sr-users November 2016

sr-users@lists.kamailio.org

57 participants
126 discussions

Re: [SR-Users] Kamailio IMS virtual machine
by Franz Edler 29 Nov '16

29 Nov '16

Hi Rafael, There should not be a problem with the VMware mage. Regarding your question: you have to check kamailio-pcscf.cfg to recognize when and it how forward the SIP message towards the I-CSCF. I guess it is the statement "t_relay();" in line 896. You may provide a core tracefile (generated with tcpdump), then I may have aquick look ate your ise. BR Franz Von: Rafi Aizenstain [mailto:rafi_a@cellowireless.com] Gesendet: Montag, 28. November 2016 16:12 An: franz.edler(a)technikum-wien.at Betreff: Kamailio IMS virtual machine Hello Mr. Franz I'm trying to build a testbed using the VMware image you kindly have shared here: https://www.kamailio.org/w/2016/02/kamailio-ims-getting-started-box/ But when running the machine as-is I keep getting errors from the P-CSCF module and it doesn't forward the SIP message towards the I-CSCF. Please see the following log: root@server:~# kamailio -f /usr/local/etc/kamailio/kamailio-pcscf.cfg loading modules under config path: /usr/local/lib64/kamailio/modules/ 0(2096) INFO: <core> [sctp_core.c:75]: sctp_core_check_support(): SCTP API not enabled - if you want to use it, load sctp module Listening on udp: server.net1.test [10.0.0.9]:4060 Aliases: *: pcscf.net1.test:* WARNING: no fork mode 0(2096) INFO: rr [../outbound/api.h:54]: ob_load_api(): Failed to import bind_ob 0(2096) INFO: rr [rr_mod.c:174]: mod_init(): outbound module not available 0(2096) INFO: ims_usrloc_pcscf [hslot.c:62]: ul_init_locks(): locks array size 512 0(2096) INFO: <core> [udp_server.c:150]: probe_max_receive_buffer(): SO_RCVBUF is initially 212992 0(2096) INFO: <core> [udp_server.c:200]: probe_max_receive_buffer(): SO_RCVBUF is finally 425984 0(2096) WARNING: ims_usrloc_pcscf [usrloc_db.c:59]: connect_db(): DB connection already open... continuing 0(2096) INFO: <script>: [REGISTER] from [sip:bob@net1.test] to [sip:bob@net1.test] 0(2096) ERROR: <script>: REGISTER (sip:bob@net1.test (10.0.0.200:59721) to sip:bob@net1.test, 7013b8fc-11a0-2b70-3654-9ce68424e9a7) Looking into the configuration files I couldn't understand how does the P-CSCF determine that it has to forward the SIP message towards the I-CSCF module. Are you aware of any issue with the VMware machine you have shared. Please advise. Best Regards, Rafael A.

