sr-users March 2010

sr-users@lists.kamailio.org

60 participants
117 discussions

[Serusers] ser numbers going up
by Sabatella, Michael 08 Mar '10

08 Mar '10

Hi all, Running ser 0.9.6. I notice these numbers going up and never going back down: I am a bit concerened with the red text. Is there any reason why that does not come down to 0. Do I need to restart the ser process once a month or something around that timing? So far I have not heard of any issues with user call setup but I just want to remain proactive. Serctl moni outputs the following: Server: Sip EXpress router (0.9.6 (i386/linux)) Now: Mon Mar 8 10:05:18 2010 Up Since: Fri Jan 8 11:24:17 2010 Up time: 5092861 [sec] Transaction Statistics Current: 1 (176 waiting) Total: 5624219 (0 local) Replied localy: 6049354 Completion status 6xx: 0, 5xx: 121, 4xx: 308504, 3xx: 0,2xx: 5316846 Stateless Server Statistics 200: 13145729 202: 0 2xx: 0 300: 0 301: 0 302: 0 3xx: 0 400: 42 401: 0 403: 0 404: 350766 407: 16536998 408: 0 483: 0 4xx: 2 500: 1 5xx: 0 6xx: 0 xxx: 0 failures: 72 Michael Sabatella IPC Systems Network Services Engineer Office: 1-201-253-2280 Cell: 1-908-380-5321 @ IPCGlobalNetworks.com<http://www.ipcglobalnetworks.com/> ________________________________ DISCLAIMER: This e-mail may contain information that is confidential, privileged or otherwise protected from disclosure. If you are not an intended recipient of this e-mail, do not duplicate or redistribute it by any means. Please delete it and any attachments and notify the sender that you have received it in error. Unintended recipients are prohibited from taking action on the basis of information in this e-mail.E-mail messages may contain computer viruses or other defects, may not be accurately replicated on other systems, or may be intercepted, deleted or interfered with without the knowledge of the sender or the intended recipient. If you are not comfortable with the risks associated with e-mail messages, you may decide not to use e-mail to communicate with IPC. IPC reserves the right, to the extent and under circumstances permitted by applicable law, to retain, monitor and intercept e-mail messages to and from its systems.

1 0

[Kamailio-Users] Get all the values for dialogs with a specific profile
by Iñaki Baz Castillo 08 Mar '10

08 Mar '10

Hi, by running "kamctl fifo profile_get_size togw" I can see the number of dialog tagged as "togw". Also if I run "kamctl fifo profile_get_size togw 999888777" I can see the number of dialogs tagged as "togw" with value "999888777". Is there any way to display all current values for dialogs with a specific profile/tag (i.e. "togw")? The idea is building a simple script to display the current number of calls per user (having that the value applied to dialog profiles means the calling user). Thanks for any suggestion. -- Iñaki Baz Castillo <ibc(a)aliax.net>

2 3

[Kamailio-Users] new website look
by Daniel-Constantin Mierla 08 Mar '10

08 Mar '10

Hello, http://www.kamailio.org has a new look! The former site was built with a cms system that discontinued the development, providing no longer updates for newer technologies and nicer design. We hope the new design helps to locate project resources easier and makes site navigation more straightforward via comprehensive list of links in the right sidebar. Credits go to Elio Rojano for the logo artwork and to developers of GPL Wordpress theme Cordobo Green Park which was used as start for the new design. If you are skilled in web design and can build a more personalized look on top of wordpress, please contact us. Cheers, Daniel PS. Do not forget, if you are tomorrow in London, UK, consider attending Present and Future of SIP Routing to get latest update about the project: http://www.kamailio.org/w/present-and-future-of-sip-routing-2010-london/ -- Daniel-Constantin Mierla Kamailio SIP Router Masterclass, Berlin, March 22-26, 2010 * http://www.asipto.com/index.php/sip-router-masterclass/

1 0

[Kamailio-Users] Dispatcher ds_list results in flag=P
by Geoffrey Mina 08 Mar '10

08 Mar '10

Hello, I have a weird issue with Dispatcher module. When I do a ds_list I get some of my destinations returned with flag=P. It appears that when they are in this state, they are not included in the list of destinations to send traffic to. I have tried restarting Kamailio, and these certain servers always return to flag=P. I have confirmed the servers are up and running fine. They are communicating without issue at the SIP and network level. Any idea what could cause this? Thanks,

3 9

Re: [Kamailio-Users] Users Digest, Vol 57, Issue 85
by Zhe 07 Mar '10

07 Mar '10

Help. Please remove me from this mail list. Thanks<br><br>在2010-02-27 19:00:01，users-request@lists.kamailio.org 写道： >Send Users mailing list submissions to > users(a)lists.kamailio.org > >To subscribe or unsubscribe via the World Wide Web, visit > http://lists.kamailio.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/users >or, via email, send a message with subject or body 'help' to > users-request(a)lists.kamailio.org > >You can reach the person managing the list at > users-owner(a)lists.kamailio.org > >When replying, please edit your Subject line so it is more specific >than "Re: Contents of Users digest..." > > >Today's Topics: > > 1. remove parameter (Elgar Onel) > 2. Exotic case (but real) in which RtpProxy doesn't work > (I?aki Baz Castillo) > 3. Re: Exotic case (but real) in which RtpProxy doesn't work > (Daniel-Constantin Mierla) > 4. Re: Exotic case (but real) in which RtpProxy doesn't work > (I?aki Baz Castillo) > 5. Re: Exotic case (but real) in which RtpProxy doesn't work > (Daniel-Constantin Mierla) > 6. Re: Exotic case (but real) in which RtpProxy doesn't work > (I?aki Baz Castillo) > > >---------------------------------------------------------------------- > >Message: 1 >Date: Fri, 26 Feb 2010 03:00:25 -0800 (PST) >From: Elgar Onel <elgaronel(a)yahoo.com> >Subject: [Kamailio-Users] remove parameter >To: users(a)lists.kamailio.org >Message-ID: <444271.31134.qm(a)web114207.mail.gq1.yahoo.com> >Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" > >Dear friends, > >how to remove parameters from INVITE sip address? > >tia, e. > > > > >

