sr-users March 2008

sr-users@lists.kamailio.org

169 participants
238 discussions

[OpenSER-Users] "noisy_ctimer" parameter in TM module
by Bogdan-Andrei Iancu 07 Mar '08

07 Mar '08

Hi, I want to get some feedback from the users regarding one of the TM parameters: "noisy_ctimer" . This parameter, is disabled, would try to let a call to ring for ever (openser will never give internal timeout). But, the parameter is automatically turned on (disregarding the script setting) in certain conditions: - parallel forking is done - a failure route is set - a failure callback is set by other module (like acc, cpl, dialog, etc) - a fr_invite timeout was … [View More]

9 20

[OpenSER-Users] serializing parallel forking
by jh＠tutpro.com 07 Mar '08

07 Mar '08

a few days ago there was a question on if lcr module is able to serialize parallel forking of branches with the same q value. i replied that there is no such capability in lcr module. now that i have thought about the matter a bit, in my opinion the best solution is to write a separate serialize function that rewrites the q values rather than trying adding yet another feature to already too complex lcr module. -- juha

2 2

[Serusers] Cool New Website!
by Goran Donev 06 Mar '08

06 Mar '08

Cool New Website. www.dialaway4free.com I think they are using a combination of Ser and Asterisk to achieve this service. Everyone should look into it. Thanks

3 2

[OpenSER-Users] OpenSER & NAT Helper
by Ross Beer 06 Mar '08

06 Mar '08

Hi, I am looking to implement an OpenSER NAT helper. I need OpenSER to correct mistakes in SIP packets and pass them on to Asterisk. I do not want OpenSER to handle registrations. Does anyone have any good examples for this type of setup? Kind regards, Ross _________________________________________________________________ Who's friends with who and co-starred in what? http://www.searchgamesbox.com/celebrityseparation.shtml

3 3

Re: [OpenSER-Users] OpenSER & NAT Help
by Peter Lemenkov 06 Mar '08

06 Mar '08

2008/3/6, Ross Beer <ross_beer(a)hotmail.com>: > Just general sip message problems, i.e. if a user is behind a firewall. Take a look at the following commands: force_rport fix_nated_contact fix_nated_sdp force_rtp_proxy Don't forget also to mark (with setflag()) registered users behind NAT and fix replies in onreply_route. > I think I need to use the NAT Helper module, however I can not seam to > pass registrations on to Asterisk. BTW don't forget to CC to users(a)openser.… [View More]

2 2

[Serusers] How to force IPtel.org SIP proxy not to include RTP proxy in Media path (achive peer-to-peer flow)
by girish kumar 06 Mar '08

06 Mar '08

Hi, I have 2 SIP based softphones (Xlite) registered on IPtel.org SIP service and testing the calls among them. These 2 softphones are behind different NAT and IPtel.org SIP proxy is replacing the SDP connection details in Call setup message (Invite and 200 OK) with RTPproxy IP/ports. Hence, RTPproxy is relaying the Voice media stream among them during the call. Although, both the softphones are behind different NAT address but these are not Symmetric NATs and hence RTP can directly flow … [View More]

3 4

[OpenSER-Users] OpenSER Randomly crashes.
by Sergio Gutierrez 06 Mar '08

06 Mar '08

Hello everybody. I have written to list these days, I am still having the same symptom, so I apologize for writting again. My OpenSER 1.3 installation running on Solaris Sparc is facing random and unexpected crashes, in appearance related to timer process. The last core presents the following backtrace #0 0xfe977a04 in get_expired_dlgs (time=4233810208) at dlg_timer.c:194 #1 0xfe977540 in dlg_timer_routine (ticks=7980, attr=0x0) at dlg_timer.c:210 #2 0x000a839c in timer_ticker (… [View More]

3 5

Re: [Serusers] SER + Fax service
by roayu 06 Mar '08

06 Mar '08

Hi Ali, When I do the testing, it seems that in the SER, there are something configured for requiring an authentification for the re-invite. Does SER send an authentificatin required back? Thanks. Best regards, RoaYu _____ From: Ali Zaidi [mailto:aligzaidi@gmail.com] Sent: Thursday, March 06, 2008 2:06 PM To: roayu Cc: serusers(a)lists.iptel.org Subject: Re: [Serusers] SER + Fax service Roa, It will work, as long as you use g711, make sure both end use same … [View More]

2 1

[Serusers] separately calls limitation
by tatarskiy＠severen.net 06 Mar '08

06 Mar '08

Нello ! I need of help (it is important for me) Canaanite ! Я использую SER Sip EXpress Router 0.9.6), пока в режиме теста. Он у меня работает как: - Location Server (+ Auth); - Proxy Server; Используется MySQL. Вопрос (question) ! Как мне сделать так, чтобы SER ограничивал колличество вызовов по номеру и/или по имени !? Пример: number(E164) 8121111111 - 5 lines number(E164) 8122222222 - 3 lines number(E164) 8123333333 - 1 line username "… [View More]

4 7

[OpenSER-Users] OpenSER + OpenXcap for pres-rules: no NOTIFY
by greg.co 06 Mar '08