2 1

LCR modules troubles
by Laura 29 Nov '16

29 Nov '16

Dear list, i have a strange situation with module LCR on kamailio 4.3.6. A customer send a call to my first kamailio and i forward it with some tech prefix to my supplier. Here the 2 correct invites.. customer is sending to me with prefix 9001 14:34:29.155719 CUSTOMER_IP.101:5060 -> EU_KMAILIO_IP.40:5060 INVITE sip:900133139864069@EU_KMAILIO_IP.40 SIP/2.0. Record-Route: <sip:CUSTOMER_IP.101;lr;ftag=33F431FC-2103;vst=AAAAAAwFBQQFAwEACgkFDQgADXADCG4DDQEABQUWHwYGLjEwMQ-->. Via: SIP/2.0/UDP CUSTOMER_IP.101;branch=z9hG4bK2d4.4853821c2be0bf7d75377fce7683f593.0. Via: SIP/2.0/UDP CUSTOMER_IP.108:5060;branch=z9hG4bK504DC634. Remote-Party-ID: <sip:441753825186@CUSTOMER_IP.108>;party=calling;screen=yes;privacy=off. From: <sip:441753825186@CUSTOMER_IP.108>;tag=33F431FC-2103. To: <sip:900133139864069@EU_KMAILIO_IP.40>. Date: Mon, 28 Nov 2016 14:34:29 GMT. Call-ID: 9A8A4545-B4AE11E6-9238E2D3-6BBD43E(a)CUSTOMER_IP.108. Supported: 100rel,timer,resource-priority,replaces,sdp-anat. Min-SE: 1800. Cisco-Guid: 2592672861-3031306726-2677997592-0419390928. User-Agent: Cisco-SIPGateway/IOS-12.x. Allow: INVITE, OPTIONS, BYE, CANCEL, ACK, PRACK, UPDATE, REFER, SUBSCRIBE, NOTIFY, INFO, REGISTER. CSeq: 101 INVITE. Max-Forwards: 69. ..... and i forward to my supplier U 2016/11/28 14:34:29.157516 EU_KMAILIO_IP.40:5060 -> EU_SUPPLIER_IP.198:5060 INVITE sip:00233139864069@EU_SUPPLIER_IP.198 SIP/2.0. Record-Route: <sip:EU_KMAILIO_IP.40;lr;ftag=33F431FC-2103;did=ff5.6f01;vst=AAAAAAkAAgIAAgIKAQ4CBAYPeXIECQAABAcAAwQIAAUJOA--;nat=yes>. Record-Route: <sip:CUSTOMER_IP.101;lr;ftag=33F431FC-2103;vst=AAAAAAwFBQQFAwEACgkFDQgADXADCG4DDQEABQUWHwYGLjEwMQ-->. Via: SIP/2.0/UDP EU_KMAILIO_IP.40:5060;branch=z9hG4bK2d4.782830bfdde5e873d3dc6a71bcbba70f.0. Via: SIP/2.0/UDP CUSTOMER_IP.101;rport=5060;branch=z9hG4bK2d4.4853821c2be0bf7d75377fce7683f593.0. Via: SIP/2.0/UDP CUSTOMER_IP.108:5060;branch=z9hG4bK504DC634. Remote-Party-ID: <sip:441753825186@CUSTOMER_IP.108>;party=calling;screen=yes;privacy=off. From: <sip:441753825186@CUSTOMER_IP.108>;tag=33F431FC-2103. To: <sip:00233139864069@EU_SUPPLIER_IP.198>. Date: Mon, 28 Nov 2016 14:34:29 GMT. Call-ID: 9A8A4545-B4AE11E6-9238E2D3-6BBD43E(a)CUSTOMER_IP.108. Supported: 100rel,timer,resource-priority,replaces,sdp-anat. Min-SE: 1800. Cisco-Guid: 2592672861-3031306726-2677997592-0419390928. Allow: INVITE, OPTIONS, BYE, CANCEL, ACK, PRACK, UPDATE, REFER, SUBSCRIBE, NOTIFY, INFO, REGISTER. CSeq: 101 INVITE. Max-Forwards: 68. Timestamp: 1480343669. Contact: <sip:441753825186@CUSTOMER_IP.108:5060>. Expires: 180. Allow-Events: telephone-event. Content-Type: application/sdp. Content-Disposition: session;handling=required. Content-Length: 310. On both invites the To field respect the correct information from INVITE so that the kamailio CDR is working correct. After that the supplier reply me 503 and call is come back to my kamailio. LCR modules send the call to second supplier that on this case is my second box kamailio on another countrie.. Here there is this problem that i signed on RED U 2016/11/28 14:34:43.191618 EU_KMAILIO_IP.40:5060 -> EU_SUPPLIER2_IP.242:5060 *INVITE sip:905233139864069@EU_SUPPLIER2_IP.242 SIP/2.0.* Record-Route: <sip:EU_KMAILIO_IP.40;lr;ftag=33F431FC-2103;did=ff5.6f01>. Record-Route: <sip:CUSTOMER_IP.101;lr;ftag=33F431FC-2103;vst=AAAAAAwFBQQFAwEACgkFDQgADXADCG4DDQEABQUWHwYGLjEwMQ-->. Via: SIP/2.0/UDP EU_KMAILIO_IP.40:5060;branch=z9hG4bK2d4.782830bfdde5e873d3dc6a71bcbba70f.1. Via: SIP/2.0/UDP CUSTOMER_IP.101;rport=5060;branch=z9hG4bK2d4.4853821c2be0bf7d75377fce7683f593.0. Via: SIP/2.0/UDP CUSTOMER_IP.108:5060;branch=z9hG4bK504DC634. Remote-Party-ID: <sip:441753825186@CUSTOMER_IP.108>;party=calling;screen=yes;privacy=off. From: <sip:441753825186@CUSTOMER_IP.108>;tag=33F431FC-2103. *To: <sip:900133139864069@EU_KMAILIO_IP.40>.* Date: Mon, 28 Nov 2016 14:34:29 GMT. Call-ID: 9A8A4545-B4AE11E6-9238E2D3-6BBD43E(a)CUSTOMER_IP.108. Supported: 100rel,timer,resource-priority,replaces,sdp-anat. Min-SE: 1800. Cisco-Guid: 2592672861-3031306726-2677997592-0419390928. Allow: INVITE, OPTIONS, BYE, CANCEL, ACK, PRACK, UPDATE, REFER, SUBSCRIBE, NOTIFY, INFO, REGISTER. CSeq: 101 INVITE. Max-Forwards: 68. Timestamp: 1480343669. Contact: <sip:441753825186@CUSTOMER_IP.108:5060>. Expires: 180. Allow-Events: telephone-event. Content-Type: application/sdp. Content-Disposition: session;handling=required. .... The LCR modules make the new INVITE using the original To field and don't rewrite it like on the first request.. How is that possibile ? Any idea ? Best regards Laura

