sr-users April 2012

sr-users@lists.kamailio.org

75 participants
133 discussions

Question about processing of packet
by Fabian Borot 15 Apr '12

15 Apr '12

greetings, I have a customer that is sending the REGISTER with 2 ports in the Contact header: Contact: <sip:44435661000448181@201.xxx.xxx.xxx:19778:5060> After some troubleshooting we found that the wireless router is the one inserting the 2nd port. It is not the SIP UA itself. Is it possible to "sanitize" the REGISTER at the beginning of the configuration logic with the TEXTOPS module so that we can leave one port and then process the REGISTERwith the typical: if (!www_authorize("$fd", … [View More]

3 3

Re: [SR-Users] Visualizing SIP Trace
by Norm 15 Apr '12

15 Apr '12

Take a look at Homer. Reda Aouad <reda.aouad(a)gmail.com> wrote: >Hello, > >Anyone knows a tool/software (NOT CDRTool) to graphically visualize the SIP >traces recorded in database by Kamailio's siptrace module? > >Thanks >Reda > >_______________________________________________ >SIP Express Router (SER) and Kamailio (OpenSER) - sr-users mailing list >sr-users(a)lists.sip-router.org >http://lists.sip-router.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/sr-users

2 1

Visualizing SIP Trace
by Reda Aouad 15 Apr '12

15 Apr '12

Hello, Anyone knows a tool/software (NOT CDRTool) to graphically visualize the SIP traces recorded in database by Kamailio's siptrace module? Thanks Reda

1 0

RFC 5626 Outbound/ sip.instance in Contact header?
by Daniel Pocock 15 Apr '12

15 Apr '12

Hi, I'm just wondering if there has been any type of work to implement any part of RFC 5626, particularly the registrar server code? Lumicall now generates a UUID at install time, and sends that as sip.instance in the Contact header. It always sends reg-id=1 (only trying one proxy at the moment). Although this is not a full implementation of the spec, it seems to be sufficient for eliminating extra Contact records in the repro registration server (from reSIProcate). However, I've noticed … [View More]

2 1

Core Dump from select stmt
by Akan Technology 14 Apr '12

14 Apr '12

hello, I am running kamailio 3.2.2 on Solaris 10 64 bit and I am getting a core dump on this statement: $ru = "sip:" + $rU + "@" + $sel(cfg_get.registrar1.server_ip) + $sel(cfg_get.registrar1.server_port); Here is how the variable is defined: registrar1.server_ip = "xxx.xxx.xxx.xxx" desc "Registrar server IP address" registrar1.server_port = "5080" desc "Registrar server Port" Here is the output from the logs with debug: 10(25373) ERROR: *** … [View More]

