please. Very urgent. Regards, Ashutosh Kumar

19 years, 2 months

[Serusers] maxfwd module with Max-Forwards > 255 broken

by Hendrik Scholz

Hi! I checked how SER would behave with large Max-Forwards values. Paragraph 20.22 of RFC 3261 notes Max-Forwards to be anywhere between 0 and 255 but SER lacks a check for the upper boundry in the maxfwd module. I'm not sure how the correct way to remove the broken header field and introducing a correct one would be so I leave this for somebody who knows :) Hendrik -- freenet Cityline GmbH, Hamburger Chaussee 2-4, 24114 Kiel, Germany Phone: +49 (0)431 9020552, Fax: +49 (0)431 9020559 Internet: http://www.freenet.de, eMail: hendrik.scholz(a)freenet-ag.de

19 years, 2 months

[Serusers] overflowing Expire values

by Hendrik Scholz

Hi! I gave 3.1.2.4 of draft-ietf-sipping-torture-tests-07 a try and sent - a REGISTER with Expires > 2^31 and lower than 2^32 (2147483748 in my case). - a REGISTER with Expires > 2^32 (4294967596 = 2^32 + 300) I used print_expires() to print the resulting values SER (0.9.3 + changes) parsed. It's a negative value in first case and 300 in the latter one. parser/parse_expires.h defines exp_body_t to have 'int val' which is not enough to store the parsed values. Changing it to 'unsigned int val' prevents the negative values from coming up in SER but does not solve the main problem. The draft stats that a default value of 3600 seconds should be assumed in case of errors, so an additional check to make sure _e->val will always be below 2^32 is necessary. I do have a small patch for our non-standard branch and could wrap one up for HEAD if needed. Hendrik -- freenet Cityline GmbH, Hamburger Chaussee 2-4, 24114 Kiel, Germany Phone: +49 (0)431 9020552, Fax: +49 (0)431 9020559 Internet: http://www.freenet.de, eMail: hendrik.scholz(a)freenet-ag.de

19 years, 2 months

[Serusers] Blocking calls from unregistered users

by rpagquil＠philonline.com

19 years, 2 months

[Users] DROP statement

by Bogdan-Andrei Iancu

Hi there, The core "drop" statement has a new special meaning in some route types (by default it's equivalent to "exit"): - BRANCH ROUTE - the request branch is discarded (not fwd); - ONREPLY ROUTE - if provisional reply (<200), it will be discarded (not fwd, not stored, but only timers updated); Wiki will be updated soon with this text ;) regards, bogdan

19 years, 2 months

[Serusers] RURI or URI

by Nando

hello, somebody knows the true difference between this: sip:1111@sip.domain.com y sip:1111 at sip.domain.com Because in logs (with ngrep) only I see the URI default????? (sip:1111@.....) Why i do not see the RURI??? Thanks

19 years, 2 months

[Serusers] Support for multiple PSTN Gateways (hunting, crank back)

by Frank Fischer

Hi all i have multiple gateway devices to PSTN. All are equal in terms of what destinations may be reached behind it or the termination costs. I use multiple devices for two reasons: capacity and failover. So what i need is functionality to hunt lines or at least doing a crank back (or even better both). The best way to this (IMHO) would be to track the line usage on each gateway and check it before routing to a gateway to make sure, there is a line available to place the call to (this would be a kind of line hunting). But i could also "live" with a solution that works more like a failover mechanism. In that case i would route the call to the first gateway in my list and if it is not available or has no more free lines, i would need to detect this, take the call back and place it on another gateway. As far as i could find out, there is no hunting, failover or crank back support directly built into SER. Is it possible to implement such functionality using the "common" routing scripts in SER? Did anyone of you ever had similar requirements and did you find a way to fullfill it? I'm very thankfull for any idea, hint, snipplet, .... Thanks a lot for your help. Best Regards Frank

19 years, 2 months

Jump to page:

2024

2023

2022

2021

2020

2019

2018

2017

2016

2015

2014

2013

2012

2011

2010

2009

2008

2007

2006

2005

2004

2003

2002

sr-users August 2005