Hi all,
Congratulations!
I use Openser. I have got a question.
Has it Instant Messaging? It works like IM? Is there any module for
P&IM?
Thanks!
Danilo
Can anybody explain to me how to calculate phplib_id?
I have been aboe to calculate ha1 and ha1b, but don't see any
instructions on calculating the phplib_id.
--
Hi all
What is version OpenSER for the module IMC?
Can it use in the OpenSER 1.0.1?
And when will be ready the version 1.2.0? Delay? When time delay?
Danilo
www.adoreinfotech.com is offering a Softphone based on Microsoft RTC/1.2
which is not generating branch parameter while sending INVITE but call is
still going through.
How is branch parameter used as per RFC 3261.
>From: "Pat Wang" <wangyu39(a)hotmail.com>
>To: "Kapil Dhawan" <digitaltuffy(a)hotmail.com>,<serusers(a)lists.iptel.org>
>Subject: Re: [Serusers] branch parameter
>Date: Mon, 18 Dec 2006 00:17:26 -0000
>
>branch in Via header is a MUST have parameter by RFC 3261.
>
>----- Original Message ----- From: "Kapil Dhawan"
><digitaltuffy(a)hotmail.com>
>To: <serusers(a)lists.iptel.org>
>Sent: Sunday, December 17, 2006 4:05 PM
>Subject: [Serusers] branch parameter
>
>
>>Whats the importance of branch parameter. I am using RTC/1.2 library and
>>its not generating branch parameter.
>>
>>_________________________________________________________________
>>Tried the new MSN Messenger? Its cool! Download now.
>>http://messenger.msn.com/Download/Default.aspx?mkt=en-in
>>
>>_______________________________________________
>>Serusers mailing list
>>Serusers(a)lists.iptel.org
>>http://lists.iptel.org/mailman/listinfo/serusers
>>
>
_________________________________________________________________
Stay in tune with the latest styles! Check out the happening fashion trends
on 'Wardrobe watch'. Only on MSN Lifestyle
http://content.msn.co.in/Lifestyle/Moreonlifestyle/LifeStyle_091006_0551.htm
How do you prevent Denial-Of-service in case of a stateful Proxy.
_________________________________________________________________
Catch all the cricketing action right here. Live score, match reports,
photos et al. http://content.msn.co.in/Sports/Cricket/Default.aspx
As per RFC 3261, SIP Trapezoid
UAC1 - INVITE - UAS1
UAS1 - INVITE - UAS2
UAS1 - 100 Trying - UAC1
But i tried to check logs in SER which shows
UAC1 - INVITE - UAS1
UAS1 - 100 Trying - UAC1
UAS1 - INVITE - UAS2
Why is it different.
_________________________________________________________________
Mega Fare sale on domestic airlines. Call 1-800-11-8747 now!
http://india.makemytrip.com/?Camp=MSN&attrib=Dec/Tag/Mega
quite quite positive.
the reason i am so certain is that there is only *one* place in my entire config file that i actually do a t_relay() (or equivalent). I isolated all the code into route[1], to ease maintainability of my (admittedly complex) config file.
In route[1], the relevant section is pretty damn close to
if (!t_relay()) {
if (!is_method("ACK")) {
sl_reply_error();
}
}
fwiw, its 1.1.0 (latest cvs version thereof)
cheers
----- Original Message -----
From: Bogdan-Andrei Iancu < bogdan(a)voice-system.ro >
To: mahesh(a)aptela.com
Cc: Klaus Darilion < klaus.mailinglists(a)pernau.at >, users < users(a)openser.org >
Sent: Thursday, December 14, 2006 12:39:04 PM GMT-0600
Subject: Re: [Users] Duplicate INVITEs - t_lookup_request and t_check_trans
Hi Mahesh,
I do not think you need t_check_tran() as t_relay() automatically
absorbs the retransmissions.
are you sure you are not calling t_relay() twice for the same requests?
or calling a tm function (t_newtran) before the t_relay ??
regards,
bogdan
Mahesh Paolini-Subramanya wrote:
>Well, i read the documentation again, and found t_lookup_request, and t_check_trans.
>Question 1 - t_lookup_request() creates the transaction if it doesn't exist, correct? However, t_check_trans only checks to see if the transaction already exists, correct?
