sr-users October 2018

sr-users@lists.kamailio.org

81 participants
125 discussions

Planing the release of Kamailio v5.1.6
by Daniel-Constantin Mierla 04 Oct '18

04 Oct '18

Hello, a matter of the schedule to be agreed in the morning and the availability during the Kamailio Developers Meeting, we may do a new stable release from branch 5.1.6 on Thursday, Sep 27, 2018, in the afternoon. Given that several of us will be in the same room, the special goal would be to try to automate the process as much as possible. If the time doesn't allow it, then the release will be done next week, a specific day to be decided by the end of this week. Anyhow, this is the informal notification to report as soon as possible any issues you are aware of and not yet in bug tracker, so they get a chance to be fixed. Cheers, Daniel -- Daniel-Constantin Mierla -- www.asipto.com www.twitter.com/miconda -- www.linkedin.com/in/miconda Kamailio World Conference -- www.kamailioworld.com Kamailio Advanced Training, Nov 12-14, 2018, in Berlin -- www.asipto.com

2 4

tcp Free fragment not found
by Diego Nadares 04 Oct '18

04 Oct '18

Hi guys! We have four a scripts that sends dlg.list command to kamailio through xmlrpc. They are not executed simultaneously. Sometimes, we are getting the following errors: fm_search_defrag(): fm_search_defrag(0x7f212c25a000, 5273984); Free fragment not found!2017-05-26T13:54:20.438736-03:00 drwsip02 /usr/local/sbin/kamailio[19833]: ERROR: <core> [mem/f_malloc.c:498]: fm_malloc(): fm_malloc(0x7f212c25a000, 5273984) called from core: tcp_main.c: tcpconn_new(957), module: core; Free fragment not found!2017-05-26T13:54:20.439101-03:00 drwsip02 /usr/local/sbin/kamailio[19833]: ERROR: <core> [tcp_main.c:959]: tcpconn_new(): mem. allocation failure2017-05-26T13:54:20.439344-03:00 drwsip02 /usr/local/sbin/kamailio[19833]: ERROR: <core> [tcp_main.c:3985]: handle_new_connect(): tcpconn_new failed, closing socket I all ready increased this two variables: tcp_conn_wq_max=30000000 tcp_rd_buf_size=5273226 How can I see how much memory xmlrpc is using? Any advice will be appreciated. Thanks in advance! Diego

2 2

Freeing already Freed pointer
by Hamid Hashmi 04 Oct '18

04 Oct '18

I have been receiving CRITICAL core logs since I have updated my service to the following version. Print out of kamailio internals Version: kamailio 5.1.5 (x86_64/linux) d06080 Default config: /usr/local/SIPSer/etc/kamailio/kamailio.cfg Default paths to modules: /usr/local/SIPSer/lib64/kamailio/modules Compile flags: STATS: Off, USE_TCP, USE_TLS, USE_SCTP, TLS_HOOKS, USE_RAW_SOCKS, DISABLE_NAGLE, USE_MCAST, DNS_IP_HACK, SHM_MEM, SHM_MMAP, PKG_MALLOC, Q_MALLOC, F_MALLOC, TLSF_MALLOC, DBG_SR_MEMORY, USE_FUTEX, FAST_LOCK-ADAPTIVE_WAIT, USE_DNS_CACHE, USE_DNS_FAILOVER, USE_NAPTR, USE_DST_BLACKLIST, HAVE_RESOLV_RES MAX_RECV_BUFFER_SIZE=262144 MAX_URI_SIZE=1024 BUF_SIZE=65535 DEFAULT PKG_SIZE=8MB DEFAULT SHM_SIZE=64MB ADAPTIVE_WAIT_LOOPS=1024 TCP poll methods: poll, epoll_lt, epoll_et, sigio_rt, select Source code revision ID: d06080 Compiled with: gcc 4.8.5 Compiled on: 14:17:56 Sep 13 2018 Thank you for flying kamailio! I have been starting kamailio with the following command $ /usr/local/sbin/kamailio -P /run/kamailio/kamailio.pid -f /usr/local/etc/kamailio/kamailio.cfg -m 1024 -M 512 Sample Critical Logs are below Sep 27 14:40:19 kamailio_eu SIPSer[11289]: 923226363266 923000000001 27872 INVITE haYKxpYM1QR8XTU37WdVbxf4VkEITe7A CRITICAL: <core> [core/mem/q_malloc.c:504]: qm_free(): BUG: freeing already freed pointer (0x7f30c8a4df30), called from tm: t_reply.c: relay_reply(1920), first free tm: h_table.c: free_cell_helper(155) - aborting Sep 27 14:40:19 kamailio_eu SIPSer[11289]: 923226363266 923000000001 27872 INVITE haYKxpYM1QR8XTU37WdVbxf4VkEITe7A CRITICAL: <core> [core/mem/q_malloc.c:504]: qm_free(): BUG: freeing already freed pointer (0x7f30c8a4cc40), called from tm: h_table.c: free_cell_helper(153), first free tm: h_table.c: free_cell_helper(153) - aborting Its also causing service crash. Complete logs are here<https://paste.ee/p/q65DE>. Regards Hamid R. Hashmi

