Are there any example configuration files which will work with
ser from the latest CVS ?
I have been using a configuration based on features-callfwd.5.0.cfg
This appears to be unuseable with ser from CVS as it returns:
Jan 28 16:23:13 test ser: parse error (16,1-5): syntax error
Jan 28 16:23:13 test ser: parse error (16,5-6): unknown config variable
Jan 28 16:23:13 test ser: parse error (17,12-13): unknown config variable
Jan 28 16:23:13 test ser: parse error (19,1-11):
Any help fixing the syntax errors and config vars is greatly appreciated,
how can I trace the sources of these errors in the config file ?
-kim
--
w8hdkim(a)gmail.com
Is it the best way ?
Which solution would be able to check the ser
availability bfore estabilsh
the connections
SER2
sip agents===DNS servers==[the solutions ??]==
SER1
Harry
--- sip <sip(a)arcdiv.com> a écrit :
> We use Coyote Point load balancers (good, relatively
> cheap, hardware
> load-balancers) that monitor the connectivity to the
> SER server. The problem
> is that it ONLY monitors connectivity, so if your
> SER is still accepting
> connections to the socket, but then not working
> correctly, it doesn't know the
> difference.
>
> Our SER works off a centrally-shared DB instead of a
> replicated one (mysql
> running from a SAN connected to both machines
> through a SAN switch). That way,
> if one of the servers goes down, the other one
> picks up as if nothing ever
> happened.
>
> SER does not have stateful connections from the UA,
> so if the server gets
> switched in the middle of a conversation, it will
> cut the conversation off...
> but at least there will still be a server active for
> additional connections.
>
> N.
>
>
> On Tue, 31 Jan 2006 13:24:00 +0100 (CET),
> hgaillac-sip wrote
> > Do you know a solution !?
> >
> > Harry
> > --- sip <sip(a)arcdiv.com> a écrit :
> >
> > > Right. VRRP is for layer 2/3 but it's for
> routing
> > > purposes.
> > >
> > > If you want to handle the application layer with
> > > failover, you need a
> > > load-balancer of some sort. That way, if one SER
> > > dies, the load balancer sends
> > > data on to the other one.
> > >
> > > N.
> > >
> > > On Tue, 31 Jan 2006 12:37:56 +0100 (CET),
> > > hgaillac-sip wrote
> > > > Hello,
> > > >
> > > > I think vrrp handle layer 2/3 not sip
> application
> > > what
> > > > do you advise me ?
> > > >
> > > > Harry
> > > >
> > > > --- sip <sip(a)arcdiv.com> a écrit :
> > > >
> > > > > Sure. You can even use VRRP if there's no
> SER in
> > > > > your network. I'm not sure
> > > > > what that has to do with SER, though.
> > > > >
> > > > > VRRP is router-side.
> > > > >
> > > > > N.
> > > > >
> > > > >
> > > > > On Tue, 31 Jan 2006 10:32:03 +0100 (CET),
> > > > > hgaillac-sip wrote
> > > > > > hello,
> > > > > >
> > > > > > Can we use VRRP when a SER is down ?
> > > > > >
> > > > > > SER1 (master)
> > > > > > sip agents == || === Asterisk
> Farm==sip/pstn
> > > > > gateway
> > > > > > SER2 (slave)
> > > > > >
> > > > > > Regards
> > > > > > Harry
> > > > > >
> > > > > >
> > > > > >
> > > > > >
> > > > > >
> > > > > >
> > > > >
> > > >
> > >
> >
>
___________________________________________________________________________
> > > > > Nouveau : téléphonez moins cher avec Yahoo!
> > > > > Messenger ! Découvez les tarifs
> > > > > exceptionnels pour appeler la France et
> > > > > l'international. Téléchargez sur
> > > > > http://fr.messenger.yahoo.com
> > > > > >
> > > > > >
> > > _______________________________________________
> > > > > > Serusers mailing list
> > > > > > serusers(a)lists.iptel.org
> > > > > >
> > > http://lists.iptel.org/mailman/listinfo/serusers
> > > > >
> > > > >
> > > >
> > > >
> > > >
> > > >
> > > >
> > > >
> > >
> >
>
___________________________________________________________________________
> > > Nouveau : téléphonez moins cher avec Yahoo!