1 0

200 OK with SDP got wrong Contact HF after fix_nated_contact()
by Karsten Horsmann 13 Apr '12

13 Apr '12

Hello! I got the following problem. My 200 OK with SDP sends the private ip of the B-Leg party. Kamailio is multihomed (pulic/private address) in front of an ivr system. 222.222.222.222 public ip kamailio 172.20.100.74 private ip kamailio 172.20.100.61 private ip ivr 217.217.217.217 public ip uac 172.20.100.203 private ip uac U 2012/04/13 13:56:57.307314 222.222.222.222:5060 -> 217.217.217.217:42885 SIP/2.0 200 Ok. Via: SIP/2.0/UDP 172.20.100.103:28472;rport=42885;branch=z9hG4bK-… [View More]d8754z-824b81ca678a7de4-1---d8754z-;received=217.217.217.217. From: <sip:4horsmann@222.222.222.222>;tag=e9d1124c. To: <sip:kalkbrenner@222.222.222.222>;tag=ds-1c78ac-2ca01e29. Call-ID: NjQ5YWU0NGYxZjM3YWJhYmE5ZWYxYmQzZjYzYzQyMzI.. CSeq: 2 INVITE. Content-Length: 202. Content-Type: application/sdp. Record-Route: <sip:172.20.100.74;r2=on;lr=on;ftag=e9d1124c;nat=yes>. Record-Route: <sip:222.222.222.222;r2=on;lr=on;ftag=e9d1124c;nat=yes>. Supported: replaces. Supported: 100rel. Allow: INVITE. Allow: ACK. Allow: BYE. Allow: CANCEL. Allow: OPTIONS. Allow: NOTIFY. Allow: REFER. Allow: PRACK. Allow: INFO. Allow: UPDATE. Allow: MESSAGE. Contact: <sip:172.20.100.61:5060>. P-hint: NATMANAGE WITH SDP. . v=0. o=aculab-04246C01 2060618394 2060618394 IN IP4 212.59.42.189. s=-. c=IN IP4 222.222.222.222. t=0 0. m=audio 40390 RTP/AVP 0 101. a=rtpmap:101 telephone-event/8000. a=fmtp:101 0-15. a=nortpproxy:yes. ############################################################## # RTPProxy control route[NATMANAGE] { #!ifdef WITH_NAT xlog("NATMANAGE M=$rm RURI=$ru F=$fu T=$tu IP=$si ID=$ci\n"); if(has_body("application/sdp")) { xlog("NATMANAGE M=$rm with SDP\n"); append_hf("P-hint: NATMANAGE WITH SDP\r\n"); fix_nated_contact(); } if (is_request()) { if(has_totag()) { if(check_route_param("nat=yes")) { setbflag(FLB_NATB); } } } if (isbflagset(FLB_NATB)) return; if (dst_ip == 212.59.42.189) { xlog("rtpproxy_manage extern zu intern\n"); #rtpproxy_manage("OCFEI","172.20.10.74"); rtpproxy_manage("FWCEI","172.20.10.74"); #xlog("e->i Body vor fix: $rb\n"); #fix_nated_contact(); #xlog("e->i Body nach fix: $rb\n"); } else { xlog("rtpproxy_manage intern zu extern\n"); #rtpproxy_manage("OCFIE","222.222.222.222"); rtpproxy_manage("FWCIE","222.222.222.222"); xlog("i->e Body vor fix: $rb\n"); fix_nated_contact(); xlog("i->e Body nach fix: $rb\n"); } if (is_request()) { if (!has_totag()) { add_rr_param(";nat=yes"); } } if (is_reply()) { if(isbflagset(FLB_NATB)) { fix_nated_contact(); } } #!endif return; } -- Mit freundlichen Grüßen *Karsten Horsmann* [View Less]

1 0

200 OK with SDP gets private ip in contact field
by Karsten Horsmann 13 Apr '12

13 Apr '12

Hello! I get step by step to my multihomed setup and have now problems that kamailio didnt rewrite the 200 OK to my public ip address. I have attached an ngrep trace and my kamailio 3.2.2 config. Would be great if someone can give me an hint! 222.222.222.222 public ip-address from kamailio 172.20.100.74 private ip-address from kamailio 217.777.777.777 public ip-address from the UAC 172.20.100.103 private ip-address from the UAC 172.20.100.61 sip ip-address from the IVR … [View More]

