sr-users July 2020

sr-users@lists.kamailio.org

58 participants
92 discussions

how to achive destination number based routing before falling back to dispatcher-module
by Christoph Russow 24 Jul '20

24 Jul '20

Hi all, im fairly new to Kamailio and currently setting up our new sip-server systems so, hello everyone! right now i have a Kamailio SBC which routes all calls using the dispatcher module to our internally setup application servers (freeswitch). i just got the idea that we might want specific routing based on destination phone number in addition to simple loadbalancing. can anyone point me in the right direction where i should look for something i can place before the dispatcher routing to route calls based on some entries in a database like destination number XYZ goes to server A, number ABC goes to server Z and so on. Or is there a way to select the dispatcher group id from the database based on destination number? best regards Christoph

4 9

HEP siptrace HEPv3 truncated and ignored by heplify-server (Homer 7)
by José Lopes 24 Jul '20

24 Jul '20

Hello all, I am using the siptrace module on Kamailio 5.3.5 and I am trying to monitor the SIP over websockets traffic with Homer 7.8.1 (heplify-server). I notice a strange behavior, some packets are not presented on Homer. I checked heplify-server and i notice the next warning: heplify-server: 2020/07/22 18:41:09.425513 decoder.go:103: WARN HEP packet length is 8192 but should be 11663 So I think the packets are truncated by 8192 (packet size), so they are ignored by heplify-server. I have done a tcpdump on the Homer machine and have the next output, where I can see some packets with size greater than 8192. 19:58:29.788927 IP X.X.X.X.6666 > Y.Y.Y.Y.9060: UDP, bad length 11658 > 1472 19:58:29.793539 IP X.X.X.X.6666 > Y.Y.Y.Y.9060: UDP, length 626 19:58:29.810733 IP X.X.X.X.6666 > Y.Y.Y.Y.9060: UDP, length 579 19:58:29.811121 IP X.X.X.X.6666 > Y.Y.Y.Y.9060: UDP, length 579 19:58:29.838824 IP X.X.X.X.6666 > Y.Y.Y.Y.9060: UDP, bad length 11953 > 1472 19:58:29.852286 IP X.X.X.X.6666 > Y.Y.Y.Y.9060: UDP, length 473 19:58:29.865388 IP X.X.X.X.6666 > Y.Y.Y.Y.9060: UDP, bad length 3521 > 1472 19:58:29.875311 IP X.X.X.X.6666 > Y.Y.Y.Y.9060: UDP, length 562 Can you guide me to identify where the packets are truncated? Os melhores cumprimentos / Best regards, *José Lopes* Research and Development Technician Phone: +351 256 370 980 Email: jose.lopes(a)itcenter.com

2 2

new in upcoming Kamailio 5.4.0
by Henning Westerholt 23 Jul '20

23 Jul '20

Hello, I've updated the "New in version 5.4.0" document in our wiki. It is again an impressive list! * In this development period (started October 2019) almost 1500 commits have been added to the repository * 5 new modules have been added (pv_headers, kafka, secsipid, systemdops, dlgs) * Over 70 modules have been extended, many of them substantially (dispatcher, pv, tls, presence etc..) * Countless bugfixes and documentation extensions/fixes have been added as well * Many refactorings, extensions and architectural improvements were done in Kamailio core, tooling and modules You'll find the full details at the usual place: https://www.kamailio.org/wiki/features/new-in-5.4.x Many thanks to everybody that contributed to the Kamailio project. Cheers, Henning -- Henning Westerholt - https://skalatan.de/blog/ Kamailio services - https://gilawa.com<https://gilawa.com/>

5 15

TAS recommendation
by BALL SUN 23 Jul '20

23 Jul '20

Hi We recently setup Kamailio as the IMS core in our test lab, and we would like to test scenarios with TAS, is there any recommendation? Does Kamailio able to setup as a SIP AS? if yes, any online instruction on how we can make it works? Thanks RBK

1 0

Dispatcher does not go to 2nd server
by Aristeidis Tsitras 22 Jul '20

22 Jul '20

I have a Kamailio and 2 asterisk servers. All users are created in both of the asterisk servers. I am forwarding the registration to asterisk. The problem is that it is always used on only one server from the list. Even if one goes to shutdown, then there is not any registration sent to the available server. Even if *some *of the extensions can be seen registered in both of the asterisk's, if the secondary goes down, then there are no services for the phones. I am attaching the kamailio.cfg. My dispatch list is: 1 sip:192.168.0.100:5080 0 0 maxload=20 2 sip:192.168.0.101:5080 0 0 maxload=20 In both of the asterisk servers i am using sip.conf to create users and s sip trunk for the Kamailio. Nothing special about it. I am looking to find what is wrong with my config and i cannot loadbalance/failover to the asterisk servers.

