sr-users July 2016

sr-users@lists.kamailio.org

82 participants
125 discussions

by Colin Morelli

Hey all, I've got two layers of Kamailio proxies running. One set of edge proxies that are parking outbound connections and doing load balancing to a set of registrar/proxies. This is working well with one exception: I can't seem to get t_load_contacts/t_next_contacts working correctly for handling multiple outbound connections. It *appears* to work (though I haven't extensively tested) whenever there's more than one registration binding for an AOR. However, when there's only one, I get: 8(27) DEBUG: tm [t_serial.c:191]: t_load_contacts(): nr_branches is 0 8(27) DEBUG: tm [t_serial.c:194]: t_load_contacts(): nothing to do - only one contact! 8(27) DEBUG: tm [t_serial.c:455]: t_next_contacts(): no contacts in contacts_avp - we are done! 8(27) ERROR: <script>: t_next_contacts() failed I tried omitting the call to t_next_contacts(), thinking it should possibly only be used in failure_route. But when I do that (while leaving t_load_contacts), I get: 5(24) ERROR: tm [t_fwd.c:1730]: t_forward_nonack(): ERROR: t_forward_nonack: no branches for forwarding 5(24) WARNING: <core> [receive.c:258]: receive_msg(): error while trying script The relevant part of the config is: if (!lookup("location")) { $var(rc) = $rc; switch ($var(rc)) { case -1: xlog("L_INFO", "$ci|log|lookup of contacts for $ru returned no results\r\n"); send_reply("404", "Not Found"); exit; case -3: xlog("L_INFO", "$ci|log|lookup of contacts for $ru failed with code $var(rc)\r\n"); send_reply("404", "Not Found"); exit; case -2: send_reply("405", "Method Not Allowed"); exit; } } if (!t_load_contacts() || !t_next_contacts()) { xlog("L_ERR", "t_load_contacts() failed\n"); sl_reply_error(); t_release(); exit; } Am I missing something else here? Note: it works fine if I remove t_load_contacts/t_next_contacts, but then I don't get proper handling of multiple sip.instance bindings/differing q values. Best, Colin

8 years, 4 months

business case

by anfecora

I apologize since this is a technical mail list and this question may not belong here but i need to fill a business requirement and need more information of big companies using kamailio, i am searching over the internet but if anyone can provide me with names of real carriers using kamailio will be very useful. Thanks again for any help in this case.

8 years, 4 months

Dispatcher list not loading from dispatcher.list, but loading from DB

by Tickling Contest

Hello, I have a Kamailio 4.0.4 configured with the cfg file shown in https://gist.github.com/ticklingcontest/f96aa4d08b08dc4643056d73da24f0a5 The modparam for dispatcher sets the dispatcher file to be in /var/run/kamailio/dispatcher.list. However, I recently discovered that $ kamctl dispatcher show picks up the information from the kamailio DB instead of the dispatcher.list. What's going on? Any insight is appreciated. Thanks!

8 years, 4 months

kamailio starts looping invites(some) back to itself.

by Aqs Younas

Hi, I am using http_async_client and dispatcher modules of Kamailio. Here is scenario! http_async_client makes calls to an API to get groupid upon which dispatcher sends calls. I am using SIPp to generate calls with 100 cps. I see some calls being failed with an error cause, 483 Too Many Hops. Taking the trace shows Kamailio routing some calls to itself. I think this is not a configuration issue since all calls are same(follow same logic) and some calls get failed. Any pointer is much appreciated. Best Regards.

