sr-users March 2006

sr-users@lists.kamailio.org

223 participants
505 discussions

by Damien Sandras

Hello, Ekiga.net is configured with SERWEB so that users can create accounts by themselves. It is configured to create numerical aliases, incremented one by one when the user subscribes. Unfortunately, there must be some bug somewhere, because some users have the same numerical alias. Is that something known? Thanks, -- _ Damien Sandras (o- //\ Ekiga Softphone: http://www.ekiga.org/ v_/_ FOSDEM 2006 : http://www.fosdem.org/ SIP Phone : sip:dsandras@ekiga.net sip:600000@ekiga.net

18 years, 6 months

[Serusers] Check if user is registered without uri rewrite

by Kai Militzer

Hello everyone, I am looking for an alternative for lookup(location) to check if a certain user/uri is registered with a location at ser, but without rewriting the to uri as I have to forward the call to another system, but need to know at first, if the user is registered. With lookup it won't work as it rewrites the to-uri with the contact-information of the client, which can be quite different from the original to-uri. Best regards, Kai Militzer -- Kai Militzer WESTEND GmbH | Internet-Business-Provider Technik CISCO Systems Partner - Authorized Reseller Lütticher Straße 10 Tel 0241/701333-14 km(a)westend.com D-52064 Aachen Fax 0241/911879

18 years, 6 months

[Serusers] Can I have ser ldap authenticated

by Friend

Hi Friends, Am running the ser on redhat with mysql auth. Now I would like to know whether i could have the ser users get authenticated from windows active directory or linux openldap server. Any of your suggestions are welcome. Or just write me is it possible or not. Not doing anything commercial or professional, am just trying to understand the ser and to have some exposure on this arena. Thanks Friend, Se. ___________________________________________________________ Yahoo! Photos NEW, now offering a quality print service from just 8p a photo http://uk.photos.yahoo.com

18 years, 6 months

[Serusers] subscriber table

by jidn

Hi list, Somebody know which is the name of table "subscriber" in the new ser with presence Thanks, Pablo

18 years, 6 months

[Users] registration wierdness on single contact to be returned

by Marcello Lupo

Hi, i have configuration of registrar module as: modparam("registrar", "nat_flag", 20) modparam("registrar", "use_domain", 0) modparam("registrar", "desc_time_order", 1) modparam("registrar", "append_branches", 0) modparam("registrar", "max_expires", 3600) This because i want to have only the most recent contact to be retrived on location. The problem is that the client with public ip (the 2. row) is every time preferred to the behind nat one although the behind nat one is the last one to make/update the registration. I'd like to know in which way are ordered the records in location table, which difference make the nat flag and if the choose is made on the last updated/inserted record or the last that expire. This is what is registered on the location table for user 777654321 : *************************** 1. row *************************** username: 777654321 domain: contact: sip:777654321@192.168.30.200:5060 received: sip:193.45.98.211:15397 expires: 2006-03-24 13:46:58 q: -1.00 callid: FA900625953C490B80D1679605057052(a)mysip.domain.com cseq: 21374 last_modified: 2006-03-24 12:46:58 flags: 1 user_agent: X-PRO build 1082 socket: 193.76.98.23_5060 *************************** 2. row *************************** username: 777654321 domain: contact: sip:777654321@193.45.35.76:5060 received: NULL expires: 2006-03-24 13:22:22 q: -1.00 callid: dc626ada088ed5f38bd4d182b9cf3167(a)mysip.domain.com cseq: 570534571 last_modified: 2006-03-24 12:22:22 flags: 0 user_agent: Patton SN4524 JS EUI MxSF v3.2.7.44 00A0BA01BB96 socket: 193.76.98.23_5060 *************************** 3. row *************************** username: 777654321 domain: contact: sip:777654321@193.24.87.95:5060 received: NULL expires: 2006-03-24 13:20:04 q: -1.00 callid: 0192d72378dac66b000c579f6237bad6(a)mysip.domain.com cseq: 586618969 last_modified: 2006-03-24 12:20:04 flags: 0 user_agent: Patton SN1400 MxSF v3.2.7.36 00302B005C98 socket: 193.76.98.23_5060 3 rows in set (0.01 sec) ************************************************************** Thanks, Bye, Marcello

18 years, 6 months

[Serusers] Priority field in LCR table

by Ryan Pagquil

Hi, What is the function of the priority field in LCR table? Is this the gateway group ID that will be used for the prefix that match? Thanks, Ryan

