sr-users August 2008

sr-users@lists.kamailio.org

144 participants
201 discussions

by Ali Jawad

Hi All Has anyone tried portabilling with Openser ? If so can you please provide a sample of your config file ? THanks With Regards Ali Jawad System Administrator Splendor Telecom (www.splendor.net) Beirut, Lebanon Phone: +961 1 373725 Fax: + 961 1 375554

16 years, 3 months

[Serusers] SER - Waiting Transaction

by Arun Kumar

Hi, I'm running SER 0.96 in my production for a long but there is strange problem , when I do serctl moni and looks for transaction it shows waiting transaction in () almost 400+ can some one tell me why there are so many transaction in waiting while I see processing only 10-20 transaction. Thanks arun

16 years, 3 months

[Kamailio-Users] pick_branch failed (lowest==-1) for code 302--HELP!!

by Krunal Patel

Hi, Here is the scenario: -----------------------Invite--------------> <----------100 Trying---------------------- <----------302 Moved temporarily-------- -----------------------ACK--------------> Now I would like to route call to contact returned in 302 responce. But I am getting problem: Aug 17 18:10:41 [16667] DBG:core:parse_headers: flags=80 Aug 17 18:10:41 [16667] DBG:tm:t_should_relay_response: T_code=100, new_code=302 Aug 17 18:10:41 [16667] DBG:tm:t_pick_branch: picked branch -1, code 999 Aug 17 18:10:41 [16667] CRITICAL:tm:t_should_relay_response: pick_branch failed (lowest==-1) for code 302 Aug 17 18:10:41 [16667] DBG:tm:relay_reply: branch=0, save=0, relay=-1 Please help me to fix this. Thanking you Krunal Patel

16 years, 3 months

[Serusers] Gentilini, Paul is out of the office.

by PGentilini＠intellicare.com

I will be out of the office starting 08/15/2008 and will not return until 08/18/2008. Please contact the CSC at 888-899-4227 if you need immediate assistance.

16 years, 3 months

[Serusers] Acc module extra patches

by caio

Hello, Is there patches for acc extra params for ser version 0.9.7? I've found this link http://www.voice-system.ro/docs/acc-headers/ but do not know if is it for v0.9.x Thanks... -- caio

16 years, 3 months

[Serusers] on Ubuntu Installation & Config

by Ameed Jamous

Hi all, Am trying to install & Configure SER on ubuntu 8.04. After i intsalled the SER file i can see this in my terminal: Listening on udp: 127.0.0.1 [127.0.0.1]:5060 udp: 192.168.1.104 [192.168.1.104]:5060 tcp: 127.0.0.1 [127.0.0.1]:5060 tcp: 192.168.1.104 [192.168.1.104]:5060 Aliases: tcp: Ubuntu-AM.local:5060 tcp: localhost:5060 udp: Ubuntu-AM.local:5060 udp: localhost:5060 ok now how can i add a user to register to SER ? How can i monitor the logs and the prosses happening? i tried using serctl moni Error opening ser's FIFO /tmp/ser_fifo Make sure you have line fifo=/tmp/ser_fifo in your config Even though i have line fifo=/tmp/ser_fifo in my config. Can anyone help with this? Regards, Ameed -- Best Regards, Ameed Jamous Project Manager/Carriers Relations. Direct Line: +962 777 835819. www.joodtelecomgroup.com

16 years, 3 months

[Serusers] call forward no answer

by caio

Hi all, I can't make call forwarding on no answer works on my ser-0.9.7 installation. Here you can see a snippet of log, where the call falls on failure_route and then to route_1 where t_relay is called. Log at: http://rafb.net/p/xwTmn195.html The call is from sip:579951 to sip:579915(who has enabled the feature fwdnoanswer to sip:579916. But I do not know why the INVITE after the append_branch() is still to R-URI: sip:579915@.... After the relay then the call terminates with: Aug 15 16:13:25 [/usr/sbin/ser] SIP Reply (status):_ Aug 15 16:13:25 [/usr/sbin/ser] version: <SIP/2.0>_ Aug 15 16:13:25 [/usr/sbin/ser] status: <487>_ Aug 15 16:13:25 [/usr/sbin/ser] reason: <Request Terminated>_ I follow the example of ser guide.., but do not work.. I would appreciate any comment.. Regards, -- caiogf