2 2

is_first_hop() fails to detect 'myself' when using advertise
by Sergiu Pojoga 04 Oct '18

04 Oct '18

Hi ppl, If I add a FQDN advertise address to the listen statement, *is_first_hop() <https://kamailio.org/docs/modules/4.3.x/modules/siputils.html#siputils.f.is…>* seems to return FALSE no matter how I play with the listen and alias settings. listen=udp:1.1.1.1:5060 advertise sip.mydomain.net:5060 alias="sip.mydomain.net:5060" This statement doesn't get executed in the *onreply_route* *onreply_route[MANAGE_REPLY] {* *if(is_first_hop())* *set_contact_alias(); # contact alias doesn't get set?* *}* *is_first_hop()* *"The function returns true if the proxy is first hop after the original sender. For incoming SIP replies, it means that top Record-Route URI is 'myself' and source address is not matching it"* *This is the reply.* 2018/10/03 17:03:38.276846 2.2.2.2:62033 -> 1.1.1.1:5060 SIP/2.0 200 OK Via: SIP/2.0/UDP sip.mydomain.net:5060 ;branch=z9hG4bK49b3.bfbe15.0;received=1.1.1.1 Via: SIP/2.0/UDP 10.10.10.10:5060;rport=5060;branch=z9hG4bK1af96136 *Record-Route*: <sip:sip.mydomain.net;lr=on;did=4cc.734> Contact: <sip:888@10.17.0.35:62033> Suggestions? Thanks.

3 2

What is the typical network setup for kamailio?
by Kevin Olbrich 03 Oct '18

03 Oct '18

Hi! I am working successfully with Kamailio in my lab setup where Kamailio is the SBC for Asterisk. The network layout is looking like this: SIP-Phone <== PUBLIC NET ==> Kamailio (SBC) <== PRIVATE NET ==> Asterisk <== PUBLIC NET ==> Carrier Each public network is reachable from the internet and has a local firewall with IP whitelists. The internal SIP transactions are UDP-only but for external phones I would like to also listen for TCP/TLS. For this layout to work with rtpproxy (before we move on to RTPengine), we have to enable mhomed in Kamailio. We also have some routing issues with packets leaving with the wrong IP via rtpproxy (when call between carrier and external phone needs to be bridged). Most examples show that Asterisk is deployed on the same network as the external interface of Kamailio (-> Asterisk exposed to the public network). In our tests, this works much better but I have great security concerns because this Asterisk instance itself does not need to be reachable from external. How do other users deploy Kamailio in front of Asterisk or similar as SBC to secure internals? There is lot of docs for Kamailio's config but IMHO less for the setup as DMZ (SBC) proxy. Thank you very much. Kind regards Kevin

