sr-users December 2016

sr-users@lists.kamailio.org

71 participants
104 discussions

help with string modification
by Sergey Basov 01 Dec '16

01 Dec '16

Hello All. I have some troubles with upstream sip switch. It ignores SIP packets which contains: User-Agent: FPBX-2.11.0(11.17.1) or Server: User-Agent: FPBX-2.11.0(11.17.1) If space is present before first "(" then sip switch works as expected So my question is: how corektly make analyze and modify this headers using kamailio? In which routes i must parse it? i need such modifications: User-Agent: FPBX-2.11.0(11.17.1) -> User-Agent: FPBX-2.11.0 (11.17.1) Server: User-Agent: FPBX-2.11.0(11.17.1) -> Server: User-Agent: FPBX-2.11.0 (11.17.1) Thank you. -- Best regards, Sergey Basov e-mail: sergey.v.basov(a)gmail.com

2 4

Re: [SR-Users] TSILO question
by Federico Cabiddu 01 Dec '16

01 Dec '16

Hi, about your questions: Q1: yes it's feasible as long as the two Registrars (Kamailio) have the location information. Please see my reply on a thread on this topic: http://lists.sip-router.org/pipermail/sr-users/2016-February/091612.html Q2: given that TSILO depends on the users' location you have to put it in the Registrar. Best regards, Federico On Wed, Nov 30, 2016 at 5:32 AM, C. J Hsu (徐熙杰) <CJ.Hsu(a)quantatw.com> wrote: > hi Federico > > i'm stuck at TSILO and wondering if you could give me some advises. > > Q1: > > in lab1, I'm having two Kamailios with proxy and registrar together, UA1 > and UA2. > UAs go thru hardware load-balancing device (F5) to register themselves in > Kamailio, > > I wonder, UA1 calling to UA2, invite suspended in Kamailio 1, waiting for > UA2; > and when UA2 come to register in Kamailio 2, TSILO in Kamailio 1 resumes > the invite and sending it to Kamailio 2, is this a no problem scenario? > > Q2: > > if we decide to separate Proxy and Registrar in different Kamailio, when > should I put TSILO in? > > > RGDS > > C J >

1 0

Real error?
by Olvera, Victor 01 Dec '16

01 Dec '16

Is this a real error? 9(1899) ERROR: cdp [peerstatemachine.c:635]: I_Snd_CER(): I_Snd_CER(): Error on finding local host address > Socket operation on non-socket Great regards, Victor Olvera victor.olvera(a)verizonwireless.com<mailto:victor.olvera@verizonwireless.com> mobile # 001-214-923-9405

3 2

In dialog messages cannot be routed after re-registration with outbound and gruu
by Robert 01 Dec '16

01 Dec '16

Hi, I'm using outbound with gruu enabled and with edge proxy, registrar and auth proxy all running as separate entities. My problem is once a dialog is formed between two UAs, if one side re-registers and gets assigned a new flow token, all subsequent in-dialog messages cannot be routed because the flow token in the Route set is no longer valid. What is the proper way to update the binding? I read in this thread <http://sip-router.1086192.n5.nabble.com/Outbound-and-Registrar-No-binding-u…> that "using GRUU means that Outbound is also used, so the Contact has a +sip.instance and reg-id params which are inspected by the registrar to create/update/delete a binding". How is the binding updated exactly? Any help would be appreciated. -- View this message in context: http://sip-router.1086192.n5.nabble.com/In-dialog-messages-cannot-be-routed… Sent from the Users mailing list archive at Nabble.com.

1 0

2026

2025

2024

2023

2022

2021

2020

2019

2018

2017

2016

2015

2014

2013

2012

2011

2010

2009

2008

2007

2006

2005

2004

2003

2002

sr-users December 2016