2 2

LCR routing and From Uri
by Alexey Mechanoshin 13 Apr '12

13 Apr '12

Hello all. In my config added LCR routing by this manual: http://www.amitnepal.com/using-lcr-with-kamailio/ and if added, to 'lcr_rule' table, uri to 'from_uri' column - kamailio always reply 503 - 'No More Gateways' :-( If remove data - routing work. A'm using last kamailio from git ... Please help me change my config to working routing by checking 'from_uri' . Need check routing prefix 5499 only from IP 192.xxx.xxx.59 , as example. In Log: Apr 10 17:01:23 r59vredfs /usr/sbin/… [View More]kamailio[29582]: INFO: <script>: New request - M=INVITE RURI=sip:5499@192.xxx.xxx.50:5070 F=sip:5491@192.xxx.xxx.59 T=sip:5499@192.xxx.xxx.50:5070 IP=192.xxx.xxx.59 ID=6c518b61-fd9f-122f-91b7-002655e85348 Apr 10 17:01:23 r59vredfs /usr/sbin/kamailio[29582]: INFO: <script>: Entering route[LCR] for method: INVITE <sip:5499@192.xxx.xxx.50:5070>, and rU=5499, caller_uri='0' Apr 10 17:01:23 r59vredfs /usr/sbin/kamailio[29582]: INFO: <script>: No More Gateways … Apr 10 17:01:23 r59vredfs /usr/sbin/kamailio[29582]: INFO: <script>: Send back 503 code … MySQL data: mysql> select * from lcr_rule; +----+--------+--------+----------+---------+---------+ | id | lcr_id | prefix | from_uri | stopper | enabled | +----+--------+--------+----------+---------+---------+ | 1 | 1 | 5498 | | 0 | 1 | | 2 | 1 | 57 | NULL | 0 | 1 | | 3 | 1 | 58 | NULL | 0 | 1 | | 4 | 1 | 541 | NULL | 0 | 1 | | 5 | 1 | 5499 | sip:192.xxx.xxx.59 | 1 | 1 | +----+--------+--------+----------+---------+---------+ 5 rows in set (0.00 sec) mysql> select * from lcr_gw; +----+--------+---------+----------------+----------+------+--------+------------+-----------+-------+--------+------+-------+---------+ | id | lcr_id | gw_name | ip_addr | hostname | port | params | uri_scheme | transport | strip | prefix | tag | flags | defunct | +----+--------+---------+----------------+----------+------+--------+------------+-----------+-------+--------+------+-------+---------+ | 1 | 1 | route1 | 213.xxx.xxx.26 | NULL | 5060 | NULL | 1 | 1 | NULL | | NULL | 1 | NULL | | 2 | 1 | routemy | 192.xxx.xxx.59 | NULL | 5070 | NULL | 1 | 1 | NULL | NULL | NULL | 1 | NULL | | 3 | 1 | route1 | 213.xxx.xxx.27 | NULL | 5060 | NULL | 1 | 1 | NULL | NULL | NULL | 1 | NULL | +----+--------+---------+----------------+----------+------+--------+------------+-----------+-------+--------+------+-------+---------+ 3 rows in set (0.00 sec) mysql> select * from lcr_rule_target; +----+--------+---------+-------+----------+--------+ | id | lcr_id | rule_id | gw_id | priority | weight | +----+--------+---------+-------+----------+--------+ | 1 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 10 | 1 | | 2 | 1 | 2 | 2 | 10 | 1 | | 3 | 1 | 3 | 2 | 10 | 1 | | 4 | 1 | 4 | 2 | 10 | 1 | | 5 | 1 | 5 | 1 | 10 | 1 | | 6 | 1 | 5 | 3 | 20 | 1 | +----+--------+---------+-------+----------+--------+ 6 rows in set (0.00 sec) Config: #!define WITH_LCR ... #!ifdef WITH_LCR loadmodule "avpops.so" loadmodule "lcr.so" #!endif ... #!ifdef WITH_LCR modparam("lcr", "db_url",DBURL) modparam("lcr", "gw_uri_avp", "$avp(i:709)") modparam("lcr", "ruri_user_avp", "$avp(i:500)") modparam("lcr", "flags_avp", "$avp(i:712)") modparam("lcr", "lcr_id_avp", "$avp(s:lcr_id_avp)") #!endif ... # dispatch destinations to PSTN route(PSTN); # LCR route route(LCR); # user location service #route(LOCATION); ... # --=== LCR routing ===-- # route[LCR] { xlog("L_INFO","Entering route[LCR] for method: $rm <$ru>, and rU=$rU, caller_uri='$var(caller_uri)'\n"); #!ifdef WITH_LCR ### if (!load_gws(1)) { ### if (!load_gws(1, $rU)) { if (!load_gws(1)) { sl_send_reply("500", "Server Internal Error - Cannot load gateways"); exit; } else { $var(i) = 0; while(is_avp_set("$(avp(i:709)[$var(i)])")) { xlog("L_INFO", "loading gw_uri_avp[$var(i)]='$(avp(i:709)[$var(i)])'\n"); $var(i) = $var(i) + 1; } if(is_avp_set("$avp(i:709)")) { xlog("L_INFO", "Trying gateway '$avp(i:709)'\n"); } else { xlog("L_INFO", "No More Gateways …\n"); } # try the first matched gateway if (next_gw()) { xlog("L_INFO", "ruri_user_avp='$avp(i:500)'\n"); # Print AVP - for debug #avp_print(); # Route to failure for failover route(RELAY); } else { avp_print(); xlog("L_INFO", "Send back 503 code …\n"); sl_send_reply("503", "No available gateways"); exit; } } #!endif #sl_send_reply("503", "Service Unavailable"); #exit; return; } PS Sorry for my bad English please. -- "В связи с отсутствием интереса общественности, конец света отменяется" (с) ? С Уважением, Механошин Алексей [View Less]

2 8

rtpproxy 1.2.1 segfaults with kamailio 3.2.2 in bridging mode
by Karsten Horsmann 12 Apr '12

