sr-users January 2015

sr-users@lists.kamailio.org

94 participants
135 discussions

One way audio & video - Kamailio + rtpproxy ( NAT call )
by Chirag Ajmera 14 Jan '15

14 Jan '15

Kamailio - 4.2.2 ( SIP server ) Rtpproxy - Git Compiled ( miconda patched version ) Issue: Remote NAT Call Bria Rmt Iphone SIP Extn (3G) ----> Kamailio Server -----> Desktop Bria Client ( Wifi ) Audio and Video packets are sent from iPhone to desktop client .. but nothing otherway Also, being totally new to kamailio I can't figure out logging SIP messages ( INVITE etc ) .. Kindly if anyone can help Thank You Best, Chirag A.

1 0

Fwd: Need a support for Siremis and kamailio server
by Gaurav Rai 14 Jan '15

14 Jan '15

Hi I am using a siremis and *kamailio * hosted server with lylix.net and they give a link for getting a support about Siremis. I need a support to how to make OUT call on PSTN with registered subscriber on Softphone. Currently we have registered user on subscriber table with their location and can make a PEER to PEER audio call and text messaging also. To make OUT call on PSTN we had create a LCR gateway and LCR rule with Prefix but still can not make a OUT call getting a error 404 can u please help me out to make a PSTN call Waiting for your reply Thanks Gaurav Rai +919716238804

2 1

Making rtp streams appear unidirectional
by aft 14 Jan '15

14 Jan '15

Hi, Is it possible to make the rtp stream appear unidirectional? By that i mean, The rtp stream from client to proxy will go through one rtpproxy and proxy to client stream will go through another rtpproxy instance? If not, is it possible to mimic something like that by running rtpproxy in bridge mode where both IPs in bridge mode will be public IP? Thanks in advance cheers arif

2 4

Dispatcher 8 algorithm based on priority strange works
by Yuriy Gorlichenko 14 Jan '15

14 Jan '15

Daniel. I added 8 algorithm to our server and it works with 2 asterisk now but it works strange because: While works server with priority 1 - all ok. When this server goes down dispatcher choose next server with lowes priority. But when server with highest priority waking up dispatcher use server with lowes priority until this server not goes down. here id my config for dispatcher modparam("dispatcher", "db_url",DBURL) modparam("dispatcher", "table_name", "dispatcher") modparam("dispatcher", "setid_col", "setid") modparam("dispatcher", "priority_col", "priority") modparam("dispatcher", "destination_col", "destination") modparam("dispatcher", "force_dst", 1) modparam("dispatcher", "flags", 3) modparam("dispatcher", "dst_avp", "$avp(i:271)") modparam("dispatcher", "grp_avp", "$avp(i:272)") modparam("dispatcher", "cnt_avp", "$avp(i:273)") modparam("dispatcher", "ds_ping_from", "sip:kamailio1@10.0.1.12") modparam("dispatcher", "ds_ping_interval",15) modparam("dispatcher", "ds_probing_mode", 1) modparam("dispatcher", "ds_ping_reply_codes", "class=2;code=403;code=404;code=484;class=3") modparam("tm", "reparse_on_dns_failover", 0) (!ds_select_dst("$var(setid)", "8")){ sl_send_reply("500", "Service Unavailable"); xlog("L_INFO","{$rm} from [$fU@$si:$sp] But NO destinations available for $rd \n"); t_on_failure("DISPATCHER_ROLLOVER"); } if (!t_relay()) { sl_reply_error(); we use 4.3 master branch kamailio

2 3

Unexpected evaluation to false on a phonenumber in $avp
by Daniel Tryba 14 Jan '15

14 Jan '15

Not a really important question, just an observation that caused some headscratching on my first day after a nice vacation. I'm using an avp to make a redirect decision. Normally this avp contains Dutch telephone numbers (+31[0-9]{7,10}). With a simple: if($avp(dst_redirectnumber)) { #change $ru } this works flawless (normally). But a client decided, to forward to a Swiss number (+4141743xxxx) but with this number the if condition results in a false. A German number just works fine (+49) The avp is stuffed in an avp_db_query loop with $avp($avp(i:1))=$avp(i:2) as key/value pair from the table. I changed above condition to check if the string length of dst_redirectnumber is larger than 0. But I'm at a loss why the false occurs, first guess was an octal conversion (number only contains the digits 0-7) which results in a number "just" above 2^32. But changing a digit to 8 still fails. -- POCOS B.V. - Croy 9c - 5653 LC Eindhoven Telefoon: 040 293 8661 - Fax: 040 293 8658 http://www.pocos.nl/ - http://www.sipo.nl/ K.v.K. Eindhoven 17097024

4 5

Dispatcher Failover algorithm
by Yuriy Gorlichenko 14 Jan '15

14 Jan '15

I as wrote before - we find dispatcher algorithm than can do mechanism something like this: Try call to fist server with max priority or weight. OIf this server unavailible then call second server with less weight and etc. Does anyone know what ling of algorithm we can use for this?

