Hi all ..
When I send a register packet to my kamctl, then I using " kamctl ul show
"openser" " to see success or not with SIP server , it's response
ERROR: domain unknown: use usernames with domain or set default domain in
SIP_DOMAIN
Do I have defind SIP_DOMAIN in /usr/local/etc/kamailio/ kamctlrc ?
SIP_DOMAIN is mean IP that install kamctl ?
Any help would be greatly appreciated
Thanks & regards,
Andre
plz help
I attach my ser.cfg
when i enter ser -c the error is:
" 0(5976) parse error (150,18-19): unknown command, missing loadmodule?
ERROR: bad config file (1 errors)"
Best regards
Shazi
Hi,
I need to pass a variable from kamailio code base to the configuration script. Can I add a new parameter to the existing pre script callbacks?
Is there any other method to achieve the same?
Thanks
Love Cricket? Check out live scores, photos, video highlights and more. Click here http://cricket.yahoo.com
No, it's created when you start Kamailio... have you restarted after
making the changes?
PS: Again, please, reply to the mailing list...
--
Saúl -- "Nunca subestimes el ancho de banda de un camión lleno de disketes."
----------------------------------------------------------------
http://www.saghul.net/
I've recently tried to migrate my production environment to kamailio
1.5.1-notls from openser-1.3.4-notls. I have been working through
some issues, and the most recent issues have been that kamailio has
begun to segmentation fault and core dump. Has anyone else
experienced any similar issues, what other information could i provide
that can be helpful in diagnosing my troubles with 1.5.1. I have had
to fall back to 1.3.4 until i can get this sorted out.
Below is my backtrace of the core dump file.
Core was generated by `/sbin/kamailio -m 1024'.
Program terminated with signal 11, Segmentation fault.
[New process 5315]
#0 0x00007f57bb9954e0 in update_dialog_dbinfo (cell=0x7f577e6a17c0)
at dlg_db_handler.c:498
498 SET_STR_VALUE(values+8, cell->bind_addr[DLG_CALLEE_LEG]-
>sock_str);
Missing separate debuginfos, use: debuginfo-install bzip2-
libs-1.0.5-3.fc10.x86_64 compat-db45-4.5.20-5.fc10.x86_64 e2fsprogs-
libs-1.41.4-5.fc10.x86_64 elfutils-libelf-0.141-1.fc10.x86_64 file-
libs-4.26-5.fc10.x86_64 glibc-2.9-3.x86_64 keyutils-
libs-1.2-3.fc9.x86_64 krb5-libs-1.6.3-18.fc10.x86_64
libconfuse-2.6-1.fc9.x86_64 libgcc-4.3.2-7.x86_64
libselinux-2.0.78-1.fc10.x86_64 lm_sensors-3.0.2-1.fc10.x86_64
lua-5.1.4-1.fc10.x86_64 mysql-libs-5.0.77-1.fc10.x86_64 net-snmp-
libs-5.4.2.1-3.fc10.x86_64 nspr-devel-4.7.3-2.fc10.x86_64 nss-
devel-3.12.2.0-5.fc10.x86_64 openssl-0.9.8g-13.fc10.x86_64
pcre-7.8-1.fc10.x86_64 perl-libs-5.10.0-68.fc10.x86_64
popt-1.13-4.fc10.x86_64 radiusclient-ng-0.5.6-3.fc9.x86_64 rpm-
libs-4.6.0-2.fc10.x86_64 tcp_wrappers-libs-7.6-53.fc10.x86_64
zlib-1.2.3-18.fc9.x86_64
(gdb) bt
#0 0x00007f57bb9954e0 in update_dialog_dbinfo (cell=0x7f577e6a17c0)
at dlg_db_handler.c:498
#1 0x00007f57bb998b5e in dlg_onreply (t=0x7f577aaec3b8, type=<value
optimized out>, param=<value optimized out>) at dlg_handlers.c:318
#2 0x00007f57bf59d345 in run_trans_callbacks (type=128,
trans=0x7f577e6a3918, req=0x7f577e6afce8, rpl=0x775710, code=200) at
t_hooks.c:240
#3 0x00007f57bf5ba352 in relay_reply (t=0x7f577e6a3918, p_msg=<value
optimized out>, branch=0, msg_status=200, cancel_bitmap=0x7fffc7c0c098)
at t_reply.c:1229
#4 0x00007f57bf5badce in reply_received (p_msg=0x775710) at t_reply.c:
1485
#5 0x0000000000420382 in forward_reply (msg=0x775710) at forward.c:521
#6 0x00000000004529f9 in receive_msg (
buf=0x71f880 "SIP/2.0 200 OK\r\nVia: SIP/2.0/UDP
8.17.32.37;branch=z9hG4bKd89d.68915ca2.0\r\nVia: SIP/2.0/UDP
8.17.32.166
:5060;received=8.17.32.166;branch=z9hG4bK0615b7d2;rport=5060\r\nFrom:
\"CID Info\" <sip:5551212"..., len=889, rcv_info=0x7fffc7c0c190) at
receive.c:212
#7 0x0000000000487da6 in udp_rcv_loop () at udp_server.c:449
#8 0x00000000004274e4 in main_loop () at main.c:774
#9 main (argc=<value optimized out>, argv=0x7fffc7c0c368) at main.c:
1321
(gdb)
On Wed, Jun 17, 2009 at 8:45 AM, André Warnier<andrewarnier(a)gmail.com> wrote:
> Hi Saúl :
> I have set SIP_DOMAIN=142.11.20.10 in /usr/local/etc/kamailio/kamctlrc ,
> Then when I using kamctl ul show openser(a)142.11.20.10 , I got the error as
> follows :
>
> ERROR: Error opening Kamailio's FIFO /tmp/kamailio_fifo
> ERROR: Make sure you have the line 'modparam("mi_fifo", "fifo_name",
> "/tmp/kamailio_fifo")' in your config
> ERROR: and also have loaded the mi_fifo module.