06 Mar '08

Hi all, I am stuck with a presence authorization problem using openSer 1.3 and openXcap 0.9.9. I have read some similar posts in the mailing list but I couldn't find a solution, so I'll try to explain my scenario to see if it is my mistake or it is a bug. I explain the scenario: User test1 and test2 successfully register and sunscribe to presence.winfo. Both receive a NOTIFY informing that their winfo subscriptions are active. Test2 adds test1 as a contact so he subscribes to test1's … [View More]presence, then test1 receives a winfo NOTIFY requesting authorization for test2. Test1 does it sending a XCAP document to openXcap the document is correctly stored in openSer xcap table. User test2 receives a presence NOTIFY in pending state, even if user test1 publishes other presence state, the subscription state of test2 remains pending forever. If we look the data base in that moment: +------+--------------------------+------------------+----------------+---------+----------------+----------------+----------+----------------------+---------------+--------------------------------------+------------+-------------+-------------------+--------------+------------+--------+--------+---------+------------------------+------------------------+ | id | presentity_uri | watcher_username | watcher_domain | to_user | to_domain | event | event_id | to_tag | from_tag | callid | local_cseq | remote_cseq | contact | record_route | expires | status | reason | version | socket_info | local_contact | +------+--------------------------+------------------+----------------+---------+----------------+----------------+----------+----------------------+---------------+--------------------------------------+------------+-------------+-------------------+--------------+------------+--------+--------+---------+------------------------+------------------------+ | 1177 | sip:test2@Mydomain | test2 | Mydomain | test2 | Mydomain | presence.winfo | NULL | 10.2670.1209516359.7 | cvvUDerBXK1Qc | b4c2997e-64ac-122b-2780-39a48cb53b8d | 1 | 96206117 | sip:192.168.1.222 | NULL | 1209519959 | 1 | | 1 | udp:192.168.1.210:5060 | sip:192.168.1.210:5060 | +------+--------------------------+------------------+----------------+---------+----------------+----------------+----------+----------------------+---------------+--------------------------------------+------------+-------------+-------------------+--------------+------------+--------+--------+---------+------------------------+------------------------+ WATCHERS +----+--------------------------+------------------+----------------+----------+--------+--------+---------------+ | id | presentity_uri | watcher_username | watcher_domain | event | status | reason | inserted_time | +----+--------------------------+------------------+----------------+----------+--------+--------+---------------+ | 80 | sip:test1@Mydomain | test2 | Mydomain | presence | 2 | NULL | 1209516407 | +----+--------------------------+------------------+----------------+----------+--------+--------+---------------+ XCAP +-----+----------+----------------+-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------+----------+----------------------------------+--------+-------------+------+ | id | username | domain | doc | doc_type | etag | source | doc_uri | port | +-----+----------+----------------+-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------+----------+----------------------------------+--------+-------------+------+ | 190 | test2 | Mydomain | <?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?> <resource-lists xmlns="urn:ietf:params:xml:ns:resource-lists"><list name="Users"><entry uri="sip:test1@Mydomain"><display-name>test1</display-name></entry></list></resource-lists> | 4 | 8ea82eeb40e00fcf626dbe17d1961ad5 | 0 | buddies.xml | 0 | | 191 | test2 | Mydomain | <?xml version='1.0' encoding='UTF-8'?><ruleset xmlns='urn:ietf:params:xml:ns:common-policy' xmlns:pr='urn:ietf:params:xml:ns:pres-rules'><rule id='whitelist'><conditions><identity></identity></conditions><actions><pr:sub-handling>allow</pr:sub-handling></actions></rule><rule id='politeblocklist'><conditions><identity></identity></conditions><actions><pr:sub-handling>polite-block</pr:sub-handling></actions></rule><rule id='blacklist'><conditions><identity></identity></conditions><actions><pr:sub-handling>block</pr:sub-handling></actions></rule></ruleset> | 2 | 46353b3b55d23d24fd4d9c87a5ff7ba4 | 0 | index.xml | 0 | | 192 | test1 | Mydomain | <?xml version='1.0' encoding='UTF-8'?><resource-lists xmlns='urn:ietf:params:xml:ns:resource-lists'><list name='Users'></list></resource-lists> | 4 | f854971d48ed1a8913e20b3409a6b723 | 0 | buddies.xml | 0 | | 193 | test1 | Mydomain | <?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?> <ruleset xmlns="urn:ietf:params:xml:ns:common-policy" xmlns:pr="urn:ietf:params:xml:ns:pres-rules"><rule id="whitelist"><conditions><identity><one id="sip:test2@Mydomain"/></identity></conditions><actions><pr:sub-handling>allow</pr:sub-handling></actions></rule><rule id="politeblocklist"><conditions/><actions><pr:sub-handling>polite-block</pr:sub-handling></actions></rule><rule id="blacklist"><conditions/><actions><pr:sub-handling>block</pr:sub-handling></actions></rule></ruleset> | 2 | 8afbf7f0464de1273303bbea554404ff | 0 | index.xml | 0 | +-----+----------+----------------+-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------+----------+----------------------------------+--------+-------------+------+ We can see in 'WATCHERS' table that test2 has a pending presence subscription but as can be seen in 'XCAP' table user test1 has authorized test2 to see his presence. My thinking is that once test1 changes his authorization rule, the presence subscription should chage to active, am I right? My conclusion is that something between the presence rules authorization and the subscriptions is not working fine, or I did something wrong and I haven't noticed it. Please, I really need help with that as I have been stuck here for weeks. Thanks in advance!! Gregorio -- View this message in context: http://www.nabble.com/OpenSER-%2B-OpenXcap-for-pres-rules%3A-no-NOTIFY-tp15… Sent from the OpenSER Users Mailing List mailing list archive at Nabble.com. [View Less]

3 2

← Newer
1
...
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
Older →

Jump to page:

2025

2024

2023

2022

2021

2020

2019

2018

2017

2016

2015

2014

2013

2012

2011

2010

2009

2008

2007

2006

2005

2004

2003

2002

sr-users March 2008