2 6

event on table location Duplicate entry for key 'ruid_idx'
by Yuriy Gorlichenko 14 Jan '15

14 Jan '15

Hello. We use 2 kamailio servers cluster and we have porblems with db. Database failed pecause of error: Could not execute Write_rows_v1 event on table production.location; Duplicate entry 'uloc-54aae947-86d-a67' for key 'ruid_idx', Error_code: 1062; handler error HA_ERR_FOUND_DUPP_KEY; the event's master log FIRST, end_log_pos 380, Internal MariaDB error code: 1062 But a location table no row 'ruid_idx' and no entry uloc-54aae947-86d-a67.

3 3

Kamailio with Asterisk 13 PjSip Realtime
by Chirag Desai 14 Jan '15

14 Jan '15

Hi, I saw Matt Jordan's recent Kamailio world talk and was interested in the idea he proposed of stripling out authentication and registration from asterisk and solely letting Kamailio handle it. In order to do this would I be correct in assuming I would have to use the asterisk database rather than the Kamailio database? I've compared the two and the table structures are very different. If I use the asterisk database I guess asterisk still needs to be responsible for handling authentication, registration and writing the contacts to the database. If I use the Kamailio database how would I dial an extension from asterisk, because as far as I can fell asterisk will have no idea who is registered or how to find them (contact details). Maybe I'm over thinking something simple, or maybe I'm not. Either way I would love your thoughts on how this could be done. Kind regards, C

1 0

pua_subscribe and force_send_socket trouble
by Mikko Lehto 13 Jan '15

13 Jan '15

Hi I am having strange behavior on local port assignment when proxying out locally generated request. Kamailio is 4.2.1 from git. I use MI pua_subscribe to create subscription to be handled by external presence server. In event_route[tm:local-request] I set $du to point back to proxy itself. When request hits initial request_route, I add some headers, change request URI and prepare failure_route for later uac_auth() processing. So far so good and TLS packets are flying to correct destination. Here is the trouble: when I observe outgoing TLS traffic with tcpdump, I can see that local source port is not following what I set with force_send_socket(). I tried to place force_send_socket() in request_route, branch_route, and tm:local-request, but it is always some random high port (>30000), never the intended one. I am trying to set it to same as my TLS listening socket. Is my usage somehow incorrect? What should I try next to make Kamailio use constant source port? Relevant config snippet below (IP address and domain part is obscured). --- mhomed=1 listen=udp:A.B.C.D:5041 listen=tls:A.B.C.D:5041 request_route { route(REQINIT); if ( blahblah... ) { $ru = "sip:" + $rU + "@domain.part.invalid;transport=tls"; $avp(uac_auth) = 0; route(PR_HDRS); route(PR_TRIGGERS); force_send_socket(A.B.C.D:5041); t_newtran(); route(RELAY); } } route[PR_HDRS] { remove_hf("User-Agent"); insert_hf("User-Agent: pua_subscribe\r\n","Call-ID"); } route[PR_TRIGGERS] { t_on_branch("PR_BRANCH"); t_on_failure("PR_FAILURE"); } branch_route[PR_BRANCH] { force_send_socket(A.B.C.D:5041); } failure_route[PR_FAILURE] { if ( $avp(uac_auth) == 0 && ($T_reply_code == 401 or $T_reply_code == 407) ) { uac_auth(); $avp(uac_auth) = 1; route(PR_TRIGGERS); route(RELAY); } } event_route [tm:local-request] { force_send_socket(A.B.C.D:5041); $du = "sip:A.B.C.D:5041"; } route[RELAY] { is from default config } --- I found these recent commits, bugs and threads somehow relating to force_send_socket and tm:local-request: http://sip-router.org/tracker/index.php?do=details&task_id=462 http://lists.sip-router.org/pipermail/sr-users/2014-August/084459.html dbd8ea9b1fa216e59d4c36e2eb4b671202824259 http://lists.sip-router.org/pipermail/sr-dev/2014-September/024984.html e404d123610b63ddd1c75d39667b373c40071eab http://lists.sip-router.org/pipermail/sr-dev/2014-September/024977.html -- Mikko Lehto