7 15

Using TLS on a load-balancing cluster behind DNS-SRV
by Kevin Olbrich 03 Oct '18

03 Oct '18

Hi! Which hostname do I need to request for the certificate when the servers are load-balanced using DNS-SRV? Do I need to get the cert for the DNS-SRV subdomain (without _sip._tls) or for the servers, eg. server0{1,2,3}.pbx.example.com ? Thank you! Kevin

3 2

rr module not detecting nat=ws route param
by Jon Bonilla (Manwe) 02 Oct '18

02 Oct '18

Hi all. I'm having problems with an indialog ACK request which is not being routed correctly. I call loose_route and print: $du=sip:MYIP:2443;transport=ws;r2=on;lr=on;did=1d1.7702;nat=ws $route_uri=sip:MYIP;r2=on;lr=on;did=1d1.7702;nat=ws But when I call check_route_param("nat=ws") I get false result. version: kamailio 5.1.4 any hints? cheers, Jon -- https://pekepbx.com https://www.issabel.com/multitenant

3 6

Dialog lifetime for dialogs synced with DMQ
by jenus＠cyberchaos.nl 02 Oct '18

02 Oct '18

Hello, I'm using DMQ to sync dialogs between a active and standby kamailio node. I noticed that when the standby takes over dialog's they do not expire after the lifetime i set on the other node. Is there a way to make sure that calls are terminated after the dialog lifetime expires? I see that the timer is replicated to the other node, but nothing happens after the dialog expires. The event routes aren't executed as well. Thanks, Jan

