sr-users May 2018

sr-users@lists.kamailio.org

92 participants
140 discussions

WebRTC to WebRTC call Kamailio ACK Problem
by Wilkins, Steve 20 May '18

20 May '18

Hello, I am using Kamailio 5.2 and Asterisk 15.3 and while doing a WebRTC (client1) to WebRTC (client2) call, Asterisks sends a re-invite and Kamailio responds with a '200 OK', but when Asterisk sends back the "ACK" to Kamailio, it cannot be relayed. Errors => WARNING: <core> [core/msg_translator.c:2767]: via_builder(): TCP/TLS connection (id: 0) for WebSocket could not be found ERROR: <core> [core/msg_translator.c:1982]: build_req_buf_from_sip_req(): could not create Via header ERROR: <core> [core/forward.c:549]: forward_request(): building failed ERROR: sl [sl_funcs.c:362]: sl_reply_error(): stateless error reply used: I'm terribly sorry, server error occurred (1/SL) As a side note, I still occasionally see the Errors => ERROR: <core> [core/pvapi.c:1452]: pv_printf(): no more space for spec value ERROR: <core> [core/pvapi.c:1461]: pv_printf(): buffer overflow -- increase the buffer size... No matter how large I make pv_buffer_size, and tcp_rd_buf_size; pv_buffer_size=16384, and tcp_rd_buf_size=16384; Thank you all!

1 0

deb.kamailio.org bionic
by Kelvin Chua 19 May '18

19 May '18

any plans of adding support for bionic? Kelvin Chua

3 3

Transport issue thought
by Wilkins, Steve 18 May '18

18 May '18

It appears that the bottom line of my TCP transport not working is that Kamailio is randomly assigning large port numbers to send the TCP traffic out on. I am not able to randomly open high ports for this purpose. Is there a way to tell Kamailio to only use specific ports for this. I have tried using force_send_socket() with Kamailio' s IP, and the port I want to send out on, but this did not work either. Does this sound like I am on the right track? Thank you, -

3 11

Transport question
by Wilkins, Steve 18 May '18

18 May '18

Hi All, I was attempting to switch from UDP to TCP for relaying. I used t_relay_to_tcp() instead of t_relay() => if (!t_relay_to_tcp()) { sl_reply_error(); } The problem is that I am still seeing the SIP messages as UDP on the Server that the messages are relayed to. Any Ideas? Thank you, Steve

6 17

Hunting - Dynamic logistics
by KamDev Essa 18 May '18

18 May '18

So I finally got to the docs on hunting under the TM Modules and there was an awesome write up and it is making a lot more sense now. Basic logic is to append_branch with your extensions and and manage serial and/or parallel forking by setting the q values. The script is static. Is there a module that automatically loads registered contacts from a grouped list of extensions or is the best way to dip into the db and DIY? I would like to know how some of you have implemented hunting, Also is there a way to set the fr_inv_timer of each branch. Thanks in advance. KD

2 1

Alcatel-Lucent Enterprise acquires majority stake in Sipwise
by Andreas Granig 18 May '18

18 May '18

Dear community, I'd like to inform you about Alcatel-Lucent Enterprise (ALE) acquiring a majority stake in Sipwise. Over the last 10 years, we at Sipwise were committed to contributing significant efforts to the open source telecom environment, resulting amongst others in the free and open source Sipwise CE soft-switch appliance, the rtpengine media relay, as well as major contributions to the Kamailio SIP proxy. Under the ALE roof, Sipwise is continuing to operate as its own brand, and our commitment to open source and our community components will be as strong as ever. Please find the official announcement here: https://www.sipwise.com/ale-sipwise/ Best regards, Andreas

3 2

Re: [SR-Users] rtpproxy not forwarding rtp packets.
by Giovanni Tommasini - evosip 18 May '18

18 May '18

Hi Younas, when you have a call if you make a trace in your sip server with sngrep or tshark can you see the RTP packet ? you says "I have kamailio server behind nat with rptproxy.", so is it possible that the router in front your SIP server blocks the traffic? could you have a trace there? I mean the packets exit the rtpproxy but don't arrive to callee or just don't come out of the rtpproxy? Giovanni Tommasini | *evosip* <http://evosip.cloud> 2018-05-18 1:36 GMT+02:00 Aqs Younas <aqsyounas(a)gmail.com>: > Thanks for replying. Callee is actually a sip provider. I see no firewall > or iptables rules on server to prevent rtp following towards callee. > > Is there anything i can do to see which thing is blocking rtps. > > Best > > On Fri, 18 May 2018 at 3:59 AM, Mack Hendricks <ap(a)goflyball.com> wrote: > >> Is there something blocking RTP traffic from reaching the callee? Is the >> callee a carrier or the actually endpoint endpoint (aka SIP Phone)? >> >> *Mack Hendricks / Head of Support / dOpenSource* >> web: http://dopensource.com >> support: +888-907-2085 >> dSIPRouter <http://dsiprouter.org> - GUI focused on implementing >> Kamailio to provide SIP Trunking and PBX Hosting Services >> >> On May 18, 2018, at 12:50 AM, Aqs Younas <aqsyounas(a)gmail.com> wrote: >> >> Greetings list, >> >> >> I have kamailio server behind nat with rptproxy. But i am getting no >> voice on the call. After taking trace i could see that rtpproxy was getting >> rtp packets but not packets was being forwarded towards callee side. >> >> Though i see in rtpproxy logs, packets being relayed from caller side. >> >> Does rtpproxy wait to receive a single rtp frame from callee before >> fowarding that to callee? >> >> Since, i am getting no rtp from callee. So, might be rptrpoxy is waiting >> to learn source address of callee side rtp, that is why it is not >> forwarding rtp packets from caller towards callee. >> >> >> Any pointer/suggestion is much appreciated. >> >> Best Regards, >> >> Aqs Younas >> >> _______________________________________________ >> Kamailio (SER) - Users Mailing List >> sr-users(a)lists.kamailio.org >> https://lists.kamailio.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/sr-users >> >> >> _______________________________________________ >> Kamailio (SER) - Users Mailing List >> sr-users(a)lists.kamailio.org >> https://lists.kamailio.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/sr-users >> > > _______________________________________________ > Kamailio (SER) - Users Mailing List > sr-users(a)lists.kamailio.org > https://lists.kamailio.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/sr-users > >