18 years, 6 months

[Users] detecting if both caller and callee are behind NAT

by Jayesh Nambiar

Hi all, I am trying to implement the following scenario: Whenever a NATed client calls to user at public IP or whenever a user at public IP calls a NATed client, I dont want to use mediaproxy. the fix_nated_sdp function does the job. But when both the caller and callee are behind nat, only then mediaproxy should be used. Can someone please help me in defining a condition which will return true if both the caller and callee are nated. I tried a lot, but my conditions allow calls from NATed client to public IP clients to use mediaproxy which I dont want. Please help me in this regard, as I want to minimise the use of mediaproxy as much as possible. Thanks in advance, jayesh --------------------------------- Jiyo cricket on Yahoo! India cricket Yahoo! Messenger Mobile Stay in touch with your buddies all the time.

18 years, 6 months

RE: [Users] Duplicate Entry Error

by Douglas Garstang

I tried setting db_mode to 1.... immediately populated the location table. Why is db_mode 1 writing to the database, but db_mode 3, not? > -----Original Message----- > From: Douglas Garstang > Sent: Thursday, March 23, 2006 12:50 PM > To: Günther Starnberger > Cc: users(a)openser.org > Subject: RE: [Users] Duplicate Entry Error > > > I'm confused. > > I just cleared all rows in the location table, and rebooted 5 > polycom phones. They are registered successfully. The > location table in the database is empty, I have db_mode set > to 3, and the contacts have been cached in memory... > 'openserctl ul show' shows them. What am I missing? > > Doug. > > > -----Original Message----- > > From: Douglas Garstang > > Sent: Thursday, March 23, 2006 12:47 PM > > To: Günther Starnberger > > Cc: users(a)openser.org > > Subject: RE: [Users] Duplicate Entry Error > > > > > > Oookay... Thanks... I had the db mode set to 2... I've > > changed it to 3, but a 'openserctl ul show' is still showing > > users. Is that normal? > > > > Doug. > > > > > -----Original Message----- > > > From: Günther Starnberger [mailto:gst@sysfrog.org] > > > Sent: Thursday, March 23, 2006 12:30 PM > > > To: Douglas Garstang > > > Cc: users(a)openser.org > > > Subject: Re: [Users] Duplicate Entry Error > > > > > > > > > On Thu, Mar 23, 2006 at 12:23:47PM -0700, Douglas Garstang wrote: > > > > > > > How do I disable usrloc caching? > > > > > > By setting the db_mode parameter of the usrloc module: > > > http://openser.org/docs/modules/devel/usrloc.html#AEN252 > > > > > > bye, > > > /gst > > > > > >

18 years, 6 months

[Users] add_rr_param() call in branch_route[] block

by Christian Schlatter

This is my first post to this list, so please bear with me ... I'm trying to do something like this branch_route[1] { ... add_rr_param(";nat=true"); ... } using the RR module with OpenSER 1.0.1. Loading the config results in openser: parse error (344,32-33): Command cannot be used in the block I thought that should work, since the add_rr_param() documentation includes "This function can be used from REQUEST_ROUTE, BRANCH_ROUTE and FAILURE_ROUTE". Thanks for any help, Christian

18 years, 6 months

[Serusers] Accounting of branched request - value of o_uri

by Arek Bekiersz

Hello, When using failure_route[] with db accounting enabled, the o_uri stored in accounting report in SER "acc" table contains o_uri of original request. Is there any way to store the real o_uri, which was after branching? Is there any other way to store in DB the IP request was forwarded to, without using AVPs? Consider example: modparam("acc", "db_flag", 3) route{ # if we do not get a positive reply, continue at route1 setflag(3); t_on_failure("1"); rewritehost( "A"); t_relay_to_udp("A", "5060"); break; } failure_route[1] { # forwarding failed -- try again at another destination t_on_failure("2"); rewritehost( "B"); append_branch(); t_relay_to_udp("B", "5060"); } failure_route[2] { # try out the last resort destination rewritehost( "C"); append_branch(); t_relay_to_udp("C", "5060"); # we no more call t_on_negative here; if this destination # fails too, transaction will complete } When INVITE will be answered in failure_route[1] or 2, it will contain o_uri=A. I would like this to contain B or C, according to real situation. -- Regards, Arek Bekiersz

18 years, 6 months

← Newer
1
...
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
...
51
Older →

Jump to page:

2024

2023

2022

2021

2020

2019

2018

2017

2016

2015

2014

2013

2012

2011

2010

2009

2008

2007

2006

2005

2004

2003

2002

sr-users March 2006