> > > Messenger ! Découvez les tarifs
> > > exceptionnels pour appeler la France et
> > > l'international. Téléchargez sur
> > > http://fr.messenger.yahoo.com
> > >
> > >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
>
___________________________________________________________________________
> Nouveau : téléphonez moins cher avec Yahoo!
> Messenger ! Découvez les tarifs
> exceptionnels pour appeler la France et
> l'international. Téléchargez sur
> http://fr.messenger.yahoo.com
>
>
___________________________________________________________________________
Nouveau : téléphonez moins cher avec Yahoo! Messenger ! Découvez les tarifs exceptionnels pour appeler la France et l'international.
Téléchargez sur http://fr.messenger.yahoo.com
hello,
I am able to issue 302 redirect from ser to asterisk.is it possible to redirect calls to a realtime peer registerd on asterisk. please help me with config requirement.cldn't find anything in the docs relating to realtime.
Thanks,
Preeti
---------------------------------
Do you Yahoo!?
With a free 1 GB, there's more in store with Yahoo! Mail.
Hi Vaclav,
> In the config in handling PUBLISH request call handle_publish instead of
> handle_subscription.
Woops, right, thanks alot.
Here are some details, I'm using SER 0.9.6 Unstable from debian
package (http://ftp.iptel.org/pub/ser/0.9.6/packages/debian/unstable/)
If I add one of these parameters in ser.cfg file,
modparam("pa", "auth", "none")
modparam("pa", "winfo_auth", "none")
modparam("pa", "auth_xcap_root", "http://localhost/xcap-root")
I get this error :
ERROR: bad config file (1 errors)
Erreur de segmentation
And when using PUA.pl to test this, I always received a closed presence state.
Do you have any idea ?
Cheers,
Akeru.
hello,
Can we use VRRP when a SER is down ?
SER1 (master)
sip agents == || === Asterisk Farm==sip/pstn gateway
SER2 (slave)
Regards
Harry
___________________________________________________________________________
Nouveau : téléphonez moins cher avec Yahoo! Messenger ! Découvez les tarifs exceptionnels pour appeler la France et l'international.
Téléchargez sur http://fr.messenger.yahoo.com
Hi asterisk and ser users,
Is there a solution to monitor asterisk and ser with
snmp ?
Regards
Harry
___________________________________________________________________________
Nouveau : téléphonez moins cher avec Yahoo! Messenger ! Découvez les tarifs exceptionnels pour appeler la France et l'international.
Téléchargez sur http://fr.messenger.yahoo.com
Hi Karel Kozlik,
Thanks for the reply. Initially I tried using serweb admin mode but for
me only
the initial page http://www.mantragroup.com/serweb/html/admin/users.php is
displayed from there if I hit on admin privileges or server monitoring or user
preferences nothing opens, it still shows the same initial page of
admin login.
Thanks,
Manoj.
Quoting Karel Kozlik <karel(a)iptel.org>:
> Hi,
> please (CC) the forum in your replies in order to others can read the
> answers.
>
> To your problem:
> the correct values to allow change ACL are:
>
> priv_name: acl_control
> priv_value: int
>
> priv_name: acl_control
> priv_value: ld
>
> priv_name: acl_control
> priv_value: local
>
> But you realy do not need to know this!
>
> Instead of changeing values in DB you can simply login to serweb as admin:
> - click to tab 'admin privileges'
> - click to link 'changes privilges' for user 'admin'
> - mark the checkboxes in 'ACL control' area
> - click to 'save'
>
> Now you should be able to change ACL of other users.
>
> Karel
>
>
>
> mkumar(a)mantragroup.com napsal(a):
>> Hi Karel Kozlik,
>>
>> I really do not know what are the correct values that must be given under
>> priv_name, for admin I gave is_admin, change_privileges and for giving acl
>> permissions I tried giving local,ld,acl_ld,acl_local but none worked and I
>> still get "You haven't any privileges to control ACL" when I log in
>> to admin,
>> can you please give me syntax which grants acl change privilges to admin. I
>> tried searching on net and doc which came with installation but none
>> helped me.