>
> What's Wrong With This?
>
Just read the error, it's very descriptive :) You need to setup the
fifo so that kamctl can communicate with the kamailio process.
PS: Please, reply to the mailing list, no to me.
PPS: Don't crosspost!!
--
Saúl -- "Nunca subestimes el ancho de banda de un camión lleno de disketes."
----------------------------------------------------------------
http://www.saghul.net/
Hello,
When I using " kamctl ul show "openser" " , I got the error :
ERROR: Error opening Kamailio's FIFO /tmp/kamailio_fifo
ERROR: Make sure you have the line 'modparam("mi_fifo", "fifo_name",
"/tmp/kamailio_fifo")' in your config
ERROR: and also have loaded the mi_fifo module.
What's Happening!!
Thanks in advance,
Vinod
Hi all ..
When I send a register packet to my kamctl, then I using " kamctl ul show
"openser" " to see success or not with SIP server , it's response
ERROR: domain unknown: use usernames with domain or set default domain in
SIP_DOMAIN
Do I have defind SIP_DOMAIN in /usr/local/etc/kamailio/ kamctlrc ?
SIP_DOMAIN is mean IP that install kamctl ?
Any help would be greatly appreciated
Thanks & regards,
Andre
Hi all,
I have a problem when calling from UAC#1 (public IP address) to UAC#2 (private IP address), call is dropping after 30 sec. STUN and ICE are disabled in UAC#2. Other way is working OK (UAC#2 --INVITE--> UAC#1), RTPProxy is in the middle,...
Kamailio is aware that UAC#2 is behind NAT and adds received filed on REGISTER.
MySQL location table:
contact received
sip:bob@10.2.4.18:1025;rinstance=24c6e191484e570a sip:UAC#2_PUBLIC_IP_ADDRESS:55671
Why proxy is not aware that UAC#2 is behind NAT (for BYE and ACK) when call is initiated by UAC#1 and thus sends ACK/BYE to private IP address? Shouldn't Contact header be rewriten with NAT address/port and also a "c" filed in SDP with RTPProxy address? fix_nated_contact() sholud fix contact header for transaction-starting messages like ACK and BYE...
I'm using kamailio 1.5.1-tls and standard kamailio.cfg (to be sure that I'm not using my cfg which could be faulty)...
Thanks a lot
Dubravko
INVITE: *working OK*
#
U UAC#1_PUBLIC_IP_ADDRESS:24354 -> KAMAILIO_PUBLIC_IP_ADDRESS:5958
INVITE sip:bob@example.com SIP/2.0....
U UAC#1_PUBLIC_IP_ADDRESS:5958 -> UAC#2_PUBLIC_IP_ADDRESS:55671
INVITE sip:bob@10.2.4.18:1025;rinstance=24c6e191484e570a SIP/2.0..
ACK (and BYE): *not working*
#
U UAC#1_PUBLIC_IP_ADDRESS:24354 -> KAMAILIO_PUBLIC_IP_ADDRESS:5958
ACK sip:bob@10.2.4.18:1025;rinstance=24c6e191484e570a SIP/2.0....
#
U KAMAILIO_PUBLIC_IP_ADDRESS:5958 -> UAC#2_PRIVATE_IP_ADDRESS:1025
ACK sip:bib@10.2.4.18:1025;rinstance=24c6e191484e570a SIP/2.0....