3 2

XAVP Null
by Linux Vince 29 Nov '16

29 Nov '16

Hi, I am sure i am doing something very basic wrongly. Here is my config file snippet $xavp(caller_peer[0]=>accountname) = "AAA"; xlog("L_WARN", "XAVP ACCOUNT NAME $xavp(caller_peer[0]=>accountname) \n"); No matter what i set this XAVP at, it always prints null in log file as below WARNING: <script>: XAVP ACCOUNT NAME <null> Please help how i can set XAVP and use it further in config file.

3 2

MSRP auth does not work with blink
by Pranathi Venkatayogi 29 Nov '16

29 Nov '16

Hi, I am trying to use MSRP feature of blink client. In the server config when auth is challenged, I see the following error in the client. Can you please advise if I am configuring the server right? Note: the return value of pv_www_authenticate is "-5". 13 2016-11-07 17:57:26.494124 [blink.exe 24976]: Closed connection to 10.0.16.51:2855 ('NotificationProxyLogger' object has no attribute 'received_illegal_data') Find attached full set of client logs. Here is the relevant portion of kamailio.cfg: if (!pv_www_authenticate("MY_DOMAIN", "$var(passwd)", "0", "$msrp(method)")) { www_challenge("MY_DOMAIN", "1"); xlog("L_ERR", "MSRP auth failed with: $var(retValue)\n"); exit; } Thanks, Pranathi Venkatayogi System Developer II (520) 745-9447 x4466 www.cyracom.com<http://www.cyracom.com/> Join us: [cid:image001.gif@01D1C9C9.C4E8B6D0] <https://www.facebook.com/pages/CyraCom-LLC/134704783312720> [cid:image002.gif@01D1C9C9.C4E8B6D0] <https://twitter.com/cyracom> [cid:image003.gif@01D1C9C9.C4E8B6D0] <http://www.linkedin.com/company/cyracom> [cid:image004.gif@01D1C9C9.C4E8B6D0] <http://www.cyracom.com/blog/> [cid:image005.png@01D1C9C9.C4E8B6D0] DISCLAIMER: This e-mail and any attached content may contain confidential or privileged material delivered for the sole use of the intended recipient(s). Any review, use, distribution or disclosure by others is strictly prohibited. If you are not the intended recipient (or authorized to receive for the recipient), please contact the sender immediately by reply e-mail and delete all copies of this message. It is the recipient's responsibility to scan this e-mail and any attachments for viruses. The content of this e-mail message, including any attachments, does not comprise a contract or a portion of a contract, and so does not bind CyraCom International, Inc. or any of its agents or subsidiaries. CyraCom, LLC and Voiance Language Services, LLC are wholly owned subsidiaries of CyraCom International, Inc.

