Hello,
We are working on a billing solution for use with SER. We have completed a great PrePaid Billing solution for a client V1010.com but they currently only do outbound and arent planning to do inbound for a time. We are looking for some sample inbound call data from PSTN if anyone has some we would appreciate it! We can handle all Country codes and Area Code rates as well as custom rates as of now. So hope to have monthly billing completed soon.
Thanks for any help
Eric Haskins
Lead Software Developer
eric(a)rackspeed.net
Hello,
I tried to use the append_rpid_hf command. I read in the internet that the
value is saved in the subscriber table in the column rpid. Is that all I
have to do? I noticed that there's no information in the header (with
ngrep).
Thanks!
Sebastian
For which OS platform is it compiled?
ps
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Chris St Denis [mailto:chris@aebc.com]
> Sent: Tuesday, September 13, 2005 7:18 PM
> To: 'Pavol Segec'; serusers(a)lists.iptel.org
> Cc: chris(a)aebc.com
> Subject: RE: [Serusers] UAC module
>
> Somebody wrote a backport to 0.9.x. I don't remember where I
> got it from, but I've attached it here.
>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: serusers-bounces(a)lists.iptel.org
> [mailto:serusers-bounces@lists.iptel.org] On Behalf Of Pavol Segec
> Sent: Tuesday, September 13, 2005 8:39 AM
> To: serusers(a)lists.iptel.org
> Subject: [Serusers] UAC module
>
> Hi,
>
> I see that 0.9.3 and 0.9.4 do not contain UAC module (src
> package neither), just as I see last CVS snapshot have it.
> How can I add UAC module for 0.9.x server?
> Is there some way?
>
> thanks
>
> pavol
>
> _______________________________________________
> Serusers mailing list
> serusers(a)lists.iptel.org
> http://lists.iptel.org/mailman/listinfo/serusers
>
Hi
I have a version of serctl ($Id: serpgctl,v 1.1 2003/04/08 01:25:35
lgfausak Exp $) that is getting the "400 ul_add: flags expected" error.
Iqbal said that maybe thats not the serctl version for my SER.
I m using ser-0.9.0 and I dont have a postgres version of serctl for
this version of SER. Does someone has the serctl_postgres for ser-0.9.0 ?
Thanks
João
Hello,
Can anyone of you give me an example how to get data from a database with
the avpops-module? I want to get a value from a special table and a special
column...
I didn't find any examples in the internet and the commands only don't help
me very much...
Many thanks!
Sebastian
Hello,
Seeing as how SER can handle a hell of alot more traffic than
rtpproxy, is there a way to set up multiple rtpproxy servers and then
configure SER to use them in a load balancing/failover fashion?
Here's my settings for nathelper currently:
# -- nathelper params --
modparam("nathelper", "natping_interval", 10)
modparam("registrar", "nat_flag", 6)
modparam("nathelper", "ping_nated_only", 1) # Ping only clients behind NAT
modparam("nathelper", "rtpproxy_sock", "udp:10.10.17.5:22222")
Thanks!
-Daniel
Hi guys!
I would like to upgrade my SER from 0.8.14 to 0.9.3 or 0.9.4 on my FC3
box. I have a problem, I can't start SER with acc module (segmentation
fault). I have this problem in both 0.9.3 and 0.9.4 versions.
This is the end of the debug messages (debug level:4) when I start my SER:
...........
