Hi, Klaus!
Thanks for your reply. In that case, is there any software that can be
integrated with SER to function as SIP trunking?
Thanks.
Best regards,
Roa Yu
-----Original Message-----
From: Klaus Darilion [mailto:klaus.mailinglists@pernau.at]
Sent: Tuesday, July 10, 2007 2:34 PM
To: roayu
Cc: serusers(a)lists.iptel.org
Subject: Re: [Serusers] How to configure Trunk capacity
What do you mean by "trunk capacity"? The number of calls which may be
sent to a certain gateway concurrently? If yes - you can't configure
this in ser. ser is is transaction statefull, thus it does not count
calls at all. Usually you just send the call to the gateway, and if the
gateway is busy it will reponse with a certain response code. Then you
configure ser to activate a failure to another gateway.
regards
klaus
roayu wrote:
> Hi, there!
>
>
>
> Can anyone tell me where can I configure the Trunk capacity for SER?
>
>
>
> Thank you.
>
>
>
>
>
> Best regards,
>
> Roa Yu
>
>
>
>
> ------------------------------------------------------------------------
>
> _______________________________________________
> Serusers mailing list
> Serusers(a)lists.iptel.org
> http://lists.iptel.org/mailman/listinfo/serusers
Hi,
openser 1.1.1 is now available in binary format for several embedded patforms:
- Linksys NSLU
- Synology DS-101(g+)
- Iomega NAS 100d
- Freecom FSG-3
- Qnap TurboStation
...
and all routers supported by the oleg or dd-wrt distributions.
Check out http://www.nslu2-linux.org
Regards,
Ovidiu Sas
Hi all,
im a new user of openser. how can i use mediaproxy found at
www.ag-projects.com to destribute load on my 2 asterisk servers. I have
configured a simple openser server which routes every request to asterisk.
now i want to install another asterisk server and openser will be used to
destribute calls between the 2. openser is running fine, i need to learn how
mediaproxy works along with openser. i have installed the mediaproxy but the
following error shows up when starting openser:
0(0) ERROR:mediaproxy:mod_init: Bad config - nat ping enabled, but not nat
bflag set in usrloc module
0(0) init_mod(): Error while initializing module mediaproxy
ERROR: error while initializing modules
0(0) INFO:mi_fifo:mi_destroy: process hasn't been created -> nothing to
kill
here are the modules and modules parameters:
loadmodule "mysql.so"
loadmodule "sl.so"
loadmodule "tm.so"
loadmodule "rr.so"
loadmodule "maxfwd.so"
loadmodule "usrloc.so"
loadmodule "registrar.so"
loadmodule "textops.so"
loadmodule "mi_fifo.so"
loadmodule "domain.so"
loadmodule "mediaproxy.so"
loadmodule "xlog.so"
modparam("mi_fifo", "fifo_name", "/tmp/openser_fifo")
modparam("rr", "enable_full_lr", 1)
modparam("domain", "db_url", "mysql://openser:openser@192.168.0.7/openser")
modparam("mediaproxy", "mediaproxy_socket", "/var/run/proxydispatcher.sock")
modparam("mediaproxy", "natping_interval", 60)
I have no idea what above statements are doing excpet they are bothering me.
i use the following link for help
http://voip-info.org/wiki/view/OpenSER+And+Mediaproxy
--
Best Regards
Rizwan Hisham
Software Engineer
AXVOICE Inc.
www.axvoice.com
HI
I've noticed strange thing about my ser(0.9.6) day by day memory usage is
getting increas and even after stopping my ser its not releasing the memory.
thanks
Arun
Hey everyone,
I've been using the radius authentication just fine but I have a general
question...
Is it possible to configure it so that openser will first look if the user
is found on
the local users/registrar database and if not found it will then use the
radius mechanism?
So, is it possible to integrate both radius and local user lookup or it's
one or the either?
Thanks,
Lir.
