El Viernes, 13 de Junio de 2008 12:34, escribió:
> Yes, I have audio. Attahced is the ngrep
It's not possible that you have audio, because on media proxy stats you see a
0 packet relayed, so that why you have a timeout.
What it's your test scenario ?
EyeBeam 1 <-> NAT router <->
^
v
OpenSer + MediaProxy
^
v
EyeBeam 2 <-> NAT router <->
This one?, are both EyeBeam behind the same NAT?
Sip and nat problems are very hard to solve headache
P.D: Just reply only to the list, no to me, that will be easier to follow the
thread.
--
Saludos.
Raúl Alexis Betancor Santana
Dimensión Virtual S.L.
Hello,
I have just started investigating OpenSER, and am looking for some
guidance. I have several Asterisk PBX's registered to OpenSER and
each can make outgoing calls to my sip provider without any issue. I
have not figured out how to route incoming calls based on DID to the
appropriate PBX.
Should I be looking at aliases, or carrierroute, or something else
entirely. I would appreciate any help you can give for this newbie
question.
Thank You
Stagg Shelton
www.sheltonjohns.com
Hi All
I am using the ACC module and I only have this parameter set
modparam("acc", "failed_transaction_flag", 1)
and I get this error
Jun 13 09:09:27 [23981] INFO:acc:mod_init: initializing...
Jun 13 09:09:27 [23981] DBG:core:find_cmd_export_t: found <load_tm>(0)
in module tm [/usr/local/lib/openser/modules/]
Jun 13 09:09:27 [23981] ERROR:acc:init_acc_rad: acc: can't get code for
the Sip-Response-Code attribute
Jun 13 09:09:28 [23981] ERROR:acc:mod_init: failed to init radius
Jun 13 09:09:28 [23981] ERROR:core:init_mod: failed to initialize module
acc
Jun 13 09:09:28 [23981] ERROR:core:main: error while initializing
modules
Jun 13 09:09:28 [23981] DBG:jabber:destroy: unloading module ...
On Thursday 12 June 2008, kionez wrote:
> > is used. Some logs (from trunk):
>
> [cut]
>
> > Jun 11 14:37:52 ca ../openser[23446]: INFO:dialog:get_dlg_timeout:
>
> > invalid AVP value, use default timeout
>
> I try to set my debug level to 9, but i can't reproduce this behaviour,
> i never seen "invalid AVP value".. what version are you using?
Hi Kionez,
i just commited this additional log messages yesterday to the trunk version,
rev 4373. I thought this could be useful in debugging this problem. :-)
Henning
Hi,
I am trying to disable the safety checks in the perl module. I use
modparam("perl","unsafemodfnc", 1), this parmeter is not documented, I find
it in source code. But I have message indicating that this parameter does
not exist.
Regards,
Yazid
Hello Everyone,
I have instlled openser-1.1-notls and radiusclient-ng.I have 4 GB
memory in my pc.
In the openser, generally Shared memory size is 32MB and private meory
is 1 MB.
For the call firing i am using sipp testing tool and my call rete is
100(-r is 100 ).
I got out of pkg memory error in the Radius module during call firing.
When i incraese the private memory in the openser,the no of calls will
become higher,but i increase the shared memory,there is not any effect
in the call.The no of calls remain same.
But everytime i got the "no more free memory" and "out of memory"
Error in the auth_radius module and everytime i haveto restart the
openser.
Plz tell me what should i have to change in the auth_radius module,so
that Out Of Memory problem is solve.
Regards,
Dilip
Hi,
I have 3 trunk gateways, two are cisco 5300 with 4E1, the other is 16E1 audio codes.
Could I use dispatch module to load balance those gateways based weight I set.
I successfully setup dispatcher module to load 50%, 50% for two gateway.
regards,
Danile
With the following in cfg --
exec_avp("uname -s","$avp(s:test)");
xlog("L_NOTICE","test result is <$avp(s:test)>\n");
1.3.1 yields "test result is <linux>"
1.3.2 yields "test result is <>"
I also noticed that 1.3.2 handles an uninitialized $var differently than
1.3.1. with the following in cfg --
if !$var(test) == "foo" {xlog("L_NOTICE", "test not equal to foo\n");};
1.3.1 yields "test not equal to foo"
1.3.2 yields "CRITICAL:core:comp_scriptvar: cannot get left var value"
"WARNING:core:do_action: error in expression"
Is this behaviour intentional
Thanks RD