sr-users July 2010

sr-users@lists.kamailio.org

64 participants
87 discussions

by Daniel-Constantin Mierla

Hello, as discussed during our devel meeting, next major release 3.1 is scheduled for this autumn. Therefore the freezing should happen soon. Would be 2 weeks from now enough for everyone to push planned new features to repo? Cheers, Daniel -- Daniel-Constantin Mierla http://www.asipto.com/

14 years, 4 months

Dialplan module examples

by Raúl Alexis Betancor Santana

Anyone known about examples for the dialplan table ? Best regards -- Raúl Alexis Betancor Santana Dimensión Virtual

14 years, 4 months

kamailio server load balancing

by RAJNIKANT VANZA

Hi Guys, I have 2 kamailio servers. I need to load balancing for this 2 kamailio servers. Scenario: ------------ Each kamailio server call limit is 5000 approx. kamailio server 1 kamailio server 2 If kamailio server 1 reach call limit (5000) then call go on kamailio server 2. What is the best way for achieve this? Thanks in advance. -- Best Regards, Rajnikant Vanza

14 years, 4 months

our kamailio server very slow , and there is no signal in the line

by hala alramli

Hello, some time ,there is no signal in phone line for a while ,also the server become very slow then it fix him self ,i don't know how . ,could any body give me possible reasons ,and how i can fix that, i checked syslog file every thing normal as i can see ,please help me. regards, hala

14 years, 4 months

Simple Least Cost Routing NPA-NXX?

by JR Richardson

Hi All, I'm in the lab with sip router 3.0 mocking up some trunk-group prefix routing with PDT and load balancing with Dispatcher. This is working great and as expected. I would like to incorporate some sort of LCR matching on NPA-NXX but I'm having some difficulty. The PDT module automatically strips the prefix so for trunk group routing it works great but really can't be used for matching NPA-NXX. The Carrierroute module is pretty nice and works as expected but the issue I'm having, it appears that I have to have a NPA-NXX entry for each domain gateway I want to send calls to. For instance if I have 3 gateways in domain 1, then I would need the same NPA-NXX record entry in the database for each gateway. The database entries would be [NPA-NXX] x [Number of Gateways] per domain. So having 100K routes would mean having 300K records. Am I looking at this correctly? This is really what it seems like to me but logically I would think this should not be the case? I really like the Dispatcher polling functions to actively know what gateways are on-line and off-line plus the different distribution algorithms to choose from. So it makes sense to me to implement a pseudo PDT/Distpacher scenario as an LCR but with PDT stripping the prefix, that can not be done. Is there another mechanism whereby I can dip the database looking for the NPA-NXX, extract the domain group and send that to the Dispatcher function, without stripping the prefix? Or can a PDT module parameter be added to not strip the prefix. But I'm not sure this will work, can the PDT module hold in memory a few hundred thousand records? Thanks. JR -- JR Richardson Engineering for the Masses

14 years, 4 months

Load Balancing REDIRECT

by Maw Zin Tun - Real Telekom

Hi, I started using Kamailio 3.0 as redirect server about 2 months ago, basically I'm quite new to it. Now I need to change current setup to redundant active-active system but I'm struggling where to find documentation that can lead me to achiving it. Can anyone pls advise me where to start looking ? Many thanks, Maw Tun

14 years, 4 months

No error line printed ?

by Raúl Alexis Betancor Santana

Hi, I'm trying to test the new 3.0.2 release ... but with no luck ... sbc02:/etc/kamailio# kamailio -ddddddddd -u kamailio -g kamailio -c -E 0(1036) DEBUG: <core> [main.c:1800]: read 343643572 from /dev/urandom 0(1036) DEBUG: <core> [main.c:1806]: seeding PRNG with 1622837431 0(1036) DEBUG: <core> [main.c:1810]: test random numbers 396346077 2140170049 1800197589 0(1036) : <core> [cfg.lex:1390]: included file name must be between quotes If i'm not wrong ... I should get the line/caracter at witch the parser get the error ... but that's not true ... I'm missing something really stupid ? Best regards -- Raúl Alexis Betancor Santana Dimensión Virtual

14 years, 4 months

Dispatcher: ds_select_domain(set, alg) with a pseudo variable.

by Geoffrey Mina

How difficult would it be to make ds_select_domain(set, alg) accept a pseudo variable for the "set" argument? I would like to map the $rU to a specific dispatcher set via a database table. I suppose i could just hard code three or four sets with a conditional if() statement, but I would prefer to make it a little more dyanimc. Correct me if I am wrong in my assumption that ds_select_domain() doesn't accept pseudo variables. Thanks.

