sr-users March 2015

sr-users@lists.kamailio.org

88 participants
149 discussions

by Marc Soda

I'm wondering if anyone has any experience load testing with Kamailio and rtpengine using WebRTC. I've had success load testing just Kamailio with sipp, but now I'd like to add the media piece and, if possible, do it via WebRTC. Anyone have any thoughts? Thanks, Marc

9 years, 8 months

Continent Code GeoIP module, kamailio 4.2

by Rene Montilva

Hi list i'm trying to configure rtp engine routing by source ip, i'd like divide it by continent code, is there any pseudo-variables or possibilites to handle continent code. Team, any idea about it?

9 years, 8 months

Re: [SR-Users] Regd. Kamailio GPL

by Daniel Tryba

On Tuesday 10 March 2015 14:52:22 Shankar wrote: > We are exploring kamailio source for use in our VOIP solution. This is the > first time we are looking at open source. We have few doubts in using > kamailio for providing our VOIP service. Under GPL any customization > (customization mainly with respect to interacting with our proprietary > applications e.g. Billing server) we do to kamailio also has to be provided > to the end user. Our doubt is whether we can procure commercial rights to > our customised code? You should really contact a lawyer specialised in IP to get good advice. But gnu.org points out that above assumption isn't always true: http://www.gnu.org/licenses/old-licenses/gpl-2.0-faq.html#GPLRequireSourceP… "The GPL does not require you to release your modified version. You are free to make modifications and use them privately, without ever releasing them. This applies to organizations (including companies), too; an organization can make a modified version and use it internally without ever releasing it outside the organization. But if you release the modified version to the public in some way, the GPL requires you to make the modified source code available to the program's users, under the GPL." So if you don't ship a binary to endusers, you don't have to release source (including modifications). It all depends on what you are supplying to your endusers (a service or a (complete) software product).

9 years, 8 months

Re: [SR-Users] Regd. Kamailio GPL

by Shankar

Hi, Thank you very much for the clarification. Our intention is to provide VOIP service and hence we need not expose our customized code to end users. Regards, Shankar --------------------------------------------------------------------- Date: Wed, 11 Mar 2015 10:56:02 +0100 From: "Olle E. Johansson" <oej(a)edvina.net> To: "Kamailio (SER) - Users Mailing List" <sr-users(a)lists.sip-router.org> Subject: Re: [SR-Users] Regd. Kamailio GPL Message-ID: <DD23FDE1-C5DA-4D98-B20E-DE7173C4902F(a)edvina.net> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii On 11 Mar 2015, at 10:13, Daniel Tryba <d.tryba(a)pocos.nl> wrote: > On Tuesday 10 March 2015 14:52:22 Shankar wrote: >> We are exploring kamailio source for use in our VOIP solution. This is the >> first time we are looking at open source. We have few doubts in using >> kamailio for providing our VOIP service. Under GPL any customization >> (customization mainly with respect to interacting with our proprietary >> applications e.g. Billing server) we do to kamailio also has to be provided >> to the end user. Our doubt is whether we can procure commercial rights to >> our customised code? > > You should really contact a lawyer specialised in IP to get good advice. But > gnu.org points out that above assumption isn't always true: > http://www.gnu.org/licenses/old-licenses/gpl-2.0-faq.html#GPLRequireSourcePo stedPublic > > "The GPL does not require you to release your modified version. You are free > to make modifications and use them privately, without ever releasing them. > This applies to organizations (including companies), too; an organization can > make a modified version and use it internally without ever releasing it > outside the organization. > > But if you release the modified version to the public in some way, the GPL > requires you to make the modified source code available to the program's > users, under the GPL." > > So if you don't ship a binary to endusers, you don't have to release source > (including modifications). It all depends on what you are supplying to your > endusers (a service or a (complete) software product). > There is a big difference between GPLv2 and GPLv3 here. For GPL2, providing services is not seen as distribution of the source, and the commercial code can stay in the company. For GPLv3 it's different as far as I understand. Kamailio is GPLv2 and Siremis - the web interface by Asipto - is GPLv3. /O

9 years, 8 months

Parser error with sql_pvquery?

by Anthony Messina

I'm trying to do an sql_pvquery() and have PostgreSQL return the default value using COALESCE (if the other parts of the query return NULL) rather than placing the $null check on the return in the Kamailio script. I seem to be coming up on a parser issue, perhaps too many nested parentheses: sql_pvquery("kamailio", "SELECT COALESCE((SELECT value FROM usr_preferences WHERE attribute='callee_rtp_transport' AND (uuid='$sht(rtpengine=>$ci::$T_branch_idx::callee_ip)' OR username='$rU') LIMIT 1), 'RTP/AVP')", "$sht(rtpengine=>$ci::$T_branch_idx::callee_rtp_transport)"); <core> [cfg.y:3428]: yyerror_at(): parse error in config file /etc/kamailio/kamailio.cfg, line 1444, column 14: syntax error Is this query "too complex" for the parser, or is there something I've missed above? Thanks. -A -- Anthony - https://messinet.com/ - https://messinet.com/~amessina/gallery 8F89 5E72 8DF0 BCF0 10BE 9967 92DC 35DC B001 4A4E

