sr-users November 2019

sr-users@lists.kamailio.org

67 participants
100 discussions

by Ilie Soltanici

Hello, I am trying to set up a WebRTC2SIP Gateway by using Kamailio and rtpengine. So far, everything is working fine, I'm able to register an extension and make a call, but for some reason, when i'm trying to call a WebRTC extension from any SIP Extension Kamailio is sending INVITE, WebRTC extension is sending back 200 OK, and then Kamailio is trying to send an ACK through UDP protocol, and not through wss, as it's supposed to do. This is how invite is looking: INVITE sip:nl7oe4ss@vjbh7r4im6j7.invalid;transport=wss SIP/2.0 Record-Route: <sip:my-company.net ;transport=udp;ftag=as1789445c;lr=on;nat=yes> Via: SIP/2.0/WSS 123.123.123.123:10443 ;branch=z9hG4bKe655.29d7c135a302f3eb803902d4f5a8da7e.0 Via: SIP/2.0/UDP 192.168.50.237:5060 ;received=192.168.50.237;branch=z9hG4bK7d2e534e;rport=5060 Max-Forwards: 70 From: "WebRTC" <sip:11@my-company.net>;tag=as1789445c To: <sip:15@192.168.50.210:5060> Contact: <sip:11@192.168.50.237:5060> Call-ID: 7fc800de060197fa2315c93763873092(a)my-company.net CSeq: 102 INVITE User-Agent: Proxy Date: Wed, 03 Apr 2019 17:11:41 GMT Allow: INVITE, ACK, CANCEL, OPTIONS, BYE, REFER, SUBSCRIBE, NOTIFY, INFO, PUBLISH, MESSAGE Supported: replaces, timer Alert-Info: Content-Type: application/sdp Content-Length: 596 Server: SIP Proxy and then WebRTC app is replying with 200 OK: SIP/2.0 200 OK Record-Route: <sip:my-company.net ;transport=udp;ftag=as1789445c;lr=on;nat=yes> Via: SIP/2.0/WSS 123.123.123.123:10443 ;branch=z9hG4bKe655.29d7c135a302f3eb803902d4f5a8da7e.0 Via: SIP/2.0/UDP 192.168.50.237:5060 ;received=192.168.50.237;branch=z9hG4bK7d2e534e;rport=5060 To: <sip:15@192.168.50.210:5060>;tag=dk4fa8ftt6 From: "WebRTC" <sip:11@my-company.net>;tag=as1789445c Call-ID: 7fc800de060197fa2315c93763873092(a)my-company.net CSeq: 102 INVITE Contact: <sip:nl7oe4ss@vjbh7r4im6j7.invalid;transport=wss> Allow: ACK,CANCEL,INVITE,MESSAGE,BYE,OPTIONS,INFO,NOTIFY,REFER Supported: outbound User-Agent: Proxy-WEBRTC Content-Type: application/sdp Content-Length: 901 and finally, Kamailio is trying to send this ack through UDP protocol: ACK sip:nl7oe4ss@22.22.22.22:57421;transport=wss SIP/2.0 Via: SIP/2.0/UDP 192.168.50.237:5060;branch=z9hG4bK56363ddf;rport Route: <sip:my-company.net;transport=udp;ftag=as1789445c;lr=on;nat=yes> Max-Forwards: 70 From: "WebRTC" <sip:11@my-company.net>;tag=as1789445c To: <sip:15@192.168.50.210:5060>;tag=dk4fa8ftt6 Contact: <sip:11@192.168.50.237:5060> Call-ID: 7fc800de060197fa2315c93763873092(a)my-company.net CSeq: 102 ACK User-Agent: Proxy Content-Length: 0 If i'm trying to force it through TLS, i'm receiving error: get_send_socket2(): protocol/port mismatch (forced tls:123.123.123.123:10443, to udp:22.22.22.22:23317) Can someone point me in the right direction, please? Thank you.

