Hi all
with the release of kamailio 3.1.5, I've done a small change to the debian
repositories:
Nightly builds of kamailio_3.0 branch have been dropped and the repository has
been erased. There is no development in this branch and it has no sense to keep
nightly builds for it. Those (few) people using kamailio_3.0-nightly
repositories are advised to move their sources.list to the stable 3.0
repository of upgrade to 3.1 or master branches.
kamailio 3.0 will continue to be packaged if any new stable version is released
for etch, lenny, squeeze and lucid.
For 3.1 branch, nightly builds and stable repos will be provided for lenny,
lucid and squeeze
When the time for 3.2 (master branch at the moment) comes, I'll add Wheezy
support. Not sure about Ubuntu distro support. Should we add support to Ubuntu
11.10 or wait until the lts 12.04 is released?
Any opinions welcomed
cheers,
Jon
Dear All,
I would like to ask please if and in case I'm using STUN/TURN for Nat
traversal to drp the rtpproxy from my solution as NAT traversal and relay
server as I'm using SYUN for NAT traversal and TURN as relay in case of
Symmetric NAT
Regards
My architecture is described below:
TDM device----------- Call
server[IPv4]---------------[IPv4]Kamailio[IPv6]------------[IPv6]Asterisk---------[IPv6]Linphone
* *
*
* *
*
* *
*
* *
*
Media Server Rtpproxy
Media Server and Rtpptoxy carry the media.
Call Server carry only signaling.
I have succeeded to establish audio communication between an IPv6 domain &
an IPv4 domain
i.e. : from an TDM device to a Linphone.
However, When i try to establish a call from (IPv6 to IPv4), i.e. from
Linphone to TDM device, the signaling is OK, but there's no voice.
Because, Rtpproxy forward the media to the Call server instead the Media
Server. Hence, there can't be voice.
I have been stucking on this for a couple of months.
I will be very glad if somebody have any idea.
best regards!
Dear Marius
Thank you for your prompt reply.
I apologise, As i am a newbie could you please explain how to produce the
below output that you require?
Thanking you in advance for your help!
Regards
Phillip
> Hello
>
Hello.
You should have a coredump . Can you please send the trace (bt full) as
seen with gdb ?
Thanks
Marius
> Im facing a big problem after upgrading from version 3.1.2 to 3.1.4.
> The kamailio process keeps on terminating every now and then, this is
> what i was able to retrieve from my logs.
>
>
> Sep 14 12:52:31 SipProxy1 kernel: [71448.062089] __ratelimit: 15
> callbacks suppressed
> Sep 14 12:52:31 SipProxy1 kernel: [71448.062096] kamailio[13963]:
> segfault at 14 ip 0816452a sp bfedc940 error 4 in kamailio[8048000+1d9000]
>
>
> Does anyone have an idea why this is happening?
>
> Your help is much appreciated!
>
> Regards
> Phillip
I'm running 3.1.4 on centos and I'm having some trouble with voice only going
one way.
Both extensions will ring each other, but after they connect, voice will
only travel in one direction. One extension hears fine, but can't talk.
I've totally opened up the firewalls (including port 5060) and I'm still
having the trouble. I'm not behind NAT.
I've tried it using X-Lite, VoIP phones and ATAs in a number of
combinations. The problem is across the board. X-Lite sometimes
automatically disconnects after 32 seconds.
Does anyone have any suggestions on where to look? ANY help appreciated.
This has been going on for weeks.
--
View this message in context: http://old.nabble.com/One-way-communications-in-Kamailio-3.1.4-tp32460597p3…
Sent from the OpenSER Users Mailing List mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
I know this is the mailing list for Kamailio, but hopefully someone can help
me out as it is "kinda" related to VoIP etc.
Does anyone know any open source / free HLR implementation?
Hi,
There is any reasons why any linked Siremis site is not accessible from
Romania ?
i tried to access http://siremis.asipto.com/ and other sites and they
are not accesible.
Thanks,
Dani Popa
There is a bug in UAC module. uac_req_send doesn't restore avps.
I tried to backport your patch to 3.1 but with no success.
Could you add this patch to a new stable release ?
Dear sirs and madams,
I was wondering what is the current support for DNS fallback in the
3.1.x branch .
Lets assume we have a new dialog started and the name in the To field
needs to be resolved via a NAPTR.
Kamailio sends a NAPTR request, gets 3 SRVs , each with a number of A or
AAAA records.
The best/most suitable SRV is selected, however no response is returned
from any of the addresses in the A records.
Now, we should go the second SRV and try the A records in there and so on.
My question is how much from this kind of dns fallback algorithm is
supported ?
(I hope my explanation wasn't too confusing)
Thank you,
Costin Radu