>> Please spare a minute and help me configure serweb.
>>
>> Thanks,
>> Manoj.
>>
>> Quoting Karel Kozlik <karel(a)iptel.org>:
>>
>>> Hi,
>>> that is OK. You can have more admins in serweb. And you can define
>>> privileges for changeing ACL for each admin. To do that, click to
>>> tab 'admin privileges' and select 'change privileges' for some
>>> admin. Here you may define which values of ACL this admin may
>>> change.
>>>
>>> Karel
>>>
>>> mkumar(a)mantragroup.com napsal(a):
>>>
>>>> Hi All,
>>>>
>>>> I was able to install serweb and login to it both from admin and
>>>> user end. But
>>>> in admin end I have a problem, when I hit on ACL of any user that
>>>> appered when
>>>> I first login as admin, I get a error "You haven't any privileges
>>>> to control
>>>> ACL". In the DataBase I gave the following privileges to admin
>>>>
>>>> username admin
>>>> domain mantragroup.com
>>>> priv_name change_privileges
>>>> priv_value 1
>>>>
>>>> username admin
>>>> domain mantragroup.com
>>>> priv_name change_privileges
>>>> priv_value 1
>>>>
>>>> Someone please help me and guide me to inderstand where I am going wrong.
>>>>
>>>> Thanks,
>>>> Manoj
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> _______________________________________________
>>>> Serusers mailing list
>>>> serusers(a)lists.iptel.org
>>>> http://lists.iptel.org/mailman/listinfo/serusers
>>>
>>>
>>
>>
>>
>
Hi,
One of my (Open)SER machines (P1) is acting as registrar and so I have
alias=mydomain.tld in the script; it is used in the (uri == myself)
check to handle REGISTER requests.
I have a setup like this:
UA1 (user1(a)mydomain.tld) - P2 - P1 - P3 - P1 - P2 - UA2 (user2(a)mydomain.tld)
(all proxies are record-routing except P3)
For initial requests (INVITE from UA1 to UA2) all is fine. But I'm
having problems with the loose_route() function, because when an
in-dialog (subsequent) request comes into P1 (from UA1, P2) with a
Route header containing (<P1>, <P1>, <P2>), the after_strict()
function is called, when I would expect the after_loose() function to
be called since P1 is a loose router.
Within loose_route(), is_preloaded() returns 0, which is correct. But
then is_myself returns true because of the alias...
Is this a bug in loose_route() which doesn't account for this kind of
setup (Routeing in-dialog requests through the registrar)? Maybe this
could be avoided, if there was a parameter forcing loose_route to
treat previous hop as a loose router... Or am I just doing something
wrong?
Thanks in advance,
JF
Hi,
just a few questions regarding the path implementation (if someone cares
to answer, taht is ;-))
I've read through the RFC3327 (I hope)
If I have a scenario: UAC->OBP->Registrar
(th OB is a dispatcher)
In the current version, should I append_hf both:
Supported: path
and a
Path: <sip:[OBP];lr>
to make it work?
I tried.
I get a P-Registrar-Error: Path parse error
and in my log:
ERROR: build_path_vector(): First Path URI is not a loose-router, not
supported
I guess I might have a configuration error, but do not really know.
br hw
Hi,
I want to use the openser as a UAS on behalf of a user that's not
registered.
There's a proxy in the middle that receives an INVITE and find that the user
is not registered, and rely the INVITE to the openser.
I want the openser to send a 200 OK response, but also to put a Contact in
the response so the final ACK will be send also to the openser.
I have tried the following:
append_hf("Contact: xxxxx:pp");
if (t_newtran()) {
xlog("UAS logic");
append_hf("Contact: xxxxx:pp");
t_reply("200","OK");
append_hf("Contact: xxxxx:pp");
} else sl_reply_error();
But still no Contact appears in the 200 OK response.
Thanks