sr-users August 2005

sr-users@lists.kamailio.org

220 participants
558 discussions

by Somlai Gábor

Hello, How should I concatenate the values of two AVPs? I have not found the answer in the docs and in archive, maybe I'm lame.. Thanks, Gabor Somlai

19 years, 3 months

[Serusers] thanx

by rupesh

hello, thank you sam lee and ashutosh kumar for ur suggestions, it worked.

19 years, 3 months

[Serusers] Large Telco SER Implementation

by INNOVE Communications - Cocoy J. Claravall

Can anyone share large SER installations in a telco environment? I read somewhere about Earthlink w/ 1.6million subs on SER. Any other that you know? We would like to get some reference accounts for this platform, thanks.

19 years, 3 months

[Serusers] Paid help and support

by Sebastian Muniz

Hello. We are planning an enterprise with SER + ArtDIO UA. I have already asked info(a)iptel.org for a paid expert or so to help us set up SER remotely and they have said all of their resources are busy. So, is there any person in the list willing to help us set ip up? If so, please write a personal e-mail to sebastianm(a)smartsecurity.com.mx Thanks in advance. Sebastian.

19 years, 3 months

Re: [Users] rport in via header

by Daniel-Constantin Mierla

Hello, so actually the gateway is a NAT, and it is not SIP aware at all. From the picture I got that the gateway adds also a via header with ip2:port2. In this case, I understand your question, I will double check how via header is built inside openser and come back with answer during the day (too late now). Daniel On 08/11/05 21:06, ranveer kunal wrote: >hi, > RFC 3581 says if the the transport layer is UDP, the reply should >be sent to ip of ip packet received and the port shud be taken from >the via header, untill unless rport is there. > >since in via header port is port1(it was written by proxy). next hop >proxy sends the reply to ip2:port1. > >I have figured a work around, i'll force gateway to send the packet >from port=port1. Thus the problem will be solved. > >Thanks. > >Regards, >Ranveer. > > >On 8/11/05, Daniel-Constantin Mierla <daniel(a)voice-system.ro> wrote: > > >>Hello, >> >>On 08/11/05 04:33, ranveer kunal wrote: >> >> >> >>>hey daniel, >>> The packet from the ser proxy is statelessly forwarded >>>by a gateway that is inline with proxy, now i want next hop proxy to >>>reply on the port of the gateway rather than port of proxy. that is y >>>i need proxy to send rport. >>> >>>proxy--------------gateway--------------next hop proxy >>> >>>proxy -> ip1:port1-> gateway -> ip2:port2 -> next hop proxy >>>next hop proxy -> replies to ip2:port1 (hybrid) -> screws my setup >>> >>> >>> >>> >>the next hop proxy is broken, why does it reply to ip2:port1? It should >>reply to source_ip and source_port of the received request. The proxy is >>not aware at all about ip2:port2 used by gateway. >> >>Daniel >> >> >> >>>can you suggest me some way to overcome this. >>> >>>Regards, >>>Ranveer. >>> >>>On 8/11/05, Daniel-Constantin Mierla <daniel(a)voice-system.ro> wrote: >>> >>> >>> >>> >>>>Hello, >>>> >>>>On 08/10/05 21:10, ranveer kunal wrote: >>>> >>>> >>>> >>>> >>>> >>>>>hi daniel, >>>>> as far as i have explored force_rport(), places the rport >>>>>parameter in the topmost via header and not in its own via header. am >>>>>i right ? >>>>> >>>>>example : >>>>> >>>>>UAC -> (via1:via2:via3)proxy(force_rport)->(via1:via2:via3,rport:via4)next proxy >>>>> >>>>>i want this : >>>>>UAC -> (via1:via2:via3)proxy(force_rport)->(via1:via2:via3:via4,rport)next proxy >>>>> >>>>>Please clarify it ? >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> >>>>yes, it is like that. And this is how it is supposed to be, according to >>>>RFC3581. Why do you need it in proxy's via? The proxy will look at the >>>>second via to get the destination address for reply. >>>> >>>>Daniel >>>> >>>> >>>> >>>> >>>> >>>>>Regards, >>>>>Ranveer. >>>>> >>>>>On 8/10/05, Daniel-Constantin Mierla <daniel(a)voice-system.ro> wrote: >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> >>>>>>Hello, >>>>>> >>>>>>you have to use force_rport() in the configuration file for the request >>>>>>you want rport parameter in VIA. >>>>>> >>>>>>Daniel >>>>>> >>>>>> >>>>>>On 08/10/05 20:44, ranveer kunal wrote: >>>>>> >>>>>> >>>>>> >>>>>> >>>>>> >>>>>> >>>>>> >>>>>>>hi all, >>>>>>> Is there a way to configure openser so that it sends rport in >>>>>>>via header ? Actually th packet from server is reverse natted through >>>>>>>another system using any random port, i want it the reply to come on >>>>>>>the same port . thanks .... >>>>>>> >>>>>>>Regards, >>>>>>>Ranveer. >>>>>>> >>>>>>> >>>>>>> >>>>>>> >>>>>>> >>>>>>> >>>>>>> >>>>>>> >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> >>> >>> >>> >>> > > > >

