sr-users March 2008

sr-users@lists.kamailio.org

169 participants
237 discussions

by Bai Shi

Hi TA, Please check ur config file line 163 as mentioned in the debug log: CRITICAL:core:yyerror: parse error in config file, line 163, column 1-9: Invalid arguments Mar 11 22:36:20 [3449] If you have any problem with it, you can try to post ur config file in the mailing list, so other may be able to help you. Rgds, BS

16 years, 8 months

[OpenSER-Users] Preserve the original number with alias_db_lookup

by Morten Isaksen

Hi! I have some challenges with alias_db_lookup and hope someone here can help. I have a PBX that has registered 111@xxx with my OpenSER. I want to attach 222@xxx and 333@xxx to that registration and alias_db_lookup does that fine. If a call comes to 111 the sip header looks like this INVITE 111@xxx .... To: 111 <111@xxx> ... And everything works fine. But if a call comes to 222 the sip header looks like this: INVITE 111@xxx .... To: 222 <222@xxx> ... But now the PBX thinks that the call is for 111 and not 222. On Asterisk I can do something like this to solve the problem: exten => _X.,1,goto(from-siptrunk,${CUT(CUT(SIP_HEADER(To),@,1),:,2)},1) [from-siptrunk] exten => 111,1,dial(SIP/1010) exten => 222,1,dial(SIP/1020) But a lot of SIP enabled PBX's cannot do that sort of thing. One solution is the force the PBX to register with OpenSER for every number, but I would prefer not to do that. Another solution is to manually populate the alias tables but this is not very elegant. -- Morten Isaksen http://www.misak.dk/blog/

16 years, 8 months

Re: [OpenSER-Users] OpenSER + OpenXcap for pres-rules: no NOTIFY

by Mircea Amarascu

16 years, 8 months

[OpenSER-Users] Error in pua_usrloc: PUBLISH with empty body (bug 1821002)

by Zappasodi Daniele

Hello, what about the bug 1821002 on pua_usrloc: PUBLISH with no body? I read that is closed, but in the release 1.3.1 it is still present. Mar 13 14:15:12 localhost ./openser[16477]: ERROR:pua:send_publish: New PUBLISH and no body found- invalid request Mar 13 14:15:12 localhost ./openser[16477]: ERROR:pua_usrloc:ul_publish: while sending publish ********************************************************************** The information in this message is confidential and may be legally privileged. It is intended solely for the addressee. Access to this message by anyone else is unauthorized. If you are not the intended recipient, any disclosure, copying, or distribution of the message, or any action or omission taken by you in reliance on it, is prohibited and may be unlawful. Please immediately contact the sender if you have received this message inerror. **********************************************************************

16 years, 8 months

[OpenSER-Users] Is it a bug? TM module is sending CANCEL request regardless what the script do with the From Header since 1.3.0

by Bai Shi

I'm not sure if it is a bug. Currently our set up need to do masquerading on the From header for all invite requests. It used to work okie when we process for the CANCEL request in the routing logic. But after upgrading to openser 1.3.0, the TM module is sending CANCEL out using local cached From info rather than the info processed by uac_replace_from. May I know is this by design or it is a bug? Rgds, BS