8 years, 4 months

sip options not relaying

by gerry kernan

Hi I have a kamailio proxy in front of asterisk ver 13 servers. I'm using path support to route to the relevant asterisk server depending on the domain in the sip header. The incoming registers & invites from sip endpoints get routed to the correct asterisk server , but when asterisk is sending sip options to the end points my kamailio config is not routing the option on to the endpoint . Kamailio debug shows error below ERROR: <script>: 192.168.200.131 OPTIONS sip:1333@192.168.200.112:5062 -- domain "192.168.200.112" is not found in domain table 192.168.200.131 Am I correct in thinking that this SIP option should be getting routed via my on-reply route. the sip option looks like it is failing here at the start of my config if (src_ip != BACKEND_NET4) { xlog("L_NOTICE", "FROM CLIENT IP: $si $rm $ru $td \n"); # SIP request packet client->backend if( !loose_route() ) { if (!lookup_domain("$td", "dattr_")) { xlog("L_NOTOCE" , "Domain lookup, $rm "); xlog("L_ERR", "$si $rm $ru -- domain \"$td\" is not " + "found in domain table $si\n"); drop(); } Sample of SIP option captured on the kamailio server OPTIONS sip:1333@192.168.200.112:5062 SIP/2.0 Via: SIP/2.0/UDP 192.168.200.131:5060;branch=z9hG4bK4f910445 Max-Forwards: 70 Route: <sip:192.168.200.148;lr;received=sip:87.198.223.83:16070> From: "Unknown" <sip:Unknown@192.168.200.131>;tag=as54cfb9df To: <sip:1333@192.168.200.112:5062> Contact: <sip:Unknown@192.168.200.131:5060> Call-ID: 257dea110f5255275aa38d9c45e0e235@192.168.200.131:5060 CSeq: 102 OPTIONS User-Agent: FPBX-2.11.0(13.10.0) Date: Fri, 22 Jul 2016 15:31:13 GMT Allow: INVITE, ACK, CANCEL, OPTIONS, BYE, REFER, SUBSCRIBE, NOTIFY, INFO, PUBLISH, MESSAGE Supported: replaces, timer, path Content-Length: 0 OPTIONS sip:1333@192.168.200.112:5062 SIP/2.0 Via: SIP/2.0/UDP 192.168.200.131:5060;branch=z9hG4bK20611e3b Max-Forwards: 70 Route: <sip:192.168.200.148;lr;received=sip:87.198.223.83:16070> From: "Unknown" <sip:Unknown@192.168.200.131>;tag=as1b6a0faf To: <sip:1333@192.168.200.112:5062> Contact: <sip:Unknown@192.168.200.131:5060> Call-ID: 7f8ed5ea7a147f2b61269df862af7fae@192.168.200.131:5060 CSeq: 102 OPTIONS User-Agent: FPBX-2.11.0(13.10.0) Date: Fri, 22 Jul 2016 15:31:27 GMT Allow: INVITE, ACK, CANCEL, OPTIONS, BYE, REFER, SUBSCRIBE, NOTIFY, INFO, PUBLISH, MESSAGE Supported: replaces, timer, path Content-Length: 0 Gerry Kernan Infinity IT | 17 The Mall | Beacon Court | Sandyford | Dublin D18 E3C8 | Ireland Tel: +353 - (0)1 - 293 0090 | E-Mail: <mailto:gerry.kernan@infinityit.ie> gerry.kernan(a)infinityit.ie Managed IT Services Infinity IT - <http://www.infinityit.ie/> www.infinityit.ie IP Telephony Asterisk Consulting - <http://www.asteriskconsulting.com> www.asteriskconsulting.com Contact Centre Total Interact - <http://www.totalinteract.com> www.totalinteract.com

