sr-users November 2017

sr-users@lists.kamailio.org

89 participants
111 discussions

authenticating to mongodb fails
by hdssdsdsdsfsdf hdssdsdsdsfsdf 21 Mar '18

21 Mar '18

When I connect using mongo, the credentials work: $ mongo kamailio -u "kam" -p "kam" MongoDB shell version v3.4.9 connecting to: mongodb://127.0.0.1:27017/kamailio MongoDB server version: 3.4.9 > db.subscriber.find() { "_id" : ObjectI ... But when I use the following DBURL in kamailio.cfg, kamailio fails to even login to mongo: #!define DBURL "mongodb://kam:kam@localhost/kamailio" If I disable mongodb authentication, kamailio starts up just fine again. Any idea what's going wrong here?

3 10

is_audio_on_hold() doesn't support rfc3264
by Julia Boudniatsky 13 Feb '18

13 Feb '18

FYI, After some tests found, that function "*is_audio_on_hold()*" (textops) *supports only rfc 254*3, where "hold" is indicated by setting the "c" destination addresses for the media streams to zero (0.0.0.0). The newest *rfc3264*, where "hold" is indicated by a=sendonly/inactive, *is not supported*. Kamailio version 4.4.6. Best regards, Julia

4 8

rtjson + uac + event - OK, ACK and BYE display name not updated
by Diego Nadares 30 Jan '18

