>
> Hi,
> I've been working my way through this tutorial (
> http://kb.asipto.com/asterisk:realtime:kamailio-3.0.x-asterisk-1.6.2-astdb)
> and all it working well thanks. In the other benifits section you mention
> that this configuration can be used with multiple instances of Asterisk.
> I've configured my [TOASTERISK] route
route[TOASTERISK] {
ds_select_dst("1","4");
$sht(forw=>$ft)=$du;
sl_send_reply("100","Trying");
xlog("L_INFO","INVITE: INVITE [$tU] Passed to [$du] Asterisk
Cluster [$rm:$au].\n");
route(RELAY);
exit;
How can i achieve the same for my [FROMASTERISK] route as now with
asterisk.bindip = "x.x.x.x" desc "Asterisk IP Address"
asterisk.bindport = "5060" desc "Asterisk Port"
and
route[FROMASTERISK] {
if($si==$sel(cfg_get.asterisk.bindip)
&& $sp==$sel(cfg_get.asterisk.bindport))
xlog("L_INFO","INVITE: INVITE Passed From [$fu] Asterisk
Cluster To [$rm:$au].\n");
return 1;
return -1;
}
This allows calls only from cfg_get.asterisk.bindip (single gateway) where
I would like gateways in the dispatcher list to be selected and marked as a
positive match
if(ds_is_from_list("1"))
$sht(forw=>$ft)=$si;
xlog("L_INFO","INVITE: INVITE Passed From [$fu] Asterisk
Cluster To [$rm:$au].\n");
return 1;
return -1;
}
Can you help?
Thanks in advance
Ian
Hello,
the wiki page collecting the guidelines for upgrading from 3.3.x to
4.0.0 is available at:
- http://www.kamailio.org/wiki/install/upgrade/3.3.x-to-4.0.0
I just added the SQL statements needed to upgrade the MySQL database,
but there is lot of other stuff to be added. Hopefully, anyone noticing
changes will add few notes and instructions about how to upgrade.
The wiki can be edited if you make an account, it is not required to be
a developer to add notes to this page. Would be great if users of
postgres will add the sql statements specific for this database type.
Thanks,
Daniel
--
Daniel-Constantin Mierla - http://www.asipto.comhttp://twitter.com/#!/miconda - http://www.linkedin.com/in/miconda
Kamailio World Conference, April 16-17, 2013, Berlin
- http://conference.kamailio.com -
On Tue, January 22, 2013 1:58 pm, sr-users-request(a)lists.sip-router.org
wrote:
> Send sr-users mailing list submissions to
> sr-users(a)lists.sip-router.org
>
> To subscribe or unsubscribe via the World Wide Web, visit
> http://lists.sip-router.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/sr-users
> or, via email, send a message with subject or body 'help' to
> sr-users-request(a)lists.sip-router.org
>
> You can reach the person managing the list at
> sr-users-owner(a)lists.sip-router.org
>
> When replying, please edit your Subject line so it is more specific
> than "Re: Contents of sr-users digest..."
>
>
> Today's Topics:
>
>
> 1. Modify IP address in SDP (Austin Einter)
> 2. Re: Modify IP address in SDP (Olle E. Johansson)
> 3. Problem with 4.0 nightlies and IMS - sem_post undefined
> (Barry Flanagan)
> 4. Patch to resolve segfault in json module (Richard Brady)
> 5. Re: Modify IP address in SDP (Austin Einter)
> 6. Re: Patch to resolve segfault in json module
> (Daniel-Constantin Mierla)
> 7. Re: [sr-dev] FOSDEM (Daniel Pocock)
>
>
>
> ----------------------------------------------------------------------
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
> Message: 3
> Date: Tue, 22 Jan 2013 13:19:44 +0000
> From: Barry Flanagan <barry(a)flanagan.ie>
> Subject: [SR-Users] Problem with 4.0 nightlies and IMS - sem_post
> undefined To: sr-users(a)lists.sip-router.org
> Message-ID:
> <CALJb54-rPPbjgGR5iEKYztNGDvT11znthJzgMYovpp_t6N0S8w(a)mail.gmail.com>
> Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8"
>
>
> Hi
>
>
> I am trying to run the Ubuntu nightlies from
> http://deb.kamailio.org/kamailiodev-nightly and loading the p-cscf config
> files.
>
> Things were working fine while I was on the 20130110 nightlies, but when
> I
> upgraded to 20130122 I get the following errors. Any have an idea why
> sem_post is undefined and how to fix this?
