sr-users May 2013

sr-users@lists.kamailio.org

95 participants
157 discussions

Does Kamailio check for CSeq, Call-ID when unregister ?
by Khoa Pham 03 Jun '13

03 Jun '13

Hi, When I want to unregister, I have 2 ways 1. Append ;expires=0 in Contact field 2. Add another Expires : 0 header with CSeq, Call-ID not the same with when i register Does Kamailio check for the saem Cseq, Call-ID to allow unregistration ? -- Khoa Pham HCMC University of Science www.fantageek.com

3 2

Re: [SR-Users] SIP Trunks
by Keith Hubner 01 Jun '13

01 Jun '13

Hi, Authentication for users is working fine for me, I add a user to the db and the phone can register. I am looking to connect a SIP trunk but there doesn't seem to be any authentication? What I want is to allow users to connect from any IP but only allow SIP trunks to connect from certain IPs and authenticate. Thanks, Keith

2 1

How to make BLF work
by SamyGo 31 May '13

31 May '13

Hi list, I've been trying to make my Yealink phone to give BLF indications but I haven't been able to achieve this successfully yet so I need some expert advise here. My Yealink phone, as soon as it registers to Asterisk, gives me BLF lights. The same phone registering to Kamailio sends SUBSCRIBE and nothing happens. The Presence Handling is enabled in configurations and yet no dialog-info+xml NOTIFY is received. Please help. Best Regards, Sammy Go.

4 12

pua: lock release
by Halina Nowak 31 May '13

31 May '13

missing lock release: --- a/modules/pua/hash.c Mon May 27 16:42:23 2013 +0200 +++ b/modules/pua/hash.c Fri May 31 16:36:01 2013 +0200 @@ -339,7 +339,10 @@ if (temp_dialog) delete_htable(temp_dialog, hash_code); else + { + lock_release(&HashT->p_records[hash_code].lock); return -1; + } insert_htable(dialog, hash_code);

2 1

Why does Kamailio return many Contacts in Contact header in REGISTER response ?
by Khoa Pham 30 May '13

30 May '13

When I make REGISTER request to server Kamailio. Kamailio sometimes return me REGISTER 200 OK response with many Contacts in Contact header field Contact: <sip:user1@1.1.1.1:58492 ;transport=TLS;ob>;expires=29;received="sip:1.1.1.1:58492;transport=TLS", <sip:user1@3.3.3.3:58520;transport=TLS;ob>;expires=244, <sip:user1@1.1.1.1:58529 ;transport=TLS;ob>;expires=284;received="sip:1.1.1.1:58529;transport=TLS", <sip:user1@3.3.3.3:58548;transport=TLS;ob>;expires=329, <sip:user1@3.3.3.3:58562;transport=TLS;ob>;expires=393, <sip:user1@1.1.1.1:58571 ;transport=TLS;ob>;expires=483;received="sip:1.1.1.1:58571;transport=TLS", <sip:user1@2.2.2.2:58588;transport=TLS;ob>;expires=538, <sip:user1@1.1.1.1:58600 ;transport=TLS;ob>;expires=587;received="sip:1.1.1.1:58600;transport=TLS", <sip:user1@2.2.2.2:58611;transport=TLS;ob>;expires=630, <sip:user1@1.1.1.1:58624 ;transport=TLS;ob>;expires=670;received="sip:1.1.1.1:58624;transport=TLS", <sip:user1@2.2.2.2:58632;transport=TLS;ob>;expires=706, <sip:user1@1.1.1.1:58650 ;transport=TLS;ob>;expires=826;received="sip:1.1.1.1:58650;transport=TLS", <sip:user1@2.2.2.2:58661 ;transport=TLS;ob>;expires=900;+sip.instance="<urn:uuid:00000000-0000-0000-0000-00007dtrf0a4c>";reg-id=1 Why is that ? -- Khoa Pham HCMC University of Science www.fantageek.com

5 9

change cli in unconditional call Forward
by Barry Flanagan 30 May '13

30 May '13

Hi I have the same issue with the CLI on unconditional call forwarding being set to the original caller's number as in this post from March 2012 http://lists.sipwise.com/pipermail/spce-user/2012-March/001149.html In that post it suggests that version 2.6 might have a fix. I am on 2.8 and have tried various settings but can't see a way to make the From: header contain the subscriber's CLI. Is this still not possible without a custom tweak? -Barry Flanagan