WARNING: no fork mode
0(32449) shm_mem_init: success
0(0) core dump limits set to 4294967295
0(0) DEBUG: init_mod: acc
acc - initializing
0(0) find_export: found <load_tm> in module tm
[/usr/local/lib/ser/modules/tm.so]
0(0) find_export: found <register_tmcb> in module tm
[/usr/local/lib/ser/modules/tm.so]
0(0) find_export: found <t_newtran> in module tm
[/usr/local/lib/ser/modules/tm.so]
0(0) find_export: found <t_relay_to_tcp> in module tm
[/usr/local/lib/ser/modules/tm.so]
0(0) find_export: found <t_relay_to_udp> in module tm
[/usr/local/lib/ser/modules/tm.so]
0(0) find_export: found <t_relay> in module tm
[/usr/local/lib/ser/modules/tm.so]
0(0) find_export: found <t_reply> in module tm
[/usr/local/lib/ser/modules/tm.so]
0(0) find_export: found <t_reply_with_body> in module tm
[/usr/local/lib/ser/modules/tm.so]
0(0) find_export: found <t_is_local> in module tm
[/usr/local/lib/ser/modules/tm.so]
0(0) find_export: found <t_get_trans_ident> in module tm
[/usr/local/lib/ser/modules/tm.so]
0(0) find_export: found <t_lookup_ident> in module tm
[/usr/local/lib/ser/modules/tm.so]
0(0) find_export: found <t_add_blind> in module tm
[/usr/local/lib/ser/modules/tm.so]
0(0) find_export: found <t_forward_nonack> in module tm
[/usr/local/lib/ser/modules/tm.so]
0(0) find_export: found <t_request_within> in module tm
[/usr/local/lib/ser/modules/tm.so]
0(0) find_export: found <t_request_outside> in module tm
[/usr/local/lib/ser/modules/tm.so]
0(0) find_export: found <t_request> in module tm
[/usr/local/lib/ser/modules/tm.so]
0(0) find_export: found <new_dlg_uac> in module tm
[/usr/local/lib/ser/modules/tm.so]
0(0) find_export: found <dlg_response_uac> in module tm
[/usr/local/lib/ser/modules/tm.so]
0(0) find_export: found <new_dlg_uas> in module tm
[/usr/local/lib/ser/modules/tm.so]
0(0) find_export: found <dlg_request_uas> in module tm
[/usr/local/lib/ser/modules/tm.so]
0(0) find_export: found <free_dlg> in module tm
[/usr/local/lib/ser/modules/tm.so]
0(0) find_export: found <print_dlg> in module tm
[/usr/local/lib/ser/modules/tm.so]
0(0) find_export: found <t_gett> in module tm
[/usr/local/lib/ser/modules/tm.so]
Segmentation fault (core dumped)
Anyone know of a good/fast/flexible B2BUA?
I'm looking to do some LCR, Billing (prepaid, postpaid, credit
accounts, etc), and just some general call supervision.
I see that Vovida's b2bua hasn't seen a fresh release in over 2 years
now and I'm wondering if anyone still has this deployed and if it
still offers the kind of flexibility that would be required to build
an LCR/Billing engine.
Does anyone have asterisk deployed as a B2BUA? If so, is it fast and
does it provide a decent amount of flexibility? Have you had to throw
a session border controller in front of it?
Any other recommendations on a B2BUA?
Thanks.
-Daniel
[new post of previous summary of Tekelec acquisition after input from Daniel-Constantin Mierla on this list earlier today. This post can also be found at http://onsip.org/ ]
AFAIK, Tekelec bought iptelorg.com with its intellectual property (commercial extensions/extras/related software to SER) and its employees. Iptel.org was NOT part of the deal and is still sponsored by FOKUS Fraunhofer (as stated on the iptel.org website). SER is an independent GPL project and Tekelec cannot do anything about that.
However, iptelorg.com sponsored development resources on the open source SER. Tekelec is free to decide to stop this sponsoring. I cannot see how this can be in their interest, but if the focus on the development they want to do with SER is too far away the open source project, the project may not give Tekelec enough value. If this happens, the developers must decide whether to continue in their spare time, quit SER development, or look for employment with another company willing to sponsor hours on open source SER development. In addition, SER has MANY other developers who were not involved at all with iptelorg.com. Of course, as some of the most active coders were with iptelorg.com, such a decision may impact SER's development.
Also, note that the OpenSER project has branched off with many main contributions from Voice System. The Voice System developers are not affected by the Tekelec deal. However, as OpenSER since openser has a published policy to stay compatible with ser and thus continously incorporate SER code into OpenSER, OpenSER will be equally affected (in terms of reduced code contribution) if those contributing this SER code are prevented from working on the code in their day-time job. Again, both SER and OpenSER have many non-iptelorg.com contributors to the code bases and the development will not halt.