16 years, 3 months

[Kamailio-Users] Question

by Edgar Guadamuz

Hello, I'm a newbie and I don't know the difference between opensips (where openser.org redirects) and kamailio, If someone can give me a light on this it would be great, thanks,

16 years, 3 months

[Kamailio-Users] project foundation

by Daniel-Constantin Mierla

Hello everybody, I think it is the time to move forward with project management structure. During last days there were talks and discussions on the lists, the solution to make the project independent and long term trustable is to create a foundation. We made a draft of purpose and organization structure and we want to get your comments. http://www.kamailio.net/dokuwiki/doku.php/admin:foundation-draft For the statute we are looking at similar cases of foundations around open source projects. Considering the developer population and contributors, I find as good and reliable place to register the foundation to be Germany. There is still long way to go and a lot to discuss: * membership fees * how one can become a full member (associate member can be anyone that is friend of the project and pays the membership fee) * how a member loses the board or full member rights * how the board is supervised o when and how the reports of the board are presented o when and how the general assembly meeting takes place o how the reports are approved by full members * how to change the statute over time ... and perhaps more, but if we start and put some effort we can have it ready in reasonable time, avoiding trust and reliability issues in long term. Let's have debates here and contribute the results to the wiki. Cheers, Daniel -- Daniel-Constantin Mierla http://www.asipto.com

16 years, 3 months

[Kamailio-Users] project status and my decisions

by Daniel-Constantin Mierla

Hello all, following the last events everybody perhaps wonders what is going on. I was surprised by the way everything happens and I am not sure yet how this resulted. Probably a bit of time is needed to clarify relations between developers themselves and community as well. There is not any official statement that a developer quited the support for this project, but I guess the trust between some is at lowest level possible. It is clear that we cannot say anything about a board right now that manages the project. From board discussions summary you may see that discussions were conducted to create a legal entity around the project, a non profit foundation. This might be hard to achieve in this status, but as a personal decision, I am not going in any other management group unless there is a legal framework backing up. Human relations prove to be pretty unpredictable and not conforming with initial statements. What is sure now - openser 1.3.x and 1.4.x will be maintained properly and I am volunteering to take care but hope others will join. It is really a good achievement of a sip server. Decision about future development will be based on community and developers feedback for this project. I am not going to promise anything by myself as I admit one person (to be more specific: myself) cannot take care of the entire code base -- I am just realistic, not willing to sell dreams. I think the people that still believe in the project can come with suggestions and alternatives of future development. What I can tell for sure, I am not going to join a fork of the original openser project. If something happened to make developers not working together, solution to solve nicely could have been found, in the worst, maybe just by splitting teams, but keeping old domain together just to show the new alternatives. "Why not joining a fork in this manner?"> Because I was one of the founders of this one and involved in development and management at top level. If I failed to build something I started, I had all the tools in my hands, why just creating something similar saying the old is crap but this new one will be the best? What is the difference? Why I didn't do it first time? Would I be able to fool someone? Does leaving my ship in secrecy on back door will bring more trust on me? I doubt and perhaps you, too. I am certainly assuming share of the failure in managing this project. I was there, in management, period. There is no single person responsible for mis-management, but it comes just easy for some to blame the others. But I am really confident we built outstanding sip server, all of us contributed with code, documentation, testing to an application that routes million and millions of minutes per day. There were accuses of bad things about project, I will argument in a separate message, this will get too long. So, I am asking: - how do you see a proper management structure for the future - feedback about future involvement, suggestions and alternative for going on Cheers, Daniel -- Daniel-Constantin Mierla http://www.asipto.com

16 years, 3 months

← Newer
1
...
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
...
21
Older →

Jump to page:

2024

2023

2022

2021

2020

2019

2018

2017

2016

2015

2014

2013

2012

2011

2010

2009

2008

2007

2006

2005

2004

2003

2002

sr-users August 2008