2 1

Fwd: kamailio with evapi crashing on high volume
by Jayesh Nambiar 02 Oct '18

02 Oct '18

Hello Daniel, Just a quick update on this. After running from the 5.1 branch twice it happened that Server became unresponsive. It never crashed and on forceful shutdown it only generated a core with shutdown routine. Here is what the syslog contained off while the calls were being sent to kamailio but kamailio was not processing any calls: Sep 22 16:09:04 triviamedia /usr/local/kamailio/sbin/kamailio[16006]: CRITICAL: <core> [core/mem/q_malloc.c:502]: qm_free(): BUG: freeing already freed pointer (0x7fcd23ce5648), called from tm: h_table.c: free_cell_helper(235), first free tm: h_table.c: free_cell_helper(235) - aborting Sep 22 16:09:04 triviamedia /usr/local/kamailio/sbin/kamailio[16006]: CRITICAL: <core> [core/mem/q_malloc.c:502]: qm_free(): BUG: freeing already freed pointer (0x7fcd24a38ea8), called from tm: h_table.c: free_cell_helper(234), first free tm: h_table.c: free_cell_helper(234) - aborting Sep 22 16:09:04 triviamedia /usr/local/kamailio/sbin/kamailio[16006]: CRITICAL: <core> [core/mem/q_malloc.c:502]: qm_free(): BUG: freeing already freed pointer (0x7fcd23ce5648), called from tm: h_table.c: free_cell_helper(235), first free tm: h_table.c: free_cell_helper(235) - aborting Sep 22 16:09:04 triviamedia /usr/local/kamailio/sbin/kamailio[16006]: CRITICAL: <core> [core/mem/q_malloc.c:502]: qm_free(): BUG: freeing already freed pointer (0x7fcd24a38ea8), called from tm: h_table.c: free_cell_helper(234), first free tm: h_table.c: free_cell_helper(234) - aborting Sep 22 16:09:04 triviamedia /usr/local/kamailio/sbin/kamailio[16006]: CRITICAL: <core> [core/mem/q_malloc.c:502]: qm_free(): BUG: freeing already freed pointer (0x7fcd23ce5648), called from tm: h_table.c: free_cell_helper(235), first free tm: h_table.c: free_cell_helper(235) - aborting Sep 22 16:09:04 triviamedia /usr/local/kamailio/sbin/kamailio[16006]: CRITICAL: <core> [core/mem/q_malloc.c:502]: qm_free(): BUG: freeing already freed pointer (0x7fcd24a38ea8), called from tm: h_table.c: free_cell_helper(234), first free tm: h_table.c: free_cell_helper(234) - aborting Sep 22 16:09:04 triviamedia /usr/local/kamailio/sbin/kamailio[16006]: CRITICAL: <core> [core/mem/q_malloc.c:502]: qm_free(): BUG: freeing already freed pointer (0x7fcd23ce5648), called from tm: h_table.c: free_cell_helper(235), first fre And here's the "bt full" of the core file: [New LWP 16003] Cannot access memory at address 0x7fcd64e1a148 Cannot access memory at address 0x7fcd64e1a140 Failed to read a valid object file image from memory. Core was generated by `/usr/local/kamailio/sbin/kamailio -P /var/run/siptrunk.pid -f /usr/local/carrie'. Program terminated with signal SIGABRT, Aborted. #0 0x00007fcd6443f428 in ?? () (gdb) bt full #0 0x00007fcd6443f428 in ?? () No symbol table info available. Backtrace stopped: Cannot access memory at address 0x7ffed40e9e68 Thanks, - Jayesh On Sat, Sep 15, 2018 at 7:09 PM Jayesh Nambiar <jayesh1017(a)gmail.com> wrote: > Hello Daniel, > I have now git cloned from 5.1 branch and restarted kamailio today. Also > an observation; that when one particular customer with around 40-50cps > capacity starts his dialing is when the kamailio kept crashing. I will > observe in the coming week and report of any crashes accordingly. > > Thanks, > > - Jayesh > > On Wed, Sep 12, 2018 at 3:11 AM Jayesh