Hello,
We are trying to benchmark openser1.3.1 - installed in a 2cpu-dual core(Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU 5110 @ 1.60GHz),hp c-class blade, with 2GBRAM.
OS:RHEL4U5.
We have configured openser with mysql database as registerer.
We are using IMS Bench(IMS SIPp),to generate SIPp traffic - combination of registration/re registration/de-registration/call flow(uac)/scenarios.
It looks like, the when the calls per second is increased 150/200 CPS, calls started failing.
Is this is normal acceptable performance figures for openser for the above configuration?
we record route all the SIP requests (except for REGISTER,MESSAGE ) and we do have mysql database for authenticating registration requests.
Attached, the openser.cfg
Also attached the Error logs from SIPP.
Anyone have some clues/hints?
Thanks for your help,
Regards,
VJ
Hi,
I have a problem using SER, i have a client behind CheckPoint FW, when
the client tries to register, SER receives the SIP REGISTER message and
SER reply to the source IP and source PORT, but because the client is
behind CheckPoint FW if the source port is not 5060 the FW blocks it, so
i need SER to reply not to the source port of the client but to port 5060.
i'll attach ngrep on the SER server:
client sends REGISTER to the SER server at 192.168.0.161:5060.
U 2008/06/12 21:36:01.654005 10.6.67.10:31472 -> 192.168.0.161:5060
REGISTER sip:213.8.57.218 SIP/2.0..Via: SIP/2.0/UDP
10.6.67.10:31472;branch=z9hG4bK-d87543-de5ac063e
9293020-1--d87543-;rport..Max-Forwards: 70..Contact:
<sip:200@10.6.67.10:31472;rinstance=82602d40693
d48a6>;expires=0..To: "test1"<sip:200@213.8.57.218>..From:
"test1"<sip:200@213.8.57.218>;tag=5c6b793
a..Call-ID: NmI4MTUyMWY5MTEwYTI3ZjY2ZTE2ZTMzNzk5ZGFmZWI...CSeq: 5
REGISTER..Allow: INVITE, ACK, CANC
EL, OPTIONS, BYE, REFER, NOTIFY, MESSAGE, SUBSCRIBE, INFO..User-Agent:
X-Lite release 1011s stamp 41
150..Authorization: Digest
username="200",realm="localhost",nonce="48516daafb5a3406078621
<http://www.snapanumber.com/>9a55fdb4908
9064386",uri="sip:213.8.57.218",response="b8501a2d0c096b934320be23363dee32",algorithm=MD5..Content-L
ength: 0....
#
SER server response to the source IP and source port
U 2008/06/12 21:36:01.654992 192.168.0.161:5060 -> 10.6.67.10:31472
SIP/2.0 200 OK..Via: SIP/2.0/UDP
10.6.67.10:31472;branch=z9hG4bK-d87543-de5ac063e9293020-1--d87543-;
rport=31472..To:
"test1"<sip:200@213.8.57.218>;tag=40c9dbfbe83fe4e1cec231af33432933.321f..From:
"tes
t1"<sip:200@213.8.57.218>;tag=5c6b793a..Call-ID:
NmI4MTUyMWY5MTEwYTI3ZjY2ZTE2ZTMzNzk5ZGFmZWI...CSeq:
5 REGISTER..Server: OpenSER (1.3.2-notls (i386/linux))..Content-Length:
0....
but i need to response to port 5060 and not the source port , i'm not
using rport, i also talk to CheckPoint service and they claim that they
are working according RFC 3261, and that my SER server should reply to
port 5060
any suggestions?
Thanks In Advance,
David Lubarski,
Hi,
I have setup ser to run with mysql. At beginning, it worked fine that the mysql/ser/location table got the correct update. However, after 3 days the table won't get updated. When I enable the mysql log I cannot see any updating or inserting into that table. User registration is still working fine but just not get updated into the location table. Also, server_monitoring tables are working fine.