8 years, 4 months

Kamailio + Asterisk MWI Issues

by TEG AMJG

Dear list I am quite new to Kamailio and i know that probably this thread has been answered quite few times. But i have few questions I was able to configure Kamailio + Asterisk MWI with Kamailio handling the registration of users. The problem is that i am quite sure that is not the right way. What i did was just putting "subscribemwi=no" on every user declared on Asterisk and he will send NOTIFY's when a voicemail has been received for a particular user to Kamailio and Kamailio will just forward them to the endpoints (because he knows the location of the users). I know about the modules presence presence_xml and presence_mwi of Kamailio which will handle the subscription of users and send NOTIFY's but it is useless since I am not verifying any NOTIFY that comes from Asterisk, just forwarding. Now, some others solution are just a bunch of scripts that, for me, it doesnt make much sense since is the same idea like how i did it just more hacky and unnecesary, i guess?. This solution can be found here: http://saevolgo.blogspot.com/2012/07/asterisk-behind-kamailio-voicemail-mwi… There is another solution that i found in few threads here which i dont understand really well, is to send PUBLISH messages from Asterisk to Kamailio so Kamailio sends NOTIFY's with the event and content about the amount of voice messages in a particular mailbox. Some say that you need to create the message PUBLISH and send it with sipsak or another solution in Asterisk. For what i see in SIP documentation, the last solution seems a bit less of a hack lets say, more resilient. With all said, i have a few questions Is it the solution I made really a bad idea?. I havent take a lot of time understanding SUBSCRIBE/NOTIFY messages, just the basics, i dont know if there are some security issues i should think about in this particular flow. Should i check the status of the authorization of the subscription in Kamailio before forwarding the mesage (if there is a way, how)? or it really doesnt make sense at all? because after all, my endpoints receives the NOTIFY and "you have a new voicemail" message appears. Now, about the last solution, is there any guide of someone that has done that in a clean way?, may someone guide me how to construct the PUBLISH message and when should i send it?, should i create a cron or something?, this PUBLISH message needs to be send for every user?. may someone guide me (if this is considered a cleaner way of doing it) how to make this? Many of the answers in other threads about this are not enough to understand the idea as a whole, at least for me. Thank you very much in advance Alejandro -- - Saludos a todos

8 years, 4 months

Kamailio stops accepting calls for few seconds after 80 CPS.

by Aqs Younas

Greeting list. I am doing the load test of Kamailio with SIPp using most basic script(kamailio.cfg) with logging level set to minimum to dispatch requests to SIPp UAS. This is my dispatcher code snippet. $avp(quality) = "1"; ds_select_dst("$avp(quality)", "4"); route(RELAY); At 70 CPS calls work fine. But if I increase CPS to 80, Kamailio stops accepting calls for few seconds and comes to life after being idle for some time. 100 CPS for sip proxy is not hot cake. Also, I see in http://www.kamailio.org/docs/openser-performance-tests/ tests were made with -l27 and -m7000 which looks wronged to me. ./sipp -sf uac_inv.xml <http://www.kamailio.org/docs/openser-performance-tests/data/uac_inv.xml> -rsa 192.168.2.102:5060 192.168.2.102:5070 -m 200000 -r 7000 -d 1 -l 27 There must be something wrong in my configuration since this cps is very low. kamailio -version version: kamailio 4.4.1 (x86_64/linux) 90be8b flags: STATS: Off, USE_TCP, USE_TLS, USE_SCTP, TLS_HOOKS, USE_RAW_SOCKS, DISABLE_NAGLE, USE_MCAST, DNS_IP_HACK, SHM_MEM, SHM_MMAP, PKG_MALLOC, Q_MALLOC, F_MALLOC, TLSF_MALLOC, DBG_SR_MEMORY, USE_FUTEX, FAST_LOCK-ADAPTIVE_WAIT, USE_DNS_CACHE, USE_DNS_FAILOVER, USE_NAPTR, USE_DST_BLACKLIST, HAVE_RESOLV_RES ADAPTIVE_WAIT_LOOPS=1024, MAX_RECV_BUFFER_SIZE 262144, MAX_LISTEN 16, MAX_URI_SIZE 1024, BUF_SIZE 65535, DEFAULT PKG_SIZE 8MB poll method support: poll, epoll_lt, epoll_et, sigio_rt, select. id: 90be8b SHM_MEMORY=768 PKG_MEMORY=64 Any suggestion is much appreciated. Best Regards,

