sr-users March 2019

sr-users@lists.kamailio.org

78 participants
101 discussions

docker image for non x86 arch
by Sergey Safarov 30 Apr '19

30 Apr '19

Is the community involved in kamailio docker image for ARM architecture and others not x86 platforms? ARM ARM 64 IBM POWER IBM Z PowerPC 64 LE

3 3

TCP connection lifetime
by Aymeric Moizard 17 Apr '19

17 Apr '19

Hi Again, Here is an issue with TCP connection being kept for more: Yesterday, I have discovered that a User-Agent (<Avaya IP Phone 1120E (SIP1120e.04.04.30.00)> tried to register a lot. It was sending REGISTER over new established TCP socket *every 2 seconds*. All the REGISTER was rejected with 401. (may be the device was misconfigured? or not receiving any of my answer? I can't tell) NOTE: You can see the expires header was very large: 86400, ie: 24 hours... I was checking the TCP/TLS connections on my server and discovered more than 1000 TCP established connection to that user/ip, and thus, I have tried to understand what happened. Checking the logs, I received 4855 REGISTER from this device from "Mar 25 03:47:09" to "Mar 25 07:56:13" which is a rate of approx one new TCP connection every 2.5 seconds... Today, I decided to check it again around 11am. jack@sip:~$ sudo kamctl stats tcp { "jsonrpc": "2.0", "result": [ "tcp:con_reset = 1857", "tcp:con_timeout = 35927", "tcp:connect_failed = 25", "tcp:connect_success = 2", "tcp:current_opened_connections = 2291", "tcp:current_write_queue_size = 0", "tcp:established = 80778", "tcp:local_reject = 0", "tcp:passive_open = 80776", "tcp:send_timeout = 2", "tcp:sendq_full = 0" ], "id": 7305 } There was still A LOT of established connections. And the connections have been established more than 24 hours ago. At 11H16: $> lsof -n -l | grep kamailio | grep TCP | grep 41.234.242.69 | grep ESTA | wc -l 1161 At 11H22: $> lsof -n -l | grep kamailio | grep TCP | grep 41.234.242.69 | grep ESTA | wc -l 1018 At 11H35: $> lsof -n -l | grep kamailio | grep TCP | grep 41.234.242.69 | grep ESTA | wc -l 655 At 13H $> lsof -n -l | grep kamailio | grep TCP | grep 41.234.242.69 | grep ESTA | wc -l 0 So the established connections are all gone now. Between 11h16 and 11H35, I was seeing the server regularly sending [FIN, ACK] over each TCP established connection, with retransmissions for all of them. (no incoming trafic) I do not have numbers/capture/stats, but I think that kamailio was already closing some connection yesterday. I don't know when kamailio started to try closing those connections. I'm now back with this status: At 13pm: jack@sip:~$ sudo kamctl stats tcp { "jsonrpc": "2.0", "result": [ "tcp:con_reset = 1896", "tcp:con_timeout = 38042", "tcp:connect_failed = 26", "tcp:connect_success = 2", "tcp:current_opened_connections = 939", "tcp:current_write_queue_size = 0", "tcp:established = 81950", "tcp:local_reject = 0", "tcp:passive_open = 81948", "tcp:send_timeout = 2", "tcp:sendq_full = 0" ], "id": 12734 } With around 155 registration entries using TCP and TLS in my location database. As you can see, tcp:current_opened_connections = 939 is still pretty high compared to my currently registred users. I have "modparam("registrar", "max_expires", 86400)", because I'm keeping contact entries (even with TCP connection down) for push notifications. I have "tcp_connection_lifetime=3600" configured. Question 1 With "tcp_connection_lifetime=3600", I would expect kamailio to close the established connection after 3600 seconds without traffic. It is pretty obvious that no data has been exchanged over the 4855 established connection during a day. Despite the issue with the Avaya phones is solved automatically after a day, I guess similar stuff or happening, at a different rate, for other users as well. (because current_opened_connections is way higher than registred TCP/TLS users) Question 2 I can list TLS connection with "kamctl rpc tls.list" Can I get a similar list for TCP? (lsof returns a lot of duplicates...) Tks Aymeric -- Antisip - http://www.antisip.com