3 5

Kamailio 4.2.1 crashes on using exec_msg
by Tobias 13 Jan '15

13 Jan '15

Hi! We recently upgraded our Kamailio 4.1 to 4.2.1. With the newer version Kamailio crashes after just running a few minutes. After some debugging it looks as though the problem is in exec_msg (which is used in our config). After disabling this 4.2.1 seem to run just fine. Core file exists, here's the output: (gdb) backtrace #0 0x00000000005ebf0f in fm_extract_free (frag=0x7f053ea08d18, qm=0x7f053e88e010) at mem/f_malloc.c:206 #1 fm_malloc (qm=0x7f053e88e010, size=<optimized out>, file=file@entry=0x7f053cbedfd4 "exec: exec_hf.c", func=func@entry=0x7f053cbef378 "replace_env", line=line@entry=375) at mem/f_malloc.c:490 #2 0x00007f053cbe7953 in replace_env (list=0x7f053ea08868) at exec_hf.c:375 #3 0x00007f053cbe862e in set_env (msg=0x7f053e91d690) at exec_hf.c:547 #4 0x00007f053cbeb835 in w_exec_msg (msg=0x7f053e87c480, cmd=0x7f053ea5e168 "X֤>\005\177", foo=<optimized out>) at exec_mod.c:164 #5 0x00000000004274f7 in do_action (h=h@entry=0x7fff02e9cf90, a=a@entry=0x7f053ea5cfb8, msg=msg@entry=0x7f053e87c480) at action.c:1094 #6 0x00000000004261a9 in run_actions (h=h@entry=0x7fff02e9cf90, a=a@entry=0x7f053ea5cfb8, msg=msg@entry=0x7f053e87c480) at action.c:1583 #7 0x0000000000432980 in run_top_route (a=0x7f053ea5cfb8, msg=msg@entry=0x7f053e87c480, c=c@entry=0x0) at action.c:1669 #8 0x00007f053e610d2a in run_failure_handlers (t=t@entry=0x7f0534ecc770, rpl=0x7f053ea71040, code=486, extra_flags=extra_flags@entry=64) at t_reply.c:1051 #9 0x00007f053e612aa3 in t_should_relay_response (Trans=Trans@entry=0x7f0534ecc770, new_code=new_code@entry=486, branch=branch@entry=0, should_store=should_store@entry=0x7fff02e9d2a0, should_relay=should_relay@entry=0x7fff02e9d290, cancel_data=cancel_data@entry=0x7fff02e9d490, reply=reply@entry=0x7f053ea71040) at t_reply.c:1406 #10 0x00007f053e616126 in relay_reply (t=t@entry=0x7f0534ecc770, p_msg=p_msg@entry=0x7f053ea71040, branch=0, msg_status=msg_status@entry=486, cancel_data=cancel_data@entry=0x7fff02e9d490, do_put_on_wait=do_put_on_wait@entry=1) at t_reply.c:1809 #11 0x00007f053e61a9f3 in reply_received (p_msg=0x7f053ea71040) at t_reply.c:2493 #12 0x00000000004920a6 in do_forward_reply (msg=msg@entry=0x7f053ea71040, mode=mode@entry=0) at forward.c:783 #13 0x0000000000493637 in forward_reply (msg=msg@entry=0x7f053ea71040) at forward.c:885 #14 0x00000000004f5634 in receive_msg (buf=<optimized out>, len=<optimized out>, rcv_info=<optimized out>) at receive.c:275 #15 0x00000000005d929d in udp_rcv_loop () at udp_server.c:521 #16 0x00000000004a73f1 in main_loop () at main.c:1629 #17 0x0000000000425085 in main (argc=<optimized out>, argv=<optimized out>) at main.c:2561 Kind regards,/Tobias

2 3

← Newer
1
...
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
Older →

Jump to page:

2025

2024

2023

2022

2021

2020

2019

2018

2017

2016

2015

2014

2013

2012

2011

2010

2009

2008

2007

2006

2005

2004

2003

2002

sr-users January 2015