sr-users September 2020

sr-users@lists.kamailio.org

84 participants
108 discussions

Re: [SR-Users] Trying to use xavu with "two level naming" => fixed
by Chaigneau, Nicolas 30 Sep '20

30 Sep '20

Hello, I've rebuilt with the following commit: https://github.com/kamailio/kamailio/commit/aa8589ba66f984e93438a91a7fe8b26… Confirming the issue is now fixed. Thanks! Regards, Nicolas. De : Daniel-Constantin Mierla <miconda(a)gmail.com> Envoyé : mardi 29 septembre 2020 09:33 À : Kamailio (SER) - Users Mailing List; Chaigneau, Nicolas Objet : Re: [SR-Users] Trying to use xavu with "two level naming" Hello, can you try with the latest branch 5.4, there was a mistake in setting the callback function for parsing the name for this type of variable -- I just pushed a commit for in to master and 5.4 branches. Cheers, Daniel On 27.09.20 20:05, Chaigneau, Nicolas wrote: Hello, I'm trying to use xavu as described in Kamailio documentation: https://www.kamailio.org/wiki/cookbooks/5.4.x/pseudovariables#xavu_id_-_xav… $xavu(a=>b) = "xyz"; # <- two level naming supported However, this does not seem to work. The second level is ignored. When calling pv_xavu_print() it only shows the last element set, e.g.: $xavu(cdru=>one) = "one" ; $xavu(cdru=>two) = "two" ; pv_xavu_print() ; Result: 11(14989) INFO: {1 1 INVITE 7rc2rGgOYS56zDqN} <core> [core/xavp.c:592]: xavx_print_list_content(): *** (l:0 - 0x7f217c55eab8) XAVU name: cdru 11(14989) INFO: {1 1 INVITE 7rc2rGgOYS56zDqN} <core> [core/xavp.c:593]: xavx_print_list_content(): XAVU id: 1863997055 11(14989) INFO: {1 1 INVITE 7rc2rGgOYS56zDqN} <core> [core/xavp.c:594]: xavx_print_list_content(): XAVU value type: 2 11(14989) INFO: {1 1 INVITE 7rc2rGgOYS56zDqN} <core> [core/xavp.c:603]: xavx_print_list_content(): XAVU value (str): two 11(14989) INFO: {1 1 INVITE 7rc2rGgOYS56zDqN} <core> [core/xavp.c:629]: xavx_print_list_content(): *** (l:0 - 0x7f217c55eab8) end 11(14989) INFO: {1 1 INVITE 7rc2rGgOYS56zDqN} <core> [core/xavp.c:632]: xavx_print_list_content(): ----- end XAVU list: 0x7f217c55eab8 (level=0) Am I missing something, or is this a bug ? Regards, Nicolas. This message contains information that may be privileged or confidential and is the property of the Capgemini Group. It is intended only for the person to whom it is addressed. If you are not the intended recipient, you are not authorized to read, print, retain, copy, disseminate, distribute, or use this message or any part thereof. If you receive this message in error, please notify the sender immediately and delete all copies of this message. _______________________________________________ Kamailio (SER) - Users Mailing List sr-users(a)lists.kamailio.org<mailto:sr-users@lists.kamailio.org> https://lists.kamailio.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/sr-users -- Daniel-Constantin Mierla -- www.asipto.com<http://www.asipto.com> www.twitter.com/miconda<http://www.twitter.com/miconda> -- www.linkedin.com/in/miconda<http://www.linkedin.com/in/miconda> Funding: https://www.paypal.me/dcmierla

1 0

P2P Video call over Public IP
by amitsharma＠coraltele.com 30 Sep '20

30 Sep '20

Dear Team, I was trying P2P video calling over Public IP with Kamailio. I have used Linphone as client. But my call is connected but no video and audio was there. For reference I am attaching Client and Kamailio logs. Any help will be appreciated. Thanks & Regards, Amit Sharma (Sr. Team Leader) (An ISO 9001:2008 company) Mobile: <tel:9891612004> tel:9891612004 PH: +91 120 2595870 Ext.: <tel:870> tel:870 Email : <mailto:amitsharma@coraltele.com> amitsharma(a)coraltele.com Web : <blocked::http://www.coraltele.com> www.coraltele.com

2 1

Computing a time difference when handling a stateless SIP request
by Chaigneau, Nicolas 30 Sep '20

30 Sep '20

Hello, New to Kamailio, first post on this ML. I'll probably ask dumb questions, please bear with me :) Here goes the first one. I would like to compute a time difference (with microseconds precision) when handling a stateless SIP request. I looked into the core functions and modules but did not find anything suitable. Before I start implementing this by myself, I'd like to know if there's a simpler way. Thanks for your help! Regards, Nicolas. This message contains information that may be privileged or confidential and is the property of the Capgemini Group. It is intended only for the person to whom it is addressed. If you are not the intended recipient, you are not authorized to read, print, retain, copy, disseminate, distribute, or use this message or any part thereof. If you receive this message in error, please notify the sender immediately and delete all copies of this message.

