sr-users September 2020

sr-users@lists.kamailio.org

84 participants
111 discussions

Record Route
by Andy Kama 01 Oct '20

01 Oct '20

Hi Guys I am trying to add a custom record route so i have added record_route_preset("mydomain:5061;transport=tls", "myip:5060"); yet kamailio is still not adding it in the sip message what am i doing wrong?

2 3

XHTTP_Prom syntax error with usrloc in Kamailio 5.3
by Tim Unkrig 30 Sep '20

30 Sep '20

Hello hello, I would like to monitor our production kamailio cluster (5.3) with prometheus and I was in the beginning so happy to spot the xhhtp_prom module. But when we enabled it, the output was in view of prometheus malformed in combination with the usrloc module, we got the following output: kamailio_usrloc_location-contacts 0 1597934423943 kamailio_usrloc_location-expires 0 1597934423943 kamailio_usrloc_location-users 0 1597934423943 Prometheus only accepts “_” instead of “-“. So unfortunately I get "strconv.ParseFloat: parsing "-contacts": invalid syntax” on the prometheus primary node, when I activated the scraper. This has been issued in the master branch of kamailio with a sanatize function for that problem. But I would like to avoid compiling modules by myself, because this can be messy from time to time. That´s why my question, is there maybe another way of fixing this? I really appreciate any comments here and thanks for your time, Tim Unkrig

2 1

xavu methods equivalent to that of xavp (e.g. xavp_get_child)
by Chaigneau, Nicolas 30 Sep '20

30 Sep '20

Using xavu (now that they have been fixed) in a custom C module, I've noticed that the following methods do not exist: xavu_get_child xavu_get_child_with_ival xavu_get_child_with_sval xavu_serialize_fields Though they are not strictly necessary, it could be useful to add them to Kamailio core. (Possibly with code refactoring, to avoid duplicating whole functions ?) What do you think? Regards, Nicolas. This message contains information that may be privileged or confidential and is the property of the Capgemini Group. It is intended only for the person to whom it is addressed. If you are not the intended recipient, you are not authorized to read, print, retain, copy, disseminate, distribute, or use this message or any part thereof. If you receive this message in error, please notify the sender immediately and delete all copies of this message.

1 0

Re: [SR-Users] Trying to use xavu with "two level naming" => fixed
by Chaigneau, Nicolas 30 Sep '20

30 Sep '20

Hello, I've rebuilt with the following commit: https://github.com/kamailio/kamailio/commit/aa8589ba66f984e93438a91a7fe8b26… Confirming the issue is now fixed. Thanks! Regards, Nicolas. De : Daniel-Constantin Mierla <miconda(a)gmail.com> Envoyé : mardi 29 septembre 2020 09:33 À : Kamailio (SER) - Users Mailing List; Chaigneau, Nicolas Objet : Re: [SR-Users] Trying to use xavu with "two level naming" Hello, can you try with the latest branch 5.4, there was a mistake in setting the callback function for parsing the name for this type of variable -- I just pushed a commit for in to master and 5.4 branches. Cheers, Daniel On 27.09.20 20:05, Chaigneau, Nicolas wrote: Hello, I'm trying to use xavu as described in Kamailio documentation: https://www.kamailio.org/wiki/cookbooks/5.4.x/pseudovariables#xavu_id_-_xav… $xavu(a=>b) = "xyz"; # <- two level naming supported However, this does not seem to work. The second level is ignored. When calling pv_xavu_print() it only shows the last element set, e.g.: $xavu(cdru=>one) = "one" ; $xavu(cdru=>two) = "two" ; pv_xavu_print() ; Result: 11(14989) INFO: {1 1 INVITE 7rc2rGgOYS56zDqN} <core> [core/xavp.c:592]: xavx_print_list_content(): *** (l:0 - 0x7f217c55eab8) XAVU name: cdru 11(14989) INFO: {1 1 INVITE 7rc2rGgOYS56zDqN} <core> [core/xavp.c:593]: xavx_print_list_content(): XAVU id: 1863997055 11(14989) INFO: {1 1 INVITE 7rc2rGgOYS56zDqN} <core> [core/xavp.c:594]: xavx_print_list_content(): XAVU value type: 2 11(14989) INFO: {1 1 INVITE 7rc2rGgOYS56zDqN} <core> [core/xavp.c:603]: xavx_print_list_content(): XAVU value (str): two 11(14989) INFO: {1 1 INVITE 7rc2rGgOYS56zDqN} <core> [core/xavp.c:629]: xavx_print_list_content(): *** (l:0 - 0x7f217c55eab8) end 11(14989) INFO: {1 1 INVITE 7rc2rGgOYS56zDqN} <core> [core/xavp.c:632]: xavx_print_list_content(): ----- end XAVU list: 0x7f217c55eab8 (level=0) Am I missing something, or is this a bug ? Regards, Nicolas. This message contains information that may be privileged or confidential and is the property of the Capgemini Group. It is intended only for the person to whom it is addressed. If you are not the intended recipient, you are not authorized to read, print, retain, copy, disseminate, distribute, or use this message or any part thereof. If you receive this message in error, please notify the sender immediately and delete all copies of this message. _______________________________________________ Kamailio (SER) - Users Mailing List sr-users(a)lists.kamailio.org<mailto:sr-users@lists.kamailio.org> https://lists.kamailio.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/sr-users -- Daniel-Constantin Mierla -- www.asipto.com<http://www.asipto.com> www.twitter.com/miconda<http://www.twitter.com/miconda> -- www.linkedin.com/in/miconda<http://www.linkedin.com/in/miconda> Funding: https://www.paypal.me/dcmierla

