> -----Original Message-----
> From: Tavis P [mailto:tavis.lists@galaxytelecom.net]
> Sent: Thursday, June 15, 2006 3:33 PM
> To: devel(a)openser.org
> Cc: users(a)openser.org
> Subject: Re: [Devel] RE: [Users] OpenSER - one year old
>
>
> Douglas Garstang wrote:
> >> -----Original Message-----
> >> From: Tavis P [mailto:tavis.lists@galaxytelecom.net]
> >> Sent: Thursday, June 15, 2006 3:04 PM
> >> Cc: devel(a)openser.org; users(a)openser.org
> >> Subject: Re: [Devel] RE: [Users] OpenSER - one year old
> >>
> >>
> >> Juha Heinanen wrote:
> >>
> >>> Douglas Garstang writes:
> >>>
> >>> > My comments are constructive. I've constructively
> stated several
> >>> > times that the documentation is very bad. Each time I've
> >>>
> >> made this
> >>
> >>> > constructive comment, I've been attacked. In my previous
> >>>
> >> post, I made
> >>
> >>> > another constructive comment. I said that maybe the reason the
> >>> > documentation is so bad is that the project isn't that old.
> >>>
> >>> rather that complaining, learn to read the relevant pieces
> >>>
> >> of code and
> >>
> >>> write better documentation.
> >>>
> >>> -- juha
> >>>
> >>> _______________________________________________
> >>> Devel mailing list
> >>> Devel(a)openser.org
> >>> http://openser.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/devel
> >>>
> >>>
> >>>
> >>>
> >> I find it interesting that you would characterize your
> statements as
> >> "constructive" and the responses you've received as "attacks"
> >>
> >> I believe this may be one of the central issues
> >>
> >
> > Why do you consider my opinion that the documentation is
> bad, and that it should be maintained by the developers interesting?
> >
> >
> >
> Its not your opinion on the documentation that i find interesting, its
> how you characterize your dislike for the documentation (and repeated
> expression of it)
>
>
> In my opinion, if you are able to use an application you are able to
> document how you use it.
> I am not a C developer however i have contributed to the
> documentation,
> and i believe it is with this type of action that Open Source
> communities become strong (contribution).
> Having someone constantly express what they don't like about
> the project
> yet do little else to effect change in it serves no positive or
> productive purpose
>
> OpenSER is an excellent application and i am proud to be a part of its
> community. A community that responds to impatience and contempt with
> patience and wisdom
> Please help us keep this community healthy because in the end it
> benefits us all (in more ways that i can count)
>
> Demanding that others solve perceived issues is generally not a good
> approach (unless you are dealing with a commercial entity and has a
> professional responsibility to you)
Sorry, but I disagree with you. I'm fed up with relying on documentation that's badly written or wrong, because the person who wrote it made assumptions about what they thought they knew... because they in turn relied upon someone else who had made the same mistakes. The reason the chain of events got started in the first place was because people played around, experimated, tinkered, etc, and came to incorrect conclusions.
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Tavis P [mailto:tavis.lists@galaxytelecom.net]
> Sent: Thursday, June 15, 2006 3:04 PM
> Cc: devel(a)openser.org; users(a)openser.org
> Subject: Re: [Devel] RE: [Users] OpenSER - one year old
>
>
> Juha Heinanen wrote:
> > Douglas Garstang writes:
> >
> > > My comments are constructive. I've constructively stated several
> > > times that the documentation is very bad. Each time I've
> made this
> > > constructive comment, I've been attacked. In my previous
> post, I made
> > > another constructive comment. I said that maybe the reason the
> > > documentation is so bad is that the project isn't that old.
> >
> > rather that complaining, learn to read the relevant pieces
> of code and
> > write better documentation.
> >
> > -- juha
> >
> > _______________________________________________
> > Devel mailing list
> > Devel(a)openser.org
> > http://openser.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/devel
> >
> >
> >
> I find it interesting that you would characterize your statements as
> "constructive" and the responses you've received as "attacks"
>
> I believe this may be one of the central issues
Why do you consider my opinion that the documentation is bad, and that it should be maintained by the developers interesting?
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Juha Heinanen [mailto:jh@tutpro.com]
> Sent: Thursday, June 15, 2006 12:59 PM
> To: Douglas Garstang
> Cc: ram; users(a)openser.org; devel(a)openser.org
> Subject: RE: [Users] OpenSER - one year old
>
>
> Douglas Garstang writes:
>
> > It's only a year old? Oh... I thought it was older. That might help
> > to explain the really bad documention then.
>
> if you don't have anythign constructive to say about openser
> open source
> project, could you please switch to other sip proxy software and stop
> insulting hard working people on this list.
My comments are constructive. I've constructively stated several times that the documentation is very bad. Each time I've made this constructive comment, I've been attacked. In my previous post, I made another constructive comment. I said that maybe the reason the documentation is so bad is that the project isn't that old.
Doug.
Hi
iam working with Ser + ASterisk
how can i send the call to voice mail
after X rings ( any way of the user is not there iam already sending to
voice mail)
example : if some one calls registered user
if the user is not respond for 6 rings its go to Voice mail
if the user not there it should go directly to voice mail
help will be appriciated
ram
hello,
i try to install the latest cdrtool but i get this
messsage:
#!/usr/bin/php4
Fatal error: Cannot redeclare class db_sql in
/var/www/CDRTool/phplib/db_mysql.inc on line 12
Thanks for help
Harry
__________________________________________________
Do You Yahoo!?
En finir avec le spam? Yahoo! Mail vous offre la meilleure protection possible contre les messages non sollicités
http://mail.yahoo.fr Yahoo! Mail
It's only a year old? Oh... I thought it was older. That might help to explain the really bad documention then.
-----Original Message--- --
From: ram [mailto:talk2ram@gmail.com]
Sent: Wednesday, June 14, 2006 9:14 AM
To: users(a)openser.org; devel(a)openser.org
Subject: Re: [Users] OpenSER - one year old
Hi
happy to hear that
I wish all who are involve to make this project so success and helpfull
happy <http://openser.org/> OpenSER project celebrates one year
ram
Hi
iam working with OpenSer + ASterisk
how can i send the call to voice mail
after X rings ( any way of the user is not there iam already sending to
voice mail)
example : if some one calls registered user
if the user is not respond for 6 rings its go to Voice mail
if the user not there it should go directly to voice mail
help will be appriciated
ram
Hi all,
I'm trying to setup an openser using an asterisk as a pstn gw and voicemail
server.
Everything seems to be working fine except when a call is redirected to
voicemail by timeout (using failure_route).
In this situation, asterisk is asking for proxy auth to openser that
redirects the request to the calling ua. But when the ua responds to
openser, this latest sends the invitation to the destination ua and not to
asterisk, as he should.
I can't figure out a way of accomplishing this... any idea?
The sip trace diagram and the full openser.cfg are in attachment.
The wrong invite is represented as "F19 INVITE" in the diagram...
Thanks,
Edgar
Hello there,
Why does the following configuration statement :
setdsturi("sip:hostname:5061");
is not accepted and results in the following in my logs :
set_dst_uri: Invalid parameter value
It's probably straightforward but I don't understand...
Thanks in advance.
--
Simon Morvan.
