sr-users September 2006

sr-users@lists.kamailio.org

184 participants
436 discussions

by ravi reddy

Hi Users, I am Using SER-0.9.6 on a public ip and using another sip-proxy(not SER) behind the NAT. and when the users who registerd to Sip-proxy which is behind NAT,, calls to the users who registered to public domain SER.. call is being established . but when hunging the phone the SER is not sending "BYE" messages to the NAT device it is sending to the Sip-proxy (not SER) that is for a private IP . so even when i hung the call from the Nated Sip proxy ,SER is getting messages through NAT but again SER is not sending "BYE" messages to other party its sending back to the nated sip-proxy having private IP , so the messages are going in a wrong direction and is being wasted . It looks like this is a BUG in SER , i would take this oppurtunity to report this. If this is not a bug please send me the suggestions ..... To solve my problem. thank you. regards, Ravi.

18 years, 2 months

[Serusers] server error message " 500 I'm terribly sorry, server error occurred (1/SL)".

by ravi reddy

Hi users , I am proceeding in this way i have a SER-0.9.6 running fine :-) and I had given a username and password to a call-shop and this callshop owner with his username and password he connects to another 6 phones, Actually he bills to his 6 phones and I will bill him ."o.k overall Scenario is well and good". I made a little changes in ser.cfg and when the call made from the call shop up to call connecting is O.K but when we hung the phone the SER is not generating "BYE" messages to other party , so the call is on.. and i am not getting "Acct Stop" packet also SO How I can solve my problem :-( any suggestions will be appreciated . below is the message i am getting from SER when I hung the phone on one side -------------------<this message is came from callshop Nat address>---------<"it sends bye to my SER "------------------------------------------------------ U 82.102.69.105:32768 -> 81.21.33.35:5060 BYE sip:99106883@81.21.33.35:5060 SIP/2.0. To: "99106883"<sip:99106883@81.21.33.35:5060>;tag=78F9ECC4-166C. From: "12345"<sip:12345@81.21.33.35:5060>;tag=837e5b2ff0b4cf4a. Via: SIP/2.0/UDP 192.168.1.100:5060 ;branch=z9hG4bK-d87543-5983e94f152d226c82a4e76799fe58e5-1--d87543-;rport. Via: SIP/2.0/UDP 192.168.1.102;branch=z9hG4bK9bf920205fe3bef9. Call-ID: f1b0fe2b6cdf1456(a)192.168.1.102. CSeq: 9533 BYE. Route: <sip:99106883@81.21.33.35:5060;lr;nat=yes;ftag=837e5b2ff0b4cf4a>. Route: <sip:192.168.1.100:5060>. Record-Route: <sip:192.168.1.100:5060>. Contact: <sip:192.168.1.100:5060>. Max-Forwards: 69. Allow: INVITE, ACK, CANCEL, BYE, NOTIFY, REFER, OPTIONS, INFO, SUBSCRIBE. Proxy-Authorization: Digest username="12345", realm="81.21.33.35", algorithm=MD5, uri="sip:192.168.1.100:5060", nonce="44fd415a6754afa39f2668ce2ad11da6bfc65cde", response="4001812db780010a557b40683efd2f9e". Supported: replaces. User-Agent: Grandstream BT110 1.0.8.23. Content-Length: 0. . ----------------<here it is as soon as SER recieve Bye message it has to send Bye to other party >------<But it is sending to the hung up phone itself>--------- # U 81.21.33.35:5060 -> 192.168.1.100:5060 BYE sip:192.168.1.100:5060 SIP/2.0. Record-Route: <sip:81.21.33.35;ftag=837e5b2ff0b4cf4a;lr=on>. To: "99106883"<sip:99106883@81.21.33.35:5060>;tag=78F9ECC4-166C. From: "12345"<sip:12345@81.21.33.35:5060>;tag=837e5b2ff0b4cf4a. Via: SIP/2.0/UDP 81.21.33.35;branch=z9hG4bK936f.7ff7572.0. Via: SIP/2.0/UDP 192.168.1.100:5060;received=82.102.69.105 ;branch=z9hG4bK-d87543-5983e94f152d226c82a4e76799fe58e5-1--d87543-;rport=32768. Via: SIP/2.0/UDP 192.168.1.102;branch=z9hG4bK9bf920205fe3bef9. Call-ID: f1b0fe2b6cdf1456(a)192.168.1.102. CSeq: 9533 BYE. Record-Route: <sip:192.168.1.100:5060>. Contact: <sip:192.168.1.100:5060>. Max-Forwards: 16. Allow: INVITE, ACK, CANCEL, BYE, NOTIFY, REFER, OPTIONS, INFO, SUBSCRIBE. Proxy-Authorization: Digest username="12345", realm="81.21.33.35", algorithm=MD5, uri="sip:192.168.1.100:5060", nonce="44fd415a6754afa39f2668ce2ad11da6bfc65cde", response="4001812db780010a557b40683efd2f9e". Supported: replaces. User-Agent: Grandstream BT110 1.0.8.23. Content-Length: 0. . -----------------<And here I go iam getting this message and the call is not being stopped >---------------------------------- # U 81.21.33.35:5060 -> 82.102.69.105:32768 SIP/2.0 500 I'm terribly sorry, server error occurred (1/SL). To: "99106883"<sip:99106883@81.21.33.35:5060>;tag=78F9ECC4-166C. From: "12345"<sip:12345@81.21.33.35:5060>;tag=837e5b2ff0b4cf4a. Via: SIP/2.0/UDP 192.168.1.100:5060 ;branch=z9hG4bK-d87543-5983e94f152d226c82a4e76799fe58e5-1--d87543-;rport=32768;received= 82.102.69.105. Via: SIP/2.0/UDP 192.168.1.102;branch=z9hG4bK9bf920205fe3bef9. Call-ID: f1b0fe2b6cdf1456(a)192.168.1.102. CSeq: 9533 BYE. Content-Length: 0. Warning: 392 81.21.33.35:5060 "Noisy feedback tells: pid=27773 req_src_ip= 82.102.69.105 req_src_port=32768 in_uri=sip:99106883@81.21.33.35:5060 out_uri=sip:192.168.1.100:5060 via_cnt==2". . any suggestions will be appreciated: Thank You.