>
>
>
> 0(1980) ERROR: <core> [sr_module.c:572]: ERROR: load_module: could not
> open module </usr/lib64/kamailio/modules/ims_registrar_pcscf.so>:
> /usr/lib64/kamailio/modules/ims_registrar_pcscf.so: undefined symbol:
> sem_post 0(1980) ERROR: <core> [sr_module.c:572]: ERROR: load_module: could
> not open module </usr/lib64/kamailio/modules/cdp.so>:
> /usr/lib64/kamailio/modules/cdp.so: undefined symbol: sem_post
> 0(1980) ERROR: <core> [sr_module.c:572]: ERROR: load_module: could not
> open module </usr/lib64/kamailio/modules/ims_qos.so>:
> /usr/lib64/kamailio/modules/ims_qos.so: undefined symbol: sem_post
>
>
> Thanks
>
>
> -Barry Flanagan
>
Dear All
When 200 OK to INVITE passes through Kamailio proxy , I want to change the
IP address in SDP to a specific IP address.
Can this be done by just modifying configuration files or do I need to
modify in source code.
In case I need to modify source code, which files I need to look at.
Kindly provide pointers for said problem.
Thanks
Austin
Hi folks
If an empty or invalid JSON string is passed to the json_get_field function
from the the json module, it causes a segfault.
I have attached a patch.
Regards,
Richard
--
Richard Brady
M: +44 (0)7771 623 348
T: +44 (0)20 8144 8160
E: rnbrady(a)gmail.com
Do no send replies to private address only, keep mailing list otherwise
future such emails will be discarded.
The contact has to stay the same, because it needs to be the address of
the device. Record-Route and Path are designed to take care of routing
back to lb, which will use tls to send to device.
Cheers,
Daniel
On 1/22/13 12:26 PM, Anton Kvashenkin wrote:
> Thanks for reply. Yes, kamailio acts as a balancer sending REGISTER
> and INVITES, etc. The problem is that at L3-L4 it works well (sends
> all datagram messages to 10.0.0.1:5060 <http://10.0.0.1:5060> UDP) but
> at L7 the Contact header: <>;transport=tls.
>
>
> 2013/1/22 Daniel-Constantin Mierla <miconda(a)gmail.com
> <mailto:miconda@gmail.com>>
>
> Hello,
>
>
> On 1/22/13 10:56 AM, Anton Kvashenkin wrote:
>> Guys, I've already asked @ G+ Kamailio coummunity but had no
>> answer so I'm asking here:
>>
>> I'm trying to deploy +Kamailio
>> <https://plus.google.com/114984922071338017631> as a front-end
>> for TLS-UDP translation, as a back-end would be +FreeSWITCH
>> <https://plus.google.com/104108080382960591162> . So, is kamailio
>> so smart to fix Contact or Path header for ;transport=tls or it
>> translates only on L3-L4 layer and I should fix those headers
>> manually?
> is it only for calls or you need to forward registrations to
> kamailio as well?
>
> Everything is done automatically, for calls you just need to do
> record routing. For registrations you have to use path module and
> be sure that freeswitch supports sip path extension.
>
> Cheers,
> Daniel
>
> --
> Daniel-Constantin Mierla -http://www.asipto.com
> http://twitter.com/#!/miconda <http://twitter.com/#%21/miconda> -http://www.linkedin.com/in/miconda
> Kamailio World Conference, April 16-17, 2013, Berlin
> -http://conference.kamailio.com -
>
>
--
Daniel-Constantin Mierla - http://www.asipto.comhttp://twitter.com/#!/miconda - http://www.linkedin.com/in/miconda
Kamailio World Conference, April 16-17, 2013, Berlin
- http://conference.kamailio.com -
Guys, I've already asked @ G+ Kamailio coummunity but had no answer so I'm
asking here:
I'm trying to deploy
+Kamailio<https://plus.google.com/114984922071338017631> as
a front-end for TLS-UDP translation, as a back-end would be
+FreeSWITCH<https://plus.google.com/104108080382960591162> .
So, is kamailio so smart to fix Contact or Path header for ;transport=tls
or it translates only on L3-L4 layer and I should fix those headers
manually?
Hi,
I am organizing a diner for all Voice over IP hackers (Asterisk,
Freeswitch, Kamailio, OpenSER, Sipvicious :-), etc…) during the
Saturday evening of FOSDEM 2013.
There is a complete track at the Telephony devroom as well:
https://fosdem.org/2013/schedule/track/telephony/
More infos are registration:
http://www.zoobab.com/voip-diner-fosdem
Best,
--
Benjamin Henrion <bhenrion at ffii.org>
FFII Brussels - +32-484-566109 - +32-2-3500762
"In July 2005, after several failed attempts to legalise software
patents in Europe, the patent establishment changed its strategy.
Instead of explicitly seeking to sanction the patentability of
software, they are now seeking to create a central European patent
court, which would establish and enforce patentability rules in their
favor, without any possibility of correction by competing courts or
democratically elected legislators."