9 years, 8 months

Re: [SR-Users] kamailio asterisk NOTIFY

by Slava Bendersky

Hello Daniel, I have record route in WITHINDLG for NOTIFY, but it not helped behaviour is the same it loosing route for NOTIFY. Slava. From: "Daniel-Constantin Mierla" <miconda(a)gmail.com> To: "Slava Bendersky" <volga629(a)networklab.ca>, "sr-users" <sr-users(a)lists.sip-router.org> Sent: Wednesday, March 11, 2015 2:14:02 PM Subject: Re: [SR-Users] kamailio asterisk NOTIFY Hello, you have to do record_route() for all NOTIFY requests -- there are new specs requiring that (RFC 6665) and perhaps asterisk is following them. If you look in the default kamailio.cfg for v4.2, inside route[WITHINDLG], then you will see how it is done. Cheers, Daniel On 11/03/15 14:22, Slava Bendersky wrote: Hello Daniel, Here fresh paste http://fpaste.org/196616/42608006/ I see proper routing headers on SUBSCRIBE, but then NOTIFY loose it. Slava. From: "Daniel-Constantin Mierla" <miconda(a)gmail.com> To: "sr-users" <sr-users(a)lists.sip-router.org> Sent: Tuesday, March 10, 2015 5:31:51 PM Subject: Re: [SR-Users] kamailio asterisk NOTIFY Hello, fpaste link doesn't show anything. Can you check if the NOTIFY coming to Kamailio has two Route headers? Cheers, Daniel On 10/03/15 18:44, Slava Bendersky wrote: BQ_BEGIN Hello Everyone, Having issue with NOTIFY, is not forwarded to client properly. asterisk ---> private kamailio public ----> soft client http://fpaste.org/196257/99948714/ I see kamailio trying connect always with private IP to the client when NOTIFY is come is in. Is this something to do with rr_advertise_address ? Mar 10 13:44:23 canlvprx01 kamailio: 16(24971) ERROR: <core> [tcp_main.c:4338]: tcpconn_main_timeout(): connect 192.168.88.246:5064 failed (timeout) Mar 10 13:44:23 canlvprx01 kamailio: 16(24971) DEBUG: <core> [tcp_main.c:4362]: tcpconn_main_timeout(): tcp_main: timeout for 0x7fbbb64e2800 Mar 10 13:44:23 canlvprx01 kamailio: 16(24971) DEBUG: <core> [io_wait.h:610]: io_watch_del(): DBG: io_watch_del (0x9dbf00, 33, -1, 0x10) fd_no=24 called Mar 10 13:44:23 canlvprx01 kamailio: 16(24971) DEBUG: <core> [tcp_main.c:4320]: tcpconn_main_timeout(): tcp_main: entering timer for 0x7fbbb64eb6c0 (ticks=839577436, timeout=839634956 (3595 s), wr_timeout=839577436 (0 s)), write queue: 798 bytes Mar 10 13:44:23 canlvprx01 kamailio: 16(24971) ERROR: <core> [tcp_main.c:4338]: tcpconn_main_timeout(): connect 192.168.88.246:5066 failed (timeout) Mar 10 13:44:23 canlvprx01 kamailio: 16(24971) DEBUG: <core> [tcp_main.c:4362]: tcpconn_main_timeout(): tcp_main: timeout for 0x7fbbb64eb6c0 Mar 10 13:44:23 canlvprx01 kamailio: 16(24971) DEBUG: <core> [io_wait.h:610]: io_watch_del(): DBG: io_watch_del (0x9dbf00, 34, -1, 0x10) fd_no=23 called Mar 10 13:44:42 canlvprx01 kamailio: 5(24960) DEBUG: tm [t_reply.c:1294]: t_should_relay_response(): ->>>>>>>>> T_code=0, new_code=408 Mar 10 13:44:42 canlvprx01 kamailio: 5(24960) DEBUG: tm [t_reply.c:1812]: relay_reply(): DEBUG: relay_reply: branch=0, save=0, relay=0 icode=0 Mar 10 13:44:42 canlvprx01 kamailio: 5(24960) DEBUG: <core> [mem/shm_mem.c:111]: _shm_resize(): WARNING:vqm_resize: resize(0) called Mar 10 13:44:42 canlvprx01 kamailio: 5(24960) DEBUG: tm [t_reply.c:1294]: t_should_relay_response(): ->>>>>>>>> T_code=0, new_code=408 Mar 10 13:44:42 canlvprx01 kamailio: 5(24960) DEBUG: tm [t_reply.c:1812]: relay_reply(): DEBUG: relay_reply: branch=0, save=0, relay=0 icode=0 I have in configuration in WITHINDLG if (is_method("NOTIFY")) { record_route(); } and in NATDETECT if(is_method("INVITE|SUBSCRIBE|UPDATE|NOTIFY")) { set_contact_alias(); } Slava. _______________________________________________ SIP Express Router (SER) and Kamailio (OpenSER) - sr-users mailing list sr-users(a)lists.sip-router.org http://lists.sip-router.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/sr-users -- Daniel-Constantin Mierla http://twitter.com/#!/miconda - http://www.linkedin.com/in/miconda Kamailio World Conference, May 27-29, 2015 Berlin, Germany - http://www.kamailioworld.com _______________________________________________ SIP Express Router (SER) and Kamailio (OpenSER) - sr-users mailing list sr-users(a)lists.sip-router.org http://lists.sip-router.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/sr-users BQ_END -- Daniel-Constantin Mierla http://twitter.com/#!/miconda - http://www.linkedin.com/in/miconda Kamailio World Conference, May 27-29, 2015 Berlin, Germany - http://www.kamailioworld.com

