sr-users December 2015

sr-users@lists.kamailio.org

70 participants
113 discussions

SIP Trunking Kamailio directly to external SIP Trunk Provider
by amjadali_bb＠hotmail.com 07 Dec '15

07 Dec '15

Hi, I have got two Asterisk servers and both are communicating with the SIP Trunk provider (External Network) directly - the Asterisk servers are connected with the Kamailio and then Kamailio with the Agent Phones. I need some change in this architecture that I want Kamailio to communicate with the SIP Trunk provider (External Network) directly. Can any one please advise if this is possible and how ? -- View this message in context: http://sip-router.1086192.n5.nabble.com/SIP-Trunking-Kamailio-directly-to-e… Sent from the Users mailing list archive at Nabble.com.

2 1

Announcement: Next Kamailio World - May 18-20, 2016, in Berlin
by Daniel-Constantin Mierla 07 Dec '15

07 Dec '15

Hello, a short message to announces that the date and location for next Kamailio World Conference were decided - May 18-20, 2016, in Berlin, Germany. Kamailio project is celebrating 15 years of development in 2016, therefore we plan to have a special edition. Website of the event and call for presentations will be launched very soon. Meanwhile, if you haven't participated at a past edition, you can check the previous edition website in order to get an idea about the structure and content of the event: - http://www.kamailioworld.com/k03/ Have a great week, Daniel -- Daniel-Constantin Mierla http://twitter.com/#!/miconda - http://www.linkedin.com/in/miconda Book: SIP Routing With Kamailio - http://www.asipto.com http://miconda.eu

1 0

Kamailio radius authentication prolem
by Volkan Oransoy 07 Dec '15

07 Dec '15

Hi all, I try to authenticate my users via mod_radius, but I have problem. FreeRadius server gives this error: Auth: [digest] Cleartext-Password or Digest-HA1 is required for authentication. I think I need to send those attributes from kamailio but I couldn't figure out how to do it. Here is diff of my config with default config. Thanks, /Volkan ===================== diff /etc/kamailio/kamailio.cfg /etc/kamailio/kamailio.cfg.original < #!define WITH_DEBUG 294,297d292 < loadmodule "auth_radius.so" < modparam("auth_radius", "radius_config", "/etc/radiusclient/radiusclient.conf") < loadmodule "avpops.so" < 739,783c734,739 < if (is_method("REGISTER")) < { < avp_print(); < if (!radius_www_authorize("example.com")) { < xlog("SCRIPT: www auth return code: $rc\n"); < switch ($rc) { < case -7: < send_reply("500", "Server Internal Error"); < exit; < case -1: < send_reply("400", "Bad Request"); < exit; < default: < }; < if (defined($avp(digest_challenge)) && < ($avp(digest_challenge) != "")) { < append_to_reply("$avp(digest_challenge)"); < }; < send_reply("401", "Unauthorized"); < exit; < }; < } < < if (from_uri==myself) < { < if (!radius_proxy_authorize("example.com", "$pU")) { # Realm and URI user are taken < switch ($rc) { # from P-Preferred-Identity < case -7: # header field < send_reply("500", "Server Internal Error"); < exit; < case -1: < send_reply("400", "Bad Request"); < exit; < default: < }; < if (defined($avp(digest_challenge)) && < ($avp(digest_challenge) != "")) { < append_to_reply("$avp(digest_challenge)"); < }; < send_reply("407", "Proxy Authentication Required"); < exit; < }; < < } < --- > #!ifdef WITH_IPAUTH > if((!is_method("REGISTER")) && allow_source_address()) { > # source IP allowed > return; > } > #!endif 784a741,753 > if (is_method("REGISTER") || from_uri==myself) > { > # authenticate requests > if (!auth_check("$fd", "subscriber", "1")) { > auth_challenge("$fd", "0"); > exit; > } > # user authenticated - remove auth header > if(!is_method("REGISTER|PUBLISH")) > consume_credentials(); > } > # if caller is not local subscriber, then check if it calls > # a local destination, otherwise deny, not an open relay here

2 1

No NOTIFY while PUBLISHing new presence status
by Thierry Luo 07 Dec '15

07 Dec '15

Hi All, I'm now using Kamailio as Presence Server for my IM system. All is fine except that, when one user publishes new presence status (in tuples) to the Presence Server, which does not NOTIFY the subscribers of the status. And the more weird is that, when I restart the subscriber UAs and re-subscribe, the Presence Server send out the NOTIFY messages to the subscribers that just re-subscribed. This is not compliant with RFCs. Anybody please help me out. Attached is the configuration file. Thanks. Thierry Luo

