sr-users May 2007

sr-users@lists.kamailio.org

164 participants
295 discussions

[Users] Distribution Calls with the same destination number to different servers

by Andreas Brodmann

Hi all, I am working on the following scenario: Our carrier sends all calls (SIP protocol) to my openser, which forwards the calls depending on their destination number to four asterisk servers (for load sharing reason - we're speaking of a roof of 300 concurrent calls). I have one number which leads to a conferencence (one speaker, multiple listeners), whoose number of callers will exceed the number of calls a single asterisk will hold. Therefore I want the openser to distribute the calls to this number to all four asterisk servers (to share the load). My question is: how do I configure this on openser, as I have to send all requests from the same SIP session to the same asterisk? Can anyone give me a hint on this? Thanks in advance. Andreas

17 years, 6 months

[Serusers] Unable to download SER RC1

by Andrey Kuprianov

Hi, Is something wrong with siprouter.onsip.org FTP site? I've tried Firefox, IE7 and even wget, but still cant download ftp://siprouter.onsip.org/pub/ser/ser-2.0.0-rc1_src.tar.gz. What's wrong? Andrey.

17 years, 6 months

[Serusers] ser.cfg buildsystem

by KUMAR

Hi all, I am having some problem with the configuration file buildsystem. Whatever changes I make, it always creates only the basic hello world configuration file only. I am using the latest package. It also gives the following message **** WARNING! Only helloworld is implemented!!!! How do I include other feature packages like NAT and authentication. Here's what i've done This configure script will generate a new local configuration to ./local/default/config.m4. ====================== Press ENTER to accept default values. SER Server IP address: IP address to listen on (202.52.247.221): 192.168.2.2 Port to listen on (5060): Public IP address of server (ENTER if same as listen IP): Domain name for this SER installation (i.e. mydomain.com, def. mytestser.org) : MYDOMAIN SER installation path (/usr/local, i.e. modules in /usr/local/lib/ser/modules): Usage: dbtype://readwriteuser:password@host/databasename Database URL (mysql://ser:heslo@localhost/ser): You may choose to turn on logging as found in the SER - Getting Started guide. This logging can be turned on and off in a live environment, and we recommend everybody to include the logging except in high-load environments. (You can also later disable it from your config.m4) Turn on logging (yes): How much log possibilities to include (low/medium/high, default high): You can base your configuration file on one of the feature packages available. Currently, the supported packages are (gettingstarted sems) gettingstarted : A set of basic configurations found in most setups sems : A configuration file that enables SER as a front-end for SEMS You can also choose to include specific components within a feature package (components). And finally, you can choose to include no prepared features, just use your own code in ./local. Your choice of feature, choose only one, default is gettingstarted (none, components or gettingstarted sems) ? You have chosen the SER - Getting Started feature package. (See SER - Getting Started document) Which feature set do you want to base your configuration on: helloworld : basic configuration auth : authentication using mysql database nat : NAT traversal handling pstn : Functionality for PSTN integration callfwd : basic call features like call forwarding **** WARNING! Only helloworld is implemented!!!! Your choice (default helloworld, auth, nat, pstn, callfwd): nat You have chosen NAT traversal, do you want to use rtpproxy (iptel.org) or mediaproxy (ag-projects)? Your choice (default rtpproxy, mediaproxy): rtpproxy Copying site templates to ./local/default... The resulting ser.config doesn't include anything except the helloworld. Thank you in advance. Kumar

