sr-users August 2008

sr-users@lists.kamailio.org

144 participants
201 discussions

[Kamailio-Users] Question regarding outbound configuration.

by Siddhardha Garige

Hello all, I am working on an outbound proxy configuration and here is my setup. UA ------> Outbound ------->firewall(NAT) -------->Proxy. Both UA and outbound are behind the NAT. I did some RFC study on outbound configuration for routing calls both inbound and outbound through outbound proxy. According to RFC 3327 Extension Header field for Registering Non-Adjacent contacts, PATH variable has to be introduced into REGISTRATIONS. Here are few questions and any help with answers is greatly appreciated. 1. Default openser.cfg will route request to destination if (URI != myself) and appends p-hint:outbound. What exactly is the significance of P-hint:outbound? http://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-ietf-sip-outbound-15 says ob parameter has to be added to PATH filed or Contact Field to retain path. P-hint got to do any thing regarding this? 2. I enabled path.so module. But openser does not at PATH filed to outgoing requests. Can someone direct me to a config example? Thanks in advance, Sid

16 years, 2 months

[Kamailio-Users] event notifications and user aliases

by Alexander 'Leo' Bergolth

Hi! I'd like to implement P2P presence and extension monitoring for my SIP network. Our users register by using a numeric extension (e.g. sip:226050@wu-wien.ac.at), but most of the time, they are contacted using a user alias that looks like their email-address (e.g. sip:bergolth@wu-wien.ac.at). So the addresses stored in their buddy-lists won't be the "real"-SIP-URI of the users. Will there be a problem if I translate those aliases on subscription, so that a user may also subscribe for the presence of a user alias? If I rewrite SUBSCRIBE requests to use the "real" SIP-URI on subscription, the following NOTIFY messages will contain the wrong URI in the From-header and in the pidf body. But maybe this won't be a problem, since the watcher can assign it to the correct username because the NOTIFY belongs to the same dialog as the SUBSCRIBE? Will the user agents be able to correctly assign those notifications to their contacts? Any experiences with this? Cheers, --leo -- e-mail ::: Leo.Bergolth (at) wu-wien.ac.at fax ::: +43-1-31336-906050 location ::: Computer Center | Vienna University of Economics | Austria

16 years, 2 months

[Serusers] Call forwarding: Diversion header

by caio

Hi, Does anyone know how to implement draft-levy diversion header on for example bilnd call forwarding? I have this scenario: xlite ------ SER-0.9.7 ------ PSTN-GW ------ PSTN Case: Call from xlite-579950 to 579917 (both registered at SER), 579917 has fwdblind enabled to pstn-501866. where SER modifies INVITE when detect that user 579917 has fwdblind feature enabled. The call must be forwarded to the pstn number. but the PSTN-GW returns to SER a "302: Moved Temporarily" with a confused diversion header.. Here a few sip messages: = SER -----> PSTN-GW U +0.000824 200.2.127.187:5060 -> 200.2.127.153:5060 INVITE sip:501866@200.2.127.153:5060 SIP/2.0. Record-Route: <sip:200.2.127.187;ftag=2d0ad32d;lr=on>. Via: SIP/2.0/UDP 200.2.127.187;branch=z9hG4bK396d.c60b3015.0. Via: SIP/2.0/UDP 192.168.132.22:35318;branch=z9hG4bK-d8754z-c16e4506aa72e334-1---d8754z-;rport=35318. Max-Forwards: 16. Contact: <sip:579950@192.168.132.22:35318>. To: "579917"<sip:579917@wsa.lab>. From: "579950"<sip:579950@wsa.lab>;tag=2d0ad32d. Call-ID: MzI2MjQ4ZTMyMGQzOWRlYzNkMWFkZTVmNGY3MzIzNDE.. CSeq: 2 INVITE. Allow: INVITE, ACK, CANCEL, OPTIONS, BYE, REFER, NOTIFY, MESSAGE, SUBSCRIBE, INFO. Content-Type: application/sdp. User-Agent: X-Lite release 1100l stamp 47546. Content-Length: 385. = PSTN-GW ----> SER U +0.051198 200.2.127.153:5060 -> 200.2.127.187:5060 SIP/2.0 302 Moved Temporarily. Via: SIP/2.0/UDP 200.2.127.187;branch=z9hG4bK396d.c60b3015.0. Via: SIP/2.0/UDP 192.168.132.22:35318;branch=z9hG4bK-d8754z-c16e4506aa72e334-1---d8754z-;rport=35318. To: "579917" <sip:579917@wsa.lab>;tag=121881197764d164f2-9431-47bb-be95-8af6684ebc04. From: "579950" <sip:579950@wsa.lab>;tag=2d0ad32d. CSeq: 2 INVITE. Call-ID: MzI2MjQ4ZTMyMGQzOWRlYzNkMWFkZTVmNGY3MzIzNDE.. Contact: <sip:579917@200.2.127.187:5060>. Diversion: <sip:501866@200.2.127.153:5060>;reason=unknown. Server: Epygi Quadro SIP User Agent/v4.1.23 (SOHOGW). Content-Length: 0. What is wrong? How the flow must be to satisfies diversion of levy draft? Any comments are welcome...i'm confused if SER must modify INVITE or "To" header or if a diversion must be set (add_diversion of diversion.so module) when SER send the first invite to PSTN-GW... Regards, -- caio