30 Jan '18

Hi Guys, We are modifying "from" and "to" headers with rtjson module via a json struct. It works fine in INVITE, TRYING, RINGING and OK but not in the following messages. Kamailio It's changing ONLY "from" and "to" URI BUT NOT the DISPLAY NAME. I think it's the tm module but I can't figure out how to confirm this. Maybe I need to configure something else in my cfg or could it be a bug? My json struct that is handled by rtjson module response.routing = "serial"; //response.routing = "parallel"; response.routes = []; response.routes[0] = {}; response.routes[0].uri = "sip:1111111111@172.16.213.31:5060"; response.routes[0].headers = { // Headers to be modified "from": { "display": "1111111111", "uri": "sip:111111111@172.16.213.38" }, "to": { "display": "2222222222", "uri": "sip:2222222222@172.16.213.38" }, }; response.routes[0].headers.extra = {};//"X-Hdr-A: abc\r\nX-Hdr-B: bcd\r\n"; This is part of my cfg .... modparam("dialog","dlg_flag", FLD_START) modparam("uac","restore_mode","auto") modparam("uac", "restore_dlg", 1) .... # account only INVITEs if (is_method("INVITE") && !has_totag()) { setflag(FLT_ACC); # do accounting * setflag(FLD_START); # do accounting* setflag(FLT_ACCMISSED); setflag(FLT_ACCFAILED); } ..... >From source/Aleg: *From: sipp <sip:sipp@172.16.213.21:5060 <http://sip:sipp@172.16.213.21:5060>>;tag=1.* *To: sut <sip:5555555555@172.16.213.38:5060 <http://sip:5555555555@172.16.213.38:5060>>.* To dest/Bleg: *From: 1111111111 <sip:111111111@172.16.213.38 <sip%3A111111111(a)172.16.213.38>>;tag=1.* *To: 2222222222 <sip:2222222222@172.16.213.38 <sip%3A2222222222(a)172.16.213.38>>.* Incorrect display name in BYE and ACK: *From: sipp <sip:111111111@172.16.213.38 <sip%3A111111111(a)172.16.213.38>>;tag=1.* *To: sut <sip:2222222222@172.16.213.38 <sip%3A2222222222(a)172.16.213.38>>;tag=2.* interface: any filter: ( port 5060 ) and (ip or ip6) # U 2016/12/06 15:52:13.638731 172.16.213.21:5060 -> 172.16.213.38:5060 INVITE sip:5555555555@172.16.213.38:5060 SIP/2.0. Via: SIP/2.0/UDP 172.16.213.21:5060;branch=z9hG4bK-12775-1-0. *From: sipp <sip:sipp@172.16.213.21:5060 <http://sip:sipp@172.16.213.21:5060>>;tag=1.* *To: sut <sip:5555555555@172.16.213.38:5060 <http://sip:5555555555@172.16.213.38:5060>>.* Call-ID: 1-12775(a)172.16.213.21. CSeq: 1 INVITE. Contact: "SIPP" <sip:sipp@172.16.213.21:5060>. Max-Forwards: 70. Subject: Performance Test. Content-Type: multipart/mixed;boundary=uniqueBoundary. Remote-Party-ID: <sip:sipp@172.16.213.21 >:5060;party=calling;id-type=subscriber;privacy=off;screen=no>. Content-Length: 549. . --uniqueBoundary. Content-Type: application/sdp. . v=0. o=user1 53655765 2353687637 IN IP4 172.16.213.21. s=-. c=IN IP4 172.16.213.21. t=0 0. m=audio 6000 RTP/AVP 8. a=rtpmap:8 PCMA/8000. a=rtpmap:101 telephone-event/8000. a=fmtp:101 0-11,16. . --uniqueBoundary. Content-Type: application/gtd. Content-Disposition: signal;handling=optional. . IAM,. CGN,04,y,1,y,4,1143617400. CIC,0000000573. CPC,09. CPN,02,y,1,52381660. FCI,n,n,n,n,y,n,n,u. GCI,f7140cc78a611601838a002128d7e512. NOC,0,n,1,n. PRN,q761*,AR*,oper2,1993. TMR,02. . --uniqueBoundary--. ................ # U 2016/12/06 15:52:13.734159 172.16.213.38:5060 -> 172.16.213.21:5060 SIP/2.0 100 trying -- your call is important to us. Via: SIP/2.0/UDP 172.16.213.21:5060;branch=z9hG4bK-12775-1-0. *From: sipp <sip:sipp@172.16.213.21:5060 <http://sip:sipp@172.16.213.21:5060>>;tag=1.* *To: sut <sip:5555555555@172.16.213.38:5060 <http://sip:5555555555@172.16.213.38:5060>>.* Call-ID: 1-12775(a)172.16.213.21. CSeq: 1 INVITE. Server: kamailio (4.4.4 (x86_64/linux)). Content-Length: 0. . ................ # U 2016/12/06 15:52:13.878600 172.16.213.38:5060 -> 172.16.213.31:5060 INVITE sip:1111111111@172.16.213.31:5060 SIP/2.0. Via: SIP/2.0/UDP 172.16.213.38;branch=z9hG4bKabaa.840cc83114975a34a37b7af020d37b65.1. *From: 1111111111 <sip:111111111@172.16.213.38 <sip%3A111111111(a)172.16.213.38>>;tag=1.