sr-users March 2013

sr-users@lists.kamailio.org

92 participants
141 discussions

Does Kamailio work with ICE ?
by Khoa Pham 25 Mar '13

25 Mar '13

Hi, 1. Does Kamailio work with ICE? What does Kamailio do with ICE candidates in SDP ? 2. Does rtpproxy acts as TURN server ? Many thanks. Please help -- Khoa Pham HCMC University of Science Faculty of Information Technology

2 1

Store GeoIP in Accounting
by Ali Jawad 25 Mar '13

25 Mar '13

Hi I am storing accounting entries in the db, and I am also inserting some custom AVP values, however I also need to store the GeoIP value that I am extracting using gip. I did try the below, but it is not working, any other ideas how I could achieve this ? modparam("acc", "log_extra", "src_user=$fU;src_domain=$fd;dst_ouser=$tU;dst_user=$rU;dst_domain=$rd;CountryCode=$gip(src=>cc)") Regards

2 1

How to enable TLS in Kamailio ?
by Khoa Pham 25 Mar '13

25 Mar '13

Hi, I want to enable TLS in Kamailio, as in here http://kamailio.org/docs/modules/stable/modules/tls.html But how can I get the certificate and private key ? -- Khoa Pham HCMC University of Science Faculty of Information Technology

7 14

Problems with Mar portion of registration
by mrichardson 22 Mar '13

22 Mar '13

Date: Fri, 15 Mar 2013 08:44:13 +0100 From: Daniel-Constantin Mierla <miconda(a)gmail.com> Subject: Re: [SR-Users] Problems with Mar portion of registration [IMS] To: "Kamailio (SER) - Users Mailing List" <sr-users(a)lists.sip-router.org> Message-ID: <5142D14D.7080808(a)gmail.com> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Hello, I haven't played with IMS modules, but you said is causing scscf to die -- is that a kamailio instance? What means 'to die' -- does it crash? If yes, can you get the syslog messages and the gdb backtrace? Cheers, Daniel ============================================ *Response:* ============================================ It appears any way we force the scscf to process a mar causes a crash. Core was generated by `/usr/sbin/kamailio -P /var/run/kamailio.pid -m 64 -M 4 -u kamailio -g kamailio'. Program terminated with signal 11, Segmentation fault. #0 async_cdp_callback (is_timeout=<value optimized out>, param=0x7f641b158e70, maa=0x7f641b159040, elapsed_msecs=<value optimized out>) at cxdx_mar.c:414 414 start_reg_await_timer(avlist[0]); //start the timer to remove stale or unused Auth Vectors Missing separate debuginfos, use: debuginfo-install glibc-2.12-1.107.el6.x86_64 libxml2-2.7.6-8.el6_3.4.x86_64 nss-pam-ldapd-0.7.5-18.el6.x86_64 pcre-7.8-6.el6.x86_64 zlib-1.2.3-29.el6.x86_64 (gdb) syslog: 7(2211) DEBUG: tm [t_lookup.c:1657]: DEBUG: t_lookup_ident: transaction found 7(2211) INFO: ims_auth [cxdx_avp.c:139]: cxdx_get_experimental_result_code: Failed finding avp 7(2211) INFO: ims_auth [cxdx_avp.c:139]: cxdx_get_sip_number_auth_items: Failed finding avp 7(2211) DEBUG: <core> [msg_translator.c:206]: check_via_address(10.12.92.191, 10.12.92.191, 0) 7(2211) DEBUG: <core> [mem/shm_mem.c:111]: WARNING:vqm_resize: resize(0) called 7(2211) DEBUG: tm [t_reply.c:1547]: DEBUG: cleanup_uac_timers: RETR/FR timers reset 7(2211) DEBUG: tm [t_reply.c:706]: DEBUG: reply sent out. buf=0x7f64e586b950: SIP/2.0 403 Forbidde..., shmem=0x7f64de66c1b0: SIP/2.0 403 Forbidde 7(2211) DEBUG: tm [t_reply.c:716]: DEBUG: _reply_light: finished 0(2204) DEBUG: <core> [parser/msg_parser.c:623]: SIP Request: 0(2204) DEBUG: <core> [parser/msg_parser.c:625]: method: <REGISTER> 0(2204) DEBUG: <core> [parser/msg_parser.c:627]: uri: <sip:scscf.somecompany.com:6060> 0(2204) DEBUG: <core> [parser/msg_parser.c:629]: version: <SIP/2.0> 0(2204) DEBUG: <core> [parser/msg_parser.c:170]: get_hdr_field: cseq <CSeq>: <5> <REGISTER> 0(2204) DEBUG: <core> [parser/parse_to.c:799]: end of header reached, state=10 0(2204) DEBUG: <core> [parser/msg_parser.c:190]: DEBUG: get_hdr_field: <To> [34]; uri=[sip:bob@somecompany.com] 0(2204) DEBUG: <core> [parser/msg_parser.c:192]: DEBUG: to body ["bob" <sip:bob@somecompany.com> ] 0(2204) DEBUG: <core> [parser/parse_via.c:1284]: Found param type 232, <branch> = <z9hG4bK1bd1.929b9c33.1>; state=16 0(2204) DEBUG: <core> [parser/parse_via.c:2672]: end of header reached, state=5 0(2204) DEBUG: <core> [parser/msg_parser.c:513]: parse_headers: Via found, flags=2 0(2204) DEBUG: <core> [parser/msg_parser.c:515]: parse_headers: this is the first via 0(2204) DEBUG: <core> [receive.c:149]: After parse_msg... 0(2204) DEBUG: <core> [receive.c:190]: preparing to run routing scripts... 