sr-users March 2008

sr-users@lists.kamailio.org

169 participants
237 discussions

[OpenSER-Users] PUA/PUA_MI: More than one Publish sent

by Schumann Sebastian

Dear all I am using OpenSER 1.3.1 branch release R3936. I face some bad behaviour using pua and pua_mi modules. I publish presence states via the management interface. Sometimes, it happens that multiple PUBLISH message are sent by one request. Unfortunately, there is no "system" or oder when this occurs. It just happens after some publications. In case of an expiration (Expires=0, E-Tag .) it is not that bad, I receive the log message: ERROR:presence:update_presentity: No E_Tag match. In case of publication (Expires=-1, E-Tag .) it is very bad: After publication, he receives also two similar messages, and threats both PUBLISH messages as two different ones. Thus, creates two different presentity entries with different E-Tags. If the state is expired now via MI (Expires: -1, E-Tag .) only one of the E-Tags is removed. The second stays in the presentity table and the user still appears online. Any ideas what can be the reason and how to solve it? Best regards Sebastian

16 years, 7 months

[OpenSER-Users] forwarding responses to early in TM

by Taisto Qvist

Hi folks, When I am doing forking I am getting a puzzling result concerning forwarding of responses, and I'm wondering how script needs tweaking. When recieving a 6xx on one branch, the TM-module automatically generates CANCEL to cancel the remaining branches(I wouldnt mind if this was configurable), but the puzzling thing is that it forwards the 603 _before_ it has terminated the remaining client transactions. (It sends cancel but it doesnt wait for final responses of the invites its cancelling, just forwards 6xx directly.) A similar scenario happends when I let Timer C pop. My TM-module will send a final response on the server-side at the same time as it starts to cancel the client side. But since one of the client txns just might result in a 2xx(INV) I cant forward the final response until ALL client txns are done, if I am going to follow the rfc properly. I thought the TM module would keep track of all client txns for "me", but it seems it isnt, so is this something I should "manually" handle in my script? Regards Taisto Qvist

16 years, 7 months

[Serusers] Automatic end of call

by inge

Hi all, In find some informations about an automatic end of call system. The aim is to cut the call after 2 hours. So it's not specificly link to a pre-paid system, but for all my ser user, I want to end the call after 2 hours. Is there a existing solution to do that ? Or maybe some idea to deal with this project ? Thank you !

16 years, 7 months

[OpenSER-Users] survey: Who is using serweb?

by Klaus Darilion

Which version do you use? Does it work at all with current version of openser (1.3)? PS: this is to find out if serweb supported can be removed from openser regards klaus

16 years, 7 months

[OpenSER-Users] sdp_mangle_ip()

by Travis Hegner

Hello All, I have briefly looked through the bug list but couldn't find anything related to my problem. I thought I would check here first to see if perhaps I have a configuration issue. I'm currently using the latest 1.3 version downloaded with svn. When attempting to call "sdp_mangle_ip()" I end up with a malformed sip packet. Upon inspection, I realized that the packet is correct except for the "Content-Length:" header, which seems to have the new (correct) content-length of the new packet written twice into the data stream. Here is what a snippet of the packet looks like: Content-Length: 156\r\n156\r\n Obviously, a correct packet should look like: Content-Length: 156\r\n Has anyone experienced this error before? Is there some parameter I should be setting for the mangler module, or another function I should call before this one? Should I roll up my sleeves and see if I can patch it myself? Any info is greatly appreciated... Travis

16 years, 7 months

[OpenSER-Users] CPL and Postgres problems.

by Ola Karlsson

Hi Users! Have a problem with CPL scripts and postgres. I've tried to make the simplest possible script for debugging which resulted in the following in the 'cpl_xml' column. '<cpl>\012 <incoming>\012 <reject status="reject" reason="I reject anonymous calls"/>\012 </incoming>\012</cpl>\012\012' Loading it with openserctl that gets translated to this in the cpl_bin field. '\001\001\000\000\000\006\002\001\000\000\000\006\026\000\002\000\000\000\002[\000\001\000\031I reject anonymous calls\000\000' The reason I figure that postgres could have something to do with this is that I've got this working before(before being quite a while ago though. ) with MySQL. Turning on debugging gives this information. Mar 31 18:13:18 fuj /sbin/openser[601]: cpl-c B4script Mar 31 18:13:18 fuj /sbin/openser[601]: DBG:cpl-c:get_dest_user: trying to get user from new_uri Mar 31 18:13:18 fuj /sbin/openser[601]: DBG:cpl-c:get_dest_user: trying to get user from R_uri Mar 31 18:13:18 fuj /sbin/openser[601]: DBG:cpl-c:get_user_script: fetching script for user <olak> Mar 31 18:13:18 fuj /sbin/openser[601]: DBG:cpl-c:get_user_script: we got the script len=0 Mar 31 18:13:18 fuj /sbin/openser[601]: cpl-c After Script OpenSER says that the length of the script is 0 whatever script I load?. I changed that in the CPL-C module so we get the right length of the compiled script but then it falls over on the sanity check for NODE_CPL = 001 , and if you skip that check it starts complaining about unknown nodes ( in my case 92 ) ... So my question is if anyone uses postgres and CPL, if so can you give me some pointers? Would be good to know if this happens to be a bug or an untested area in that case I have no problem fixing the problem just don't want to burn alot of time on something already fixed or me doing something stupid with configuration. Regards /Ola Karlsson

