Dear All,
I'm trying to send FAX using T38...Everything looks fine when using
endpoints with real IP...As soon as I use endpoint behind NAT everything
looks not working
Any clue?
Regards
On Tue, Mar 17, 2009 at 1:35 PM, Henning Westerholt <
henning.westerholt(a)1und1.de> wrote:
>
> Hi Sara,
>
> this is strange. If you increase the debug level to 4, you should see some
> message about the module loading. Is the mi_fifo module correctly loaded?
> Perhaps you configured another path in another modparam statement, so that
> the first one is overwritten, and subsequently not found from the ctl
> command?
>
> Cheers,
>
> Henning
>
Hello,
The log i get after increasing the debug level to 4 is in the attached.
Hope it's fine to attach files in this mailing list :-)
--
S.
hello,
I am running Kamailio 1.5 and siremis. I want to deploy some IP based
ACL services. Basically checking the source IP on an INVITE to see if
it's in a list of trusted IP addresses. I see in the sirmeis
configuration under "ACL Services" there is a tab for "trusted
addresses", but I can't figure out what module those are in support
of, or what exported functions I would call to check against the list
of trusted IPs.
I have had a high fever for 2 days, so perhaps my brain is fried and I
am missing something totally obvious :)
Thanks!
Geoff
Top quality:
**> 164,251 De'ntists
**> 158,743 Addresses
**> 163,412 Telephone Numbers
**> 77,326 Office Fax Numbers
**> 45,520 Email Addys
from now until Friday the new lowered price is $299
Send an email to MiguelChampagne(a)mylistsource.com to inquire about this and other Database we have
to adjust your subscription status email to takeoff(a)mylistsource.com
Hi, let's me explain a simple escenario and the behaviour I want:
Kamailio
phone1 phone2-1 phone2-2 phone3
(201) (202) (202) (203)
1) 201 calls 202 so both phone2-1 and phone2-2 start ringing (180) in parallel.
2) phone2-1 replies a redirect "302" to user 203.
3) Kamailio cancels the branch with phone2-1 and replies 302 upstream
*inmediatelly*.
This is however not the most "compliant" behaviour, since Kamailio
should wait for phone2-1 to reply a final response and then choose
which one response to reply upstream. And that is of course the
default behaviour in Kamailio.
Is it possible however the behaviour I want? I find no way to get it.
Thanks.
--
Iñaki Baz Castillo
<ibc(a)aliax.net>
Hi, I receive INVITE like this:
INVITE sip:client_xxx2004@domain.org SIP/2.0
and I get from an $avp(CLIENT) the value "client_xxx".
I need to strip from $rU the lenght of $avp(CLIENT), this is:
# Original $rU => client_xxx2004
strip($avp(CLIENT));
# New $rU => 2004
Unfortunatelly "strip()" doesn't accept a PV as parameter, but a static integer.
Any suggestion on how to achieve my goal?
Thanks a lot.
--
Iñaki Baz Castillo
<ibc(a)aliax.net>
Hi, I don't want/need the "rpid" column in "subscriber" table but if I
delete it I get an error:
-------
Mar 18 14:49:47 [22377] ERROR:db_mysql:db_mysql_submit_query: driver
error on query: Unknown column 'rpid' in 'field list'
Mar 18 14:49:47 [22377] ERROR:core:db_do_query: error while submitting query
Mar 18 14:49:47 [22377] ERROR:auth_db:get_ha1: failed to query database
-------
After readin "auth" module documentation I've found a parameter:
------------
rpid_avp (string)
Full AVP specification for the AVP which stores the RPID value. It
used to transport the RPID value from authentication backend modules
(auth_db or auth_radius) or from script to the auth function
append_rpid_hf and is_rpid_user_e164.
If defined to NULL string, all RPID functions will fail at runtime.
------------
I expected that if I set:
modparam("auth", "rpid_avp", "NULL")
then "auth_db" module wouldn't require "rpid" column, but I must be
wrong since I get an error:
------
ERROR:auth:init_rpid_avp: malformed or non AVP NULL AVP definition
------
So, is there any way to avoid "rpid" column usage?
Thanks.
--
Iñaki Baz Castillo
<ibc(a)aliax.net>
Pickup with OpenSER >> Asterisk 1.4.17 works just fine.
Mark
At 12:26 p.m. 18/03/2009, you wrote:
>No, I don't need app_pickup... but thanks for the heads up.
>
>On Tue, Mar 17, 2009 at 8:21 PM, Iñaki Baz Castillo <ibc(a)aliax.net> wrote:
> > El Miércoles, 18 de Marzo de 2009, Geoffrey Mina escribió:
> >> I tend to not agree with some of what people are saying here. We have
> >> deployed a Kamailio/Asterisk platform with GREAT success. Although, I
> >> have the luxury of having many asterisk servers to achieve a common
> >> goal. I have found asterisk to be VERY stable,
> >
> >> I am running 1.4.23.
> >
> > Then I hope you don't need Asterisk pickup code (since it doesn't work in
> > 1.4.23 due to a regression).
> >
> > XD
> >
> >
> > --
> > Iñaki Baz Castillo
> >
> > _______________________________________________
> > Kamailio (OpenSER) - Users mailing list
> > Users(a)lists.kamailio.org
> > http://lists.kamailio.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/users
> > http://lists.openser-project.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/users
> >
>
>_______________________________________________
>Kamailio (OpenSER) - Users mailing list
>Users(a)lists.kamailio.org
>http://lists.kamailio.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/users
>http://lists.openser-project.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/users
Hi,
I have a question regarding the global hash_table_2 variable. It seems
to me that it is defined twice in different modules:
./modules/permissions/trusted.c:47:struct trusted_list **hash_table_2;
/* Pointer to hash table 2 */
./modules/domain/domain_mod.c:85:struct domain_list **hash_table_2 =
0; /* Pointer to hash table 2 */
Could you please explain why this variable is defined twice?