0(2204) DEBUG: maxfwd [mf_funcs.c:85]: value = 15 0(2204) DEBUG: <core> [parser/parse_via.c:1284]: Found param type 232, <branch> = <z9hG4bK1bd1.a11580a2575452ad784ca00f869952fb.0>; state=16 0(2204) DEBUG: <core> [parser/parse_via.c:2672]: end of header reached, state=5 0(2204) DEBUG: <core> [parser/msg_parser.c:513]: parse_headers: Via found, flags=1000 0(2204) DEBUG: <core> [parser/msg_parser.c:526]: parse_headers: this is the second via 0(2204) DEBUG: <core> [parser/parse_via.c:1284]: Found param type 232, <branch> = <z9hG4bK-333530-035cb8a7773aa017e8e89aa8db3c4f01>; state=16 0(2204) DEBUG: <core> [parser/parse_via.c:2672]: end of header reached, state=5 0(2204) DEBUG: <core> [parser/msg_parser.c:513]: parse_headers: Via found, flags=1000 0(2204) DEBUG: <core> [parser/msg_parser.c:204]: DEBUG: get_hdr_body : content_length=0 0(2204) DEBUG: <core> [parser/msg_parser.c:106]: found end of header 0(2204) DEBUG: <core> [parser/parse_to.c:176]: DEBUG: add_param: tag=1f9be4d3 0(2204) DEBUG: <core> [parser/parse_to.c:799]: end of header reached, state=29 0(2204) DEBUG: sanity [mod_sanity.c:255]: sanity checks result: 1 0(2204) DEBUG: siputils [checks.c:103]: no totag 0(2204) DEBUG: <core> [select.c:425]: Calling SELECT 0x7f64e5839ea0 0(2204) DEBUG: tm [t_lookup.c:1095]: DEBUG: t_check_msg: msg id=5 global id=4 T start=0xffffffffffffffff 0(2204) DEBUG: tm [t_lookup.c:534]: t_lookup_request: start searching: hash=7601, isACK=0 0(2204) DEBUG: tm [t_lookup.c:492]: DEBUG: RFC3261 transaction matching failed 0(2204) DEBUG: tm [t_lookup.c:716]: DEBUG: t_lookup_request: no transaction found 0(2204) DEBUG: tm [t_lookup.c:1164]: DEBUG: t_check_msg: msg id=5 global id=5 T end=(nil 0(2204) ERROR: <script>: Enter register block 0(2204) DEBUG: tm [t_lookup.c:1395]: DEBUG: t_newtran: msg id=5 , global msg id=5 , T on entrance=(nil) 0(2204) DEBUG: tm [t_lookup.c:534]: t_lookup_request: start searching: hash=7601, isACK=0 0(2204) DEBUG: tm [t_lookup.c:492]: DEBUG: RFC3261 transaction matching failed 0(2204) DEBUG: tm [t_lookup.c:716]: DEBUG: t_lookup_request: no transaction found 0(2204) DEBUG: tm [t_hooks.c:374]: DBG: trans=0x7f64de66c4d0, callback type 1, id 0 entered 0(2204) DEBUG: ims_auth [authorize.c:567]: Checking if REGISTER is authorized for realm [somecompany.com]... 0(2204) DEBUG: ims_auth [authorize.c:597]: Nonce or response missing: nonce len [1910316154], response16 len[-440163170] 0(2204) INFO: ims_auth [cxdx_mar.c:81]: created AVP successfully : [maa_return_code] - [-2] 0(2204) DEBUG: ims_auth [authorize.c:298]: Need to challenge for realm [somecompany.com] 0(2204) DEBUG: ims_auth [authorize.c:305]: Checking if REGISTER is authorized for realm [somecompany.com]... 0(2204) DEBUG: ims_auth [authorize.c:435]: Suspending SIP TM transaction 0(2204) DEBUG: ims_auth [authorize.c:1271]: Sending MAR 0(2204) DEBUG: cdp [session.c:276]: adding a session with id scscf.somecompany.com;1782936534;5 0(2204) DEBUG: cdp [routing.c:80]: get_first_connected_route in list 0x7f64de63dbc0 for app_id 16777216 and vendor_id 10415 0(2204) DEBUG: cdp [routing.c:88]: The peer hss.somecompany.com state is opened 0(2204) DEBUG: cdp [routing.c:63]: Checking if peer hss.somecompany.com handles application 16777216 for vendord 10415 0(2204) DEBUG: cdp [routing.c:90]: The peer hss.somecompany.com matches - will forward there 0(2204) DEBUG: cdp [peerstatemachine.c:91]: sm_process(): Peer hss.somecompany.com State I_Open Event Send_Message 0(2204) DEBUG: cdp [peerstatemachine.c:1096]: Snd_Message