2 4

Problems with Siremis and Kamailio - PHP7
by Diogenes Aviles 29 Nov '16

29 Nov '16

I have Kamailio 4.4 installed in ubuntu 16.04.03, with Siremis 4.2.0, PHP7 and apache2. All is OK, but when I try to install the Siremis Wizard, the step 2 (Data Base Configuration) doesn't work, and there is the message "Something Went Wrong". I tried all the option on Step 2, but the problem continuous. Then I can't go to step 3 Application Configuration. The Siremis DataBase is created and the user also. I appreciate any help. -- Diogenes

2 1

Siremis v4.3.0 Released
by Daniel-Constantin Mierla 29 Nov '16

29 Nov '16

Hello, a new release of Siremis, the web management interface for Kamailio, has been released recently. The main work was towards making it compatible with PHP 7 and the new constraints from MySQL 5.7+. The announcement is available at: - http://siremis.asipto.com/2016/11/26/siremis-v4-3-0-released/ Cheers, Daniel -- Daniel-Constantin Mierla http://twitter.com/#!/miconda - http://www.linkedin.com/in/miconda Kamailio World 2017 - May 8-10, in Berlin - www.kamailioworld.com

1 0

custom version database/table
by David Villasmil 28 Nov '16

28 Nov '16

Hello all, I have a databse where i created a "version" table only with a version, a dispatcher records. I only want to use dispatcher on a db. I don't know if kamailio is looking for the version tables somewhere else, or it does find it in my database (not named kamailio) but the format is wrong. I used: CREATE TABLE `version` ( `table_name` VARCHAR(32) NOT NULL, `table_version` INT UNSIGNED DEFAULT 0 NOT NULL, CONSTRAINT table_name_idx UNIQUE (`table_name`) ); INSERT INTO version (table_name, table_version) values ('version','1'); INSERT INTO version (table_name, table_version) values ('dispatcher','4'); To create an populate the table, but kamailio returns: mod_init(): could not initiate a connect to the database but it does connect properly... any thoughts? Regards, David Villasmil email: david.villasmil.work(a)gmail.com phone: +34669448337 ᐧ

2 3

Recent problem with fix_nated_sdp and kamailio 4.4.4
by Anthony Messina 28 Nov '16