16 years, 7 months

[OpenSER-Users] Openser with RTPProxy in a different scenario

by morton.olson

Hi all! I have a problem with Openser an RTPProxy. I am using nathelper module to establish a statefull connection with RTPProxy in between the both clients. I player around with it now for a while but I cant get it to work. All the examples in the internet a for clients behind NAT, etc... Maybe one of you might help me. I am using Openser 1.3.0 with RTPProxy 20040107 on Debian Linux "Etch". My scenario looks like this: UA(public ip) ----- Firewall (public IP; 192.168.0.1/24) ---- Openser+RTPProxy (192.168.0.5/24) ----- UA (192.168.0.23/24) The Firewall forward Port 5060 to the Openser which is listening on 5060 as well. Also Ports from 60000-61000 are forwarded to the Openser aswell. (RTPProxy was compile with these Ports) I have no access to the firewall and it does not manipulate SIP Messages. Is there a chance to get this to work? If so, I willl post my configuration file to see what I did wrong. Thanks a lot. Greetz Martin -- View this message in context: http://www.nabble.com/Openser-with-RTPProxy-in-a-different-scenario-tp16349… Sent from the OpenSER Users Mailing List mailing list archive at Nabble.com.

16 years, 7 months

[OpenSER-Users] 1.3.x package?? forLinux??

by Rey Mulero

Hello, I am new to OpenSER. I wanted to know if there was a package already compiled to support a P4 Intel machine. I was looking in the website but it really does not spell it out. I see file names openser-1.3.0-tls_linux_i386.tar.gz and openser-1.3.0-notls_linux_i386.tar.gz I am wondering what the difference is? What does tls or notls stand for? Your help is appreciated. Thank you Rey ____________________________________________________________________________________ Looking for last minute shopping deals? Find them fast with Yahoo! Search. http://tools.search.yahoo.com/newsearch/category.php?category=shopping

16 years, 7 months

[Serusers] rtpproxy address filling

by Andres

Hi, I have a question regarding the way rtpproxy handles 'address filling'. After a session has been created, the rtpproxy pre-fills the caller and callee's addresses and we see that in the rtpproxy output like: pre-filling caller's address with 192.116.246.234:41000 pre-filling callee's address with 192.116.246.234:20000 Then when it sees the actual packets coming in from a different source port, it updates the address and we see it in the log like: callee's address filled in: 192.116.246.234:1024 (RTP) The audio then flows fine both ways. My question is, what would happen it the actual packets came in from a different IP while the rtpproxy was waiting between the state of 'pre-filling' and 'address filled' states? Will the rtpproxy accept such a change that includes a new IP? Will it ignore packets from a different IP and continue the session normally? Or will it abort the session completely? Thanks, Andres http://www.telesip.net

16 years, 7 months

[OpenSER-Users] Problem activating auth and auth_db modules using openser 1.3.1

by Pascal Maugeri

Hi My 1.3.1 server does not start when I activate the modules auth and auth_db modules with the following configuration: loadmodule "auth.so" loadmodule "auth_db.so" [...] modparam("auth_db", "calculate_ha1", yes) modparam("auth_db", "user_column", "username") modparam("auth_db", "password_column", "password") modparam("auth_db", "domain_column", "domain") modparam("auth_db", "db_url", "mysql://openser:openserrw@192.168.1.4 /openser") modparam("auth_db", "load_credentials", "") There is no error in the log file but no other module is loaded whenever I enable auth and auth_db. Is there anything else I should enable to configure these two modules ? When I disable the loading of these two modules everything works fine. Regards, Pascal

16 years, 7 months

Jump to page:

2024

2023

2022

2021

2020

2019

2018

2017

2016

2015

2014

2013

2012

2011

2010

2009

2008

2007

2006

2005

2004

2003

2002

sr-users March 2008