2 2

Table 'kamailio.version' doesn't exist
by Annus Fictus 07 Dec '15

07 Dec '15

Hello List, when I try to create Kamailio Database, I receive this error: *kamdbctl create* MySQL password for root: INFO: test server charset INFO: creating database kamailio ... INFO: granting privileges to database kamailio ... INFO: creating standard tables into kamailio ... ERROR 1146 (42S02) at line 1: Table 'kamailio.version' doesn't exist ERROR: Creating core tables failed at standard! Kamailio version 4.3.4 Any hint? Regards

2 3

UAC dynamic reg_contact_addr()
by Yuriy Gorlichenko 07 Dec '15

07 Dec '15

I have multiple ip addresses at my kamailio. I use uac module for registration to sip providers. I have one provider but want to register form different ip addresses used by my server. When register sends it takes ip address form reg_contact_addr(). But if I want to register from another interface with different ip i need to get to this parametr another ip address. So As I understand it imposibleto do with avp. Does kamailio have some methods to do this?

2 3

why is rtpenengine-delete deleting the whole call?
by Juha Heinanen 05 Dec '15

05 Dec '15

in my test sip proxy parallel forks the invite to two contacts and two rtpengine-offers are made with these kind of call-id and via-branch params: "call-id": "f33a7e21c57edbf3", "via-branch": "z9hG4bK79d6.d19587ffadd9f72bca61d9578eb12bd9.0" "call-id": "f33a7e21c57edbf3", "via-branch": "z9hG4bK79d6.d19587ffadd9f72bca61d9578eb12bd9.1", then the via-branch .0 callee answers and rtpengine-answer is sent to with this kind of call-id and via-branch params: "call-id": "f33a7e21c57edbf3", "via-branch": "z9hG4bK79d6.d19587ffadd9f72bca61d9578eb12bd9.0", after that sip proxy deletes the other branch by sending rtpengine-delete with this kind of params: Nov 27 02:25:55 lohi rtpengine[3792]: [f33a7e21c57edbf3] Received command 'delete' from 127.0.0.1:40700 Nov 27 02:25:55 lohi rtpengine[3792]: [f33a7e21c57edbf3] Dump for 'delete' from 127.0.0.1:40700: { "call-id": "f33a7e21c57edbf3", "via-branch": "z9hG4bK79d6.d19587ffadd9f72bca61d9578eb12bd9.1", "received-from": [ "IP4", "127.0.0.1" ], "from-tag": "3322319973f3909e", "command": "delete" } and rtpengine responds: Nov 27 02:25:55 lohi rtpengine[3792]: [f33a7e21c57edbf3] Response dump for 'delete' to 127.0.0.1:40700: { "created": 1448583951, "last signal": 1448583955, "tags": { "3322319973f3909e": { "tag": "3322319973f3909e", "created": 1448583951, "in dialogue with": "0f6759297b8f1711", "medias": [ { "index": 1, "type": "audio", "protocol": "RTP/AVP", "streams": [ { "local port": 53864, "endpoint": { "family": "IPv4", "address": "192.98.102.10", "port": 10458 }, "advertised endpoint": { "family": "IPv4", "address": "192.98.102.10", "port": 10458 }, "last packet ... Nov 27 02:25:55 lohi rtpengine[3792]: [f33a7e21c57edbf3] ... ": 1448583951, "flags": [ "RTP", "filled" ], "stats": { "packets": 0, "bytes": 0, "errors": 0 } }, { "local port": 53865, "endpoint": { "family": "IPv4", "address": "192.98.102.10", "port": 10459 }, "advertised endpoint": { "family": "IPv4", "address": "192.98.102.10", "port": 10459 }, "last packet": 1448583951, "flags": [ "RTCP", "filled" ], "stats": { "packets": 0, "bytes": 0, "errors": 0 } } ], "flags": [ "initialized", "send", "recv" ] } ] }, "0f6759297b8f1711": { "tag": "0f6759297b8f1711", ... Nov 27 02:25:55 lohi rtpengine[3792]: [f33a7e21c57edbf3] ... "via-branch": "z9hG4bK79d6.d19587ffadd9f72bca61d9578eb12bd9.0", "created": 1448583951, "in dialogue with": "3322319973f3909e", "medias": [ { "index": 1, "type": "audio", "protocol": "RTP/AVP", "streams": [ { "local port": 53844, "endpoint": { "family": "IPv4", "address": "10.0.2.15", "port": 10144 }, "advertised endpoint": { "family": "IPv4", "address": "10.0.2.15", "port": 10144 }, "last packet": 1448583951, "flags": [ "RTP", "RTCP", "filled" ], "stats": { "packets": 0, "bytes": 0, "errors": 0 ... Nov 27 02:25:55 lohi rtpengine[3792]: [f33a7e21c57edbf3] ... } }, { "local port": 53845, "endpoint": { "family": "IPv6", "address": "::", "port": 0 }, "advertised endpoint": { "family": "IPv6", "address": "::", "port": 0 }, "last packet": 1448583951, "flags": [ "RTCP", "fallback RTCP", "filled" ], "stats": { "packets": 0, "bytes": 0, "errors": 0 } } ], "flags": [ "initialized", "send", "recv", "rtcp-mux" ] } ] } }, "totals": { "RTP": { "packets": 0, "bytes": 0, "errors": 0 }, "RTCP": { "packets": 0, "bytes": 0, "errors": 0 } }, "result": "ok" } which then results in deletion of the whole call, i.e., also the branch that answered. question: why does rtpengine not do what it is asked to do in rtpengine-delete, i,e. delete the offer corresponding to "call-id": "f33a7e21c57edbf3", "via-branch": "z9hG4bK79d6.d19587ffadd9f72bca61d9578eb12bd9.1"? -- juha