17 years, 6 months

Re: RES: [Users] Presence Problem - Publish Offline

by Anca Vamanu

Hello, The proper way to send Publish messages is described in RFC 3903 (see section 4.1 for event refreshing event state publication). If you don't include a Sip-If-Match header it is not considered a refresh of the previous state and thus it does not rewrite the open state previously published. regards, Anca Hildebrando Trannin wrote: >Hi Anca, > >Thanks for your answer. When I say that OFFLINE doesn't works is that I send >a PUBLISH with the basic status CLOSED (after already sent others PUBLISH >with status OPENED) and OpenSER doesn't send NOTIFY message to inform >subscribers that that contact is now OFFLINE. According to your answer it >happens because I'm not sending PUBLISH's with Sip-If-Match. Is it right? If >no, how is the correct way to send PUBLISH? Just to complement, PUBLISH with >expires = 0 that do UNPUBLISH is working fine. > >Regards, > Hildebrando Trannin > >-----Mensagem original----- >De: Anca-Maria Vamanu [mailto:anca@voice-system.ro] >Enviada em: segunda-feira, 21 de maio de 2007 06:12 >Para: Hildebrando Trannin >Cc: users(a)openser.org >Assunto: Re: [Users] Presence Problem - Publish Offline > >Hello, > >What happens here is that the presence module receives a first Publish >from your aplication (that is a Publish with no Sip-If-Match header) >having the basic status closed. In this situation, it does not send >Notify to its watches to prevent descovering that the user is in fact >online by tracking packets. > >Hildebrando Trannin wrote: > > > >>Hi all, >> >>I was testing OpenSER presence functionality using eyebeam and a >>softphone developed by my team. The OFFLINE state with eyebeam worked >>perfectly, but with my softphone it didn't work. I set force_active = >>1. XML sent by PUBLISH and OpenSER log are below. Can anyone help me? >> >> >> >I don't understand what you mean with the Offline state not working. >Could you please give more details? > > > >>Thanks, Hildebrando >> >>*PIDF XML:* >> >>* * >> >><?xml xmlns="urn:ietf:params:xml:ns:pidf" >> >>entity="sip:hildebrando@voip.maritaca"> >> >><presence> >> >><tuple id=""> >> >><status> >> >><basic>closed</basic> >> >></status> >> >><note>offline</note> >> >></tuple> >> >></presence> >> >>The basic difference between my application and eyebeam is that >>eyebeam uses *RPID XML *and I use *PIDF XML*. >> >>*OPENSER LOG:* >> >>* * >> >>3(26039) PRESENCE: update_presentity: The presentity status is >>offline; do not send notify >> >>------------------------------------------------------------------------ >> >> >> >> >> >regards, > >Anca Vamanu > > > >>_______________________________________________ >>Users mailing list >>Users(a)openser.org >>http://openser.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/users >> >> >> >> > > >

17 years, 6 months

Re: [Serusers] Does SER's MYSQL work in SUSE Linux?

by Cyprian Clement

Hi Ram, Thanks for the note. I thought there may be some issues with SUSE regarding mysql since all the talk is about other Linux flavours. I will give it a try and see. Thanks, Cyp. ==== ----- Original Message ---- From: ram <talk2ram(a)gmail.com> To: Cyprian Clement <cyprian_clement(a)yahoo.co.uk> Cc: "serusers(a)iptel.org" <serusers(a)iptel.org> Sent: Sunday, 20 May, 2007 5:06:55 PM Subject: Re: [Serusers] Does SER's MYSQL work in SUSE Linux? On 5/18/07, Cyprian Clement <cyprian_clement(a)yahoo.co.uk> wrote: Hello Community, Does anyone know whether it's possible to install the current recommended MYSQL on SUSE Linux. I have a Machine with a SUSE installed on it. I have successfully installed SER 0.9.6 but now I would like to have MYSQL for authentication support. Does the SER's recommended MYSQL work with SUSE?. I only see the talk about Redhat and Debian so unsure if it works with SUSE. Many thanks for in advance. Hi any linux with mysql and ser should support try using mysql authentication any problems post here ram Cyp. ---------- Yahoo! Answers - Got a question? Someone out there knows the answer. Try it now. _______________________________________________ Serusers mailing list Serusers(a)lists.iptel.org http://lists.iptel.org/mailman/listinfo/serusers ___________________________________________________________ What kind of emailer are you? Find out today - get a free analysis of your email personality. Take the quiz at the Yahoo! Mail Championship. http://uk.rd.yahoo.com/evt=44106/*http://mail.yahoo.net/uk