18 years, 2 months

[Serusers] Record Route problem :-(

by ravi reddy

Hi SER Users, I am using SER-0.9.6 on public domain . and I am using another Sip-proxy behind NAT (ip-address=192.168.1.100:5060) i have some clients registered to that nated sip-proxy and here that nated sip-proxy forwards PSTN calls to SER on public domain. when call make from client (registered to nated sip-proxy) the session establishing suscessfully , but when the client hung the phone the SER on public domain is taking the BYE message and is not sending the BYE message to the other end and it is sending directly to the Sip-proxy which is a private-ip . So, here SER is not getting ACK and its keep on sending the BYE requests to the privateip instead of sending to the NAT address . In some docs which jiri wrote on record route he mentioned the same problem below is the link ; but he dint mention how to solve that record route problem, If SER send messages back as it recieving path there is no problem , but its changing the route to send BYE , For the request "CANCEL","ACK","INVITE","200 OK" every thing is happening in the same Route but it is not happening only for the "BYE" request . Hope some body can help me. Thank You. here is the link which i told;- http://216.239.59.104/search?q=cache:A32Unl9P0hkJ:voip.internet2.edu/meetin… Regards, Ravi.

18 years, 2 months

[Users] t_forward() functionality with t_relay()?

by Greg Fausak

I've got a dumb question. Can I get t_relay() functionality (transactions and whatnot) without getting the Via and potentially Record-Route tags in the header??? I warned you it was dumb.... -g -- Greg Fausak greg(a)thursday.com