2 4

uac_replace_from/to, msg_apply_changes and Re-INVITE
by Henning Westerholt 03 Apr '19

03 Apr '19

Hello, I am currently debugging a strange issue related to the usage of uac_replace_from/to() after msg_apply_changes(). It works all fine, but in a Re-INVITE case it inserts the wrong headers for the 100 - Trying case. The calle side gets then a reply with wrong From/To. This happens all the time with this particular cfg. I already checked for the usual issues: - msg_apply_changes() called several times - msg_apply_changes() called after transactions created/async processing etc.. Any ideas what else could be the problem? The msg_apply_changes() is needed for some SDP filtering logic in the cfg. Thanks and regards, Henning -- Henning Westerholt - https://skalatan.de/blog/ Kamailio services - https://skalatan.de/services

3 8

Port 5060 omitted in Record-Route
by Lợi Đặng 02 Apr '19

02 Apr '19

Hi all, i was using kamailio 4.2.1 located in 2 networks > listen = tcp:MY_ADDR:5060 advertise MY_ADDR:5060 > listen = tls:MY_ADDR:5061 advertise PUBLIC_NAT_ADDR:5061 when the call made from the inside network to out side, running `record_route()` resulted in 2 Record-Route headers added (enable_double_rr=1) Record-Route: PUBLIC_NAT_ADDR:5061;transport=tls;lr > Record-Route: MY_ADDR;transport=tcp;lr That was totally fine omitting the port in the first Record-Route when using tcp (or udp) on the first realm, but when i start switching to tls, it caused trouble Record-Route: PUBLIC_NAT_ADDR:5061;transport=tls;lr > Record-Route: MY_ADDR;transport=tls;lr The client is then told to send ACK/BYE to `MY_ADDR;transport=tls` located at `MY_ADDR:5061` as per rfc3263, then the call would failed. I had another try with `record_route_preset("PUBLIC_NAT_ADDR:5061;transport=tls", "MY_ADDR:5060;transport=tls");`, it really did add what i want with explicit 5060 port on RR, `ACK/BYE` travel on the correct path, but `loose_route()` only consumes the local `Route` header (it should consume 2). So my assumption is to stick with `record_route()` function to make `loose_route()` work properly. I tried using another port on the local realm, e.g: 5062 and the port is explicitly added to the Record-Route header `MY_ADDR:5062;transport=tls;lr` So is `5060` couldn't be explicitly added to the inbound Record-Route, or i just missed something? Any help will be appreciated. P/S: I also tried 4.4.7 and it still omit my 5060 port in the RR. rgds, Loi Dang Thanh Phone : +84. 774.735.448 Email : loi.dangthanh(a)gmail.com

3 5

presence_dialoginfo module not sending publish on dialogue change
by Richard Nunley 01 Apr '19

01 Apr '19

To whom can be of assistance, I’m am working towards enabling presence on my Kamailio proxy but have hit a bit of a brick wall. I’m seeing dialogues being created and persisted to the database, subscriptions are being handled and rows are being written to the active_watchers table but no PUBLISH is ever being received by the server to kickoff the sending of NOTIFY to the active watchers. Further, I’m never seeing a row in the watchers table though I don’t know that this isn’t expect behavior. I’ve attached my current config for review. Any help will be greatly appreciated! Thank in advance!