called to peer [hss.somecompany.com] for request with code 303 0(2204) DEBUG: cdp [session.c:297]: called get session with id scscf.somecompany.com;1782936534;5 and hash 111 0(2204) DEBUG: cdp [session.c:306]: no session found 0(2204) DEBUG: cdp [diameter_msg.c:83]: AAABuildMsgBuffer(): len=348 0(2204) DEBUG: cdp [receiver.c:967]: peer_send_msg(): Pipe push [0x7f64de66edd0] 0(2204) DEBUG: ims_auth [cxdx_mar.c:516]: Successfully sent async diameter 0(2204) DEBUG: <core> [usr_avp.c:644]: DEBUG:destroy_avp_list: destroying list (nil) 0(2204) DEBUG: <core> [usr_avp.c:644]: DEBUG:destroy_avp_list: destroying list (nil) 0(2204) DEBUG: <core> [usr_avp.c:644]: DEBUG:destroy_avp_list: destroying list (nil) 0(2204) DEBUG: <core> [usr_avp.c:644]: DEBUG:destroy_avp_list: destroying list (nil) 0(2204) DEBUG: <core> [usr_avp.c:644]: DEBUG:destroy_avp_list: destroying list (nil) 0(2204) DEBUG: <core> [usr_avp.c:644]: DEBUG:destroy_avp_list: destroying list (nil) 0(2204) DEBUG: <core> [xavp.c:447]: destroying xavp list (nil) 0(2204) DEBUG: <core> [receive.c:293]: receive_msg: cleaning up 10(2214) DEBUG: cdp [receiver.c:743]: select_recv(): There is something on the send pipe 10(2214) DEBUG: cdp [receiver.c:756]: select_recv(): Send pipe says [0x7f64de66edd0] 8 10(2214) DEBUG: cdp [diameter_msg.c:412]: AAAFreeMessage: Freeing message (0x7f64de66edd0) 303 10(2214) DEBUG: cdp [receiver.c:104]: --- Receiver [cdp_receiver_peer=hss.somecompany.com] Serviced Peers: --- 10(2214) DEBUG: cdp [receiver.c:110]: Peer: [hss.somecompany.com] TCP Socket: [15] Recv.State: [0] 10(2214) DEBUG: cdp [receiver.c:112]: -------------------------------------------------------- 10(2214) DEBUG: cdp [receiver.c:104]: --- Receiver [cdp_receiver_peer=hss.somecompany.com] Serviced Peers: --- 10(2214) DEBUG: cdp [receiver.c:110]: Peer: [hss.somecompany.com] TCP Socket: [15] Recv.State: [1] 10(2214) DEBUG: cdp [receiver.c:112]: -------------------------------------------------------- 10(2214) DEBUG: cdp [receiver.c:567]: receive_loop(): [hss.somecompany.com] Recv Version 1 Length 172 10(2214) DEBUG: cdp [receiver.c:104]: --- Receiver [cdp_receiver_peer=hss.somecompany.com] Serviced Peers: --- 10(2214) DEBUG: cdp [receiver.c:110]: Peer: [hss.somecompany.com] TCP Socket: [15] Recv.State: [2] 10(2214) DEBUG: cdp [receiver.c:112]: -------------------------------------------------------- 10(2214) DEBUG: cdp [receiver.c:1061]: receive_message(): [hss.somecompany.com] Recv msg 303 10(2214) DEBUG: cdp [peerstatemachine.c:91]: sm_process(): Peer hss.somecompany.com State I_Open Event I_Rcv_Message 10(2214) DEBUG: cdp [session.c:297]: called get session with id scscf.somecompany.com;1782936534;5 and hash 111 10(2214) DEBUG: cdp [session.c:306]: no session found 10(2214) DEBUG: cdp [receiver.c:104]: --- Receiver [cdp_receiver_peer=hss.somecompany.com] Serviced Peers: --- 10(2214) DEBUG: cdp [receiver.c:110]: Peer: [hss.somecompany.com] TCP Socket: [15] Recv.State: [0] 10(2214) DEBUG: cdp [receiver.c:112]: -------------------------------------------------------- 0(2204) ALERT: <core> [main.c:788]: child process 2212 exited by a signal 11 0(2204) ALERT: <core> [main.c:791]: core was generated 0(2204) INFO: <core> [main.c:800]: INFO: dont_fork turned on, living on 0(2204) ALERT: <core> [main.c:788]: child process 2211 exited by a signal 11 0(2204) ALERT: <core> [main.c:791]: core was generated 0(2204) INFO: <core> [main.c:800]: INFO: dont_fork turned on, living on This is the modified register block to get a 401 unauthorized to even be generated (probably broken).... route[REGISTER] { xlog("L_ERR", "Enter register block"); t_newtran(); if (!ims_www_authenticate(NETWORKNAME)) { ims_www_challenge("$td"); exit; } if ($avp(maa_return_code) != 1 ) { if (!impu_registered("location")) { save("location"); if ($avp(saa_return_code) == 1) { isc_match_filter_reg("0","location"); exit; } } else { save("location"); if($avp(saa_return_code) == 1) { isc_match_filter_reg("1","location"); exit; } } } }