1 0

Re: [SR-Users] git branch moved?
by Gertjan Wolzak 30 May '13

30 May '13

Never mind... Problem on my end.... not between keyboard and chair. Rgds, Gertjan From: sr-users-bounces(a)lists.sip-router.org [mailto:sr-users-bounces@lists.sip-router.org] On Behalf Of Gertjan Wolzak Sent: donderdag 30 mei 2013 11:39 To: sr-users(a)lists.sip-router.org Subject: [SR-Users] git branch moved? Gents, Trying to install Kamailio 4.0 from GIT, but it looks like only the master is still there... Something gone wrong ?? root@sip:/usr/local/src/kamailio-4.0/kamailio# git status # On branch master nothing to commit (working directory clean) root@sip:/usr/local/src/kamailio-4.0/kamailio# git checkout -b 4.0 origin/4.0 fatal: git checkout: updating paths is incompatible with switching branches. Did you intend to checkout 'origin/4.0' which can not be resolved as commit? root@sip:/usr/local/src/kamailio-4.0/kamailio# git branch * master root@sip:/usr/local/src/kamailio-4.0/kamailio# git show show show-branch root@sip:/usr/local/src/kamailio-4.0/kamailio# git show show show-branch root@sip:/usr/local/src/kamailio-4.0/kamailio# git show-branch [master] documentation: Rebuild all modified READMEs root@sip:/usr/local/src/kamailio-4.0/kamailio# git checkout HEAD master origin/HEAD origin/master root@sip:/usr/local/src/kamailio-4.0/kamailio# git checkout Regards, Gertjan Wolzak

1 0

git branch moved?
by Gertjan Wolzak 30 May '13

30 May '13

Gents, Trying to install Kamailio 4.0 from GIT, but it looks like only the master is still there... Something gone wrong ?? root@sip:/usr/local/src/kamailio-4.0/kamailio# git status # On branch master nothing to commit (working directory clean) root@sip:/usr/local/src/kamailio-4.0/kamailio# git checkout -b 4.0 origin/4.0 fatal: git checkout: updating paths is incompatible with switching branches. Did you intend to checkout 'origin/4.0' which can not be resolved as commit? root@sip:/usr/local/src/kamailio-4.0/kamailio# git branch * master root@sip:/usr/local/src/kamailio-4.0/kamailio# git show show show-branch root@sip:/usr/local/src/kamailio-4.0/kamailio# git show show show-branch root@sip:/usr/local/src/kamailio-4.0/kamailio# git show-branch [master] documentation: Rebuild all modified READMEs root@sip:/usr/local/src/kamailio-4.0/kamailio# git checkout HEAD master origin/HEAD origin/master root@sip:/usr/local/src/kamailio-4.0/kamailio# git checkout Regards, Gertjan Wolzak

1 0

I need you help-----about Kamailio 3.3.x and Asterisk 10.7.0 Realtime Integration
by zhengyw 30 May '13

30 May '13

Hello: I followed the step by step guide (http://kb.asipto.com/asterisk:realtime:kamailio-3.3.x-asterisk-10.7.0-astdb) that describe the realtime integration between Kamailio and Asterisk. I have no problem with registration but when I try a call from 106 to 107 I get the followng error : 1. in the asterisk console: " Unresolvable destination (478/SL)" 2. in the kamailio log: May 6 17:01:38 WH-PC /usr/sbin/kamailio[4192]: ERROR: <core> [resolve.c:1540]: ERROR: sip_hostport2su: could not resolve hostname: "(null)" May 6 17:01:38 WH-PC /usr/sbin/kamailio[4192]: ERROR: tm [ut.h:327]: failed to resolve "(null)" May 6 17:01:38 WH-PC /usr/sbin/kamailio[4192]: ERROR: tm [t_fwd.c:1530]: ERROR: t_forward_nonack: failure to add branches May 6 17:01:38 WH-PC /usr/sbin/kamailio[4192]: ERROR: sl [sl_funcs.c:371]: ERROR: sl_reply_error used: Unresolvable destination (478/SL) Any idea about the cause of this problem? ps:kamailio and asterisk are running in the same machine. ps:attachment is Asterisk CLI log Best Regards, zhengyw 郑友闻医疗终端部东软熙康健康有限公司沈阳市浑南新区新秀街2号，A1楼216 Postcode：110179 Tel：+86 24 83662278 Mobile：15242493836 Email : zhengyw(a)neusoft.com http://www.neusoft.com --------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Confidentiality Notice: The information contained in this e-mail and any accompanying attachment(s) is intended only for the use of the intended recipient and may be confidential and/or privileged of Neusoft Corporation, its subsidiaries and/or its affiliates. If any reader of this communication is not the intended recipient, unauthorized use, forwarding, printing, storing, disclosure or copying is strictly prohibited, and may be unlawful.If you have received this communication in error,please immediately notify the sender by return e-mail, and delete the original message and all copies from your system. Thank you. ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

4 14

outbound loose routing question
by אורן אברהם 29 May '13

29 May '13

Dear list I'm trying to route using the loose_route() method for an ACK message of an INVITE. the ACK message contains a Route header field with the outbound proxy address (which is the server processing this message - aka "myself") and a flow token to the UAC. but the routing is failed because the process_outbound() function in loose.c deliberatly ignores my flow-token because of the condition in loose.c:522 which is: else if (!ip_addr_cmp(&rcv->src_ip, &_m->rcv.src_ip || rcv->src_port != _m->rcv.src_port). I don't understand why i cannot use this flow token to send the ACK back to the UAC... Thanks in advance...

2 2

← Newer
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
...
16
Older →

Jump to page:

2025

2024

2023

2022

2021

2020

2019

2018

2017

2016

2015

2014

2013

2012

2011

2010

2009

2008

2007

2006

2005

2004

2003

2002

sr-users May 2013