17 years, 6 months

Re: [Serusers] Problem running presence modules - SER won't start

by Vaclav Kubart

There was problem that sudo didn't propagate LD_LIBRARY_PATH settings or it did, but linker didn't care or something like that. Does your ser binary has setuid/setgid bit set? In this case linker may ignore the LD_LIBRARY_PATH settings too. You can try to add the path /usr/local/lib/ser to your /etc/ld.so.conf and run ldconfig. This might help... Vaclav On Mon, May 21, 2007 at 12:32:15PM -0700, Mahatma Sarasvati wrote: > No, I'm not using sudo. Does it matter? > > M > > ----- Original Message ---- > From: Vaclav Kubart <vaclav.kubart(a)iptel.org> > To: Mahatma Sarasvati <gnoahhb(a)yahoo.com> > Cc: serusers(a)iptel.org > Sent: Wednesday, May 16, 2007 9:47:40 PM > Subject: Re: [Serusers] Problem running presence modules - SER won't start > > Hello, > how did you start ser? Aren't you using sudo? > Vaclav > > On Wed, May 16, 2007 at 11:24:07AM -0700, Mahatma Sarasvati wrote: > > Hello All, > > > > Running SER 2.0.0 rc1 from CVS (updated yesterday) on CentOS 5. > > > > I'm trying to test/use the presence functionality in SER. > > I've compiled and installed with make group_include="standard standard-dep" all > > > > I've set the environment variable: export LD_LIBRARY_PATH=/usr/local/lib/ser > > [root@vx1 modules]# echo $LD_LIBRARY_PATH > > /usr/local/lib/ser > > > > My supporting modules are here: > > > > [root@vx1 modules]# ls -l /usr/local/lib/ser/ > > total 828 > > -rwxr-xr-x 1 root root 40768 May 14 15:19 libbinrpc.so > > -rwxr-xr-x 1 root root 179044 May 14 15:19 lib_ser_cds.so > > -rwxr-xr-x 1 root root 213028 May 14 15:19 lib_ser_presence.so > > -rwxr-xr-x 1 root root 371056 May 14 15:19 lib_ser_xcap.so > > drwxr-xr-x 2 root root 4096 May 14 15:19 modules > > [root@vx1 modules]# > > > > Load module commands are in ser.cfg: > > loadmodule "/usr/local/lib/ser/modules/xmlrpc.so" > > loadmodule "/usr/local/lib/ser/modules/xcap.so" > > loadmodule "/usr/local/lib/ser/modules/pa.so" > > loadmodule "/usr/local/lib/ser/modules/presence_b2b.so" > > loadmodule "/usr/local/lib/ser/modules/rls.so" > > loadmodule "/usr/local/lib/ser/modules/dialog.so" > > > > libXML2 and libXML2-devel are installed. > > > > Yet, when I try to start SER I get this: > > May 15 13:09:24 vx1 ser: ERROR: load_module: could not open module </usr/local/lib/ser/modules/pa.so>: lib_ser_xcap.so: cannot open shared object file: No such file or directory > > May 15 13:09:24 vx1 ser: parse error (81,13-14): failed to load module > > May 15 13:09:24 vx1 ser: ERROR: load_module: could not open module </usr/local/lib/ser/modules/presence_b2b.so>: lib_ser_xcap.so: cannot open shared object file: No such file or directory > > May 15 13:09:24 vx1 ser: parse error (82,13-14): failed to load module > > May 15 13:09:24 vx1 ser: ERROR: load_module: could not open module </usr/local/lib/ser/modules/rls.so>: lib_ser_xcap.so: cannot open shared object file: No such file or directory > > May 15 13:09:24 vx1 ser: parse error (83,13-14): failed to load module > > May 15 13:09:24 vx1 ser: ERROR: load_module: could not open module </usr/local/lib/ser/modules/dialog.so>: lib_ser_cds.so: cannot open shared object file: No such file or directory > > > > Can anyone help? I think I've done everything right. Why won't SER start? > > > > Thanks, > > M > > > > Here's my modules directory: > > [root@vx1 modules]# ls -l > > total 7264 > > -rwxr-xr-x 1 root root 67000 May 14 15:19 acc_db.so > > -rwxr-xr-x 1 root root 73248 May 14 