Hi all,
I've a working openser and a cisco router (17xx). I'd like
to authenticate the cisco router as a sip ua.
If I disable www_authorize everything is working fine and
the router register to the server.
If I enable it and configure the router with
sip-ua
authentication username xxx password xxx realm xxx
I see the router trying to register, but no way to make
it working. I tried I think every combination of realm
in www_authorize, www_challenge and so on.
If I debug a successful authentication, I see a query
on the db, "select ... from subscriber". If I debug
the cisco auth, the server doesn't even try the query.
Has somebody any hint please?
TIA,
--
"Work and play are words used to
describe the same thing under
differing conditions." Mark Twain
Hello,
May be its a very simple question,
I have a SIP account from one VoIP service provider.
username:password@domain-name-of-voip-service-provider.
How can I register my ser server to receive calls.
-JK
hi all
i have facing a problem that i am not able to send the call on other sip proxy where in route logic give the ip address of particullar sip proxy to send the call on it.
thanks
vijay
---------------------------------
Stay in the know. Pulse on the new Yahoo.com. Check it out.
On Tue, 17 Oct 2006 08:08:32 -0400
Nathan Hawkins <utsl(a)quic.net> wrote:
> I'm testing Polycom 601's with 2.0.1 firmware and Mediaproxy. I
> haven't noticed any problems with hold at all, so I haven't looked
> into whether it's using 0.0.0.0 or not. I supposed it's possible that
> that parameter doesn't actually work, and Mediaproxy just works with
> it.
>
> I think though, that what you're describing below, where it resumes
> from hold with 0.0.0.0 as the address, is a firmware bug. The Polycom
> should definitely not be doing that. That's going to break all kinds
> of things.
hmm, guess i missunderstood - should the media direction parameter also
be marked when "on hold" is "started" or only at the end when we resume
the call that was on hold?
Currently, Polycom sets IP 0.0.0.0 at the beginning of the hold, no
media path direction is set. When the call is resumed later, the polycom
sets the correct "sendrecv"-parameter (Which i didn't recognize
earlier, sorry). However, if i understood rfc3264 the polycom should
mark the media stream as sendonly on the beginning of the hold...
To clarify what i'm talking about i've attached the whole sip-debug of
two calls, the first call is sent on hold when a second call comes and
resumed after the second call has ended(1111111801 calls 2222222804
and it answers, then 0891234567 calls 2222222804 and 1111111801
is set on hold and resumed later). Openser runs on .98, which also
serves the rtpproxy. .97 is a asterisk-gateway.
Thanks for the input
Christian
>
> What firmware version are you running?
>
> Nathan
>
> Benko wrote:
> > Hmm, actually this parameter is set to 0(default).
> > However, in practice it still uses the old standard(rfc2543).
> > There's no media direction parameter in the sdp-message sent by the
> > polycom for some reason, although the manual states to do so
> > (firmware 2.0.1). Is it possible to force this somehow?
> >
> > regards
> > christian
> >
> > On Sun, 15 Oct 2006 19:58:33 -0400
> > Nathan Hawkins <utsl(a)quic.net> wrote:
> >
> >> There's an option for the Polycom phones to switch the hold
> >> behaviour.
> >>
> >> Set voIpProt.SIP.useRFC2543hold to 0, and it should use RFC3264
> >> rules for signalling hold instead of 0.0.0.0.
> >>
> >> Benko wrote:
> >>> Hello!
> >>>
> >>> I'm having a issue with NAT and rtpproxy. Usually my setup works
> >>> fine with natted clients, the Connection Information is
> >>> overwritten with the IP of the rtpproxy and audio passes through
> >>> in both directions. However, today i came across a problem where
> >>> the Polycom 501 sets a outgoing ip of 0.0.0.0 instead of the
> >>> private ip after resuming a call that was on hold(actually, the
> >>> other party is invited again) - and the force_rtp_proxy
> >>> ()-command on openser left the ip untouched instead of
> >>> overwriting it with the rtpproxy-ip. As a result the person that
> >>> was on hold had audio but the polycom user (with the "wrong" ip)
> >>> hadn't.
> >>>
> >>> The false ip left aside, is it expected behaviour of
> >>> force_rtp_proxy to not touch 0.0.0.0?
> >>>
> >>> Just out of curiosity - does someone know the "on hold"-problem
> >>> with polycoms?
> >>>
> >>> thx
> >>> christian
> >>>
> >>> _______________________________________________
> >>> Users mailing list
> >>> Users(a)openser.org
> >>> http://openser.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/users
>
Hi,
Do you know dual phones (wifi SIP and GSM) compatible with openser ?
For example is Nokia E61 compatible ? Any others ?
Thanks in advance,
Christophe
Hello!
I'm having a issue with NAT and rtpproxy. Usually my setup works fine
with natted clients, the Connection Information is overwritten with the
IP of the rtpproxy and audio passes through in both directions.
However, today i came across a problem where the Polycom 501 sets a
outgoing ip of 0.0.0.0 instead of the private ip after resuming a call
that was on hold(actually, the other party is invited again) - and the
force_rtp_proxy ()-command on openser left the ip untouched instead of
overwriting it with the rtpproxy-ip. As a result the person that was on
hold had audio but the polycom user(with the "wrong" ip) hadn't.
The false ip left aside, is it expected behaviour of force_rtp_proxy to
not touch 0.0.0.0?
Just out of curiosity - does someone know the "on hold"-problem with
polycoms?
thx
christian
Samuel:
A while back you responded to one of my posts about writing modules
for SER. I am currently writing a module and I have an issue I do not
understand. I'm hoping you can help.
I created a directory under the ser-0.9.7-pre3/modules source
directory on my server and placed my code there along with a Makefile.
If I make the code from this directory it compiles with two warnings
including one about running make from the main directory.
If I cd to the main directory and run make clean my new subdirectory
is visited as expected. If I then run make my modules does not get
compiled. I believe the new directory is not recognized but I cannot
figure out why. Would you hapen to be able to explain this behavior?
Thank you,
Steve
Got my answer
Regards
Kamal Mann
-----Original Message-----
From: Mann, Kamal
Sent: Tuesday, October 17, 2006 11:37 AM
To: serusers(a)lists.iptel.org
Subject: [Serdev] :Check for URI (from incoming messages) w.r.t database
Hi All
I need to check for each URI with respect to his/her credentials stored
in SER database. I am using avpops functions avp_check & avp_db_load. I
am able to compile ser.cfg but after writing this piece of code ser
stops responding to all kinda requests not even for register messages.
Like -->
if(avp_check("s:kamal","eq/$from/username"))
//avp_db_load("$from/username","s:kamal")
// also tried with scheme1: example
{
****some more code****
break;
}
Is this way is correct or I need to use some another function?? I am a
newbie to ser; I need your valuable suggestions for the same.
Regards
Kamal Mann
Hi all!
I am experimenting a bit with SER, and am trying to get it to do some of
the same things I now have Asterisk for.
But I am having trouble with the following: I want to route all
non-local calls to my SIP service provider. But for this to work I need
to authenticate myself first towards my SIP service provider. How do I
do this with SER?
Regards,
Evert