9 years, 8 months

Re: [SR-Users] kamailio asterisk NOTIFY

by Slava Bendersky

Hello Daniel, Here fresh paste http://fpaste.org/196616/42608006/ I see proper routing headers on SUBSCRIBE, but then NOTIFY loose it. Slava. From: "Daniel-Constantin Mierla" <miconda(a)gmail.com> To: "sr-users" <sr-users(a)lists.sip-router.org> Sent: Tuesday, March 10, 2015 5:31:51 PM Subject: Re: [SR-Users] kamailio asterisk NOTIFY Hello, fpaste link doesn't show anything. Can you check if the NOTIFY coming to Kamailio has two Route headers? Cheers, Daniel On 10/03/15 18:44, Slava Bendersky wrote: Hello Everyone, Having issue with NOTIFY, is not forwarded to client properly. asterisk ---> private kamailio public ----> soft client http://fpaste.org/196257/99948714/ I see kamailio trying connect always with private IP to the client when NOTIFY is come is in. Is this something to do with rr_advertise_address ? Mar 10 13:44:23 canlvprx01 kamailio: 16(24971) ERROR: <core> [tcp_main.c:4338]: tcpconn_main_timeout(): connect 192.168.88.246:5064 failed (timeout) Mar 10 13:44:23 canlvprx01 kamailio: 16(24971) DEBUG: <core> [tcp_main.c:4362]: tcpconn_main_timeout(): tcp_main: timeout for 0x7fbbb64e2800 Mar 10 13:44:23 canlvprx01 kamailio: 16(24971) DEBUG: <core> [io_wait.h:610]: io_watch_del(): DBG: io_watch_del (0x9dbf00, 33, -1, 0x10) fd_no=24 called Mar 10 13:44:23 canlvprx01 kamailio: 16(24971) DEBUG: <core> [tcp_main.c:4320]: tcpconn_main_timeout(): tcp_main: entering timer for 0x7fbbb64eb6c0 (ticks=839577436, timeout=839634956 (3595 s), wr_timeout=839577436 (0 s)), write queue: 798 bytes Mar 10 13:44:23 canlvprx01 kamailio: 16(24971) ERROR: <core> [tcp_main.c:4338]: tcpconn_main_timeout(): connect 192.168.88.246:5066 failed (timeout) Mar 10 13:44:23 canlvprx01 kamailio: 16(24971) DEBUG: <core> [tcp_main.c:4362]: tcpconn_main_timeout(): tcp_main: timeout for 0x7fbbb64eb6c0 Mar 10 13:44:23 canlvprx01 kamailio: 16(24971) DEBUG: <core> [io_wait.h:610]: io_watch_del(): DBG: io_watch_del (0x9dbf00, 34, -1, 0x10) fd_no=23 called Mar 10 13:44:42 canlvprx01 kamailio: 5(24960) DEBUG: tm [t_reply.c:1294]: t_should_relay_response(): ->>>>>>>>> T_code=0, new_code=408 Mar 10 13:44:42 canlvprx01 kamailio: 5(24960) DEBUG: tm [t_reply.c:1812]: relay_reply(): DEBUG: relay_reply: branch=0, save=0, relay=0 icode=0 Mar 10 13:44:42 canlvprx01 kamailio: 5(24960) DEBUG: <core> [mem/shm_mem.c:111]: _shm_resize(): WARNING:vqm_resize: resize(0) called Mar 10 13:44:42 canlvprx01 kamailio: 5(24960) DEBUG: tm [t_reply.c:1294]: t_should_relay_response(): ->>>>>>>>> T_code=0, new_code=408 Mar 10 13:44:42 canlvprx01 kamailio: 5(24960) DEBUG: tm [t_reply.c:1812]: relay_reply(): DEBUG: relay_reply: branch=0, save=0, relay=0 icode=0 I have in configuration in WITHINDLG if (is_method("NOTIFY")) { record_route(); } and in NATDETECT if(is_method("INVITE|SUBSCRIBE|UPDATE|NOTIFY")) { set_contact_alias(); } Slava. _______________________________________________ SIP Express Router (SER) and Kamailio (OpenSER) - sr-users mailing list sr-users(a)lists.sip-router.org http://lists.sip-router.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/sr-users -- Daniel-Constantin Mierla http://twitter.com/#!/miconda - http://www.linkedin.com/in/miconda Kamailio World Conference, May 27-29, 2015 Berlin, Germany - http://www.kamailioworld.com _______________________________________________ SIP Express Router (SER) and Kamailio (OpenSER) - sr-users mailing list sr-users(a)lists.sip-router.org http://lists.sip-router.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/sr-users