1 0

P2P Video call over Public IP
by amitsharma＠coraltele.com 30 Sep '20

30 Sep '20

Dear Team, I was trying P2P video calling over Public IP with Kamailio. I have used Linphone as client. But my call is connected but no video and audio was there. For reference I am attaching Client and Kamailio logs. Any help will be appreciated. Thanks & Regards, Amit Sharma (Sr. Team Leader) (An ISO 9001:2008 company) Mobile: <tel:9891612004> tel:9891612004 PH: +91 120 2595870 Ext.: <tel:870> tel:870 Email : <mailto:amitsharma@coraltele.com> amitsharma(a)coraltele.com Web : <blocked::http://www.coraltele.com> www.coraltele.com

2 1

Computing a time difference when handling a stateless SIP request
by Chaigneau, Nicolas 30 Sep '20

30 Sep '20

Hello, New to Kamailio, first post on this ML. I'll probably ask dumb questions, please bear with me :) Here goes the first one. I would like to compute a time difference (with microseconds precision) when handling a stateless SIP request. I looked into the core functions and modules but did not find anything suitable. Before I start implementing this by myself, I'd like to know if there's a simpler way. Thanks for your help! Regards, Nicolas. This message contains information that may be privileged or confidential and is the property of the Capgemini Group. It is intended only for the person to whom it is addressed. If you are not the intended recipient, you are not authorized to read, print, retain, copy, disseminate, distribute, or use this message or any part thereof. If you receive this message in error, please notify the sender immediately and delete all copies of this message.

5 8

I want to get call info from kamailio
by ahmed moghazy 29 Sep '20

29 Sep '20

Excuse me , I want to get call info

3 2

TOPOS issue
by David Villasmil 29 Sep '20

29 Sep '20

Hello guys, I have this scenario where I have an ongoing transaction. I receive a 180 (non 100rel) with some to_tag, which i forward back to the caller. Then I receive an 183 (100rel) which is forwarded back to the caller, who in turn PRACKs it. It is then that Kamailio (apparently) can't match that transaction internally and replies to the caller (the one PRACKing the 183 (100rel)), with 493 FORBIDDEN. I'm attaching a trace flow. (Kamailio is 10.255.0.1) Anyone ever encountered this? Is this valid and should work? Regards, [image: prack.jpeg] David Villasmil email: david.villasmil.work(a)gmail.com phone: +34669448337

1 0

TOPOS issue
by David Villasmil 29 Sep '20

29 Sep '20

Hello all, I have this scenario where I have an ongoing transaction. I receive a 180 (non 100rel) with some to_tag, which i forward back to the caller. Then I receive an 183 (100rel) which is forwarded back to the caller, who in turn PRACKs it. It is then that Kamailio (apparently) can't match that transaction internally and replies to the caller (the one PRACKing the 183 (100rel)), with 493 FORBIDDEN. I'm attaching a trace flow. (Kamailio is 10.255.0.1) Anyone ever encountered this? Is this valid and should work? [image: Screenshot 2020-09-29 at 19.34.19.png] Thanks! David Villasmil email: david.villasmil.work(a)gmail.com phone: +34669448337

1 0

websocket transport protocol in Record-Route header
by Juha Heinanen 29 Sep '20

29 Sep '20

No matter if UA uses ws or wss to connect to Kamailio, when K routes INVITE from this UA and record_route() is called, K always adds ;transport=ws parameter to Record-Route URI, for example, Record-Route: <sip:192.168.43.83:7998;transport=ws;r2=on;lr> In this test, Kamailio is listening on that port like this: # SIP over WebSocket listen=tls:192.168.43.83:7998 Why doesn't K in this case add ;transport=wss to the R-R URI? -- Juha

2 5

2026

2025

2024

2023

2022

2021

2020

2019

2018

2017

2016

2015

2014

2013

2012

2011

2010

2009

2008

2007

2006

2005

2004

2003

2002

sr-users September 2020