6 12

Siremis - PassThru Authentication
by Adam - UC-Reseller 21 Jul '20

21 Jul '20

I have recently installed Siremis And have set up a domain pointing to it, how do I configure it so registration requests to this domain are passed thru to the actual PBX Adam

2 1

P-Asserted-Identity in SIP INVITE from Kamailio IMS to PSTN (MGCF)
by BALL SUN 21 Jul '20

21 Jul '20

Hi We have a question. We are preparing a setup to bridge the SIP call from Kamailio IMS to PSTN, but we are puzzling how we can present the P-Asserted-Identity in the SIP INVITE. By default, the PAI is in sip:user@domain, but we believed we should use<tel> format in the PAI when bridge to PSTN. question is 1. should we have two PAI headers?, or 2. should we paste <tel> format in PAI User Part and domain in PAI Host Part?, or 3. Should we only use one PAI header with tel format? In our test setup, we are using FHoSS, and the IMPU sip:user@domain have below entry in "IMPUs from Implicit-Set" - sip:user@domain - tel:number Question is how we can extract the number from the HSS and presented in PAI? - RBK

1 1

Kamailio load balance to PBXes
by John Tuxies 20 Jul '20

20 Jul '20

Trying to setup a lab where i would like tohave: -kamailio (5.3 from deb repo) in front to load balance. Keep registrations. IP: 192.168.1.100 -Asterisk _1 (16 LTS). IP: 192.169.1.101.It <http://192.169.1.232.It> will serve as media server for IVR, VM, etc. Bind port is 5080. A sip trunk to Kamailio in sip.conf -Asterisk-2 (16 LTS). IP: 192.168.1.102. Identical config to Asterisk-1. Tried to follow this https://kb.asipto.com/asterisk:realtime:kamailio-3.0.x-asterisk-1.6.2-astdb, but it is quite old and it does jot apply to newer versions of Asterisk and Kamailio. Up to jow i have the Kamailio setup and users can register on Kamailio following the basic setup. I would like advice on setup and configuration, to integrate Kamailio with Asterisk boxes Some advice please? Sincerely yours, John

2 2

Kamailio load balance to PBXes
by John Tuxies 20 Jul '20

20 Jul '20

Trying to setup a lab where i would have: -kamailio in front to load balance. Keep registrations. IP: 192.168.1.100 -Asterisk _1 (16 LTS). IP: 192.169.1.101.It <http://192.169.1.232.It> will serve as media server for IVR, VM, etc. Bind port is 5080. A sip trunk to Kamailio in sip.conf -Asterisk-2 (16. IP: 192.168.1.102. Identical config to Asterisk-1. Tried to follow this https://kb.asipto.com/asterisk:realtime:kamailio-3. 0.x-asterisk-1.6.2-astdb, but it is quite old and it does jot apply to newer versions of Asterisk and Kamailio. Up to jow i have the Kamailio setup and users can register on Kamailio following the basic setup. I would like advice on setup and configuration, to integrate Kamailio with Asterisk boxes

1 0

Kamailio load balance to PBXes
by John Tuxies 20 Jul '20

20 Jul '20

Trying to setup a lab where i would have: -kamailio in front to load balance. Keep registrations. IP: 192.168.1.218 -Asterisk _1. IP: 192.169.1.232.It will serve as media server for IVR, VM, etc -Asterisk-2. IP: 192.168.1.233. Identical config to Asterisk-1. Tried to follow this https://kb.asipto.com/asterisk:realtime:kamailio-3.0.x-asterisk-1.6.2-astdb, but it is quite old and it does jot apply to newer versions of Asterisk and Kamailio. Up to jow i have the I would like advice on setup and configuration,

1 0

← Newer
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
Older →

2026

2025

2024

2023

2022

2021

2020

2019

2018

2017

2016

2015

2014

2013

2012

2011

2010

2009

2008

2007

2006

2005

2004

2003

2002

sr-users July 2020