* *To: 2222222222 <sip:2222222222@172.16.213.38 <sip%3A2222222222(a)172.16.213.38>>.* Call-ID: 1-12775(a)172.16.213.21. CSeq: 1 INVITE. Max-Forwards: 69. Subject: Performance Test. Content-Type: multipart/mixed;boundary=uniqueBoundary. Content-Length: 788. Contact: <sip:btpsh-58470879-6c61-1@172.16.213.38>. . --uniqueBoundary. Content-Type: application/sdp. . v=0. o=user1 53655765 2353687637 IN IP4 172.16.213.38. s=-. c=IN IP4 172.16.213.38. t=0 0. m=audio 40236 RTP/AVP 8. a=rtpmap:8 PCMA/8000. a=rtpmap:101 telephone-event/8000. a=fmtp:101 0-11,16. a=sendrecv. a=rtcp:40237. a=ice-ufrag:QNCzXhUr. a=ice-pwd:Ci90BRpdZH51Hx5BaPgGMrGCeh. a=candidate:P1djl8LFNb5kexbG 1 UDP 2130706431 172.16.213.38 40236 typ host. a=candidate:P1djl8LFNb5kexbG 2 UDP 2130706430 172.16.213.38 40237 typ host. . --uniqueBoundary. Content-Type: application/gtd. Content-Disposition: signal;handling=optional. . IAM,. CGN,04,y,1,y,4,1143617400. CIC,0000000573. CPC,09. CPN,02,y,1,52381660. FCI,n,n,n,n,y,n,n,u. GCI,f7140cc78a611601838a002128d7e512. NOC,0,n,1,n. PRN,q761*,AR*,oper2,1993. TMR,02. . --uniqueBoundary--. ................ # U 2016/12/06 15:52:13.879441 172.16.213.31:5060 -> 172.16.213.38:5060 SIP/2.0 180 Ringing. Via: SIP/2.0/UDP 172.16.213.38;branch=z9hG4bKabaa.840cc83114975a34a37b7af020d37b65.1. *From: 1111111111 <sip:111111111@172.16.213.38 <sip%3A111111111(a)172.16.213.38>>;tag=1.* *To: 2222222222 <sip:2222222222@172.16.213.38 <sip%3A2222222222(a)172.16.213.38>>;tag=2.* Call-ID: 1-12775(a)172.16.213.21. CSeq: 1 INVITE. Contact: <sip:172.16.213.31:5060;transport=UDP>. Content-Type: application/sdp. Content-Length: 137. . v=0. o=user1 53655765 2353687637 IN IP4 172.16.213.31. s=-. c=IN IP4 172.16.213.31. t=0 0. m=audio 6000 RTP/AVP 0. a=rtpmap:0 PCMU/8000. ................ # U 2016/12/06 15:52:13.936565 172.16.213.38:5060 -> 172.16.213.21:5060 SIP/2.0 180 Ringing. *From: sipp <sip:sipp@172.16.213.21:5060 <http://sip:sipp@172.16.213.21:5060>>;tag=1.* *To: sut <sip:5555555555@172.16.213.38:5060 <http://sip:5555555555@172.16.213.38:5060>>;tag=2.* Call-ID: 1-12775(a)172.16.213.21. CSeq: 1 INVITE. Content-Type: application/sdp. Content-Length: 316. Via: SIP/2.0/UDP 172.16.213.21:5060;branch=z9hG4bK-12775-1-0. Contact: <sip:atpsh-58470879-6c61-2@172.16.213.38>. . v=0. o=user1 53655765 2353687637 IN IP4 172.16.213.38. s=-. c=IN IP4 172.16.213.38. t=0 0. m=audio 40248 RTP/AVP 0. a=rtpmap:0 PCMU/8000. a=sendrecv. a=rtcp:40249. a=candidate:P1djl8LFNb5kexbG 1 UDP 2130706431 172.16.213.38 40248 typ host. a=candidate:P1djl8LFNb5kexbG 2 UDP 2130706430 172.16.213.38 40249 typ host. ................ # U 2016/12/06 15:52:20.882165 172.16.213.31:5060 -> 172.16.213.38:5060 SIP/2.0 200 OK. Via: SIP/2.0/UDP 172.16.213.38;branch=z9hG4bKabaa.840cc83114975a34a37b7af020d37b65.1. *From: 1111111111 <sip:111111111@172.16.213.38 <sip%3A111111111(a)172.16.213.38>>;tag=1.* *To: 2222222222 <sip:2222222222@172.16.213.38 <sip%3A2222222222(a)172.16.213.38>>;tag=2.* Call-ID: 1-12775(a)172.16.213.21. CSeq: 1 INVITE. Contact: <sip:172.16.213.31:5060;transport=UDP>. Content-Type: application/sdp. Content-Length: 213. . v=0. o=user1 53655765 2353687637 IN IP4 172.16.213.31. s=-. c=IN IP4 172.16.213.31. t=0 0. m=audio 6000 RTP/AVP 0. a=rtpmap:0 PCMU/8000. a=rtpmap:101 telephone-event/8000. a=fmtp:101 0-15. a=ptime:20. a=sendrecv. ................ # U 2016/12/06 15:52:21.173798 172.16.213.38:5060 -> 172.16.213.21:5060 SIP/2.0 200 OK. *From: sipp <sip:sipp@172.16.213.21:5060 <http://sip:sipp@172.16.213.21:5060>>;tag=1.* *To: sut <sip:5555555555@172.16.213.38:5060 <http://sip:5555555555@172.16.213.38:5060>>;tag=2.