sr-users January 2021

sr-users@lists.kamailio.org

58 participants
63 discussions

by Sergiu Pojoga

Hi there, I was wondering if there's a way to log various core error events in some DB. For example, below error occurred Jan 29 11:43:56 kamailio[11076]: {1 11440 INVITE 28b653bd-8f62-4085-a5ef-f2a4ac0f393d } ERROR: <core> [core/parser/sdp/sdp_helpr_funcs.c:499]: extract_mediaip(): no `IP[4|6]' address in `c=' field Jan 29 11:43:56 kamailio[11076]: {1 11440 INVITE 28b653bd-8f62-4085-a5ef-f2a4ac0f393d } ERROR: <core> [core/parser/sdp/sdp.c:430]: parse_sdp_session(): can't extract common media IP from the message Thanks in advance. Regards, --Sergiu

3 years, 9 months

Establish connection between MsTeams and Kamailio.

by Willy Valles Rios

Hello community, Please your support, I tell you that I am integrating Kamailio with MsTeams, after some time reviewing this, I finally achieved the connection from my Kamailio server to MsTeams and I can validate that the connection to MsTeams is in AP. [root @ kamailio-server kamailio] # kamcmd dispatcher.list | egrep "URI | FLAGS" URI: sip: sip.pstnhub.microsoft.com; transport = tls FLAGS: AP However, from the admin panel of MsTeams (Direct Routing) I see that the connection to my sbc "sbc.netvoiceperu.com" is with TLS connectivity status in "Active" but the SIP options status is in "Warning". I have made calls from MsTeams thinking that the SIP options status would change to "active" but it is still in "Warning" state. On the other hand, I have enabled a siptrace in Kamailio and verify that the SIP OPTIONS from kamailio are being sent in the following format to MsTeams. OPTIONS sip: sip.pstnhub.microsoft.com; transport = tls SIP / 2.0 Via: SIP / 2.0 / TLS 161.35.44.66:5061 ;branch=z9hG4bKea07.52224687000000000000000000000000.0 To: <sip: sip.pstnhub.microsoft.com; transport = tls> From: <sip: sbc.netvoiceperu.com>; tag = d3569c818b500aeb8c373426e76c2884-81763c71 CSeq: 10 OPTIONS Call-ID: 13ea237a751e0c48-9148(a)161.35.44.66 Max-Forwards: 70 Content-Length: 0 User-Agent: kamailio (5.4.0 (x86_64 / linux)) As you can see, the SIP OPTIONS sent from Kamailio to MsTeams does not contain the "Contact" field, which in theory said "Contact" field should have been added by Kamailio according to the configuration added in kamailio.cfg event_route [tm: local-request] { sip_trace (); if (is_method ("OPTIONS") && $ ru = ~ "pstnhub.microsoft.com") { append_hf ("Contact: <sip: sbc.netvoiceperu.com: 5061; transport = tls> \ r \ n"); } xlog ("L_INFO", "Sent out tm request: $ mb \ n"); } As additional information, I inform you that I also managed to observe the SIP OPTIONS that MsTeams sends to Kamailio. OPTIONS sip: sbc.netvoiceperu.com: 5061; transport = tls SIP / 2.0 FROM: <sip: sip-du-a-eu.pstnhub.microsoft.com: 5061>; tag = f1bdeb5f-662f-4544-a436-e9aa9ad78da4 TO: <sip: sbc.netvoiceperu.com> CSEQ: 1 OPTIONS CALL-ID: c47e2782-16c3-49cb-8931-24e9709d260a MAX-FORWARDS: 70 VIA: SIP / 2.0 / TLS 52.114.75.24:5061;branch=z9hG4bK48b0e6be CONTACT: <sip: sip-du-a-eu.pstnhub.microsoft.com: 5061> CONTENT-LENGTH: 0 USER-AGENT: Microsoft.PSTNHub.SIPProxy v.2021.1.15.7 i.EUWE.10 ALLOW: INVITE, ACK, OPTIONS, CANCEL, BYE, NOTIFY However I don't see the 200 OK SIP responses from Kamailio to MsTeams. I think this may be the reason why I see the SIP OPTIONS status in "Warning" from the MsTeams panel. Maybe the contact field is not being added in the SIP OPTIONS messages that Kamailio sends to MsTeams and for that reason I don't see 200OK responses from MsTeams. Could you help me solve this please. Cheers Saludos Cordiales -- *Willy Valles Rios* *Unified Communications Specialist* phone: +51955747343 em@il: willyvalles17(a)gmail.com

3 years, 9 months

registering gsm gateway by siremis

by shashank shekhar

Hi, I want to register a gsm gateway on my kamailio server with siremis ...kindly guide me on this Thankyou Regards Shashank shekhar 9162735161

3 years, 9 months

Kamailio as inbound and outbound proxy

by Michael Friesen

Hello, I am trying to configure Kamailio as both an inbound and outbound proxy. Inbound requests flow Sip Trunk -> Kamailio -> Asterisk. Outbound requests flow Asterisk -> Kamailio -> Sip Trunk. Inbound traffic is sent to port 5060 on kamailio which listens on the PRIVATE_IP:5060 and advertises PUBLIC_IP:5060. How can we ensure that when messages are sent to the Sip Trunk they have Record-Route headers with the PUBLIC_IP and when messages are sent to asterisk they have Record-Route headers with the PRIVATE_IP?