28 Nov '16

Prior to the upgrade to Kamailio 4.4.4, I was using 4.4.3 with updates through 81df84b from the 4.4 branch and the following fix_nated_sdp call worked through the initial INVITE and when a voicemail branch was appended from the failure_route. route[NATMANAGE] { ... # RTPEngine is not needed but if STUN addresses are being used on our # internal network, rewrite the addresses to the internal source address if(!isbflagset(FLB_RTPENGINE) && has_body("application/sdp")) { if(dst_ip==10.1.1.2 && compare_pure_ips($sel(contact.uri.host), "<EXTERNAL_IP>")) { fix_nated_sdp("10"); } } ... } Since the upgrade to 4.4.4, when the original INVITE fails over to voicemail (branch appended), fix_nated_sdp creates the SDP below, doubling the replaced IP addresses. Asterisk replies with 488, as the media address is completely invalid. I need something like the above (which worked for the request and the reply) but can't figure out what the problem is. v=0 o=Zoiper 0 0 IN IP4 10.1.1.18210.1.1.182 s=Zoiper c=IN IP4 10.1.1.18210.1.1.182 t=0 0 m=audio 63732 RTP/SAVP 9 3 0 97 101 a=rtpmap:9 G722/8000 a=rtpmap:3 GSM/8000 a=rtpmap:0 PCMU/8000 a=rtpmap:97 iLBC/8000 a=fmtp:97 mode=30 a=rtpmap:101 telephone-event/8000 a=fmtp:101 0-16 a=sendrecv a=crypto:5 AES_256_CM_HMAC_SHA1_80 inline:n2C0BcdXOr32BPTEE8pfHII9mamAK566xMNvQIDIGKI2LPOLdNDOcpFdtqu5DQ== a=crypto:6 AES_256_CM_HMAC_SHA1_32 inline:n2C0BcdXOr32BPTEE8pfHII9mamAK566xMNvQIDIGKI2LPOLdNDOcpFdtqu5DQ== a=crypto:3 AES_192_CM_HMAC_SHA1_80 inline:n2C0BcdXOr32BPTEE8pfHII9mamAK566xMNvQIDIGKI2LPOLdNA= a=crypto:4 AES_192_CM_HMAC_SHA1_32 inline:n2C0BcdXOr32BPTEE8pfHII9mamAK566xMNvQIDIGKI2LPOLdNA= a=crypto:1 AES_CM_128_HMAC_SHA1_80 inline:n2C0BcdXOr32BPTEE8pfHII9mamAK566xMNvQIDI a=crypto:2 AES_CM_128_HMAC_SHA1_32 inline:n2C0BcdXOr32BPTEE8pfHII9mamAK566xMNvQIDI a=oldmediaip:<EXTERNAL_IP> a=oldmediaip:<EXTERNAL_IP> a=oldmediaip:<EXTERNAL_IP> a=oldmediaip:<EXTERNAL_IP> -- Anthony - https://messinet.com/ - https://messinet.com/~amessina/gallery F9B6 560E 68EA 037D 8C3D D1C9 FF31 3BDB D9D8 99B6

