sr-users October 2010

sr-users@lists.kamailio.org

77 participants
157 discussions

lua.h / lauxlib.h issue while making deb pkgs ! (for 3.1 master branch i.e)

by X- x -X

Hey Jony, while during "make deb" it complains of lua files output .................................. In file included from app_lua_api.c:37: app_lua_api.h:27:17: warning: lua.h: No such file or directory app_lua_api.h:28:21: warning: lauxlib.h: No such file or directory app_lua_api.h:29:20: warning: lualib.h: No such file or directory In file included from app_lua_api.c:37: app_lua_api.h:35: error: expected specifier-qualifier-list before ‘lua_State’ app_lua_api.h:58: error: expected ‘)’ before ‘*’ token --------------------------------- I have all the 3 versions devs of lua installed debbox:~/kamailio# apt-file search lualib.h liblua5.1-0-dev: /usr/include/lua5.1/lualib.h liblualib40-dev: /usr/include/lua40/lualib.h liblualib50-dev: /usr/include/lua50/lualib.h dpkg - L | grep -i liblua debbox:~/kamailio# dpkg -l |grep lua ii liblua40 4.0-13 Main interpreter library for the Lua 4.0 programming language ii liblua40-dev 4.0-13 Main interpreter library for lua40: static library and headers ii liblua5.1-0 5.1.3-1 Simple, extensible, embeddable programming language ii liblua5.1-0-dev 5.1.3-1 Simple, extensible, embeddable programming language ii liblua50 5.0.3-3 Main interpreter library for the Lua 5.0 programming language ii liblua50-dev 5.0.3-3 Main interpreter library for Lua 5.0: static library and heade ii liblualib40 4.0-13 Extension library for the Lua 4.0 programming language ii liblualib40-dev 4.0-13 Extension library for Lua 4.0: static and headers ii liblualib50 5.0.3-3 Extension library for the Lua 5.0 programming language ii liblualib50-dev 5.0.3-3 Extension library for Lua 5.0: static and headers ii lua50 5.0.3-3 Small embeddable language with simple procedural syntax I reckon the path is not correct in one of the header files. vi modules/app_lua/app_lua_api.h ..................... #include <lua.h> #include <lauxlib.h> #include <lualib.h> ........................ could you enlighten me ? Thanx.

14 years, 1 month

Re: [SR-Users] add fromuser to sip request

by JR Richardson

>> In Kamailio, how would I go about receiving a sip request, append a >> user "sipentry1" then forward it to Asterisk? I would be using some >> sort of trunk prefix to identify which sip request to append the user >> like: >> >> 552145551212@siprouter, strip 55, append user "sipentry1", dispatch >> t-relay to asterisk >> 562145551212@siprouter, strip 56, append user "sipentry2", dispatch >> t-relay to asterisk >> 572145551212@siprouter, strip 57, append user "sipentry3", dispatch >> t-relay to asterisk >> >> Any point in the right direction will be appriciated. Which module >> should I be looking into? > > In Asterisk, sip.conf peer matching is done by source host and port > unless the 'type' is set to 'dynamic'. > > That said, if your desire is to change the From header display name or > user part of the From URI, you should use the 'uac' module and look > into the 'uac_replace_from()' function. It's a little unorthodox by > RFC 2543 standards, but because it spoofs the From header statefully > and reverts the value on replies before passing back to the near > end--such that the initiating endpoint is none the wiser--it works. > > Otherwise, if your main desire is to customise entry points into > various dial plan contexts for otherwise similar calls, I suggest > routing on a different criterion. Custom headers have sort of become > a de facto means of out-of-band inter-machine associated signaling > additions in SIP where it is possible to add them. Why not use a > custom header? In Kamailio, add a header to the initial INVITE > request that is something like: > > append_hf("X-JR-Dialplan-Target: my_context"); > > Then, route all calls in Asterisk via one sip.conf peer and into one > "master" dial plan context, where you can then make further routing > decisions based on the value of the header - sip.conf: > > [my_proxy] > ... > host=xx.xx.xx.xx > insecure=port,invite > ... > context=master_dp_router > > And then in extensions.conf: > > [master_dp_router] > > exten => _.,1,Goto(${SIP_HEADER(X-JR-Dialplan-Target)},${EXTEN},1) > > ... > > [my_context] > > exten => 5551212,1,Answer > exten => 5551212,n,Playback(hello-world) > ... > Alex Balashov - Principal > Evariste Systems LLC Hi Alex. I use a general context in asterisk to route calls already and wanted to get away from pattern matches. I'm using asterisk realtime and want to decrease the load. I'll play around with the 'uac_replace_from()' and 'append_hf' to see what works best for me. I really appreciate your quick response, very insightful. Thanks. JR -- JR Richardson Engineering for the Masses

14 years, 1 month

add fromuser to sip request

by JR Richardson

Hi All, I am using Kamilio 3.0.2 as a load balancer in front of Asterisk servers, using Dispatcher/PDT and such, working fine. I would like to be able to bring sip calls into Asterisk at different entry points in the dialp plan, so I want to setup sip users; [sipentry1] contex=blah, [sipentry2] context=blahblah. In Kamailio, how would I go about receiving a sip request, append a user "sipentry1" then forward it to Asterisk? I would be using some sort of trunk prefix to identify which sip request to append the user like: 552145551212@siprouter, strip 55, append user "sipentry1", dispatch t-relay to asterisk 562145551212@siprouter, strip 56, append user "sipentry2", dispatch t-relay to asterisk 572145551212@siprouter, strip 57, append user "sipentry3", dispatch t-relay to asterisk Any point in the right direction will be appriciated. Which module should I be looking into? Thanks. JR -- JR Richardson Engineering for the Masses