9 years, 8 months

SIREMIS error

by Agiftel

Hi, i tried to install SIREMIS v 4.2 and i get error, already posted on internet/forum, regarding versione of PHP 5.6 What i didn't find is a solution. So my question is, I still unsupported by SIREMIS php v 5.4 and upper? Is there a solution?' Regards -- View this message in context: http://sip-router.1086192.n5.nabble.com/SIREMIS-error-tp135884.html Sent from the Users mailing list archive at Nabble.com.

9 years, 8 months

OT: results investigating why kamailio.org was not responding recently

by Daniel-Constantin Mierla

Hello, as some noticed and informed privately or on mailing list, several days ago kamailio.org was not accessible. It was caused by apache getting stuck on connecting to a remote host due to the pingback feature of wordpress. All the other services were fine. Listing running processes showed a large number of apache instances connecting to an address like 23.x.y.204 and being stuck in that state. Fetching the page from that address with wget resulted in some html with embedded obfuscated javascript. I couldn't find a reason why apache was not closing the connection, although there are some timeouts in configs. Also, as I expect apache/php/wordpress don't run javascript, the issue should be somewhere at the http layer. At some point apache reached the max number of threads and didn't serve other requests. The solution was to disable the pingbacks using a plugin for wordpress named: Disable XML-RPC Pingback . All seems ok for the last days. I posted here just in case it will be useful for someone else, but also to get hints on other tweaks that we should to do wordpress to prevent similar situation, if anyone can share from his/her experience. Cheers, Daniel -- Daniel-Constantin Mierla http://twitter.com/#!/miconda - http://www.linkedin.com/in/miconda Kamailio World Conference, May 27-29, 2015 Berlin, Germany - http://www.kamailioworld.com

9 years, 8 months

Calling ims charging function in route_failure

by Shane Harrison

Hi all, What I want to do ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~ If a call to a SIP AoR fails then try the PSTN number associated with the AoR by routing the request to a PSTN gateway. Calls to a PSTN gateway need to be charged so need to call the Ro_CCR function in ims_charging module. How I tried to do it ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~ In the failure_route[MANAGE_FAILURE] block I call the Ro_CCR() Result was ~~~~~~~~ Kamailio fails to parse config file. yyparse(): misused command Ro_CCR yyerror_at(): parse error in config file //etc/kamailio/kamailio.cfg, line 1162, column 91: Command cannot be used in the block So two questions: 1) What constraints are there for calling functions in the failure_route blocks i.e. how does parser decide what can be called and what can't 2) Any thoughts of how I can do effectively a late charging decision Cheers and thanks in advance Shane Shane Harrison Senior Software Engineer Imagination Technologies NZ Limited Level 2 1 Market Grove Lower Hutt, 5010 New Zealand PO Box 30-449 Lower Hutt, 5040 New Zealand Phone: +64 4 890-3681 ext 3361

9 years, 8 months

← Newer
1
...
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
Older →

Jump to page:

2024

2023

2022

2021

2020

2019

2018

2017

2016

2015

2014

2013

2012

2011

2010

2009

2008

2007

2006

2005

2004

2003

2002

sr-users March 2015