3 6

Re: [SR-Users] 2 kamailio servers sharing one database and one dns name
by David Thomson 22 Mar '13

22 Mar '13

Hi Barry, Thanks for trying to help me out. Unfortunately your suggestion didn't work out. Not sure why. I tried a few other functions like t_relay_to. Guess I still have a lot to learn about this kamailio stuff in more complex setups. Any other ideas, anyone? Ttyl, Dave -----Original Message----- From: Barry Flanagan <barry(a)flanagan.ie> Date: Thu, 21 Mar 2013 12:01:18 To: <sr-users(a)lists.sip-router.org> Subject: Re: [SR-Users] 2 kamailio servers sharing one database and one dns name On 20 March 2013 03:05, David Thomson <jdavidthomson(a)hotmail.com <mailto:jdavidthomson@hotmail.com> > wrote: hi, I have two kamailio 3.3.4 servers sharing one database. usrloc module is loaded on both machines. The DNS name for the machines is shared (i.e siptest.testdomain.com <http://siptest.testdomain.com> with 2 public ip's - one for Server1 and one for Server2) and setup in round robin mode. The scenario is as follows: User 1 registers to Server1 User 2 registers to Server2 User1 tries to call User2 but Server1 throws an error and the call doesn't ever connect to User2: WARNING: usrloc [udomain.c:321]: non-local socket <udp:xxx.xxx.xxx.xxx:5060>...ignoring. Hi I think you can use the t_replicate function within your register route so that each server will replicate the registration request to the other. I did this many years ago on OpenSER using the following just before the consume_credentials() line. On each of the servers you want to check that the src_ip is not that of the OTHER sever so they don't keep sending back and forth forever :-) So in the example below 10.0.1.1 is the IP of the other server. --------8<----------------------------------------- if (!src_ip==10.0.1.1) { t_replicate("udp:10.0.1.1:5060 <http://10.0.1.1:5060> "); xlog("L_INFO", "Replicating $ct, URI = $ru"); }; consume_credentials(); --------8<----------------------------------------- Have a look at http://www.kamailio.org/docs/modules/3.3.x/modules/tm.html#t_replicate Hope this helps. -Barry