15:19 acc_syslog.so > > -rwxr-xr-x 1 root root 69946 May 14 15:19 auth_db.so > > -rwxr-xr-x 1 root root 58071 May 14 15:19 auth.so > > -rwxr-xr-x 1 root root 37345 May 14 15:19 avp_db.so > > -rwxr-xr-x 1 root root 168768 May 14 15:19 avpops.so > > -rwxr-xr-x 1 root root 79110 May 14 15:19 avp.so > > -rwxr-xr-x 1 root root 279385 May 14 15:19 ctl.so > > -rwxr-xr-x 1 root root 72896 May 14 15:19 db_ops.so > > -rwxr-xr-x 1 root root 218639 May 14 15:18 dbtext.so > > -rwxr-xr-x 1 root root 97287 May 14 15:19 dialog.so > > -rwxr-xr-x 1 root root 63003 May 14 15:19 dispatcher.so > > -rwxr-xr-x 1 root root 21604 May 14 15:19 diversion.so > > -rwxr-xr-x 1 root root 114536 May 14 15:19 domain.so > > -rwxr-xr-x 1 root root 45704 May 14 15:19 enum.so > > -rwxr-xr-x 1 root root 109624 May 14 15:19 eval.so > > -rwxr-xr-x 1 root root 84357 May 14 15:19 exec.so > > -rwxr-xr-x 1 root root 81398 May 14 15:19 fifo.so > > -rwxr-xr-x 1 root root 53442 May 14 15:19 flatstore.so > > -rwxr-xr-x 1 root root 43414 May 14 15:19 gflags.so > > -rwxr-xr-x 1 root root 87574 May 14 15:19 lcr.so > > -rwxr-xr-x 1 root root 35883 May 14 15:19 maxfwd.so > > -rwxr-xr-x 1 root root 112635 May 14 15:19 mediaproxy.so > > -rwxr-xr-x 1 root root 87485 May 14 15:19 msilo.so > > -rwxr-xr-x 1 root root 106696 May 14 15:19 mysql.so > > -rwxr-xr-x 1 root root 187822 May 14 15:19 nathelper.so > > -rwxr-xr-x 1 root root 21203 May 14 15:19 options.so > > -rwxr-xr-x 1 root root 741640 May 14 15:19 pa.so > > -rwxr-xr-x 1 root root 131893 May 14 15:19 pdt.so > > -rwxr-xr-x 1 root root 272113 May 14 15:19 permissions.so > > -rwxr-xr-x 1 root root 122158 May 14 15:19 pike.so > > -rwxr-xr-x 1 root root 232133 May 14 15:19 presence_b2b.so > > -rwxr-xr-x 1 root root 26172 May 14 15:19 print.so > > -rwxr-xr-x 1 root root 47597 May 14 15:19 ratelimit.so > > -rwxr-xr-x 1 root root 152843 May 14 15:19 registrar.so > > -rwxr-xr-x 1 root root 402652 May 14 15:19 rls.so > > -rwxr-xr-x 1 root root 114896 May 14 15:19 rr.so > > -rwxr-xr-x 1 root root 63276 May 14 15:19 sanity.so > > -rwxr-xr-x 1 root root 66942 May 14 15:19 sl.so > > -rwxr-xr-x 1 root root 222033 May 14 15:18 sms.so > > -rwxr-xr-x 1 root root 34415 May 14 15:19 speeddial.so > > -rwxr-xr-x 1 root root 120807 May 14 15:19 textops.so > > -rwxr-xr-x 1 root root 43276 May 14 15:19 timer.so > > -rwxr-xr-x 1 root root 848962 May 14 15:19 tm.so > > -rwxr-xr-x 1 root root 117593 May 14 15:19 uac.so > > -rwxr-xr-x 1 root root 38793 May 14 15:19 unixsock.so > > -rwxr-xr-x 1 root root 38979 May 14 15:19 uri_db.so > > -rwxr-xr-x 1 root root 38603 May 14 15:19 uri.so > > -rwxr-xr-x 1 root root 351468 May 14 15:19 usrloc.so > > -rwxr-xr-x 1 root root 41867 May 14 15:19 xcap.so > > -rwxr-xr-x 1 root root 100354 May 14 15:19 xlog.so > > -rwxr-xr-x 1 root root 98456 May 14 15:19 xmlrpc.so > > [root@vx1 modules]# > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > ____________________________________________________________________________________Boardwalk for $500? In 2007? Ha! Play Monopoly Here and Now (it's updated for today's economy) at Yahoo! Games. > > http://get.games.yahoo.com/proddesc?gamekey=monopolyherenow > > _______________________________________________ > > Serusers mailing list > > Serusers(a)lists.iptel.org > > http://lists.iptel.org/mailman/listinfo/serusers > > > > > > > ____________________________________________________________________________________ > Don't pick lemons. > See all the new 2007 cars at Yahoo! Autos. > http://autos.yahoo.com/new_cars.html