4 years, 10 months

rtpproxy does not response, disable it

by Zodiac

Dear friends, I am working on a program on Kamailio and rtpengine proxy. I am wondering whether can I set Kamailio and rtpengine daemon on different physical machines. For example, I set Kamailio on a machine with IP address:10.109.247.80, and launch rtpengine daemon on another machine with interface parameter as 10.109.247.90 and ng port 7723. I set parameter in Kamailio.cfg with modparam(“rtpengine”, “rtpengine_sock”, “udp:10.109.247.90:7723”). Unfortunately I got debug message like this: ERROR: rtpengine [rtpengine.c:1710]: send_rtpp_command(): can't send command to a RTP proxy ERROR: rtpengine [rtpengine.c:1746]: send_rtpp_command(): proxy <udp:10.109.247.90:7723> does not respond, disable it ERROR: rtpengine [rtpengine.c:1616]: rtpp_test(): proxy did not respond to ping And, I also tried to set Kamailio and rtpengine daemon in a same machine,and use modparam(“rtpengine”, “rtpengine_sock”, “udp:localhost:7723”). And Kamailio can work functionally under this situation. rtpengine daemon can receive ping message from Kamailio and rtpengine daemon can work as suspected. So for the later case, is it supposed that Kamailio be in the same machine with same localhost address? Otherwise, what’s the reason for my ERROR? ------------------------------------ 北京邮电大学网络技术研究院网络与交换技术国家重点实验室田军 +86 18810315790 mozillafire(a)bupt.edu.cn ------------------------------------

4 years, 10 months

Not working : Using $cfg(line) to print line number

by mahesh b

Hi All, Below is the syntax am using to print the line number in kamailio configuration file. xlog("L_WARN","Hi Mahesh at line $cfg(line)\n"); Unfortunately , when i do this looks like kamailio is not starting, Any help please regarding what am i missing here. I tried Xlogl as well, which doesnt print the line number by default in my setup. This is the details i had read to understand config file attributes : $cfg(key) - Config File Attributes Attributes related to configuration file. The key can be: - line - return the current line in config - name - return the name of current config file - file - return the name of current config file - route - return the name of routing block Example: send_reply("404", "Not found at line $cfg(line)")

4 years, 11 months

lookup(aliases) issues with 5.2

by igor.potjevlesch＠gmail.com

Hello! I have notice some issues with lookup(aliases) since I upgraded to 5.2 from 5.1: First with kamctl: If this default command is executed: ctl_cmd_run ul.add "$USRLOC_TABLE" "$OSERUSER@$OSERDOMAIN" "$2" \ "$UL_EXPIRES" "$DEFAULT_Q" "$UL_PATH" "$UL_FLAGS" "$BR_FLAGS" "$ALL_METHODS" as $ALL_METHODS is not defined, there is a huge value in methods and then lookup(aliases) fails with -2. I have to update kamctl script and put -1 ("-1") instead of the variable. So, now, methods is a NULL value in DB and my alias is not ignored. But I use to make my alias like this: sip:number@blabla_1.local Which is no longer works: ERROR: registrar [common.c:62]: extract_aor(): failed to parse AoR [sip:number@blabla_1.local] Any idea of the difference since 5.2 with this behaviour? Without the underscore, the AoR seems to be valid but I need to support underscore as before. Regards, Igor.

4 years, 11 months

siputils: how does sip_p_charging_vector generate the header

by George Diamantopoulos

Hello, I've been looking at the sip_p_charging_vector() function of siputils. From the documentation it is not evident how the PCV header is generated. Are the exported $pcv pseudovariables writable, so that the function canl use those when generating the header? Thanks! BR, George

4 years, 11 months

kamailio IMS supporting VOLTE

by Shubhendu Das

Hi , I have a query regarding Kamailio open source SIP server. Does it have any release, where its supports the feature of IMS supporting VOLTE with real commercial mobile phones(IMSI based) ? If so, what is the release number ? Please also let me know about the supported mobile phones list. BR, Shubhendu -- _Disclaimer: This email and any files transmitted along with it may contain Azcom confidential and proprietary information. If you are not the intended recipient, you are notified that disclosing, copying, distributing or taking any action based on the contents of the information contained herein is strictly prohibited. If you are not an intended recipient of this transmission and you received it in error, please inform the sender by reply e-mail and destroy this and all other copies of this transmission to which you have access. The sender of this email or Azcom does not accept liability for any errors or omissions in the contents of this message that may occur as a result._