1 0

GeoIP Issue
by Ali Jawad 21 Mar '13

21 Mar '13

Hi I did setup geoIP module and got the latest geoipcity free dat file and csv file and did setup all parameters in kamailio, when doing a test the instead of showing the country name the code is showing the region name, while region name is empty "I only need the country name", see : Config : if(geoip_match("$si", "src")) xlog("L_ERR","SIP message from: $gip(src=>cc) $gip(src=>regn) $gip(src=>regc)\n"); Log : SIP message from : A2 <null> <null> >From the CSV file of geoipcity just for cross reference : locId,country,region,city,postalCode,latitude,longitude,metroCode,areaCode 190132,"FR","A2","Lézardrieux","",48.7851,-3.1059,, As you can see above A2 is the region it is the 3rd column, src=>CC should show FR instead of A2. Working on Kamailio 3.3.4. Is there anything I missed here ? Regards

1 2

2 kamailio servers sharing one database and one dns name
by David Thomson 21 Mar '13

21 Mar '13

hi, I have two kamailio 3.3.4 servers sharing one database. usrloc module is loaded on both machines. The DNS name for the machines is shared (i.e siptest.testdomain.com with 2 public ip's - one for Server1 and one for Server2) and setup in round robin mode. The scenario is as follows:User 1 registers to Server1User 2 registers to Server2 User1 tries to call User2 but Server1 throws an error and the call doesn't ever connect to User2: WARNING: usrloc [udomain.c:321]: non-local socket <udp:xxx.xxx.xxx.xxx:5060>...ignoring. Any ideas? ttyl,Dave

3 2

New developer: Hugh Waite
by Daniel-Constantin Mierla 21 Mar '13

21 Mar '13

Hello, I want to announce that a new person got developer GIT write access to repository: Carlos Ruiz Díaz - he is going to add and maintain the credit control module, that was announced earlier this year on mailing list - the module is part of a framework that has three parts: - The module itself: https://github.com/caruizdiaz/cnxcc (to be added in Kamailio git repository) - The web interface: https://github.com/caruizdiaz/cnxcc-web - A helper script: https://github.com/caruizdiaz/cnxcc-db-sync His git commit id is: caruizdiaz My warm welcome and looking forward to future work within the project! Cheers, Daniel -- Daniel-Constantin Mierla - http://www.asipto.com http://twitter.com/#!/miconda - http://www.linkedin.com/in/miconda Kamailio World Conference, April 16-17, 2013, Berlin - http://conference.kamailio.com -

1 1

New developer: Carlos Ruiz Díaz
by Daniel-Constantin Mierla 21 Mar '13

21 Mar '13

1 0

Need help with port fowards.
by Mini UN 21 Mar '13

21 Mar '13

Hi, was on the chat channel, so emailed as no activity. I have a new Cisco/Linksys EA-2700 and port forwarding is the same as my old Linksys WRT-610N. However my VoIP and website don't work. I tried DMZ aswell. Confused? Unfortunately, this router isn't compatibel for DD-WRT firmware. Thanks if anyone answers.

3 2

← Newer
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
...
15
Older →

Jump to page:

2025

2024

2023

2022

2021

2020

2019

2018

2017

2016

2015

2014

2013

2012

2011

2010

2009

2008

2007

2006

2005

2004

2003

2002

sr-users March 2013