18 years, 2 months

[Users] Error in installing Ruby...Please help...Please

by Ferianto siregar

Dear all, Thank you very much for your help. A few days ago, I have sent a message that to ask about openser admin installation. Thank you very much for your help. Thanks Now, I have tried to install it again. But, When I compile the rubygerms-0.9.0.tar.gz, I got error message. This is the task that I have done before: 1. Untar the rubygerms packet # tar -zxvf rubygems-0.9.0.tar.gz # cd rubygems-0.9.0 # ruby setup.rb # gem install --include-dependencies When I type this command, "gem install --include-dependencies", I got error message. This is the error message: Attempting local installation of 'rails' Local gem file not found: rails*.gem Attempting remote installation of 'rails' Updating Gem source index for: http://gems.rubyforge.org ERROR: While executing gem ... (Gem::RemoteSourceException) Error fetching remote gem cache: getaddrinfo: Temporary failure in name esolution What`s wrong? I do hope anybody can help me to solve this problem. Please help me...Please help because of my lack skills..Please Note: 1. I do not have connection through the internet, so for rails packet, I have downloaded the rails-1.1.6.tar.gz. I have untar it in root directory(same as rubygems) and type command rails # script/server But, Nothing happens. Why? Please... Thank you very much Regards, Ferianto --------------------------------- Do you Yahoo!? Next-gen email? Have it all with the all-new Yahoo! Mail.

18 years, 2 months

[Serusers] NAT Solution

by Asep Saifudin

Hi, Does anyone can help me to choose best NAT solution for SER/OpenSER ?NatHelper or Mediaproxy ? And if they compare with STUN, TURN, ICE technology Nathelper or Mediaproxy better than them ? My target is I want my SIP Server can pass all NAT/Firewall just like SkyPE which hard to be block by firewall and can pass all NAT system. ~Asep

18 years, 2 months

[Serusers] SER not responding

by Henry Duan

hi, I'm new to SER. I downloaded SER0.9.6 source to my local Fedora Core 5. I run make all and make prefix=/ install, and then set SIPDOMAIN, and run ser. However it didn't respond with incomging Registration(it showed incoming Registration from Ethereal). (I used default ser.cfg). Can anybody tell me what's the problem, or how to debug? Thanks so much! Henry

18 years, 2 months

[Users] OSS on openSER and Redriect .

by raviprakash sunkara

Hi Users, Can any one tell about OSS ( Operation Support System) on openSER, Why we need ? But i think to reduce the load balance on openSER server, Suppose is I use 3 OSS's on SIP server. Sip users should also insert in to 3 OSS sip. And other doubt is ? Suppose if we using the redirect , that forwording into other openser system, When openSER redirect to other openSER, the user should also insert, But i think that .... OSS and redirect on openSER are the same. Please for me in English, I know its naughty questioin, please excuse me ! -- -- Thanks and Regards with cheers Sunkara Ravi Prakash (Voip Developer) Hyperion Technology www.hyperion-tech.com +91-9985077535

18 years, 2 months

[Serusers] Free DNS Service

by Tracy Lofton

Hi All, I am new to OpenSER/SER but have been receiving quite a bit of help and would like to express my gratitude by letting you all know of the FREE DNS Service that I am offering to the Internet Community. Go to http://www.t4tm.net to find out more, signup and enjoy the benefits. Tracy _________________________________________________________________ Get the new Windows Live Messenger! http://imagine-msn.com/messenger/launch80/default.aspx?locale=en-us&source=…

18 years, 2 months

[Serusers] Preregistering a sip address?

by Ignacio Mas Ivars

Hi all! I have just started using the SIP Express Router and I am looking for a way to have a user preregistered when the router starts. Is there any way to configure that user1 should be registered by default at an IP address without needing to send the registration? I guess it will have to do with messing a bit with the routing engine, but I don't dare to touch it so far and I don't know how to do it. Any help would be very much appreciated! Thanks very much for any help! /Nacho --- ,,, (o o) --ooO--(_)---Ooo----------- Three may keep a secret, if two of them are dead.- --oo0--------0oo-----------

18 years, 2 months

← Newer
1
...
34
35
36
37
38
39
40
...
44
Older →

Jump to page:

2024

2023

2022

2021

2020

2019

2018

2017

2016

2015

2014

2013

2012

2011

2010

2009

2008

2007

2006

2005

2004

2003

2002

sr-users September 2006