4 4

Help on how to debug cfg_get variable having unexpected value?
by Malcolm O'Hare 18 May '18

18 May '18

I'm trying to debug an issue I've encountered where a variable that I've set using kamcmd cfg.set has an unexpected value when used in kamailio. The variable should be 0 or 1, but it looks like its getting set accidently somehow. 2018-05-11T22:02:58.344260+00:00 ip-172-31-129-45 kamailio[5253]: DEBUG: <core> [select.c:263]: resolve_select(): 'with_dynamodb_user_data' 2018-05-11T22:02:58.344264+00:00 ip-172-31-129-45 kamailio[5253]: DEBUG: <core> [cfg/cfg_select.c:174]: select_cfg_var(): DEBUG: select_cfg_var(): select fixup is postponed: features.with_dynamodb_user_data 2018-05-11T22:05:03.467110+00:00 ip-172-31-129-45 kamailio[5551]: INFO: <core> [cfg/cfg_ctx.c:608]: cfg_set_now(): INFO: cfg_set_now(): features.with_dynamodb_user_data has been changed to 1 2018-05-11T22:15:51.695118+00:00 ip-172-31-129-45 kamailio[5574]: [2c03c333-1705-41b1-aa26-6f10492a5a6f] DEBUG: with_dynamodb_user_data is 1157627905 I've tried to debug using gdb using breaks and set a watch on the memory address of the var, but it looks like it keeps using different memory locations. The value in the address pointed at by group.handle seems to change for each invocation of set_cfg_now, so when I try and put a watch on the address of *group.handle + var.offset it never gets hit. (gdb) print *group $36 = {num = 25, mapping = 0x7f56ee4474f0, vars = 0x0, add_var = 0x0, size = 164, meta_offset = 968, var_offset = 984, handle = 0x7f56edf92fd0, orig_handle = 0x0, dynamic = 1 '\001', next = 0x0, name_len = 8, name = "f"} (gdb) print *var $62 = {def = 0x7f56ee471668, name_len = 23, pos = 24, offset = 164, flag = 0} Any ideas? Malcolm

