sr-users April 2007

sr-users@lists.kamailio.org

177 participants
273 discussions

[Users] Module Permission (register.allow and register.deny)
by Andrew And 03 Apr '07

03 Apr '07

In http://www.openser.org/docs/modules/1.2.x/permissions.html don´t have example with files register.allow and register.deny. Does someone has one example with rules these files?

1 0

[Users] does openser support QoS ?
by yanlin 03 Apr '07

03 Apr '07

Hi, does openser support some kind of QoS ? like, band width management, when there has no more usable bandwidth, then new INVITE should be rejected. so far, i know that dialog module has a bit dialog awareness. Any clues? thanks. yan lin

4 3

[Users] Serial forking broken wrt dst_uri/path?
by Frey, Daniel (external) 03 Apr '07

03 Apr '07

Hi, I tried to use append_branch() with dst_uri and path parameters set (and using set_dst_uri() / set_path_vector() for the first message). It works well as long as only parallel forking is involved, but when I use serialize_branches and next_branches and serial forking is required, the information given in dst_uri and path is discarded. This also seems obvious when reading the code from serialize.c, which simply doesn't store it on the contacts[n]-structs. I could add it to the sturct, but I'm at a loss how to store/retrieve it from the AVP. Are there any plans to fix this? Or any help on how I can fix it myself? Regards, Daniel

2 1

[Users] expires in Register message
by Dimo 03 Apr '07

03 Apr '07

Hi guys, Congratulations on the recent release, I will be testing it soon. I wonder if you can help me with a problem. I am trying to set UAs with a certain user-agent header to have different max_expires than all the rest. I am trying to override the default min_expires and max_expires values from within the config, after the definitions. So far i cannot do it - the modparam("registrar", "min_expires", xx) does not seem to accept an AVP for the xx part. Do you know if it is possible to change these timers per client from the code? Do they accept AVPs or is there any other way i can make it work? Thanks in advance Dimo

2 1

[Users] RTP without proxying, Linksys 3102
by Amanda Mattiuz 03 Apr '07

03 Apr '07

Hello Bill... it would be great if you could send me the cfg file you used.... -- ------------------------------------------------------------------- Amanda Remes Mattiuz amattiuz(a)gmail.com

1 0

[Serusers] mail client for SER UA
by Meidiana Ten 03 Apr '07

03 Apr '07

Hi there, I'm setting up voicemail server using SER. Do I need to setup mail client in client machine so it can access mailbox in server? If so, please tell me the software and how to configure the mail client. Thanx Regards, Meidiana ____________________________________________________________________________________ Never miss an email again! Yahoo! Toolbar alerts you the instant new Mail arrives. http://tools.search.yahoo.com/toolbar/features/mail/