Nambiar <jayesh1017(a)gmail.com> > wrote: > >> Thank you Daniel. I will deploy from 5.1 branch. I will be able to update >> it in next two days. Since this is a production system, I will have to have >> find a proper time slot to get this updated. Will let you know once that is >> done. >> Thanks again. >> >> - Jayesh >> >> On Tue, Sep 11, 2018 at 2:16 PM Daniel-Constantin Mierla < >> miconda(a)gmail.com> wrote: >> >>> Hi Jayesh, >>> >>> I looked over the weekend and seems like a race or a double free. I >>> backported some patches to tm module from master to 5.1 branch (a counter >>> to see if there is more than one free). Would you be able to deploy from >>> branch 5.1 or nightly builds for 5.1? With the next crash I can evaluate >>> (rule out or go for it) if it is double free or not. >>> >>> I haven't written you yet, because I planned to dig more into libev >>> (which is used by evapi), to see if it creates some threads that can mess >>> up with some kamailio globals, although I expect it is event loop in a >>> single thread. Other work related project took a lot of time these days, so >>> not there yet ... >>> Cheers, >>> Daniel >>> >>> On 11.09.18 09:56, Jayesh Nambiar wrote: >>> >>> Hi Daniel, >>> Just a gentle follow up on this. Could you find anything useful? >>> >>> Thanks, >>> >>> - Jayesh >>> >>> >>>>>> On 07.09.18 09:56, Jayesh Nambiar wrote: >>>>>> >>>>>> Hi Daniel, >>>>>> This happens randomly. It is not a testbed and never reproducible on >>>>>> the test server. I can still give you access if you wish to analyse the >>>>>> core files to check whats happening here exactly. >>>>>> It simply feels like on heavy load the evapi socket gives up. Earlier >>>>>> I was running 5.0.2 and in that kamailio would get stuck by not sending any >>>>>> async events on evapi socket. Not even the evapi:connection-closed event >>>>>> gets triggered. After I upgraded to latest stable version (5.1.5), it at >>>>>> least started crashing. Here are two core dumps put onto pastebin. >>>>>> https://pastebin.com/nn6gJapm >>>>>> https://pastebin.com/ph7b8vFH >>>>>> >>>>>> Thanks for all the support, >>>>>> >>>>>> - Jayesh >>>>>> >>>>>> On Fri, Sep 7, 2018 at 1:55 AM Daniel-Constantin Mierla < >>>>>> miconda(a)gmail.com> wrote: >>>>>> >>>>>>> Hello, >>>>>>> >>>>>>> are you able to reproduce it somehow? Or just happens randomly? >>>>>>> >>>>>>> Is it on a testbed where I could get access to investigate the >>>>>>> corefiles? If not, then I will ask for more details from cores over email, >>>>>>> first would be 'bt full' for both cores and 'p *dead_cell' for the second >>>>>>> one. >>>>>>> Cheers, >>>>>>> Daniel >>>>>>> >>>>>>> On 05.09.18 17:47, Jayesh Nambiar wrote: >>>>>>> >>>>>>> Hi Daniel, >>>>>>> Have got these core dumps. Let me know if I should be doing a bt >>>>>>> full. I'll pastebin and send. Thanks, >>>>>>> >>>>>>> Core was generated by `/usr/local/kamailio/sbin/kamailio -P >>>>>>> /var/run/siptrunk.pid -f /usr/local/carrie'. >>>>>>> Program terminated with signal SIGSEGV, Segmentation fault. >>>>>>> #0 0x0000000000505d30 in sip_msg_shm_clone (org_msg=0x7f6ab0d9f618, >>>>>>> sip_msg_len=0x7ffdddb2e8bc, clone_lumps=1) at core/sip_msg_clone.c:491 >>>>>>> 491 LUMP_LIST_LEN(len, org_msg->add_rm); >>>>>>> (gdb) bt >>>>>>> #0 0x0000000000505d30 in sip_msg_shm_clone (org_msg=0x7f6ab0d9f618, >>>>>>> sip_msg_len=0x7ffdddb2e8bc, clone_lumps=1) at