5 8

I want to get call info from kamailio
by ahmed moghazy 29 Sep '20

29 Sep '20

Excuse me , I want to get call info

3 2

TOPOS issue
by David Villasmil 29 Sep '20

29 Sep '20

Hello guys, I have this scenario where I have an ongoing transaction. I receive a 180 (non 100rel) with some to_tag, which i forward back to the caller. Then I receive an 183 (100rel) which is forwarded back to the caller, who in turn PRACKs it. It is then that Kamailio (apparently) can't match that transaction internally and replies to the caller (the one PRACKing the 183 (100rel)), with 493 FORBIDDEN. I'm attaching a trace flow. (Kamailio is 10.255.0.1) Anyone ever encountered this? Is this valid and should work? Regards, [image: prack.jpeg] David Villasmil email: david.villasmil.work(a)gmail.com phone: +34669448337

1 0

TOPOS issue
by David Villasmil 29 Sep '20

29 Sep '20

Hello all, I have this scenario where I have an ongoing transaction. I receive a 180 (non 100rel) with some to_tag, which i forward back to the caller. Then I receive an 183 (100rel) which is forwarded back to the caller, who in turn PRACKs it. It is then that Kamailio (apparently) can't match that transaction internally and replies to the caller (the one PRACKing the 183 (100rel)), with 493 FORBIDDEN. I'm attaching a trace flow. (Kamailio is 10.255.0.1) Anyone ever encountered this? Is this valid and should work? [image: Screenshot 2020-09-29 at 19.34.19.png] Thanks! David Villasmil email: david.villasmil.work(a)gmail.com phone: +34669448337

1 0

websocket transport protocol in Record-Route header
by Juha Heinanen 29 Sep '20

29 Sep '20

No matter if UA uses ws or wss to connect to Kamailio, when K routes INVITE from this UA and record_route() is called, K always adds ;transport=ws parameter to Record-Route URI, for example, Record-Route: <sip:192.168.43.83:7998;transport=ws;r2=on;lr> In this test, Kamailio is listening on that port like this: # SIP over WebSocket listen=tls:192.168.43.83:7998 Why doesn't K in this case add ;transport=wss to the R-R URI? -- Juha

2 5

uac_replace_from function
by Ilie Soltanici 29 Sep '20

29 Sep '20

Hello, The uac_replace_from seems not to be working properly in the ver 5.4. This is the header I'm trying to change: *From: "Admin" <sip:+123456789@local.ip>;tag=as11428589* by using this function: uac_replace_from("","sip:+123456789@domain.com"); I'm getting the following header: *From: <sip:+123456789@domain.com35316853757>;tag=as11428589* (Double space in the callerid name, and number appended after the domain) Thank you.

1 1

A possibility to disable the topology hiding for some destinations.
by Leonid Fainshtein 29 Sep '20

29 Sep '20

Hi, The 'topos' module has a very useful "event_route[topos:msg-sending]" option that allows very easily to disable topology hiding for ITSPs that requires the real data in the Contact header field. It looks like the feature is not supported in the 'topoh' module (ref. https://kamailio.org/docs/modules/5.4.x/modules/topoh.html). The available 'event_route[topoh:msg-outgoing]' option requires defining the remote server IP address (or a list of addresses in some cases) that is not always convenient. Is there a chance that "event_route[topoh:msg-sending]" will be added? Best regards, Leonid Fainshtein

2 3

Received parameter on Via
by Duarte Rocha 29 Sep '20

29 Sep '20

Greetings, When NAT is detected in my Kamailio, the proxy add the parameter "received" to the Via header which includes the source IP. What is the mechanic or function responsible for this behaviour? Does it come from the NATHELPER module? Best Regards,

4 5

2025

2024

2023

2022

2021

2020

2019

2018

2017

2016

2015

2014

2013

2012

2011

2010

2009

2008

2007

2006

2005

2004

2003

2002

sr-users September 2020