1 0

RE: [Serusers] global contact list
by Barta János 03 Apr '07

03 Apr '07

Hello! Thanks for your answer. I'm using the standard config file (http://ftp.iptel.org/pub/ser/presence/cfg/full-no-failover.cfg), with a little modification, because I'm using radius authentication, accounting and media proxy. loadmodule "/opt/lib/ser/modules/acc_radius.so" loadmodule "/opt/lib/ser/modules/mediaproxy.so" loadmodule "/opt/lib/ser/modules/auth_radius.so" modparam("acc_radius","radius_config","/etc/radiusclient-ng/radiusclient.conf") modparam("acc_radius", "log_flag", 1) modparam("acc_radius", "log_missed_flag", 2) modparam("rls", "db_url", "mysql://yyyyyyy:xxxxxx@10.22.1.222/ser_pa") modparam("domain|uri_db|auth_db|usrloc|msilo", "db_url", "mysql://yyyyyyy:xxxxxx@10.22.1.222/ser_pa") if ((method=="INVITE") or (method=="BYE") or (method=="CANCEL")) { setflag(1); } if (!radius_www_authorize("test.intra")) { www_challenge("test.intra", "0"); break; }; handle_rls_subscription("1"); route[1] { if (method=="INVITE") { t_on_reply("1"); t_on_failure("1"); use_media_proxy(); } else if (method=="BYE|CANCEL") { end_media_session(); } # send it out now; use stateful forwarding as it works reliably # even for UDP2TCP if (!t_relay()) { sl_reply_error(); }; } onreply_route[1] { if (status=~"(183)|2[0-9][0-9]") { use_media_proxy(); }; if (status=~"[3-6]0[0-9]") { end_media_session(); break; } } failure_route[1] { # forwarding failed -- check if the request was a MESSAGE if (!method=="MESSAGE") { break; }; log(1, "MSILO: MESSAGE forward failed - storing it\n"); # we have changed the R-URI with the contact address, ignore it now if (m_store("0", "")) { t_reply("202", "Accepted"); } else { log(1, "MSILO: offline message NOT stored\n"); t_reply("503", "Service Unavailable"); }; end_media_session(); } ----------------- I made a capture with Ethereal, and I can see that eyeBeam sent the "Supported: eventlist" field. I inserted the lists of both type: Global-list: Message Header Via: SIP/2.0/UDP 10.22.2.134:9510;branch=z9hG4bK-d87543-dd118615e6316f41-1--d87543- Max-Forwards: 70 Contact: <sip:12345@10.22.2.134:9510> To: <sip:bartaj-list@test.intra> SIP to address: sip:bartaj-list@test.intra From: "12345"<sip:12345@test.intra>;tag=0a48df34 SIP Display info: "12345" SIP from address: sip:12345@test.intra SIP tag: 0a48df34 Call-ID: ee79a62abd227204@S2FhbGlhLXhwLndlc3RlbC53ZXN0ZWw5MDAuaHU. CSeq: 1 SUBSCRIBE Expires: 60 Allow: INVITE, ACK, CANCEL, OPTIONS, BYE, REFER, NOTIFY, MESSAGE, SUBSCRIBE, INFO Supported: eventlist User-Agent: CounterPath eyeBeam Event: presence Content-Length: 0 User-list: Message Header Via: SIP/2.0/UDP 10.22.2.134:9510;branch=z9hG4bK-d87543-6300f275d049656e-1--d87543- Max-Forwards: 70 Contact: <sip:12345@10.22.2.134:9510> To: <sip:12345@test.intra> SIP to address: sip:12345@test.intra From: "12345"<sip:12345@test.intra>;tag=cb3e2c5c SIP Display info: "12345" SIP from address: sip:12345@test.intra SIP tag: cb3e2c5c Call-ID: a46e4b35e4754144@S2FhbGlhLXhwLndlc3RlbC53ZXN0ZWw5MDAuaHU. CSeq: 1 SUBSCRIBE Expires: 3600 Accept: message/external-body Allow: INVITE, ACK, CANCEL, OPTIONS, BYE, REFER, NOTIFY, MESSAGE, SUBSCRIBE, INFO Supported: eventlist User-Agent: CounterPath eyeBeam Event: sip-profile;profile-type=application;app-id=resource-lists Content-Length: 0 The second case is working, but the first one is not. Is this maybe an EyeBeam problem? Which version of EyeBeam works fine (or which other client can I test it with)? And I have another question. What can I do with those clients, that does not support the presence information (can I do something anyway?). For example: I have a "Cisco Call Manager Express" box, and some Cisco IP Phones, that reach other PC clients through the SER. The Cisco makes the registration (and reregistration) with the phone's identifiers too into the SER (but the presence information is not handled by the Cisco), and therefore if a PC client would like to add the Cisco phone into his buddy list, the presence won't be working. ...Record(0x405cc588)... domain: 'location' aor : '101$' ~~~Contact(0x405cc5c8)~~~ domain : 'location' aor : '101$' Contact : 'sip:101$@10.22.2.233:5060' Expires : Expired q : Call-ID : '9C5717E5-D7D211DB-804EA958-71810899' CSeq : 4103 User-Agent: 'Cisco-SIPGateway/IOS-12.x' received : '' State : CS_SYNC Flags : 0 next : (nil) prev : (nil) ~~~/Contact~~~~ .../Record... ...Record(0x405cc698)... domain: 'location' aor : '100$' ~~~Contact(0x405cc6d8)~~~ domain : 'location' aor : '100$' Contact : 'sip:100$@10.22.2.233:5060' Expires : Expired q : Call-ID : '9C5717E5-D7D211DB-804DA958-71810899' CSeq : 1364 User-Agent: 'Cisco-SIPGateway/IOS-12.x' received : '' State : CS_SYNC Flags : 0 next : (nil) prev : (nil) ~~~/Contact~~~~ .../Record... Is it possible, that the SER (in these cases) simulates a presence client (if the user registration is active, then the user is online, anyway offline)? Thanks, Jani -----Original Message----- From: Vaclav Kubart [mailto:vaclav.kubart@iptel.org] Sent: Wednesday, March 28, 2007 3:46 PM To: Barta János Cc: serusers(a)iptel.org Subject: Re: [Serusers] global contact list Hi, please can you send here your config file? By the way, in some EyeBeam versions was not possible to use "Subscribe to contact list" feature because in such cases EyeBeam didn't send header "Supported: eventlist". Vaclav On Tue, Mar 27, 2007 at 08:54:15AM +0200, Barta János wrote: > Hello! > > I have a little problem with the (global) contact list subscription > of the presence, please help me. > I installed the presence server (0.10.99-dev35-pa-4.1), and it works > without any problems. > But I can not use the "Subscribe to contact list" of the eyeBeam. (The > user subscribe list works fine.) I typed the next content into this > field (of the eyeBeam): > > sip:bartaj-list@test.intra > > > and my config file contains: > > sip:/var/xcap-root/rls-services/global# cat ./index <?xml > version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?> <rls-services> > > <service uri="sip:bartaj-list@test.intra"> > <list name="Human resources"> > <entry uri="sip:test1@test.intra"> > > <display-name>bartaj</display-name> > </entry> > <entry uri="sip:test2@test.intra"> > > <display-name>12345</display-name> > </entry> > </list> > <packages> > <package>presence</package> > </packages> > </service> > > </rls-services> > > But I can see only the user subscribe list, and can't see the global > one. > Why? > Can anybody help me? > Thx, > Jani > _____________________________________________________________________________________________________ Jean Michel Jarre: Téo és Téa, az új, ünnepi album 1990 Forintért, kizárólag a T-Online Zeneáruházban! http://zenearuhaz.t-online.hu/index.php?m=info&albumid=30593&sp=1&sty=21