core/sip_msg_clone.c:491 >>>>>>> #1 0x00007f6af0bdf68d in fake_req (shmem_msg=0x7f6ab0d9f618, >>>>>>> extra_flags=0, uac=0x7f6ab1738980, len=0x7ffdddb2e8bc) at t_reply.c:854 >>>>>>> #2 0x00007f6af0c3aa27 in t_continue_helper (hash_index=58039, >>>>>>> label=413633661, rtact=0x7f6af10500f0, cbname=0x0, cbparam=0x0) at >>>>>>> t_suspend.c:293 >>>>>>> #3 0x00007f6af0c3eed4 in t_continue (hash_index=58039, >>>>>>> label=413633661, route=0x7f6af10500f0) at t_suspend.c:583 >>>>>>> #4 0x00007f6aae4dd010 in w_t_continue (msg=0x7ffdddb2fa60, >>>>>>> idx=0x7f6af1098e90 "8\306\t\361j\177", lbl=0x7f6af1098ff0 >>>>>>> "\240\264\t\361j\177", rtn=0x7f6af1099150 "0\275\t\361j\177") at >>>>>>> tmx_mod.c:760 >>>>>>> #5 0x000000000045b477 in do_action (h=0x7ffdddb2f850, >>>>>>> a=0x7f6af109ab38, msg=0x7ffdddb2fa60) at core/action.c:1085 >>>>>>> #6 0x0000000000467fd5 in run_actions (h=0x7ffdddb2f850, >>>>>>> a=0x7f6af1096630, msg=0x7ffdddb2fa60) at core/action.c:1565 >>>>>>> #7 0x000000000045b234 in do_action (h=0x7ffdddb2f850, >>>>>>> a=0x7f6af10a0f80, msg=0x7ffdddb2fa60) at core/action.c:1058 >>>>>>> #8 0x0000000000467fd5 in run_actions (h=0x7ffdddb2f850, >>>>>>> a=0x7f6af10a0f80, msg=0x7ffdddb2fa60) at core/action.c:1565 >>>>>>> #9 0x0000000000468797 in run_top_route (a=0x7f6af10a0f80, >>>>>>> msg=0x7ffdddb2fa60, c=0x0) at core/action.c:1654 >>>>>>> #10 0x00007f6aabe79370 in evapi_run_cfg_route (evenv=0x7ffdddb30250, >>>>>>> rt=3, rtname=0x7f6aac08cb18 <_evapi_rts+56>) at evapi_dispatch.c:161 >>>>>>> #11 0x00007f6aabe7f271 in evapi_recv_client (loop=0x7f6aabe698e0, >>>>>>> watcher=0x27af5e0, revents=1) at evapi_dispatch.c:467 >>>>>>> #12 0x00007f6aabc5fd73 in ev_invoke_pending () from >>>>>>> /usr/lib/x86_64-linux-gnu/libev.so.4 >>>>>>> #13 0x00007f6aabc633de in ev_run () from >>>>>>> /usr/lib/x86_64-linux-gnu/libev.so.4 >>>>>>> #14 0x00007f6aabe7867c in ev_loop (loop=0x7f6aabe698e0, flags=0) at >>>>>>> /usr/include/ev.h:835 >>>>>>> #15 0x00007f6aabe83fc6 in evapi_run_dispatcher (laddr=0x7f6af0f72300 >>>>>>> "127.0.0.1", lport=8060) at evapi_dispatch.c:705 >>>>>>> #16 0x00007f6aabe6e262 in child_init (rank=0) at evapi_mod.c:213 >>>>>>> #17 0x0000000000542cad in init_mod_child (m=0x7f6af0f71b70, rank=0) >>>>>>> at core/sr_module.c:943 >>>>>>> #18 0x0000000000542971 in init_mod_child (m=0x7f6af0f72968, rank=0) >>>>>>> at core/sr_module.c:939 >>>>>>> #19 0x0000000000542971 in init_mod_child (m=0x7f6af0f73d38, rank=0) >>>>>>> at core/sr_module.c:939 >>>>>>> #20 0x0000000000542971 in init_mod_child (m=0x7f6af0f74670, rank=0) >>>>>>> at core/sr_module.c:939 >>>>>>> #21 0x0000000000542971 in init_mod_child (m=0x7f6af0f76708, rank=0) >>>>>>> at core/sr_module.c:939 >>>>>>> #22 0x0000000000542971 in init_mod_child (m=0x7f6af0f76c08, rank=0) >>>>>>> at core/sr_module.c:939 >>>>>>> #23 0x0000000000542971 in init_mod_child (m=0x7f6af0f770d0, rank=0) >>>>>>> at core/sr_module.c:939 >>>>>>> #24 0x0000000000542971 in init_mod_child (m=0x7f6af0f77cf0, rank=0) >>>>>>> at core/sr_module.c:939 >>>>>>> #25 0x0000000000542971 in init_mod_child (m=0x7f6af0f78808, rank=0) >>>>>>> at core/sr_module.c:939 >>>>>>> #26 0x0000000000542971 in init_mod_child (m=0x7f6af0f78bd8, rank=0) >>>>>>> at core/sr_module.c:939 >>>>>>> #27 0x0000000000542971 in init_mod_child (m=0x7f6af0f794c8, rank=0) >>>>>>> at core/sr_module.c:939 >>>>>>> #28 0x0000000000542971 in init_mod_child (m=0x7f6af0f79920, rank=0) >>>>>>> at