3 11

Kamailio + Asterisk, same machine, same public IP.
by Douglas Adami 04 Dec '15

04 Dec '15

Hello everyone, I have Kamailio and Asterisk on the same machine with the same public IP. When I try to forward calls to the asterisk (PSTN GW on port 5080), returns the error 401, but does not reach the Asterisk any information. When I switch to an IP out, it works. Any idea? Regards, Doug

2 6

If we print out $fu, $fU & $fd on onsend_route, it prints out incorrect values.
by Jurijs Ivolga 04 Dec '15

04 Dec '15

Hi all, I opened a bug here: https://github.com/kamailio/kamailio/issues/430 But then I was advised to write to mailing list. In nutshell: I'm running Kamailio 4.3.3. When I'm trying to update $ru, $fu & $fd in Kamailio conf: $rU = "1000"; $fu = "sip:something@mydomain.com"; $fd = "newdomain.com"; And later I'm trying to print out $rU, $fu, $fU & $fd in onsend_route: xlog("ALERT: From URI $fu \n"); xlog("ALERT: From domain $fd \n"); xlog("ALERT: From user $fU \n"); xlog("ALERT: Request user $rU \n"); Kamailio 4.3.3 prints out following: ALERT: From URI sip:2000@some_ip ALERT: From domain some_ip ALERT: From user 2000 ALERT: Request user 1000 But I believe it should: ALERT: From URI sip:something@mydomain.com ALERT: From domain mydomain.com ALERT: From user something ALERT: Request user 1000 I'm using default Kamailio config with minor changes, you can check it in attachment. Is it proper behavior? Thank you! With kind regards, Jurijs

2 1

[permissions] allow_source_address_group() always return -1
by Iñaki Baz Castillo 04 Dec '15

04 Dec '15

Hi all, Kamailio 4.3 (Debian Wheezy package) with db_mysql and permissions modules enabled. Once started, this is the cached content of the "address" table: ~# kamctl mi "address_dump" 22 <20, 99.23.86.78, 0> [TEST SERVER] Within the script: ----------------------------- xlog("L_INFO", "request_route() [method:$rm, si:$si, sp:$sp]\n"); $var(group) = allow_source_address_group(); if ($var(group) != -1) { // ALWAYS HERE :( xlog("L_WARN", "invalid source IP [si:$si]\n"); } ----------------------------- Then I send an INVITE from such an allowed IP, and got: INFO: <script>: request_route() [method:INVITE, si:99.23.86.78, sp:7060] WARNING: <script>: invalid source IP [si:99.23.86.78] "version" table contains: table_name table_version ------------------------------------- address 6 trusted 5 I've used code similar to the above in ~30 kamailios (however never in 4.X). Do I miss something? Thanks a lot. -- Iñaki Baz Castillo <ibc(a)aliax.net>

1 2

2026

2025

2024

2023

2022

2021

2020

2019

2018

2017

2016

2015

2014

2013

2012

2011

2010

2009

2008

2007

2006

2005

2004

2003

2002

sr-users December 2015