2 1

[Kamailio-Users] 3.0 Modules
by dotnetdub 07 Mar '10

07 Mar '10

Hi List, I see two modules in particular that I could really do with running on 1.5.3 - I have started testing 3.0 but will not put into production just yet. Call control and topoh Would it be possible to backport these to 1.53 ? Would there be much to it.?. Call Control in particular is something that is very useful for us. We will eventually move to 3.0 of course as it is amazing product with lots of really nice new features just been burned badly before by moving to something so new. TIA. Stephen.

2 1

[Kamailio-Users] 10 years sip express router (ser)
by Daniel-Constantin Mierla 05 Mar '10

05 Mar '10

Hello, yesterday at CeBIT I've run into Fraunhofer booth and a banner attracted my attention, photo at: http://www.asipto.com/gallery/v/cebit2010/P3030721.JPG.html?g2_imageViewsIn… According to the middle right bubble, 2000 was the first year FhG presented SER at CeBIT. Given that, means the project should celebrate (at least) 10 years these days?!? I was among FhG staffers at CeBIT 2002, presenting latest SER at that time. According to CVS repository on BerliOS, files such as Makefile and main.c are dated 2001. Officially, SER was GPL-ed and open sourced in 2002 (year when ser project was registered to berlios.de software forge). Andrei, more insights from non-open-source era? I got into the project in January 2002, would be interesting to trace the birthday... Cheers, Daniel

2 1

[Kamailio-Users] local 408 from fr_timer and fr_inv_timer
by Robert McGilvray 04 Mar '10

04 Mar '10

I'm looking for a way to distinquish between locally generated 408s triggered by the timers. My problem is that I'm using gateway failover in a failure route and on 408s it would retry phones multiple times if they didn't answer (no voicemail etc) - so fr_inv_timer was triggered after receiving a provisional reply. I need to failover in case a gateway doesn't respond with provisional (it's set at 5 seconds currently). Will this work, is there a cleaner solution? I haven't had the oppurtunity to test it so I may have some syntax errors. onreply_route { if (t_check_status("1[0-9][0-9]")) { xlog("L_NOTICE", "KAM_HOST: ($ci) $pr $mi route[$rm][0] $fu TO $ru -> Provisional Response --> $T_reply_code\n"); setflag(FLAG_PR_RECEIVED); } } failure_route[ROUTE_DP_FAILURE] { if (t_local_replied("last") && t_check_status("408") && isflagset(FLAG_PR_RECEIVED)) { xlog("L_INFO", "KAM_HOST: ($ci) $pr $mi route[$rm][0] $fu TO $ru -> Local 408 after provisional response, giving up\n"); exit; } } Thanks! Bob -------------------------------------------------------------------------- This email with all information contained herein or attached hereto may contain confidential and/or privileged information intended for the addressee(s) only. If you have received this email in error, please contact the sender and immediately delete this email in its entirety and any attachments thereto.

2 3

[Kamailio-Users] Present and Future of SIP Routing 2010 London
by Daniel-Constantin Mierla 04 Mar '10

04 Mar '10

Hello, I am pleased to announce a dedicated event in London, Tuesday, March 9 afternoon, where to present the version 3.0 and latest developments in Kamailio and SIP Router projects. The event includes as well presentations from various players in the VoIP and SIP market, more details at: http://www.kamailio.org/mos/view/Present-and-Future-of-SIP-Routing-2010-Lon… It is a free event, the number of seats is limited, room being available courtesy of Sun Microsystems (address 55 King William St, London EC4), therefore the first come first serve policy is applied. You can also enroll for a presentation, just send a short description about the topic in the registration email. Hope to see many of you in London next week, Daniel -- Daniel-Constantin Mierla Kamailio SIP Router Masterclass, Berlin, March 22-26, 2010 * http://www.asipto.com/index.php/sip-router-masterclass/

1 0

[Serusers] Is this a SER Problem?
by Samson Luk 03 Mar '10

03 Mar '10

I use SPA3102 with a iptel.org VoIP a/c, whenever my Firewall external IP changed (SPA3102's WAN port only connected to the internal LAN with a static IP, router function not used) the iptel.org VoIP a/c will report registration failed. I have to remove the proxy domain field and re-insert it then reboot to fix the problem, just wonder if this is a problem on the SER side or on the SPA side. I am sorry if this is not a correct appropriate place to ask such a question.

1 0

2025

2024

2023

2022

2021

2020

2019

2018

2017

2016

2015

2014

2013

2012

2011

2010

2009

2008

2007

2006

2005

2004

2003

2002

sr-users March 2010