core/sr_module.c:939 >>>>>>> #29 0x0000000000542971 in init_mod_child (m=0x7f6af0f7a330, rank=0) >>>>>>> at core/sr_module.c:939 >>>>>>> #30 0x0000000000542971 in init_mod_child (m=0x7f6af0f7afd0, rank=0) >>>>>>> at core/sr_module.c:939 >>>>>>> #31 0x0000000000542971 in init_mod_child (m=0x7f6af0f7bc80, rank=0) >>>>>>> at core/sr_module.c:939 >>>>>>> #32 0x000000000054303d in init_child (rank=0) at core/sr_module.c:970 >>>>>>> #33 0x0000000000425399 in main_loop () at main.c:1701 >>>>>>> #34 0x000000000042bd5c in main (argc=13, argv=0x7ffdddb31088) at >>>>>>> main.c:2638 >>>>>>> >>>>>>> And this: >>>>>>> [New LWP 15804] >>>>>>> [Thread debugging using libthread_db enabled] >>>>>>> Using host libthread_db library >>>>>>> "/lib/x86_64-linux-gnu/libthread_db.so.1". >>>>>>> Core was generated by `/usr/local/kamailio/sbin/kamailio -P >>>>>>> /var/run/siptrunk.pid -f /usr/local/carrie'. >>>>>>> Program terminated with signal SIGSEGV, Segmentation fault. >>>>>>> #0 0x00007f6af0b90b70 in free_cell_helper >>>>>>> (dead_cell=0x7f6ab0a6baa8, silent=0, fname=0x7f6af0c8f630 "timer.c", >>>>>>> fline=654) at h_table.c:230 >>>>>>> 230 foo = tt->next; >>>>>>> (gdb) bt >>>>>>> #0 0x00007f6af0b90b70 in free_cell_helper >>>>>>> (dead_cell=0x7f6ab0a6baa8, silent=0, fname=0x7f6af0c8f630 "timer.c", >>>>>>> fline=654) at h_table.c:230 >>>>>>> #1 0x00007f6af0c24409 in wait_handler (ti=932640643, >>>>>>> wait_tl=0x7f6ab0a6bb28, data=0x7f6ab0a6baa8) at timer.c:654 >>>>>>> #2 0x00000000004bb445 in timer_list_expire (t=932640643, >>>>>>> h=0x7f6ab03ad158, slow_l=0x7f6ab03ae480, slow_mark=271) at core/timer.c:874 >>>>>>> #3 0x00000000004bb8ab in timer_handler () at core/timer.c:939 >>>>>>> #4 0x00000000004bbd30 in timer_main () at core/timer.c:978 >>>>>>> #5 0x00000000004250f9 in main_loop () at main.c:1691 >>>>>>> #6 0x000000000042bd5c in main (argc=13, argv=0x7ffdddb31088) at >>>>>>> main.c:2638 >>>>>>> >>>>>>> On Wed, Sep 5, 2018 at 3:13 PM Daniel-Constantin Mierla < >>>>>>> miconda(a)gmail.com> wrote: >>>>>>> >>>>>>>> Hello, >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> the backtrace doesn't show any hint about kamailio, only from >>>>>>>> closelog() up. >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> It may be the core generated by shutdown procedure, have you >>>>>>>> enabled one core file per pid/process? If not, do it and reproduce the >>>>>>>> issue again, you may get two core files, one being the runtime issue and >>>>>>>> the other one from shutdown procedure, which likely is an effect of the >>>>>>>> other one. The one from the runtime is more relevant. >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> Cheers, >>>>>>>> Daniel >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> On 05.09.18 10:09, Jayesh Nambiar wrote: >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> Hello, >>>>>>>> I'm using kamailio 5.1.5 with evapi. I have a node.js connecting >>>>>>>> with kamailio evapi to which I send events and also consume events based on >>>>>>>> which I do the routing. I have 8 evapi workers defined in the config. >>>>>>>> The problem is that kamailio randomly crashes on high load. I'm >>>>>>>> assuming that it is related to the evapi module as rest of the config is >>>>>>>> pretty straight forward. I could get a core file and here's the core dump: >>>>>>>> [New LWP 14042] >>>>>>>> [Thread debugging using libthread_db