Change log
xcap-lite (0.9.3) unstable; urgency=low
* Fixed sync of active_watchers and watchers tables
xcap-lite (0.9.2) unstable; urgency=low
* Fixed fetch attribute to work with MDB2 driver
* Added Content-length header
The software can be downloaded from:
http://download.dns-hosting.info/XCAP/xcap-lite-0.9.3.tar.gz
Regards,
Adrian
Hi,
I am interested in using SER DNS failover, but I am getting some problems.
A failure can be a 503 error response, ICMP errors or a timeout due to a not
received response.
Does anyone know if SER is able to detect these failures and then select an
alternative destination for the message?
If the ICMP errors can't be detected, can this be solved with timers?
I turned on use_dns_cache and use_dns_failover, but when the message fails
to be delivered to the first destination,
SER never tries the second destination, which was configured with DNS SRV.
regards,
Mário Ferreira
While I'm attempting to redo our SER 0.9.6 config in SER 2.0, I have a
question concerning migration from an OpenSER 0.9.X module that we user
in our SER config, alias_db.
Currently, all our aliases lookups are done via alias_db. Since we
provision DIDs on the fly via the web, and all our DIDs are E164 format
forwarded to our SER server, it didn't make sense to add in the security
issue of direct server access from the web server to reload the SER
config anytime there was a change to the aliases. Instead, we opted for
having everything in the DB where it should be, and we use the alias_db
module to keep track of our aliases accordingly.
So the question arises... how does one migrate this to the new SER
2.0? I'm still only barely able to grasp the whole concept of Aliases
in the new SER 2.0 stuff, but our current table has information like:
| 18005551212 | ourproxy.com | 1234567 | ourproxy.com |
This gives the alias of 18005551212(a)ourproxy.com a rewrite of
1234567(a)ourproxy.com
Simple enough concept. We add or remove aliases from the DB as
necessary, and never have to touch the running SER server.
So... how does one do this sort of thing now?
N.
Hi all,
I have added nathelper support to basic ser.cfg file of Ottendorf release.
It is a simple setup without any complexity of using other features such
as connectivity_realm etc.
You can download it at
http://www.iptel.org/ser/howtos/optimizing_the_use_of_rtp_proxy
File is called ser_config_2_0.txt
The more complex one will come with updated document soon.
Lada
Is the developer documentation on the Iptel.org site even close to still
valid?
We've just created a semi-complex AGI in Asterisk to sort of act as a
gateway for locked SEMS conferences. Our users can create a conference
number (if it's available), assign a pin, and then everyone who calls
that conference is required to enter the correct pin in order to join.
We keep track of the users logged in (contact info, since it's not
always local users), and the owner has the ability to limit the number
of users, etc.
Ideally, I'd like to task one of my C developers to create a similar
sort of gateway module for SER instead of, as we currently do, shunting
everyone over to the Asterisk server for processing and logic (and voice
prompts) and then shunting them over to the SER/SEMS server if they're
authenticated.
Of course, such a module would need to be able to do things like
complete take apart the SEMS pin-collect module (we're not interested in
using python for anything, nor in using XMLRPC) and hack it up to
collect the right DTMF signals, passing that data on to a proper SER
module.
I'm just wondering if the developer docs for SER are up to date enough
to even point my developers in that direction for information on the SER
portion of things.
N.
Hi All.
Has anyone implemented call park / pickup feature using
OpenSER and asterisk? Or maybe OpenSER and something else ?
Any help / suggestion is greatly appreciated.
Thanks.
--
Zahid
We just started experiencing a problem with call transfers. This use
to work but we cannot figure out what broke. We are investigating our
gateway software but I wanted to check with the SER community too. If we
receive a REFER method we simply t_relay(). Is this the correct handling ?
Thanks,Steve