4 years, 11 months

Possible conflict between t_newtran and setflag for ACC

by Patrick Wakano

Hello list, Hope you all doing well! I am using the ACC module and using the setflag() function as done in several examples. It works fine. However, I've added the t_newtran() function almost in the begging of the INVITE handler to help the retransmission detection and after that I noticed the ACC was not saving anything in DB. So after debugging I discovered that if I call the t_newtran() before setting the ACC flags, the module will not save the calls in DB, but if I call it after setting the ACC flags, it works.... So my question is, is this a bug or it is a expected side effect so when one is using t_newtran you must be careful and set all your transaction flags before? (ACC are the only transaction flags I am using so can't tell if other modules have the same problem) This is happening in Kamailio 5.2.2. Thank you! Kind regards, Patrick Wakano

4 years, 11 months

tcp limit, too many open files

by David Villasmil

Hello guys, I'm facing an issue where, if i start kamailio as root, all works properly, but if i start it as kamailio, i get hundreds of: handle_new_connect(): error while accepting connection(24): Too many open files My limits is like: kamailio soft core unlimited kamailio soft data unlimited kamailio soft fsize unlimited kamailio soft memlock unlimited kamailio soft nofile unlimited kamailio soft rss unlimited kamailio hard stack 240 kamailio soft cpu unlimited kamailio soft nproc unlimited kamailio soft as unlimited kamailio soft priority -11 kamailio soft locks unlimited kamailio soft sigpending unlimited kamailio soft msgqueue unlimited kamailio soft nice -11 kamailio soft nofile 65536 kamailio hard nofile 65536 root soft core unlimited root soft data unlimited root soft fsize unlimited root soft memlock unlimited root soft nofile unlimited root soft rss unlimited root hard stack 240 root soft cpu unlimited root soft nproc unlimited root soft as unlimited root soft priority -11 root soft locks unlimited root soft sigpending unlimited root soft msgqueue unlimited root soft nice -11 root soft nofile 65536 root hard nofile 65536 I can't figure out why this is happening... Regards, David Villasmil email: david.villasmil.work(a)gmail.com phone: +34669448337

4 years, 11 months

Kamailio as SBC for Microsoft Teams

by Henning Westerholt

Hello, I have created a "How-To" blog post on using Kamailio as "session border controller" for Microsoft Teams Direct Routing: https://skalatan.de/de/blog/kamailio-sbc-teams You can this way use all the existing possibilities that Kamailio provide to interact with MS Teams as well. Best regards, Henning -- Henning Westerholt - https://skalatan.de/blog/ Kamailio services - https://skalatan.de/services

4 years, 11 months

Adding "q" value for the main branch

by Maxim M

Maxim Malygin <maxim.malygin(a)gmail.com> 17:08 (5 минут назад) кому: sr-users Hello, I need to form list of Contact headers with "q" parameters for "302 Moved Temporary". I do something like this: ... # $xavp(contacts) - contains list of contact URIs (uri) and Q values (q) $var(i) = 0; $var(num) = $cnt($xavp(contacts)); while($var(i) < $var(num)) { if($var(i) == 0) { # How to add q value to this branch? $ru = $xavp(contacts[$var(i)]=>uri); } else { append_branch("$xavp(contacts[$var(i)]=>uri)", "$xavp(contacts[$var(i)]=>q)"); } } send_reply("302", "Moved Temporarily"); ... Is it possible to set "q" value for the main branch? For additional branches I do it via append_branch("uri", q_value) but I didn't find any way to do it for the main branch pointed via $ru/$du. The pseudo-variable "$branch" also doesn't allow me to access the main branch. Thanks, Maxim

4 years, 11 months

← Newer
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
Older →

2024

2023

2022

2021

2020

2019

2018

2017

2016

2015

2014

2013

2012

2011

2010

2009

2008

2007

2006

2005

2004

2003

2002

sr-users November 2019