17 years, 6 months

[Users] Customize messages [max_contacts]

by jprevedello

Hi gyus, I configure my openser to restrict the number of register with the same user using the function [max_contacts], and functioned perfectly. # Allow no more than 1 contacts per AOR modparam("registrar", "max_contacts", 1) Whenever that a user tries to register using the user that already register, the system return the following message: "Registration error:503 - Service Unavailable" I need to customize the message informing the user the reason of error, something as "user already registered" (softphone). I effected some tests, but I did not have success. Something as: if( t_check_status("503")) { t_reply("503","User already registered!!!"); exit; } Any sugestion ? Regards

17 years, 6 months

[Serusers] VON Europe

by Greger V. Teigre

Hi guys! Anyone going to VON Europe in Stockholm?! I will be there, so if there it's interest, we can arrange an informal users' meeting (or maybe a SER pub meeting :-) Jan has signaled his interest of participating remotely if possible. Regardless of users' meeting or not, I'm open to meeting anyone interested, so ping me :-) I'm staying at the Rica hotel next to the fairground and can thus easily meet. g-) PS! For those of you who find it strange that SER is not present as an exhibitor: That costs money and resources (in terms of volunteer presence and preparation). As iptel.org only relies on sponsors and part-time volunteers, and nobody has raised the topic on the mailing lists, we won't be exhibiting :-) I don't know if any of the sponsors of SER are present as exhibitors, they may be.

17 years, 6 months

Re: [Serusers] SER/PSTN Gateway conf

by Greger Viken Teigre

Copy the list! I don't understand your problem. The BYE will be caught by the loose route section of the config and relayed. The standard getting started should work fine. g-) ------- Original message ------- From: flavio <flavio.patria(a)gmail.com> Sent: 12.5.'07, 15:09 > 2007/5/12, Greger V. Teigre <greger(a)teigre.com>: > > Flavio, > > SER doesn't reply 200 OK to BYE message, the SIP UA does that. So, you > > are fine, the BYE reaches the UA. > > g-) > > > > That's right. > > If my gateway send INVITE message to SER, it does proxy it to UAC reached! > So UAC (SIP Phone) and Gateway (UAC in SIP scenario) are involved in a > media session. > If my gateway send BYE message to SER, it does not proxy it to UAC. > So I could send reply (200 OK) to Gateway (It works fine, but is not > solution!), but I cannot proxy BYE to UAC. > > How can proxy this? > > Thanks, > > Flavio

17 years, 6 months

[Serusers] Registrar / Expires & reject frequent refreshes

by Kostas Marneris

Hello all, I have an issue with some SIP clients (like Linksys SPA 1001) that have not comply with the "expires" parameter of the Contact header of a "200 OK" Registrar Response. My SER conf : modparam("registrar", "default_expires", 1800) modparam("registrar", "min_expires", 300) modparam("registrar", "max_expires", 1800) Although the (200 OK) response contains the 'expires' parameter : Contact: <sip:userb2@192.168.2.10:5061>;expires=300;received="sip:1.2.3.4:5061" the SIP client ignores it and keeps sending REGISTERs every 5 sec (if configured so). Is there a way for SER to reject these registrations with (423 Interval Too Brief), according to RFC3261 - 21.4.17 (423 Interval Too Brief) & 10.3 (Processing REGISTER Requests). The 'retry_after()' registrar modparam is not my case. thank you, Kostas

17 years, 6 months

← Newer
1
...
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
...
30
Older →

Jump to page:

2024

2023

2022

2021

2020

2019

2018

2017

2016

2015

2014

2013

2012

2011

2010

2009

2008

2007

2006

2005

2004

2003

2002

sr-users May 2007