* Call-ID: 1-12775(a)172.16.213.21. CSeq: 1 INVITE. Content-Type: application/sdp. Content-Length: 380. Via: SIP/2.0/UDP 172.16.213.21:5060;branch=z9hG4bK-12775-1-0. Contact: <sip:atpsh-58470879-6c61-2@172.16.213.38>. . v=0. o=user1 53655765 2353687637 IN IP4 172.16.213.38. s=-. c=IN IP4 172.16.213.38. t=0 0. m=audio 40248 RTP/AVP 0. a=rtpmap:0 PCMU/8000. a=rtpmap:101 telephone-event/8000. a=fmtp:101 0-15. a=ptime:20. a=sendrecv. a=rtcp:40249. a=candidate:P1djl8LFNb5kexbG 1 UDP 2130706431 172.16.213.38 40248 typ host. a=candidate:P1djl8LFNb5kexbG 2 UDP 2130706430 172.16.213.38 40249 typ host. ................ # U 2016/12/06 15:52:21.174390 172.16.213.21:5060 -> 172.16.213.38:5060 ACK sip:atpsh-58470879-6c61-2@172.16.213.38 SIP/2.0. Via: SIP/2.0/UDP 172.16.213.21:5060;branch=z9hG4bK-12775-1-4. *From: sipp <sip:sipp@172.16.213.21:5060 <http://sip:sipp@172.16.213.21:5060>>;tag=1.* *To: sut <sip:5555555555@172.16.213.38:5060 <http://sip:5555555555@172.16.213.38:5060>>;tag=2.* Call-ID: 1-12775(a)172.16.213.21. CSeq: 1 ACK. Contact: sip:sipp@172.16.213.21:5060. Max-Forwards: 70. Subject: Performance Test. Content-Length: 0. . ................ # U 2016/12/06 15:52:21.248172 172.16.213.38:5060 -> 172.16.213.31:5060 ACK sip:172.16.213.31:5060;transport=UDP SIP/2.0. Via: SIP/2.0/UDP 172.16.213.38;branch=z9hG4bKabaa.98116b5795d4c30f52156187a72059c8.0. *From: sipp <sip:111111111@172.16.213.38 <sip%3A111111111(a)172.16.213.38>>;tag=1.* *To: sut <sip:2222222222@172.16.213.38 <sip%3A2222222222(a)172.16.213.38>>;tag=2.* Call-ID: 1-12775(a)172.16.213.21. CSeq: 1 ACK. Max-Forwards: 69. Subject: Performance Test. Content-Length: 0. Contact: <sip:btpsh-58470879-6c61-1@172.16.213.38>. . ................ # U 2016/12/06 15:52:51.178826 172.16.213.21:5060 -> 172.16.213.38:5060 BYE sip:atpsh-58470879-6c61-2@172.16.213.38 SIP/2.0. Via: SIP/2.0/UDP 172.16.213.21:5060;branch=z9hG4bK-12775-1-7. *From: sipp <sip:sipp@172.16.213.21:5060 <http://sip:sipp@172.16.213.21:5060>>;tag=1.* *To: sut <sip:5555555555@172.16.213.38:5060 <http://sip:5555555555@172.16.213.38:5060>>;tag=2.* Call-ID: 1-12775(a)172.16.213.21. CSeq: 2 BYE. Contact: sip:sipp@172.16.213.21:5060. Max-Forwards: 70. Subject: Performance Test. Content-Length: 0. . ................ # U 2016/12/06 15:52:51.468639 172.16.213.38:5060 -> 172.16.213.31:5060 BYE sip:172.16.213.31:5060;transport=UDP SIP/2.0. Via: SIP/2.0/UDP 172.16.213.38;branch=z9hG4bK7baa.3cb44935b506e759e3418501b0688b08.0. *From: sipp <sip:111111111@172.16.213.38 <sip%3A111111111(a)172.16.213.38>>;tag=1.* *To: sut <sip:2222222222@172.16.213.38 <sip%3A2222222222(a)172.16.213.38>>;tag=2.* Call-ID: 1-12775(a)172.16.213.21. CSeq: 2 BYE. Max-Forwards: 69. Subject: Performance Test. Content-Length: 0. Contact: <sip:btpsh-58470879-6c61-1@172.16.213.38>. . ................ # U 2016/12/06 15:52:51.469153 172.16.213.31:5060 -> 172.16.213.38:5060 SIP/2.0 200 OK. Via: SIP/2.0/UDP 172.16.213.38;branch=z9hG4bK7baa.3cb44935b506e759e3418501b0688b08.0. *From: sipp <sip:111111111@172.16.213.38 <sip%3A111111111(a)172.16.213.38>>;tag=1.* *To: sut <sip:2222222222@172.16.213.38 <sip%3A2222222222(a)172.16.213.38>>;tag=2.* Call-ID: 1-12775(a)172.16.213.21. CSeq: 2 BYE. Contact: <sip:172.16.213.31:5060;transport=UDP>. Content-Length: 0. . ................ # U 2016/12/06 15:52:51.519423 172.16.213.38:5060 -> 172.16.213.21:5060 SIP/2.0 200 OK. *From: sipp <sip:sipp@172.16.213.21:5060 <http://sip:sipp@172.16.213.21:5060>>;tag=1.* *To: sut <sip:5555555555@172.16.213.38:5060 <http://sip:5555555555@172.16.213.38:5060>>;tag=2.* Call-ID: 1-12775(a)172.16.213.21. CSeq: 2 BYE. Content-Length: 0. Via: SIP/2.0/UDP 172.16.213.21:5060;branch=z9hG4bK-12775-1-7. Contact: <sip:atpsh-58470879-6c61-2@172.16.213.38>. . ................ exit 13 received, 0 dropped Sorry for my english. Thanks in advance! Diego.