3 2

db_redis and user
by Joan Salvatella 01 Apr '19

01 Apr '19

Hello, We are working on a project that's using two active-active Kamailio 5.2 instances that redirect traffic to several Asterisk 15.4 instances. Kamailio is acting as a registrar and should store the location information of the registered terminals. The backend database is db_redis. Phone terminals get registered and the information gets looked up from the subscriber schema in redis (That's cool) but we are having problems with the locations. This is the related code: modparam("db_redis", "keys", "location=entry:ruid&usrdom:username,domain&timer:partition,keepalive") if(ds_is_from_list("1", "2", "sip:$fd:5080")) { record_route(); route(INVITE_ASTERISK); exit; } route[INVITE_ASTERISK] { xlog("L_INFO", "[R-INVITE-RESOLVER:$ci] Entering ASTERISK INVITE resolver\n"); if (!lookup("location")) { sl_send_reply("404", "User Not Found"); return; } route(INVITE_POSTROUTE); } route[INVITE_POSTROUTE] { rtpproxy_manage(); t_on_reply("MAIN_REPLY"); if(!t_relay()) sl_reply_error(); } When looking up the location schema this errors appear: 9(39) WARNING: db_redis [redis_dbase.c:1098]: db_redis_perform_query(): performing full table scan on table 'location' while performing query 9(39) WARNING: db_redis [redis_dbase.c:1101]: db_redis_perform_query(): scan key 0 is 'expires' 9(39) WARNING: db_redis [redis_dbase.c:1101]: db_redis_perform_query(): scan key 1 is 'expires' 9(39) ERROR: <core> [db_ut.c:92]: db_str2int(): Unexpected characters: [-03-29 18:16:36] 9(39) ERROR: <core> [db_val.c:76]: db_str2val(): error while converting integer value from string 9(39) ERROR: db_redis [redis_dbase.c:1062]: db_redis_convert_row(): Failed to convert redis column 'expires' to db value 9(39) ERROR: db_redis [redis_dbase.c:1231]: db_redis_perform_query(): Failed to convert redis reply for row 9(39) ERROR: db_redis [redis_dbase.c:1243]: db_redis_perform_query(): failed to perform the query 9(39) ERROR: db_redis [redis_dbase.c:1829]: db_redis_query(): failed to do the query 9(39) ERROR: usrloc [udomain.c:981]: udomain_contact_expired_cb(): db_query failed Any hints? Thanks and regards,

3 2

Kamailio v5.2 kamctl alias add problem
by Igor Potjevlesch 01 Apr '19

01 Apr '19

Hi kamailios, I meet a problem with the " kamctl alias add" command in the 5.2 version, I saw that the module used to add an alias had changed, and now the command result with an error : [kamailio]# kamctl alias add XXXX@XXXX sip:XXXXX@XXXX { "jsonrpc": "2.0", "error": { "code": 500, "message": "Not enough parameters or wrong format" }, "id": XXXXX } I read the function who return this message " static void ul_rpc_add(rpc_t* rpc, void* ctx)" in the ul_rpc.c in the usr_loc module. I tried to pass the command with two more parameters : # kamctl alias add 0175951068(a)trunk7.bornsip.fr sip:0175951068@trunk7.bornsip.fr NULL NULL { "jsonrpc": "2.0", "result": { }, "id": 29200 } And this time it works correctly, but I saw thaht the test prameters was in the field "path" , do you know why we have to indicate a path ? Are we obliged to indicate this two more parameters ? What is the utility of this field ? Thank you in advance, Igor

2 2

where to find the cfg languaje for program on it?
by PICCORO McKAY Lenz 01 Apr '19

01 Apr '19

recently i wrote a portion of my cfg file but i found that i based my code in other sources and results of try/tach experiments i cannot found the documents for the languaje of the core i only found the link: https://www.kamailio.org/wiki/cookbooks/devel/core but in that link there's no references about languaje per see only about how to write portions of the file and sections.. maybe i wrong or the document are wrote in different way? by example how to evaluate the output of a custom function/section? Lenz McKAY Gerardo (PICCORO) http://qgqlochekone.blogspot.com

2 1

drop before exit and send ok reply first can be done?
by PICCORO McKAY Lenz 01 Apr '19

01 Apr '19

h have this for a custom rule agains spoecific messages: sl_send_reply("200", "OK"); drop(); exit; my question are if that rules are correct: i want to drop but send firts to client a ok response.. i mean client receive "all are ok dont worry" and then drop the rest packets.. that's correct? Lenz McKAY Gerardo (PICCORO) http://qgqlochekone.blogspot.com

3 2

kamailio and rtpengine
by David Villasmil 01 Apr '19

01 Apr '19

Hello guys, i'm trying to configure rtpengine, but when starting kamailio (with an empty table) i'm getting ```build_rtpp_socks(): no more pkg memory for rtpp_socks``` Can anyone help? Regards, David Villasmil email: david.villasmil.work(a)gmail.com phone: +34669448337

3 5

2025

2024

2023

2022

2021

2020

2019

2018

2017

2016

2015

2014

2013

2012

2011

2010

2009

2008

2007

2006

2005

2004

2003

2002

sr-users March 2019