enabled] >>>>>>>> Using host libthread_db library >>>>>>>> “/lib/x86_64-linux-gnu/libthread_db.so.1”. >>>>>>>> Core was generated by `/usr/local/kamailio/sbin/kamailio -P >>>>>>>> /var/run/siptrunk.pid -f /usr/local/carrie’. >>>>>>>> Program terminated with signal SIGABRT, Aborted. >>>>>>>> #0 0x00007f9995283428 in __GI_raise (sig=sig@entry=6) at >>>>>>>> ../sysdeps/unix/sysv/linux/raise.c:54 >>>>>>>> 54 ../sysdeps/unix/sysv/linux/raise.c: No such file or directory. >>>>>>>> (gdb) bt >>>>>>>> #0 0x00007f9995283428 in __GI_raise (sig=sig@entry=6) at >>>>>>>> ../sysdeps/unix/sysv/linux/raise.c:54 >>>>>>>> #1 0x00007f999528502a in __GI_abort () at abort.c:89 >>>>>>>> #2 0x000000000041a029 in sig_alarm_abort (signo=14) at main.c:646 >>>>>>>> #3 <signal handler called> >>>>>>>> #4 0x00007f999534f497 in __libc_cleanup_routine (f=<optimized >>>>>>>> out>) at ../sysdeps/nptl/libc-lockP.h:291 >>>>>>>> #5 closelog () at ../misc/syslog.c:415 >>>>>>>> #6 0x0000000000000000 in ?? () >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> Any help in this regards is would allow me to identify the reason >>>>>>>> of the crash. Thanks for the support. >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> - Jayesh >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> _______________________________________________ >>>>>>>> Kamailio (SER) - Users Mailing Listsr-users@lists.kamailio.orghttps://lists.kamailio.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/sr-users >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> -- >>>>>>>> Daniel-Constantin Mierla -- www.asipto.comwww.twitter.com/miconda -- www.linkedin.com/in/miconda >>>>>>>> Kamailio World Conference -- www.kamailioworld.com >>>>>>>> Kamailio Advanced Training, Nov 12-14, 2018, in Berlin -- www.asipto.com >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> >>>>>>> -- >>>>>>> Daniel-Constantin Mierla -- www.asipto.comwww.twitter.com/miconda -- www.linkedin.com/in/miconda >>>>>>> Kamailio World Conference -- www.kamailioworld.com >>>>>>> Kamailio Advanced Training, Nov 12-14, 2018, in Berlin -- www.asipto.com >>>>>>> >>>>>>> >>>>>> -- >>>>>> Daniel-Constantin Mierla -- www.asipto.comwww.twitter.com/miconda -- www.linkedin.com/in/miconda >>>>>> Kamailio World Conference -- www.kamailioworld.com >>>>>> Kamailio Advanced Training, Nov 12-14, 2018, in Berlin -- www.asipto.com >>>>>> >>>>>> >>>>> -- >>>>> Daniel-Constantin Mierla -- www.asipto.comwww.twitter.com/miconda -- www.linkedin.com/in/miconda >>>>> Kamailio World Conference -- www.kamailioworld.com >>>>> Kamailio Advanced Training, Nov 12-14, 2018, in Berlin -- www.asipto.com >>>>> >>>>> >>> -- >>> Daniel-Constantin Mierla -- www.asipto.comwww.twitter.com/miconda -- www.linkedin.com/in/miconda >>> Kamailio World Conference -- www.kamailioworld.com >>> Kamailio Advanced Training, Nov 12-14, 2018, in Berlin -- www.asipto.com >>> >>>

2 2

[DMQ] dmq_send_message function usage.
by Denys Pozniak 02 Oct '18

02 Oct '18

Hello! I have set of Kamailios which distributed location via dmq_usrloc. Could I construct synthetic DMQ message from separate Kamailio node to this cluster to get location info for the specific user? If yes, please explain how to do it. -- BR, Denys Pozniak

3 3

2026

2025

2024

2023

2022

2021

2020

2019

2018

2017

2016

2015

2014

2013

2012

2011

2010

2009

2008

2007

2006

2005

2004

2003

2002

sr-users October 2018