Not sure if this is BS or worth exploring, it's not my expertise area so
I'm forwarding to you all just in case
---------- Forwarded message ---------
From: Lorenzo from Instal <lorenzo.tacchio(a)instal.com>
Date: Tue, Dec 3, 2019 at 8:56 AM
Subject: app-ads.txt monetization proposal
To: <joel(a)textplus.com>
app-ads.txt monetization proposal
Hello ,
I am Lorenzo, Senior Account Manager at Instal; we are currently buying
your app's traffic via DSPs.
We thought would be beneficial to work directly with you, *monetizing your
inventory with no intermediate levels at all*.
The key of our success is the *simple technical integration*. No SDK is
required, we will add our ads.txt to your page and your app would be
included in our media buying plan with budgets of *more than $1M per month*.
Would you be interested to discover more in detail this opportunity?
Please share your Skype ID or add me, *live:loresseintes*, to connect
further!
Kind Regards,
Lorenzo
Instal Srl, Via Ippolito Pindemonte, Florence, Italy
Manage preferences
<https://hs-3923849.s.hubspotemail.net/hs/manage-preferences/unsubscribe?d=V…>
Hi all,
I'm testing and moving my kamailio script to use the newer secfilter module.
In the past, I was replying "200 Ok" to "friendly scanners"...
With the newer secfilter module, it looks like I can't send a reply with
"sl_send_reply("200", "OK")"
secf_check_ua();
if ($? == -2) {
sl_send_reply("200", "OK");
exit;
}
I have read the code of the secfilter, but I was not able to see any
specific code to silently discard the SIP request.
I can see in the documentation about "secf_check_sqli_all", that the SIP
message is supposed to be "dropped". I can see "w_check_sqli_all" returns 0
on detection and w_check_ua returns -2 upon detection.
Are the message discarded because a negative value was returned?
Would it be doable, using the secfilter, to still reply 200 Ok?
Regards
Aymeric
--
Antisip - http://www.antisip.com
Hi ,
I have a query regarding Kamailio open source SIP server.
Does it have any release, where its supports the feature of IMS supporting
VOLTE with real commercial mobile phones(IMSI based) ?
If so, what is the release number ? Please also let me know about the
supported mobile phones list.
BR,
Shubhendu
--
_Disclaimer: This email and any files transmitted along with it may contain
Azcom confidential and proprietary information. If you are not the
intended recipient, you are notified that disclosing, copying, distributing
or taking any action based on the contents of the information contained
herein is strictly prohibited. If you are not an intended recipient of this
transmission and you received it in error, please inform the sender by
reply e-mail and destroy this and all other copies of this transmission to
which you have access. The sender of this email or Azcom does not accept
liability for any errors or omissions in the contents of this message that
may occur as a result._
Hello guys,
I'm connecting to a provider who requires the contact contains the proxy's
IP... I know this is weird and totally off-rfc...
I setup the topoh module and used
modparam("topoh", "mask_ip", "[PROXY_IP]:5060")
but this makes the contact:
Contact: <sip:[PROXY_IP]:5060;line=sr-Z213nshDqt98-2qiIoT8GFf.
y8PWype.SRy0nRo3nCT*>
I know this is how it works, but they don't like the additional
";line=...."
Has anyone faced this kind of thing? is there any other way to set this to
something like:
Contact: <sip:[PROXY_IP]:5060>
that won't mess everything?
Thanks all,
David Villasmil
email: david.villasmil.work(a)gmail.com
phone: +34669448337
Why is it that $null + 0 is 0 but not int? What is it?
-- Juha
$avp(test) = $null + 0;
if (is_int("$avp(test)"))
INFO(test $avp(test) IS int);
else
INFO(test $avp(test) IS NOT int);
Dec 1 02:46:01 salmon /usr/bin/sip-proxy[10138]: INFO: test 0 IS NOT int
Hello,
I would like to announce that Call for Presentations at Kamailio World
2020 is now open. You can submit your proposal or see more details at:
- https://www.kamailioworld.com/k08/call-for-speakers/
The 8th edition of the event takes place again in Berlin, Germany,
during April 27-29, 2020. Expect over 150 participants, developers and
community members as well as representatives of other popular open
source VoIP projects such as Asterisk or FreeSwitch.
Looking forward to meeting many of you there!
Cheers,
Daniel
--
Daniel-Constantin Mierla -- www.asipto.comwww.twitter.com/miconda -- www.linkedin.com/in/miconda
Kamailio World Conference - April 27-29, 2020, in Berlin -- www.kamailioworld.com
Hello list,
Hope you all doing well!
I am using the ACC module and using the setflag() function as done in
several examples. It works fine. However, I've added the t_newtran()
function almost in the begging of the INVITE handler to help the
retransmission detection and after that I noticed the ACC was not saving
anything in DB.
So after debugging I discovered that if I call the t_newtran() before
setting the ACC flags, the module will not save the calls in DB, but if I
call it after setting the ACC flags, it works....
So my question is, is this a bug or it is a expected side effect so when
one is using t_newtran you must be careful and set all your transaction
flags before? (ACC are the only transaction flags I am using so can't tell
if other modules have the same problem)
This is happening in Kamailio 5.2.2.
Thank you!
Kind regards,
Patrick Wakano