14 years, 4 months

CRITICAL:tm:set_timer: set_timer for 1 list called on a "detached" timer -- ignoring: 0x7f1106077a60

by Iñaki Baz Castillo

Hi, what does it mean this error message?: CRITICAL:tm:set_timer: set_timer for 1 list called on a "detached" timer -- ignoring: 0x7f1106077a60 Thanks a lot. -- Iñaki Baz Castillo <ibc(a)aliax.net>

14 years, 4 months

Fwd: Re: Fwd: Re: Kamailio and NAPTR lookup with TLS

by Matteo Campana

Hi Daniel, I have followed your instruction (I'm using kamailio 1.5) and before the t_relay("0x05") statement I've setted: $du="sip:" + $rd + ";transport=tls"; but I get the following mesasge: Jul 14 15:17:55 OVSIPP /usr/local/sbin/kamailio[7790] Request leaving server, *D_-URI='sip:garr.it;transport=tls'_* - M=INVITE RURI=sip:xxx@garr.it F=sip:yyyyy@sip.mydomqin.it:5066 T=sip:123456789@sip.mydomain.it:5066 Jul 14 15:17:55 OVSIPP /usr/local/sbin/kamailio[7790]: CRITICAL:core:mk_proxy: could not resolve hostname: "garr.it" Jul 14 15:17:55 OVSIPP /usr/local/sbin/kamailio[7790]: ERROR:tm:uri2proxy: bad host name in URI <sip:garr.it;transport=tls> Jul 14 15:17:55 OVSIPP /usr/local/sbin/kamailio[7790]: ERROR:tm:t_forward_nonack: failure to add branches Therefore I would like to use information about TLS connection (tls port?) got from NAPTR record. Doesn't it possible with kamailio 1.5 ? Many thanks, Daniel Il 08/07/2010 18.12, Matteo Campana ha scritto: > > > -------- Messaggio originale -------- > Oggetto: Re: [SR-Users] Kamailio and NAPTR lookup with TLS > Data: Thu, 08 Jul 2010 18:10:35 +0200 > Mittente: Daniel-Constantin Mierla <miconda(a)gmail.com> > A: matteo.campana(a)klarya.it > CC: sr-users(a)lists.sip-router.org > > > > Hello, > > On 7/8/10 5:59 PM, Matteo Campana wrote: > > > > Hi all, > > I'm using kamailio 1.5 with TLS module. > > I need to make ENUM query and get NAPTR record. > > > From NAPTR lookup, I'd like to relay my SIP Invite with tls protocol. > > > > How can I tell Kamailio to use TLS protocol ( instead of udp) after NAPTR lookup ? > > > > I've try to set : > > > > dns_tls_pref=1 > > dns_udp_pref=2 > > dns_tcp_pref=3 > > > > in the general section of kamailio.cfg, but I get a parse error. > > > > > these parameters were introduced in kamailio with version 3.0. > > If you need TLS then it is recommended to use 3.0 anyhow, it is a far > better implementation. That will make the life easier to migrate to > upcoming 3.1 that will bring asynchronous TLS. > > No matter what you have in R-URI, you can force TLS via setting outbound > proxy address to be a TLS uri: > > $du = "sip:__ip_or_host__;transport=tls"; > t_relay(); > > The IP or host you can take from R-URI without any problem via PV $rd. > Other option is to use function from tm - t_relay_to_tls(): > > http://kamailio.org/docs/modules/stable/modules/tm.html#t_relay_to_udp > > Cheers, > Daniel > > -- > Daniel-Constantin Mierla > http://www.asipto.com/ > >

14 years, 4 months

← Newer
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
Older →

2024

2023

2022

2021

2020

2019

2018

2017

2016

2015

2014

2013

2012

2011

2010

2009

2008

2007

2006

2005

2004

2003

2002

sr-users July 2010