2 2

Auth module with shared "secret"
by Asgaroth 18 May '18

18 May '18

Hi All, I am testing a scenario where we have 3 proxies and I'm trying to ensure that if a messages comes in to 1 proxy, which challenges the ua, is able to be auth'd successfully on one of the remaining 2 proxies if, for some reason the ua decides to send the response to one of the remaining two proxies. I am testing this using a seperate kamailio proxy which loadbalances messages across the 3 proxies that I am testing with. I have 1 ua (zoiper) which I tell to subscribe for mwi, the initial subscribe is sent to proxy 1, which sends a 407 back, the new subscribe with auth, from the ua, is sent to proxy 2, which deems the nonce as expired and rechallenges, this continues in a loop across the 3 proxies and never authenticates. I think I'm missing something in my settings that I just cannot put my finger on, and/or, I'm mis-understanding the documentation and how these settings interact with each other. My auth module settings are as follows: # # ----- auth params ----- # modparam("auth", "qop", "auth") modparam("auth", "nonce_count", 1) modparam("auth", "one_time_nonce", 1) modparam("auth", "nid_pool_no", 4) modparam("auth", "nc_array_size", 4194304) modparam("auth", "otn_in_flight_no", 8388608) modparam("auth", "auth_checks_no_dlg", 9) modparam("auth", "auth_checks_in_dlg", 15) modparam("auth", "auth_checks_register", 11) modparam("auth", "secret", "secret_32_char_str") I tried with one_time_nonce enabled and disabled but the result is the same, continous rechallenge. The documentation mentions that if nonce_count and one_time_nonce are enable, and a ua sends a response with nonce and qop in the auth header then one_time_nonce will not be used, one_time nonce will be used as a fallback in the case the ua does not support qop. My auth block in the routing logic looks like so: route[AUTH_CHECK]{ xlog("L_DBG", "route[AUTH_CHECK] : $rm : Performing authentication checks for '$var(creds_key)'"); $var(challenge_flags) = 1; if ( ! pv_auth_check("$fd", "$sht(creds=>$var(creds_key)::Password)", "20", "1") ) { switch($retcode) { case -1: xlog("L_DBG", "route[AUTH_CHECK] : $rm : Generic error occurred, no reply sent out."); break; case -2: xlog("L_DBG", "route[AUTH_CHECK] : $rm : Invalid password supplied, re-challenging client and removing from hash table."); sht_rm_name_re("creds=>$var(creds_key)"); break; case -4: xlog("L_DBG", "route[AUTH_CHECK] : $rm : Nonce has expired, re-challenging client."); $var(challenge_flags) = $var(challenge_flags) + 16; break; case -5: xlog("L_DBG", "route[AUTH_CHECK] : $rm : No credentials supplied, challenging client."); break; case -6: xlog("L_DBG", "route[AUTH_CHECK] : $rm : Nonce has already been used to auth a previous request, challenging client."); break; case -8: xlog("L_DBG", "route[AUTH_CHECK] : $rm : Auth user is different to From/To user, challenging client."); break; } xlog("L_INFO", "route[AUTH_CHECK] : $rm : auth_challenge will be called with '$fd' and '$var(challenge_flags)'"); auth_challenge("$fd", "$var(challenge_flags)"); exit; } consume_credentials(); } When I look at the logs I always see the proxies seeing the nonce as expired: oUBGp0n6HRWu_mvPPxJQqg..: INFO: <script>: route[AUTH_CHECK] : SUBSCRIBE : auth_challenge will be called with 'example.com' and '17' oUBGp0n6HRWu_mvPPxJQqg..: INFO: <script>: route[AUTH_CHECK] : SUBSCRIBE : auth_challenge will be called with 'example.com' and '17' oUBGp0n6HRWu_mvPPxJQqg..: INFO: <script>: route[AUTH_CHECK] : SUBSCRIBE : auth_challenge will be called with 'example.com' and '17' oUBGp0n6HRWu_mvPPxJQqg..: INFO: <script>: route[AUTH_CHECK] : SUBSCRIBE : auth_challenge will be called with 'example.com' and '17' oUBGp0n6HRWu_mvPPxJQqg..: INFO: <script>: route[AUTH_CHECK] : SUBSCRIBE : auth_challenge will be called with 'example.com' and '17' oUBGp0n6HRWu_mvPPxJQqg..: INFO: <script>: route[AUTH_CHECK] : SUBSCRIBE : auth_challenge will be called with 'example.com' and '17' I have checked: [1] that the proxies are all syncing time, and they are not out of sync, [2] The source address of the client doesnt change (in case auth_checks_no_dlg is failing), [3] The r-uri of the subscription dialog is the same (in case auth_checks_no_dlg is failing) I am using kamailio version 5.0.6: kamailio -V version: kamailio 5.0.6 (x86_64/linux) flags: STATS: Off, USE_TCP, USE_TLS, USE_SCTP, TLS_HOOKS, USE_RAW_SOCKS, DISABLE_NAGLE, USE_MCAST, DNS_IP_HACK, SHM_MEM, SHM_MMAP, PKG_MALLOC, Q_MALLOC, F_MALLOC, TLSF_MALLOC, DBG_SR_MEMORY, USE_FUTEX, FAST_LOCK-ADAPTIVE_WAIT, USE_DNS_CACHE, USE_DNS_FAILOVER, USE_NAPTR, USE_DST_BLACKLIST, HAVE_RESOLV_RES ADAPTIVE_WAIT_LOOPS=1024, MAX_RECV_BUFFER_SIZE 262144, MAX_LISTEN 16, MAX_URI_SIZE 1024, BUF_SIZE 65535, DEFAULT PKG_SIZE 8MB poll method support: poll, epoll_lt, epoll_et, sigio_rt, select. id: unknown compiled on 15:57:47 Mar 5 2018 with gcc 4.8.5 Any thoughts on what I can look at or if I'm missing something fundamental here? All suggestions/criticisms are appreciated. Thanks for reading.

3 6

rtpproxy not forwarding rtp packets.
by Aqs Younas 17 May '18

17 May '18

Greetings list, I have kamailio server behind nat with rptproxy. But i am getting no voice on the call. After taking trace i could see that rtpproxy was getting rtp packets but not packets was being forwarded towards callee side. Though i see in rtpproxy logs, packets being relayed from caller side. Does rtpproxy wait to receive a single rtp frame from callee before fowarding that to callee? Since, i am getting no rtp from callee. So, might be rptrpoxy is waiting to learn source address of callee side rtp, that is why it is not forwarding rtp packets from caller towards callee. Any pointer/suggestion is much appreciated. Best Regards, Aqs Younas

2 2

← Newer
1
...
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
...
14
Older →

Jump to page:

2025

2024

2023

2022

2021

2020

2019

2018

2017

2016

2015

2014

2013

2012

2011

2010

2009

2008

2007

2006

2005

2004

2003

2002

sr-users May 2018