2 7

strange --dialog in delete state is too old-- log line managing dialog hashes
by David Escartín 21 Dec '17

21 Dec '17

hello all recently we are seeing some weird messages handling with dialogs in Kamailio version 5.0 we sometimes are seeing messages like /usr/local/kamailio/sbin/kamailio[15372]: NOTICE: dialog [dlg_hash.c:249]: dlg_clean_run(): dialog in delete state is too old (0x7fa65445c850 ref 3) /usr/local/kamailio/sbin/kamailio[15372]: NOTICE: dialog [dlg_hash.c:235]: dlg_clean_run(): dialog in early state is too old (0x7fa652d57110 ref 1) we increased the debug description adding some lines to the dialog module code so we could track the calls of the calls that these messages belong to, and we could see that those messages appeared in calls just released at that moment, for example: <134>Nov 4 11:21:38 localhost /usr/local/kamailio/sbin/kamailio[4108]: INFO: mad-localhost-1 Call 97980 / Call-ID 1409565771_82382809(a)195.219.240.46: Creating dialog [8043:21772] with hash id 21772 and hash entry 8043 <134>Nov 4 11:21:38 localhost /usr/local/kamailio/sbin/kamailio[4106]: INFO: mad-localhost-1 Call 97980 / Call-ID 1409565771_82382809(a)195.219.240.46: Status 100, 6610 <134>Nov 4 11:21:39 localhost /usr/local/kamailio/sbin/kamailio[4111]: INFO: mad-localhost-1 Call 97980 / Call-ID 1409565771_82382809(a)195.219.240.46: CANCEL received in A-Leg, relaying downstream <134>Nov 4 11:21:39 localhost /usr/local/kamailio/sbin/kamailio[4112]: INFO: mad-localhost-1 Call 97980 / Call-ID 1409565771_82382809(a)195.219.240.46: Status 487, 6610 <133>Nov 4 11:21:39 localhost /usr/local/kamailio/sbin/kamailio[4139]: NOTICE: dialog [dlg_hash.c:251]: dlg_clean_run(): dialog in delete state is too old (0x7fa0c02a6870 ref 3) with callid '1409565771_82382809(a)195.219.240.46' <129>Nov 4 11:21:39 mad-proxy-inout-1 /usr/local/kamailio/sbin/kamailio[4112]: ALERT: dialog [dlg_handlers.c:1715]: dlg_run_event_route(): after event route - dialog not found [8043:21772] (1/5) (0x7fa0c02a6870) with callid '1409565771_82382809(a)195.219.240.46' we printed the dialog id and entry hash values and we can see there are no other calls creating same values in the previous hours, or using same memory allocation, or same callid, so it seems like there was some kind of strange issue with the dialog timers....¿? By the way, this is happening only few times (80-100 times) a day having many thousands of calls, so it's quite difficult for us to duplicate, we couldn't do it until now. We also tried to use the timer_procs 0 or 1 to use a different proc timer but seems the issue happens in both scenarios. The configuration change we made and seems it was done when these messages started to appear is to use dialog event_route when ended and failed to do some stuff there managing some dialog variables. Does ti make any sense that attempting to use those variables could cause these behaviour? Do you have any idea about it could be or how we can check it deeper? thanks a lot and regards david escartin