19 years, 3 months

[Serusers] Problem with BYE

by Teran Jesus

Hello, I have a problem, i need to transfere a "BYE" to my B2BUI and to my gateway at the same time, i have used the rewritehost and the t_relay_to_udp twice but only take me the first one. ¿Can you help me?

19 years, 3 months

[Users] problems with tcp_init...

by Loide Mara

Hi! When I start openser executing (openserctl start) it says me Starting SER : PID file /var/run/openser.pid does not exist -- SER start failed So, I try to watch debug messages and i see the rows DEBUG: setting SO_RCVBUF; set=262144,verify=262142 0(0) DEBUG: setting SO_RCVBUF has no effect 0(0) INFO: udp_init: SO_RCVBUF is finally 262142 0(0) ERROR: tcp_init: bind(6, 0x810580c, 16) on 127.0.0.1: Address already in use What can be the problem? =/ Has everyone some problems like that (and solutions =). Thanks. Have a good day. -------------------------------------------------- Loide Mara Verdes de Jesus 6º período - Ciência da Computação / UFAM Laboratório VoIP - UFAM

19 years, 3 months

[Serusers] accounting fifo messages

by SER Users

hello, I am trying to force a call disconnect by sending a BYE to both ends. everything is ok, the call gets disconnected but I do not manage to get the BYE message accounted by the accounting module. Is it possible to do accounting on messages sent using the fifo interface, is it something special that needs to be configured ? thanks, Razvan Radu

19 years, 3 months

[Serusers] TCP and UDP listeners

by Carla Ares

HI, I'm using ser 0.8.14. It opens the port 5060 udp and tcp. But I'm using only the udp port. I want to configure ser to open only the udp port. Is this possible? Carla

19 years, 3 months

[Serusers] SER in production environment

by Luba Vincent

Hello, We would like to use SER in a production environment and provide presence support to at least 5000 *online* users through a publicly available service. We are particularly worried about scalability. * How stable is the presence module? * Does it support RFC3857 to allow authorization management of subscriptions? * For such a big number of users, do we need several computers running SER? * If so, how can we ensure that all SER servers have the required information to be able to send status changes to all users? Is that stored in a MySQL DB and if so, how is it determined which SER server sends the NOTIFY on state changes to all users having the user whose state changed in their list? * Are there bandwidth estimations? I have the feeling that 5000 online users will generate many NOTIFY messages due to presence changes. * Is it possible to prevent MESSAGE requests to be sent following some piece of information found in the database? We would like to connect SER to a SMS service, and prevent users to send SMS'es when their credit is not enough. That supposes some computation in the ser.cfg file, is that possible? Greetings, Luba Vincent ___________________________________________________________________________ Appel audio GRATUIT partout dans le monde avec le nouveau Yahoo! Messenger Téléchargez cette version sur http://fr.messenger.yahoo.com

19 years, 3 months

← Newer
1
...
32
33
34
35
36
37
38
...
56
Older →

Jump to page:

2024

2023

2022

2021

2020

2019

2018

2017

2016

2015

2014

2013

2012

2011

2010

2009

2008

2007

2006

2005

2004

2003

2002

sr-users August 2005