12 Apr '12

Hi all, i try to register at the rtpproxy mailinglist, but its still pending. Maybe someone here had the same issue. In my multihomed setup (with mhomed=1 in kamailio.cfg) i had segfaults from rtpproxy if i called rtpproxy_manage with params. Notice that i must run rtpproxy as root to get core files. Any hints? Maybe my kamailio config isnt right? ulimit -c unlimited ; /usr/local/bin/rtpproxy -u root -s /home/sys/bin/rtpproxy.sock -l <PUBLIC-IP> 172.20.100.74 -d DBUG:LOG_LOCAL5 Apr … [View More]10 15:13:40 kamailio1 rtpproxy[19728]: DBUG:handle_command: received command "V" Apr 10 15:13:40 kamailio1 rtpproxy[19728]: DBUG:doreply: sending reply "20040107#012" Apr 10 15:13:40 kamailio1 rtpproxy[19728]: DBUG:handle_command: received command "VF 20050322" Apr 10 15:13:40 kamailio1 rtpproxy[19728]: DBUG:doreply: sending reply "1#012" Apr 10 15:13:40 kamailio1 rtpproxy[19728]: DBUG:handle_command: received command "VF 20071116" Apr 10 15:13:40 kamailio1 rtpproxy[19728]: DBUG:doreply: sending reply "1#012" Apr 10 15:13:40 kamailio1 rtpproxy[19728]: DBUG:handle_command: received command "VF 20081102" Apr 10 15:13:40 kamailio1 rtpproxy[19728]: DBUG:doreply: sending reply "1#012" Apr 10 15:13:40 kamailio1 rtpproxy[19728]: DBUG:handle_command: received command "UEIc107,0,8,101 NTgxNzRkMmJmYzFlYjg2NTdiN2Q3MzJkYjkzMzI3Yjk. 217.XXX.XXX.XX 49814 00671612;1" Apr 10 15:13:40 kamailio1 rtpproxy[19728]: INFO:handle_command: new session NTgxNzRkMmJmYzFlYjg2NTdiN2Q3MzJkYjkzMzI3Yjk., tag 00671612;1 requested, type strong Apr 10 15:13:40 kamailio1 rtpproxy[19728]: INFO:handle_command: new session on a port 36156 created, tag 00671612;1 Apr 10 15:13:40 kamailio1 rtpproxy[19728]: INFO:handle_command: pre-filling caller's address with 217.XXX.XX.XX:49814 Apr 10 15:13:40 kamailio1 rtpproxy[19728]: DBUG:doreply: sending reply "36156 212.XX.XX.XXX#012" (gdb) bt #0 0x0804ccb8 in ishostseq (ia1=0x99c54c8, ia2=0x0) at rtpp_util.c:55 #1 0x080514ba in handle_command (cf=0xbffb9d8c, controlfd=5, dtime=1334063620.8220949) at rtpp_command.c:761 #2 0x0804afb7 in process_commands (argc=9, argv=0xbffda634) at main.c:752 #3 main (argc=9, argv=0xbffda634) at main.c:856 (gdb) p ia1->sa_family $1 = 2 (gdb) p ia2->sa_family Cannot access memory at address 0x0 # RTPProxy control route[NATMANAGE] { #!ifdef WITH_NAT xlog("NATMANAGE M=$rm RURI=$ru F=$fu T=$tu IP=$si ID=$ci\n"); if (is_request()) { if(has_totag()) { if(check_route_param("nat=yes")) { setbflag(FLB_NATB); } } } if (isbflagset(FLB_NATB)) return; if (dst_ip == PUBLIC_IP ) { xlog("rtpproxy_manage extern zu intern\n"); rtpproxy_manage("OCFEI","172.20.10.74"); } else { xlog("rtpproxy_manage intern zu extern\n"); rtpproxy_manage("OCFIE","PUBLIC_IP"); } if (is_request()) { if (!has_totag()) { add_rr_param(";nat=yes"); } } if (is_reply()) { if(isbflagset(FLB_NATB)) { fix_nated_contact(); } } #!endif return; } -- Mit freundlichen Grüßen *Karsten Horsmann* [View Less]

3 8

Kamailio Failed to have audo converstaion with RTP
by Ryan Gholam 12 Apr '12

12 Apr '12

Dear Daniel , I thank you for your reply , I have a server having the Astersisk ip address (192.168.10.15) , and rtp + kamailio is installed on an another pc have the following ip (192.168.10.17) which is linked to the Astersik , and on the same pc , another network card exists having the ip address (192.168.20.3 ) which is linked to a client pc having the ip address ( 192.168.20.4) . I tracked the call and i can see SIP ACK nd BYE between 20.3 and 20.4 but there is no audio conversation … [View More]

2 1

← Newer
1
...
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
Older →

Jump to page:

2025

2024

2023

2022

2021

2020

2019

2018

2017

2016

2015

2014

2013

2012

2011

2010

2009

2008

2007

2006

2005

2004

2003

2002

sr-users April 2012