Hi all,
I'm fairly new to SER (just heard about it this afternoon), but I've
already run up against a problem that's vexing me.
We have a Polycom phone sitting behind a Linksys WRT54G router/firewall
with DD-WRT firmware. This version of DD-WRT is the "voip" edition,
meaning it has SER and rtpproxy installed to help ease NAT issues with
SIP. No configuration of SER is necessary, we enter the WRT54G's IP
address into the phone's outbound proxy field and it just works.
The only drawback is that when using this method, the caller ID on an
incoming call from the PSTN contains a SIP URI (in the form of
sip:5551212@207.179.x.x) instead of a simple telephone number. Our
end-users are pretty voip illiterate and thus haven't the slightest
clue how VoIP works. They are only going to get confused when a SIP URI
shows up on their caller ID instead of the actual PSTN phone number of
the person who called them. How can this be remedied?
I can't tell what version of ser is on this device because the -h and -V
flags return nothing. (Probably to make it slightly smaller for the
embedded platform.) The 'strings' utility wasn't helpful either.
Attached is the ser.cfg that comes with DD-WRT. Any help is greatly
appreciated. Let me know if I need to provide more information.
Thanks!
--
Charles Ulrich
Ideal Solution, LLC -- http://www.idealso.com
Hi all.
I'm using Openser 1.1.0 and I'm trying to create a failure route using LCR. All the calls must be routed to the same IP, but when the OpenSER execute the next_gw(), I receive the error "503 Service not available, no gateways found". When I change the IP column gw.ip_addr, it works fine.
I think that is not possible to route the messages through the same IP. But I need it! All of my calls must to pass through this IP.
openser ----> proxy B ----> the main GW (isn't answering)
Using the failure route:
openser ----> proxy B ----> the secundary GW (is answering)
This 'proxy B' is important and I can't remove it at all. So, how can I use the next_gw() or another function to route the call throught it? There are a parameter that I can set to help? I wouldn't like to use a static route wrote in the script file. And the Openser's version 1.2? I didn't try it yet. Is it possible using this version?
Any comments are welcome.
Thanks a lot.
Bruno Machado
____________________________________________________________________________________
Novo Yahoo! Cadê? - Experimente uma nova busca.
http://yahoo.com.br/oqueeuganhocomisso
Hi,
I was wondering if there is an option to disable the sending of CANCEL
towards the branches that have not yet responded when OpenSER performs
parallel forking and one endpoint has answered.
The request/question that I have is sort of outlined in RFC 3841 as follows:
cancel-directive: This type of directive indicates whether the caller
would like each proxy server to send a CANCEL request downstream
("cancel") in response to a 200 OK from the downstream server
(which is the normal mode of operation, making it redundant), or
whether this function should be left to the caller ("no-cancel").
If a proxy receives a request with this parameter set to "no-
cancel", it SHOULD NOT CANCEL any outstanding branches upon
receipt of a 2xx. However, it would still send CANCEL on any
outstanding branches upon receipt of a 6xx.
But in this case, I was wondering if there was something that was configurable.
thanks,
Tim
This is kind of odd, and should really probably be directed toward the
SEMS list, but I thought I'd pose it here first to see if anyone had
seen it.
A particular user keeps calling our SEMS server, and each and every time
he does, it crashes. It ONLY happens with that one user, and only with
his Cortelco ATA (an identical model to another we have being used on
our network with no problems).
We get this in the log:
Jul 9 20:26:32 proxy Sems[17552]: Error: (AmThread.cpp)(start)(83):
pthread create failed with code 11
Jul 9 20:26:35 proxy Sems[17552]: Error: (AmThread.cpp)(stop)(101):
pthread_detach failed with code ESRCH: thread could not be found.
And then poof, the SEMS server stops sending audio anymore and has to be
killed and restarted (it still runs and accepts connections). Any ideas?
Nothing much comes up on a google search for this error.
N.