16 years, 2 months

[Kamailio-Users] Why dialplan and drouting modules were removed from openser-1.3.3?

by Peter Lemenkov

Hello All! Subj. -- With best regards!

16 years, 2 months

[Kamailio-Users] How to test RLS and trace messages?

by mahesh.peddi＠info-spectrum.com

Hi, I am working on RLS Application server and integrated with SER IMS, i made changes in the configuration file with the help of Readme file. Its working fine. But how to confirm and test RLS is working. And how to trace the messages? Regards, Mahesh Peddi Infospectrum India Pvt. Ltd. Cell: +91 9765775176 IP-Phone Ext. - 764

16 years, 2 months

[Kamailio-Users] Using pua_bla for BLF

by catalina oancea

Hello I am trying to make some phones work with BLF using Kamailio and I found an older messge ( http://lists.kamailio.net/pipermail/users/2007-October/013700.html) saying that I could do this using BLA. I have a Thomson ST2030 as the message says, but it doesn't work with presence and pua_bla. I get the error: ERROR:presence:handle_subscribe: Missing or unsupported event header field value ERROR:presence:handle_subscribe: event= dialog I undestood from that message that the event is supposed to be 'dialog', so what's the problem then? Thanks a lot Catalina

16 years, 2 months

[Kamailio-Users] Fw: regarding 3rd party register request.

by srinivasa.reddy＠info-spectrum.com

Hi all, This is Srinivas, i am working on OpenIMScore and Openser( as Application Server) . from few days i stuck at third party regaester request(that is interface between SCSCF and Presence ). You said that, the registration-event package is not enabled at the IMS Core side that mean in the scscf.cfg is it? If it is could you please provide where and what i have to change and i am attaching the scscf.cfg . And regarding 2nd point Also the Openser presence server, as much I know, will be for the "presence" package. Not for the registration-event "reg" package That means openser does not support reg package or ? WITH BEST REGARDS, SRINIVAS. -------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Hi, >From your mail below, I could infer only that, the registration-event package is not enabled at he IMS Core side. Make sure, that you have done the necessary settings for that. Also the Openser presence server, as much I know, will be for the "presence" package. Not for the registration-event "reg" package. Thanks, Noble Antony T. On Wed, Aug 27, 2008 at 3:54 PM, <mahesh.peddi(a)info-spectrum.com> wrote: Hi, I have one issue regarding openser could you kindly reply if you know . I am implimented openser1.2.0 and 1.3.2 as Presence server. And i am connected it with IMS core .And for testing i was used UCTIMS client during the register with uctims client actually i need to get 4 messages. 1.Third party register request is going to presence server from scscf. 2.Notify messages coming from presence server to uctclient. 3.subscribe message must take route through the presence server. 4.publish message must take route through the presence server. But at present i am getting 3 and 4 messges corectly i am not getting 1 and 2. So please tell me what are the modifications or changes i need to do in any xml files or cfg files. Regards, Mahesh Peddi Infospectrum India Pvt. Ltd. Cell: +91 9765775176 IP-Phone Ext. - 764 Regards, Srinivasa Reddy Kadiri Software Developer Infospectrum India Pvt. Ltd. Cell: +91 9921710062 Email: srinivasa.reddy(a)info-spectrum.com IP-Phone Ext. - 759

16 years, 2 months

Re: [Kamailio-Users] How to test and trace the RLS messages?