2 4

kamailio core dumps once every few days
by davy van de moere 28 Nov '16

28 Nov '16

Gents, On a not really loaded kamailio (less than 50 users at the moment), I'm getting a core dump every few days. I've tried multiple verisons of Kamailio, 4.4.x , 4.3.x and also on 5.0.0-dev7 . I can't reproduce it adhoc, but every few days it happens... Is that something someone wants to jump in? grtz, davy Version: version: kamailio 5.0.0-dev7 (x86_64/linux) 7360b0 [New LWP 29728] [Thread debugging using libthread_db enabled] Using host libthread_db library "/lib/x86_64-linux-gnu/libthread_db.so.1". Core was generated by `/usr/local/sbin/kamailio -P /var/run/kamailio.pid -f /usr/local/etc/kamailio//k'. Program terminated with signal SIGSEGV, Segmentation fault. #0 0x00007f92c5a0be98 in __dialog_sendpublish (dlg=0x7f92c0e3a6c0, type=64, _params=0x7f92c0423500 <params>) at pua_dialoginfo.c:264 264 uri = dlginfo->to_uri; (gdb) backtrace #0 0x00007f92c5a0be98 in __dialog_sendpublish (dlg=0x7f92c0e3a6c0, type=64, _params=0x7f92c0423500 <params>) at pua_dialoginfo.c:264 #1 0x00007f92c01e2563 in run_dlg_callbacks (type=64, dlg=0x7f92c0e3a6c0, req=0x7f92cc6d5db8, rpl=0x0, dir=1, dlg_data=0x0) at dlg_cb.c:256 #2 0x00007f92c01a92b1 in dlg_terminated (req=0x7f92cc6d5db8, dlg=0x7f92c0e3a6c0, dir=1) at dlg_handlers.c:366 #3 0x00007f92c01b610f in dlg_onroute (req=0x7f92cc6d5db8, route_params=0x7ffc7de27ba0, param=0x0) at dlg_handlers.c:1409 #4 0x00007f92c9292171 in run_rr_callbacks (req=0x7f92cc6d5db8, rr_param=0x7ffc7de27c20) at rr_cb.c:96 #5 0x00007f92c9287ac2 in after_loose (_m=0x7f92cc6d5db8, preloaded=0) at loose.c:928 #6 0x00007f92c9288168 in loose_route (_m=0x7f92cc6d5db8) at loose.c:962 #7 0x00007f92c928b7ee in w_loose_route (msg=0x7f92cc6d5db8, p1=0x0, p2=0x0) at rr_mod.c:266 #8 0x000000000041f5d9 in do_action (h=0x7ffc7de285b0, a=0x7f92cc5f7a70, msg=0x7f92cc6d5db8) at action.c:1054 #9 0x000000000042bcde in run_actions (h=0x7ffc7de285b0, a=0x7f92cc5f7a70, msg=0x7f92cc6d5db8) at action.c:1552 #10 0x000000000042c383 in run_actions_safe (h=0x7ffc7de29c60, a=0x7f92cc5f7a70, msg=0x7f92cc6d5db8) at action.c:1620 #11 0x000000000061fe86 in rval_get_int (h=0x7ffc7de29c60, msg=0x7f92cc6d5db8, i=0x7ffc7de28cc0, rv=0x7f92cc5f7bc8, cache=0x0) at rvalue.c:912 #12 0x00000000006243c3 in rval_expr_eval_int (h=0x7ffc7de29c60, msg=0x7f92cc6d5db8, res=0x7ffc7de28cc0, rve=0x7f92cc5f7bc0) at rvalue.c:1910 #13 0x000000000041f0d1 in do_action (h=0x7ffc7de29c60, a=0x7f92cc600430, msg=0x7f92cc6d5db8) at action.c:1030 #14 0x000000000042bcde in run_actions (h=0x7ffc7de29c60, a=0x7f92cc600430, msg=0x7f92cc6d5db8) at action.c:1552 #15 0x000000000041f548 in do_action (h=0x7ffc7de29c60, a=0x7f92cc6006d0, msg=0x7f92cc6d5db8) at action.c:1045 #16 0x000000000042bcde in run_actions (h=0x7ffc7de29c60, a=0x7f92cc6006d0, msg=0x7f92cc6d5db8) at action.c:1552 #17 0x000000000041c0fb in do_action (h=0x7ffc7de29c60, a=0x7f92cc545730, msg=0x7f92cc6d5db8) at action.c:678 #18 0x000000000042bcde in run_actions (h=0x7ffc7de29c60, a=0x7f92cc537760, msg=0x7f92cc6d5db8) at action.c:1552 #19 0x000000000042c44b in run_top_route (a=0x7f92cc537760, msg=0x7f92cc6d5db8, c=0x0) at action.c:1641 #20 0x00000000005726a2 in receive_msg ( buf=0xa1c200 <buf> "BYE sip:echo@123.48.11.215:5070;transport=udp SIP/2.0\r\nVia: SIP/2.0/UDP 0.0.0.0:5060;rport;branch=z9hG4bKPj26b505ba-7ede-4198-a917-bde966b6d8b6\r\nMax-Forwards: 69\r\nFrom: sip:192.168.60.1;tag=9a10d8ab-"..., len=462, rcv_info=0x7ffc7de29fb0) at receive.c:264 #21 0x000000000047bcdc in udp_rcv_loop () at udp_server.c:507 #22 0x0000000000509de1 in main_loop () at main.c:1618 #23 0x00000000005112de in main (argc=5, argv=0x7ffc7de2a478) at main.c:2639 (gdb)

2 2

Balancer with Dispacther Module
by Rodrigo Moreira 28 Nov '16

28 Nov '16

I need help. I'm building a load balancer using the dispatcher. It does NAT with too many SIP Servers. But when the balancer receives an ACK from UAC, it immediately returns the message "404 Not Here" to UAC. Help me solve this, since this message (ACK) has to be forwarded to SIP Servers and finally to UAS to start an RTP session. I thank you. Att., -- Rodrigo M. (37) 9132-4539 (34) 9889-3069 rodrigo.moreira2007

2 1

← Newer
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
...
13
Older →

2026

2025

2024

2023

2022

2021

2020

2019

2018

2017

2016

2015

2014

2013

2012

2011

2010

2009

2008

2007

2006

2005

2004

2003

2002

sr-users November 2016