Anybody run into the same problem? I am using ser-0.9.6.
Another question is that how do I know the usrloc.so module is still loaded?
Thanks,
Ling
I've been trying to work through openser successfully authenticating a
user on an INVITE. I've tried using www_challenge and
proxy_challenge. Each time, OpenSER will respond to the INVITE with
the appropriate Authentication header depending on what I'm using, and
asterisk will resend the INVITE with the Digest credentials. I've
determined that OpenSER returns a -5 when processing either
www_authorize or proxy_authorize and the INVITE has the Digest
credentials.
The authentication seems to work just fine when asterisk Registers to
openser. Are there any known issues with asterisk authenticating
during an INVITE? I would prefer to do it this way in case the PBX
loses its primary network connectivity and is failing to a secondary
route, or some other reason that would cause the IP address to change.
I am currently using OpenSER 1.3.1
Thank You
Stagg Shelton
hi all,
I am using openser 1.3
Sometimes If we call a user , it is giving 403 even if the user is
online and sometimes there is even problem with login
I found this error in the log many times
ERROR:mysql:db_mysql_submit_query: driver error: Commands out of sync;
you can't run this command now
Jun 30 06:10:24 [6188] ERROR:mysql:db_mysql_insert: error while
submitting query
Jun 30 06:10:24 [6188] ERROR:acc:acc_db_request: failed to insert into
database
Why i am getting this error.
thanks in advance,
Chaitanya
Hi,
I'm using openser 1.3, and I can't register my sip phones even if i've configured them. I've precised (as the SIP Server)the IP address of the computer where openser is installed, but nothing. I don't know if I've to add something in the config file of openser.
Further more I've the following warning when I launch openser:
openser: WARNING:core:fix_socket_list: could not rev. resolve 192.168.10.2
where 192.168.10.2 is the IP address of the computer where openser is installed, so thje address of my the SIP Server.
V.
_________________________________________________________________
Faites vous de nouveaux amis grâce à l'annuaire des profils Messenger !
http://home.services.spaces.live.com/search/?page=searchresults&ss=true&For…
Hi,
I've to install openser on a computer which is not mine, and I 'd like
to now if there is a way to remove it,
because I know that a simple "make uninstall" doesn't work.
thanks
Dear all
I try to remove a Via from a header. Unfortunately, the via from
INVITE sip:user@domain SIP/2.0
Via: SIP/2.0/UDP
10.0.0.1:20592;branch=z9hG4bK-d8754z-1955bd20f1745139-1---d8754z-;rport
Max-Forwards: 70
is changed after remove_hf("Via") to
INVITE sip:user@domain SIP/2.0
Via: SIP/2.0/UDP
10.0.0.2;branch=z9hG4bK-d8754z-1955bd20f1745139-1---d8754z-
;rport=20592Max-Forwards: 69
10.0.0.2 is a proxy i sent the message through and 10.0.0.1 is the
originating endpoint. So rport is not removed and no CRLF is added after
the rport parameter is added. Is this behaviour as it should be? I
wanted to remove the whole line. Or can I restrict adding the rport
parameter?
Furthermore, the option _not_ to set an via for a message sent through
my proxy 10.0.0.2 would be also very helpful for me. It is not possible
though, right? At least I didn't find any further information....
Any ideas?
Best regards
Sebastian
--
Sebastian Schumann, Dipl.-Inf. (FH)
Junior Designer Applications
Slovak Telekom, a. s.
T-Com, Operations Unit
Production and Service Division
Innovations and Enterprise Solution Subunit
Architecture and Design Department
Address: Karadzicova 10, 825 13 Bratislava, Slovakia
Office: Room 449, Jarabinkova 1, 821 09 Bratislava, Slovakia
Tel. +421 2 588 13332
Mobile +421 910 643010
E-mail sebastian.schumann(a)t-com.sk
Web www.t-com.sk <http://www.t-com.sk/>