by Daniel-Constantin Mierla

Hello, please keep cc-ing to mailing lists, there are people that can answer you quicker and better. As a matter of fact, although I have studied a bit IMS docs, that happened long time ago and don't know how those messages should be routed in IMS and where the mistake can be in your routing logic. Cheers, Daniel On 08/27/08 13:24, mahesh.peddi(a)info-spectrum.com wrote: > Hi, > > I have one issue regarding openser could you kindly reply if you know . > > I am implimented openser1.2.0 and 1.3.2 as Presence server. And i am > connected it with IMS core .And for testing i was used UCTIMS client > during the register with uctims client > actually i need to get 4 messages. > 1.Third party register request is going to presence server from scscf. > 2.Notify messages coming from presence server to uctclient. > 3.subscribe message must take route through the presence server. > 4.publish message must take route through the presence server. > But at present i am getting 3 and 4 messges corectly i am not getting > 1 and 2. > So please tell me what are the modifications or changes i need to do > in any > xml files or cfg files. > > Regards, > Mahesh Peddi > Infospectrum India Pvt. Ltd. > Cell: +91 9765775176 > IP-Phone Ext. - 764 > > ----- Original Message ----- From: "Daniel-Constantin Mierla" > <miconda(a)gmail.com> > To: <mahesh.peddi(a)info-spectrum.com> > Cc: "userlist" <users(a)lists.kamailio.org> > Sent: Wednesday, August 20, 2008 10:44 PM > Subject: Re: [Kamailio-Users] How to test and trace the RLS messages? > > >> Hello, >> >> On 08/20/08 09:44, mahesh.peddi(a)info-spectrum.com wrote: >>> Hi All, >>> I am working on openser 1.3.2 version with RLS as >>> "integrated_xcap_server". Its running without erros. >>> But my query is how to test, And please send me call flow between >>> IMS components and RLS server. >> perhaps you can find some hints in IMS specifications. You need in >> first place a sip phone with rls support, afaik, there are not that >> many. >> >> Cheers, >> Daniel >> >>> Regards, >>> Mahesh Peddi >>> Infospectrum India Pvt. Ltd. >>> Cell: +91 9765775176 >>> IP-Phone Ext. - 764 >>> ------------------------------------------------------------------------ >>> >>> >>> _______________________________________________ >>> Users mailing list >>> Users(a)lists.kamailio.org >>> http://lists.kamailio.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/users >>> >> >> -- >> Daniel-Constantin Mierla >> http://www.asipto.com >> >> > -- Daniel-Constantin Mierla http://www.asipto.com

16 years, 2 months

[Kamailio-Users] openser v1.3.3. released

by Daniel-Constantin Mierla

Hi everybody, OPENSER v1.3.3 is out - it is a minor release of the branch 1.3, that includes the fixes since v1.3.2 committed so far- configuration file and database compatibility is preserved. OPENSER 1.3.3 is based on the latest version of branch 1.3, therefore those running 1.3.2 or earlier version in this branch are advised to upgrade. Source tarballs are available at: http://www.kamailio.org/pub/openser/1.3.3/src/ Detailed changelog: http://www.kamailio.org/pub/openser/1.3.3/ChangeLog Download via SVN: svn co https://openser.svn.sourceforge.net/svnroot/openser/branches/1.3 openser Tag for this release can be browsed at: http://openser.svn.sourceforge.net/viewvc/openser/tags/1.3.3/ Cheers, Daniel -- Daniel-Constantin Mierla http://www.asipto.com

16 years, 2 months

[Serusers] Radius Auth : 407 proxy auth and Get-User-Attr - crash

by Samuel Muller

Hello all, i'm using SER 2.0 with Radius accounting and authentication - based on x64 ubuntu machine. i've a problem with the Radius auth, and only for the proxy auth mechanism (method INVITE) : depending of the topology of the UAC, it crashes the SER or a there's a 407 proxy auh required. when the UAC is behind a simple NAT, i get the 407, with "preauth: credentials with realm 'sip.720.fr' not found" - i tried many configs, no way it doesn't work. but the REGISTER is ok - it's the same Radius request ? when the UAC is behind NAT but in a VPN (our customers), proxy auth is successfull even if the preauth don't find the credentials with the realm (why? it does not differ from another uac without VPN ???), but when SER requests the Radius to get the user attributes, it crashes ! in each case, there's no pbm with REGISTER requests. Radius user sample : 1010(a)sip.720.fr User-Password = "pwd" User-Name = "1010", SER-UID = "1010(a)sip.720.fr", SER-DID = "1", SER-Digest-Username = "1010", SER-Digest-Realm = "sip.720.fr", SER-Uri-User = "1010(a)sip.720.fr" Does anyone have any idea, or met already this problem ? What I have to verify ? Thanks for help, Samuel MULLER

16 years, 2 months

Jump to page:

2024

2023

2022

2021

2020

2019

2018

2017

2016

2015

2014

2013

2012

2011

2010

2009

2008

2007

2006

2005

2004

2003

2002

sr-users August 2008