2 9

kamailio 4.4.5 Crash
by Andrew Paul 18 Dec '17

18 Dec '17

Hi all, We were using kamailio 4.4.5 and we enabled only for webrtc. We were observing two memory crashed in last two weeks. Oct 10 01:03:03 webrtc /usr/sbin/kamailio[18002]: ERROR: <core> [tcp_read.c:1321]: tcp_read_req(): ERROR: tcp_read_req: error reading - c: 0x7f21ea8f6198 r: 0x7f21ea8f6218 Oct 10 01:03:04 webrtc /usr/sbin/kamailio[18003]: ERROR: tls [tls_server.c:190]: tls_complete_init(): tls: ssl bug #1491 workaround: not enough memory for safe operation: shm=9926856 threshold1=9961472 Oct 10 01:03:04 webrtc /usr/sbin/kamailio[18003]: ERROR: <core> [tcp_read.c:1321]: tcp_read_req(): ERROR: tcp_read_req: error reading - c: 0x7f21ea8f6198 r: 0x7f21ea8f6218 Oct 10 01:03:05 webrtc /usr/sbin/kamailio[18004]: ERROR: tls [tls_server.c:190]: tls_complete_init(): tls: ssl bug #1491 workaround: not enough memory for safe operation: shm=9926856 threshold1=9961472 Oct 10 01:03:05 webrtc /usr/sbin/kamailio[18004]: ERROR: <core> [tcp_read.c:1321]: tcp_read_req(): ERROR: tcp_read_req: error reading - c: 0x7f21ea8f6198 r: 0x7f21ea8f6218 Is there any known issue for tls module in kamailio_4.4.5 ?. We are using default 64MB for shared memory and 8MB for private memory. Do we need to increase this ?. Regards Andrew

3 6

pua.publish using RPC
by Alex Balashov 12 Dec '17

12 Dec '17

Hello, Is pua.publish strictly an MI function, or is it possible nowadays to call it via the RPC channel, and specifically, using jsonrpc_exec()? Thanks! -- Alex -- Alex Balashov | Principal | Evariste Systems LLC Tel: +1-706-510-6800 (direct) / +1-800-250-5920 (toll-free) Web: http://www.evaristesys.com/, http://www.csrpswitch.com/

3 5

can kamailio send 183 to caller
by 赵国杰 11 Dec '17

11 Dec '17

Hello guys, Is it possible for kamailio to initiate a 183 to caller? Thanks

3 6

Releasing Kamailio v5.1.0
by Daniel-Constantin Mierla 11 Dec '17

11 Dec '17

Hello, with no relevant new bugs reported lately, it is time to fix the date for releasing next major version, respectively Kamailio v5.1.0. I am proposing Monday, December 11, 2018, as the release date for v5.1.0, with a fallback option to next day, if a bit of time is still needed. Currently there are ongoing efforts to make rpm packaging a first class citizen via docker and obs, credits to Sergey Safarov for it, and get (auto-generated) reference list of Kemi functions, credits to Samuel Förnes for it. In the next two weeks, they can get in good shape and also do a bit more testing as well as update relevant tutorials. Regarding Kemi exports, if you are using a module, check the master branch version to see if it has any sr_kemi_t exports, if not, report it in the case you want to try using the new config framework that allows reloading routing logic script without restart (you will have to use Lua, JavaScript or Squirrel scripting). And of course, if you are aware of any problem not yet reported to the bug tracker, open an issue as soon as possible to allow time to try to fix it before the release: * https://github.com/kamailio/kamailio/issues Cheers, Daniel -- Daniel-Constantin Mierla www.twitter.com/miconda -- www.linkedin.com/in/miconda Kamailio Advanced Training - www.asipto.com Kamailio World Conference - May 14-16, 2018 - www.kamailioworld.com

1 2

400 Bad From URI reply from kamalio
by Konstantin Tumalevich 07 Dec '17

07 Dec '17

One of our clients expiriences strange error. Their system sends BYE with different from address (which IP is presented in Contact header of initial INVITE) and Kamailio immediately responded with "400 Bad From URI". In which module can be generated this response? We use 4.3 version. -- Skype: konstantin.tumalevich

2 2

t_set_fr behaviour
by Kelvin Chua 06 Dec '17

06 Dec '17

hi guys, has anyone of you tried playing around with a scenario similar to this? A. invite -> t_set_fr() 2 seconds - if "100 trying" not received in 2 seconds, timeout. works fine. B. after receiving "100 trying" received, t_set_fr() 30 seconds - if 18x not received in 30 seconds, timeout. works fine C. after receiving the first 180, t_set_fr() 10 seconds - if "200 ok" not received in 10 seconds, it will not timeout, but instead it will timeout 30 seconds after B. i noticed this behavior recently and noticed that when a previous t_set_fr() is bigger than the new one, it will be ignored. so if i did 2 -> 10 -> 30, it works (swapping timeout values of B and C) my question is, is this an expected behavior? Kelvin Chua

2 2

2025

2024

2023

2022

2021

2020

2019

2018

2017

2016

2015

2014

2013

2012

2011

2010

2009

2008

2007

2006

2005

2004

2003

2002

sr-users November 2017