14 years, 1 month

Tutorial: SIP SIMPLE Presence Made Simple with Kamailio 3.1

by Daniel-Constantin Mierla

Hello, I published a tutorial of how to implement a SIP SIMPLE Presence & XCAP server with latest Kamailio/SER version. You can find it at: http://bit.ly/btrJij Last build of SIP Communicator softphone was used to exemplify some use cases. xcap_server is a new module in upcoming v3.1.0, I have tested it with several SIP clients, but I have to say is not easy to find one that implements many presence & xcap extensions (filled already couple of bugs so far). So consider it a young component by now, however, with it inside our SIP server, deploying a SIP presence server becomes trivial. Hope is helpful, Daniel -- Daniel-Constantin Mierla http://www.asipto.com

14 years, 1 month

retrieve INVITE transaction in CANCEL

by Zappasodi Daniele

Hello, is it possible to retrieve the info related to the INVITE transaction while the CANCEL is processed? In particular, when the script is handling the CANCEL, how can I get the avp values written in the corresponding INVITE transaction? Thanks, Daniele ********************************************************************** The information in this message is confidential and may be legally privileged. It is intended solely for the addressee. Access to this message by anyone else is unauthorized. If you are not the intended recipient, any disclosure, copying, or distribution of the message, or any action or omission taken by you in reliance on it, is prohibited and may be unlawful. Please immediately contact the sender if you have received this message in error. **********************************************************************

14 years, 1 month

Re: [SR-Users] Error on radius accounting

by Asim Riaz

Hi List, Having an issue with my freeradius, I am getting below errors when kamailio sends radius records and freeradius try to store into database; Error: Ignoring request from unknown client 192.168.1.100:1814 Radius client and server are running on the same machine and I have necessary configuration in clinet.conf and server.conf for localhost and I can see radius is writing record for the calls but looks like radius client is trying to send record twice one from localhost and one from the interface ip? Error: Rejecting request 88 due to lack of any response from home server OpenSER:5061 Proxy: marking accounting server 192.168.1.100:1813 for realm DEFAULT dead Proxy: marking accounting server 78.137.190.133:1813 for realm DEFAULT dead Error: rlm_sql (sql): Couldn't insert SQL accounting START record - Duplicate entry 'fdeb080-b342ea59-13c4-50022-17bee27-76d4b161-17bee27-fc5b7f8-b34' for key 'sess_id' Error: rlm_sql_mysql: Cannot store result As the radius record being store in the database so looks like its trying to record the same data twice and because the this record already in the database its failing to record the data. I know this is more related to freeradius but I am just wondering if someone experienced the same problem and how it was resolved Thanks, Asim

14 years, 1 month

version 3.0.2.99 ?

by X- x -X

Hey Jon, I gather you are the man when it comes to packaging the goods. My query: Building packages for a distribution yields in the end packages with this 3.0.2.99 version. How come ? shoudn't it be 3.1.x (source pulled from git repo of kamailio 3.1) Anyway how are there any test packages out there to be tested before releasing on 6 th ? Thanks --

14 years, 1 month

"Create Certificates to be used with Kamailio" changes

by Juha Heinanen

now that 3.1 has async tls support, i decided (first time ever) to try to test tls. things went quite smoothly when i followed "Create Certificates to be used with Kamailio" document http://kamailio.org/dokuwiki/doku.php/tls:create-certificates#using_the_cer… during the process, i fixed a typo in the doc, added two comments to cfg part: enable_tls=1 tcp_async=no # do not include in 3.1 listen=udp:0.0.0.0:5060 listen=tcp:0.0.0.0:5060 listen=tls:0.0.0.0:5061 # not needed in 3.1 and fixed wrong file references in client configurations: eyebeam: copy the CA certificate (/etc/certs/demoCA/cert.pem) to the Windows PC and add it to the Windows certificate store (Start→Control Panel→Internet) QjSimple: copy the CA certificate (/etc/certs/demoCA/cert.pem) to the client PC and configure QjSimple to use this CA (“TLS CA file” and “verify TLS server certificate) earlier the paths pointed to certs/sip.mydomain.com files, which i think were wrong. at least i was not able to get them working. perhaps someone who is more familiar with tsl stuff could verify the above changes. -- juha

14 years, 1 month

correct way to define flags in Kamailio 3.0.3

by Andrew Pogrebennyk

What is the correct way to write flags in Kamailio 3.0.3? I've tried both enum-like way: "flags a, b;" and the macro way: "#!define a 1", but neither has worked. I'm getting a syntax error trying to used defined flag, e.g.: modparam("usrloc", "nat_bflag", FLB_NATB) In 3.1 though the macro works fine. -- Sincerely, Andrew Pogrebennyk

14 years, 1 month

what is new in v3.1.0

by Daniel-Constantin Mierla

Hello, please check the wiki page for what is new in upcoming v3.1.0 and add missing parts as well as enhance existing ones: http://sip-router.org/wiki/features/new-in-devel Thanks, Daniel -- Daniel-Constantin Mierla http://www.asipto.com

14 years, 1 month

Jump to page:

2024

2023

2022

2021

2020

2019

2018

2017

2016

2015

2014

2013

2012

2011

2010

2009

2008

2007

2006

2005

2004

2003

2002

sr-users October 2010