sr-users December 2019

sr-users@lists.kamailio.org

63 participants
78 discussions

Fwd: app-ads.txt monetization proposal
by Joel Serrano 04 Dec '19

04 Dec '19

Not sure if this is BS or worth exploring, it's not my expertise area so I'm forwarding to you all just in case ---------- Forwarded message --------- From: Lorenzo from Instal <lorenzo.tacchio(a)instal.com> Date: Tue, Dec 3, 2019 at 8:56 AM Subject: app-ads.txt monetization proposal To: <joel(a)textplus.com> app-ads.txt monetization proposal Hello , I am Lorenzo, Senior Account Manager at Instal; we are currently buying your app's traffic via DSPs. We thought would be beneficial to work directly with you, *monetizing your inventory with no intermediate levels at all*. The key of our success is the *simple technical integration*. No SDK is required, we will add our ads.txt to your page and your app would be included in our media buying plan with budgets of *more than $1M per month*. Would you be interested to discover more in detail this opportunity? Please share your Skype ID or add me, *live:loresseintes*, to connect further! Kind Regards, Lorenzo Instal Srl, Via Ippolito Pindemonte, Florence, Italy Manage preferences <https://hs-3923849.s.hubspotemail.net/hs/manage-preferences/unsubscribe?d=V…>

1 1

secfilter usage
by Aymeric Moizard 03 Dec '19

03 Dec '19

Hi all, I'm testing and moving my kamailio script to use the newer secfilter module. In the past, I was replying "200 Ok" to "friendly scanners"... With the newer secfilter module, it looks like I can't send a reply with "sl_send_reply("200", "OK")" secf_check_ua(); if ($? == -2) { sl_send_reply("200", "OK"); exit; } I have read the code of the secfilter, but I was not able to see any specific code to silently discard the SIP request. I can see in the documentation about "secf_check_sqli_all", that the SIP message is supposed to be "dropped". I can see "w_check_sqli_all" returns 0 on detection and w_check_ua returns -2 upon detection. Are the message discarded because a negative value was returned? Would it be doable, using the secfilter, to still reply 200 Ok? Regards Aymeric -- Antisip - http://www.antisip.com

2 5

kamailio IMS supporting VOLTE
by Shubhendu Das 03 Dec '19

03 Dec '19

Hi , I have a query regarding Kamailio open source SIP server. Does it have any release, where its supports the feature of IMS supporting VOLTE with real commercial mobile phones(IMSI based) ? If so, what is the release number ? Please also let me know about the supported mobile phones list. BR, Shubhendu -- _Disclaimer: This email and any files transmitted along with it may contain Azcom confidential and proprietary information. If you are not the intended recipient, you are notified that disclosing, copying, distributing or taking any action based on the contents of the information contained herein is strictly prohibited. If you are not an intended recipient of this transmission and you received it in error, please inform the sender by reply e-mail and destroy this and all other copies of this transmission to which you have access. The sender of this email or Azcom does not accept liability for any errors or omissions in the contents of this message that may occur as a result._

2 2

Contact header requirement
by David Villasmil 02 Dec '19

02 Dec '19

Hello guys, I'm connecting to a provider who requires the contact contains the proxy's IP... I know this is weird and totally off-rfc... I setup the topoh module and used modparam("topoh", "mask_ip", "[PROXY_IP]:5060") but this makes the contact: Contact: <sip:[PROXY_IP]:5060;line=sr-Z213nshDqt98-2qiIoT8GFf. y8PWype.SRy0nRo3nCT*> I know this is how it works, but they don't like the additional ";line=...." Has anyone faced this kind of thing? is there any other way to set this to something like: Contact: <sip:[PROXY_IP]:5060> that won't mess everything? Thanks all, David Villasmil email: david.villasmil.work(a)gmail.com phone: +34669448337

3 7

$null + 0 is not int
by Juha Heinanen 02 Dec '19

02 Dec '19

Why is it that $null + 0 is 0 but not int? What is it? -- Juha $avp(test) = $null + 0; if (is_int("$avp(test)")) INFO(test $avp(test) IS int); else INFO(test $avp(test) IS NOT int); Dec 1 02:46:01 salmon /usr/bin/sip-proxy[10138]: INFO: test 0 IS NOT int

2 5

Kamailio World 2020 - Call For Presentations
by Daniel-Constantin Mierla 02 Dec '19

02 Dec '19

Hello, I would like to announce that Call for Presentations at Kamailio World 2020 is now open. You can submit your proposal or see more details at: - https://www.kamailioworld.com/k08/call-for-speakers/ The 8th edition of the event takes place again in Berlin, Germany, during April 27-29, 2020. Expect over 150 participants, developers and community members as well as representatives of other popular open source VoIP projects such as Asterisk or FreeSwitch. Looking forward to meeting many of you there! Cheers, Daniel -- Daniel-Constantin Mierla -- www.asipto.com www.twitter.com/miconda -- www.linkedin.com/in/miconda Kamailio World Conference - April 27-29, 2020, in Berlin -- www.kamailioworld.com

1 0

Possible conflict between t_newtran and setflag for ACC
by Patrick Wakano 01 Dec '19

01 Dec '19

Hello list, Hope you all doing well! I am using the ACC module and using the setflag() function as done in several examples. It works fine. However, I've added the t_newtran() function almost in the begging of the INVITE handler to help the retransmission detection and after that I noticed the ACC was not saving anything in DB. So after debugging I discovered that if I call the t_newtran() before setting the ACC flags, the module will not save the calls in DB, but if I call it after setting the ACC flags, it works.... So my question is, is this a bug or it is a expected side effect so when one is using t_newtran you must be careful and set all your transaction flags before? (ACC are the only transaction flags I am using so can't tell if other modules have the same problem) This is happening in Kamailio 5.2.2. Thank you! Kind regards, Patrick Wakano

3 6

tcp limit, too many open files
by David Villasmil 01 Dec '19

01 Dec '19

Hello guys, I'm facing an issue where, if i start kamailio as root, all works properly, but if i start it as kamailio, i get hundreds of: handle_new_connect(): error while accepting connection(24): Too many open files My limits is like: kamailio soft core unlimited kamailio soft data unlimited kamailio soft fsize unlimited kamailio soft memlock unlimited kamailio soft nofile unlimited kamailio soft rss unlimited kamailio hard stack 240 kamailio soft cpu unlimited kamailio soft nproc unlimited kamailio soft as unlimited kamailio soft priority -11 kamailio soft locks unlimited kamailio soft sigpending unlimited kamailio soft msgqueue unlimited kamailio soft nice -11 kamailio soft nofile 65536 kamailio hard nofile 65536 root soft core unlimited root soft data unlimited root soft fsize unlimited root soft memlock unlimited root soft nofile unlimited root soft rss unlimited root hard stack 240 root soft cpu unlimited root soft nproc unlimited root soft as unlimited root soft priority -11 root soft locks unlimited root soft sigpending unlimited root soft msgqueue unlimited root soft nice -11 root soft nofile 65536 root hard nofile 65536 I can't figure out why this is happening... Regards, David Villasmil email: david.villasmil.work(a)gmail.com phone: +34669448337

7 17

2025

2024

2023

2022

2021

2020

2019

2018

2017

2016

2015

2014

2013

2012

2011

2010

2009

2008

2007

2006

2005

2004

2003

2002

sr-users December 2019