>
>Question 2 - Assuming that t_check_trans only checks to see if the transaction already exists, then is the following correct?
>
>Currently I do the following (after stripping out a bunch of stuff)
>
>if (!t_relay()) {
> if (!is_method("ACK")) {
> sl_reply_error();
> }
>}
>
>should this, instead, actually look like the following?
>if (is_method("INVITE")) {
> if (if !t_check_tran()) {
> t_relay();
> }
>} else if (!is_method("ACK")) {
> sl_reply_error();
>}
>
>
>
>----- Original Message -----
>From: Klaus Darilion < klaus.mailinglists(a)pernau.at >
>To: mahesh(a)aptela.com
>Cc: users < users(a)openser.org >
>Sent: Thursday, December 14, 2006 2:06:01 AM GMT-0600
>Subject: Re: [Users] Duplicate INVITEs
>
>Mahesh Paolini-Subramanya wrote:
>
>
>>We're seeing sporadic situations where fones
>>a) send an INVITE
>>b) ignore the 100-Trying response, and instead
>>c) send another INVITE with the same sequence number.
>>
>>The question is, What should happen here?
>>
>>
>
>If the message is completely identical then it is a retransmission.
>Retransmissions should be detected by tm module (e.g. t_relay()) and
>absorbed,
>
>regards
>klaus
>
>
>
>
>>Currently, we send back a 500 response (server error).
>>Is this correct? (i think not, cause it invariably causes the fone to go fast busy).
>>Is this some other response that should occur?
>>
>>poring over 3261 resulted in a headache, and no additional clarity...
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>------------------------------------------------------------------------
>>
>>_______________________________________________
>>Users mailing list
>> Users(a)openser.org
>> http://openser.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/users
>>
>>
>
>
>
>
--
*******************************************
Mahesh Paolini-Subramanya (703) 386-1500 x9100
CTO mahesh(a)aptela.com
Aptela, Inc. http://www.aptela.com
"Aptela: How Business Answers The Call"
*******************************************
--
*******************************************
Mahesh Paolini-Subramanya (703) 386-1500 x9100
CTO mahesh(a)aptela.com
Aptela, Inc. http://www.aptela.com
"Aptela: How Business Answers The Call"
*******************************************
Thanks, how could I have missed that!
Is what it does it loads usrloc table piece-wise?
And if so, why does it do only for mysql?
And also, it is saying that old version would have
increased memory consumption with TCP/TLS -- does it
mean that it does not increase with the new version?
-jiri
At 14:32 30/11/2006, Ovidiu Sas wrote:
>Maybe you are looking for this one:
>http://www.openser.org/index.php?option=com_content&task=view&id=48&Itemid=9
>
>
>Regards,
>Ovidiu Sas
>
>On 11/30/06, Jiri Kuthan <jiri(a)iptel.org> wrote:
>>At 12:53 22/11/2006, Weiter Leiter wrote:
>>>I know that OpenSER loads (only?) faster.
>>
>>Can folks share with me what the fast-usrloc-loading feature is about?
>>I was not successful finding it out.
>>
>>Thanks!
>>
>>-jiri
>>
>>
>>--
>>Jiri Kuthan http://iptel.org/~jiri/
>>
>>
>>_______________________________________________
>>Users mailing list
>>Users(a)openser.org
>>http://openser.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/users
>
>--
>Jiri Kuthan http://iptel.org/~jiri/
Hi,
How would one determine if the From address equals the To address, or even
better, if the To address is either the same as or an alias of the From
address?
Thanks
Mark Price
List of contacts and instant message.
________________________________
De: Adrian Georgescu [mailto:ag@ag-projects.com]
Enviada em: sexta-feira, 15 de dezembro de 2006 17:16
Para: Danilo Vilela Dantas
Cc: users(a)openser.org
Assunto: Re: [Users] OpenSER
Hi Danilo,
Could you please tell us what features from 1.2.0 do you need so badly?
Adrian
On Dec 15, 2006, at 8:05 PM, Danilo Vilela Dantas wrote:
Hi all
What is version OpenSER for the module IMC?
Can it use in the OpenSER 1.0.1?
And when will be ready the version 1.2.0? Delay? When time
delay?
Danilo
_______________________________________________
Users mailing list
Users(a)openser.org
http://openser.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/users