16 years, 8 months

[Serusers] serweb fifo error

by Adeyeye O. Michael

How can I fix this error? WARNING: no fork mode stateless - initializing 0(0) Maxfwd module- initializing 0(0) INFO: udp_init: SO_RCVBUF is initially 110592 0(0) INFO: udp_init: SO_RCVBUF is finally 221184 2(0) INFO: fifo process starting: 6710 2(6710) SER: open_uac_fifo: fifo server up at /tmp/ser_fifo... 2(6710) ERROR: open_reply_pipe: open error (/tmp/webfifo_1171263842): No such file or directory 2(6710) ERROR: fifo_reply: no reply pipe /tmp/webfifo_1171263842 2(6710) ERROR: open_reply_pipe: open error (/tmp/webfifo_1374470966): No such file or directory 2(6710) ERROR: fifo_reply: no reply pipe /tmp/webfifo_1374470966 2(6710) ERROR: open_reply_pipe: open error (/tmp/webfifo_1359801488): No such file or directory 2(6710) ERROR: fifo_reply: no reply pipe /tmp/webfifo_1359801488 2(6710) ERROR: open_reply_pipe: open error (/tmp/webfifo_90028122): No such file or directory 2(6710) ERROR: fifo_reply: no reply pipe /tmp/webfifo_90028122 2(6710) ERROR: open_reply_pipe: open error (/tmp/webfifo_1698796794): No such file or directory 2(6710) ERROR: fifo_reply: no reply pipe /tmp/webfifo_1698796794 ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------ Below is an excerpt of my ser.cfg ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------ # $Id: hello-world.cfg 46 2006-01-25 04:21:30Z /CN=Paul Hazlett/emailAddress=paul(a)onsip.org $ debug=3 fork=no log_stderror=yes listen=192.168.0.2 port=5060 children=4 dns=no rev_dns=no fifo="/tmp/ser_fifo" fifo_mode = 0666 fifo_db_url="mysql://ser:heslo@localhost/ser" --------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Yours, Mike.

16 years, 8 months

[OpenSER-Users] UDP messages size

by Ariadne Ramos

Hello We're having an issue with the INVITE'S size. The INVITE messages are trunked to 1480 Bytes when they exceed that size. Capturing with ethereal, the package appears like "Fragmented IP protocol" (proto=UDP 0x11, off=0) because is incomplete. Exists a package maximum size?, Can I change it?... If so, Can you tell me how to do this? Could be changing max_len keyword? Ariadne L. Ramos

16 years, 8 months

[OpenSER-Users] when are AVPs in radius extra evaluated?

by jh＠tutpro.com

if i put in radius_extra "Some-Known-Attribute=$avp(s:bar)" and in onreply_route if (is_method("INVITE") && t_check_status("200")) { xlog("L_INFO", "Setting <s:bar> to <test>\n"); $avp(s:bar) = "test"; }; i do not get Some-Known-Attribute = "test" to accounting Start request although i do get Mar 12 07:20:32 rautu /usr/sbin/openser[7440]: Setting <s:bar> to <test> in syslog. i didn't find from acc/README information on when the AVPs in radius_extra are evaluated. accounting Start is sent out AFTER final response (200 ok) had been received, because it contains SIP-Response-Code = 200 why doesn't setting $avp(s:bar) in onreply_route cause Some-Known-Attribute to be included in accounting start record? -- juha

16 years, 8 months

[OpenSER-Users] New Soap-Simple-Proxy release 1.0.3

by Adrian Georgescu

Hello, There is a new Soap-Simple-Proxy release available. soap-simple-proxy (1.0.3) unstable; urgency=low * Allow items in SOAP policy object to be nillable * Added version replace string to WSDL file The software can be downloaded from: http://openxcap.org Kind regards, Adrian Georgescu

16 years, 8 months

[OpenSER-Users] Increase MAX_BRANCHES value?

by Marcello Lupo

Hi to all, due to a failover routing policy (serial forking) i need to increase the MAX_BRANCHES value to something like 35. Our gateways have limitation of 30 Channels ---> 1 IP . I have 32 of them available. Can this change have any heavy and dangerous effect on openser ?? Just to know if i will need to increase memory aveilable or something like this. I already use : /*used only if PKG_MALLOC is defined*/ #define PKG_MEM_POOL_SIZE 4*1024*1024 due to my eavy use of AVP. Let me know if i need to increase it more than this. Thanks to all, Bye, Marcello

16 years, 8 months

← Newer
1
...
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
...
24
Older →

Jump to page:

2024

2023

2022

2021

2020

2019

2018

2017

2016

2015

2014

2013

2012

2011

2010

2009

2008

2007

2006

2005

2004

2003

2002

sr-users March 2008