8 years, 4 months

Issue with ftag parameter in Record-Route header

by Valentin Christoph

Hi community, I'm using an MGCF that creates From tags like **%%!!MYOFFICE++00!!%%**A0F1F1BA Now the special characters "%%" are allowed in tags (i.e. "token" according to RFC 3261), token = 1*(alphanum / "-" / "." / "!" / "%" / "*" / "_" / "+" / "`" / "'" / "~" ) but they are NOT allowed in URI parameters according to RFC 3261 uri-parameter = transport-param / user-param / method-param / ttl-param / maddr-param / lr-param / other-param other-param = pname [ "=" pvalue ] pname = 1*paramchar pvalue = 1*paramchar paramchar = param-unreserved / unreserved / escaped param-unreserved = "[" / "]" / "/" / ":" / "&" / "+" / "$" unreserved = alphanum / mark mark = "-" / "_" / "." / "!" / "~" / "*" / "'" / "(" / ")" escaped = "%" HEXDIG HEXDIG which makes the MGCF ignore the whole RR header and sending subsequent requests directly to the peer SIP UA, instead of sending it to the CSCF. Hence it's not OK to just copy the From tag into the ftag parameter, imho. We did a workaround in the MGCF, now sending **~~!!MYOFFICE++00!!~~**A0F1F1BA, but strictly spoken the kamailio S-CSCF is not compliant to RFC 3261. What's your opinion? Is there an configuration option to make it compliant? All the best Christoph The information contained in this e-mail message is privileged and confidential and is for the exclusive use of the addressee. The person who receives this message and who is not the addressee, one of his employees or an agent entitled to hand it over to the addressee, is informed that he may not use, disclose or reproduce the contents thereof, and is kindly asked to notify the sender and delete the e-mail immediately.

8 years, 4 months

Tsilo Tiimers

by Nahum Nir

Hello, How can I chage the timer waiting for the client to send the register. i.e. how much time to wait for the push? Thanks, Nir

8 years, 4 months

Trouble with Asterisk behind Kamailio

by Tickling Contest

Hello, I am following the instructions in http://kb.asipto.com/asterisk:realtime:kamailio-4.0.x-asterisk-11.3.0-astdb to configure my Kamailio and Asterisk (using PJSIP realtime with MySQL). I am able to get Kamailio register the clients (tested with Zoiper softphone), but having trouble getting any further to load balance a couple of Asterisk servers. Here is a range of issues I have: (a) The Kamailio server keeps sending UDP SIP messages to the Asterisk server and it is not clear where to control what protocol to use to send SIP messages Asterisk server(s). (b) I followed the instructions for the dispatcher module in the wiki, but it is not clear why I should use the #!define WITH_ASTERISK directive to enumerate the bind IPs and ports (how does this reconcile with the list of Asterisk servers in the dispatcher.list file?): !ifdef WITH_ASTERISK asterisk.bindip = "192.168.1.102" desc "Asterisk IP Address" asterisk.bindport = "5060" desc "Asterisk Port" kamailio.bindip = "192.168.1.101" desc "Kamailio IP Address" kamailio.bindport = "5060" desc "Kamailio Port" Also, where do I specify the protocol to use when sending to the Asterisk servers? Is it auto detected? If so, why is Kamailio not detecting that the Asterisk servers are only listening on TCP? Any help is appreciated. My entire /etc/kamailio/kamailio.cfg file is in here: https://gist.github.com/ticklingcontest/c7437dbc2d8e838834ee4d852753f254. I am using Kamailio 4.0.4 with Asterisk 13.7.2 using TCP for PJSIP. Thanks!

8 years, 4 months

← Newer
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
...
13
Older →

2024

2023

2022

2021

2020

2019

2018

2017

2016

2015

2014

2013

2012

2011

2010

2009

2008

2007

2006

2005

2004

2003

2002

sr-users July 2016