2 1

[Users] [resolv] radius problem in 1.2
by Bodin Bruno 03 Apr '07

03 Apr '07

Hello, During few days I've a problem with openser 1.2 and radius authentication but I just solve it ! This is a little note about my method. *Please, you're welcome to check and comment it for a better solution.* *Issue* : Radius authentication fail for openser 1.2 but not for 1.1.1 version with the same config. *Description* : freeradius server sucess (Sending Access-Accept in log) but it's not good in openser log. *Search method* : analyse of differences between 1.1.1 and 1.2 version >lsof | grep radius | grep -v radiusd /_openser 1.1.1_/ : openser 6226 root mem REG 8,2 50984 1333396 /usr/lib64/libradiusclient-ng.so.2.0.0 openser 6226 root mem REG 8,2 71642 30076344 /opt/openser-1.1.1/lib64/openser/modules/auth_radius.so openser 6226 root mem REG 8,2 41637 30076357 /opt/openser-1.1.1/lib64/openser/modules/group_radius.so openser 6226 root mem REG 8,2 43683 30076346 /opt/openser-1.1.1/lib64/openser/modules/avp_radius.so openser 6226 root mem REG 8,2 38171 30389824 /opt/openser-1.1.1/lib64/openser/modules/uri_radius.so _/openser1.2 :/_ openser 6299 root mem REG 8,2 50952 1333316 /usr/lib64/libfreeradius-client.so.2.0.0 openser 6299 root mem REG 8,2 76493 30356347 /opt/openser-1.2/lib64/openser/modules/auth_radius.so openser 6299 root mem REG 8,2 41769 30356361 /opt/openser-1.2/lib64/openser/modules/group_radius.so openser 6299 root mem REG 8,2 44923 30356349 /opt/openser-1.2/lib64/openser/modules/avp_radius.so openser 6299 root mem REG 8,2 39411 30076331 /opt/openser-1.2/lib64/openser/modules/uri_radius.so *openser 1.2.0 use libfreeradius-client.so.2.0.0 openser 1.1.1 use libradiusclient-ng.so.2.0.0 * * my solve method :* >cd /usr/lib64/ >mv libfreeradius-client.so.2.0.0 libfreeradius-client.so.2.0.0.old >ln -s libradiusclient-ng.so.2.0.0 libfreeradius-client.so.2.0.0

2 1

[Users] DLG: BYE not detected because of route reccord
by Michel Bensoussan 03 Apr '07

03 Apr '07

Hello The dialog module checks SIP messages only if the OpenSER in on record-route header in function dlg_onroute(). When the callee in registered on another SIP Server and the callee sends BYE, the OpenSER is not on record-route header. In this case, the dialog module doesn't detect end of call. Is there a way to callback the dlg_onroute() function not only in case of record-route? The configuration is as following: - Tel 101 registered to 192.168.13.8 (siproxd) (URI: 101(a)192.168.13.8) (IP: 192.168.13.101) - Tel 155 registered to 192.168.13.86 (OpenSER) (URI: 155(a)192.168.13.86) (IP: 192.168.13.155) - 155 is the caller and 101 is the callee. Attached, message capture (ethereal) when the callee (101) terminate the call. Thanks. Regards, Michel.

2 5

[Users] BUG in TM
by Sam Lee 03 Apr '07

03 Apr '07

Hey guys, I'm getting BUG:tm:run_failure_handlers: stack level is 1!! in my syslog. It is generating when i place a call out to PSTN. Any ideas ? Sam

2 5

Jump to page:

2025

2024

2023

2022

2021

2020

2019

2018

2017

2016

2015

2014

2013

2012

2011

2010

2009

2008

2007

2006

2005

2004

2003

2002

sr-users April 2007