3 years, 9 months

kamailio 5.4.3 ubuntu 20.04 tls - http_async_client

by Filippo Graziola

Hi all, I have an issue related (my guess) to tls and http_async_client module that result in a segmentation fault and a not correct handle of tls connections. First with only tls module loaded, not forked: 0(1021) INFO: <core> [core/tcp_main.c:4983]: init_tcp(): using epoll_lt as the io watch method (auto detected) 0(1021) INFO: rr [../outbound/api.h:52]: ob_load_api(): unable to import bind_ob - maybe module is not loaded 0(1021) INFO: rr [rr_mod.c:185]: mod_init(): outbound module not available 0(1021) INFO: tls [tls_mod.c:389]: mod_init(): With ECDH-Support! 0(1021) INFO: tls [tls_mod.c:392]: mod_init(): With Diffie Hellman 0(1021) WARNING: tls [tls_init.c:784]: tls_h_mod_init_f(): openssl bug #1491 (crash/mem leaks on low memory) workaround enabled (on low memory tls operations will fail preemptively) with free memory thresholds 4718592 and 2359296 bytes 0(1021) INFO: <core> [core/cfg/cfg_ctx.c:595]: cfg_set_now(): tls.low_mem_threshold1 has been changed to 4718592 0(1021) INFO: <core> [core/cfg/cfg_ctx.c:595]: cfg_set_now(): tls.low_mem_threshold2 has been changed to 2359296 0(1021) INFO: <core> [main.c:2833]: main(): processes (at least): 9 - shm size: 67108864 - pkg size: 67108864 0(1021) INFO: <core> [core/udp_server.c:154]: probe_max_receive_buffer(): SO_RCVBUF is initially 212992 0(1021) INFO: <core> [core/udp_server.c:206]: probe_max_receive_buffer(): SO_RCVBUF is finally 425984 0(1021) INFO: tls [tls_domain.c:305]: ksr_tls_fill_missing(): TLSs<default>: tls_method=12 0(1021) INFO: tls [tls_domain.c:317]: ksr_tls_fill_missing(): TLSs<default>: certificate='/etc/kamailio/fullchain.pem' 0(1021) INFO: tls [tls_domain.c:324]: ksr_tls_fill_missing(): TLSs<default>: ca_list='(null)' 0(1021) INFO: tls [tls_domain.c:331]: ksr_tls_fill_missing(): TLSs<default>: crl='(null)' 0(1021) INFO: tls [tls_domain.c:334]: ksr_tls_fill_missing(): TLSs<default>: require_certificate=0 0(1021) INFO: tls [tls_domain.c:342]: ksr_tls_fill_missing(): TLSs<default>: cipher_list='(null)' 0(1021) INFO: tls [tls_domain.c:349]: ksr_tls_fill_missing(): TLSs<default>: private_key='/etc/kamailio/privkey.pem' 0(1021) INFO: tls [tls_domain.c:352]: ksr_tls_fill_missing(): TLSs<default>: verify_certificate=0 0(1021) INFO: tls [tls_domain.c:356]: ksr_tls_fill_missing(): TLSs<default>: verify_depth=9 0(1021) INFO: tls [tls_domain.c:359]: ksr_tls_fill_missing(): TLSs<default>: verify_client=0 0(1021) NOTICE: tls [tls_domain.c:1105]: ksr_tls_fix_domain(): registered server_name callback handler for socket [:0], server_name='<default>' ... 0(1021) INFO: tls [tls_domain.c:711]: set_verification(): TLSs<default>: No client certificate required and no checks performed 0(1021) INFO: tls [tls_domain.c:305]: ksr_tls_fill_missing(): TLSc<default>: tls_method=20 0(1021) INFO: tls [tls_domain.c:317]: ksr_tls_fill_missing(): TLSc<default>: certificate='(null)' 0(1021) INFO: tls [tls_domain.c:324]: ksr_tls_fill_missing(): TLSc<default>: ca_list='(null)' 0(1021) INFO: tls [tls_domain.c:331]: ksr_tls_fill_missing(): TLSc<default>: crl='(null)' 0(1021) INFO: tls [tls_domain.c:334]: ksr_tls_fill_missing(): TLSc<default>: require_certificate=0 0(1021) INFO: tls [tls_domain.c:342]: ksr_tls_fill_missing(): TLSc<default>: cipher_list='(null)' 0(1021) INFO: tls [tls_domain.c:349]: ksr_tls_fill_missing(): TLSc<default>: private_key='(null)' 0(1021) INFO: tls [tls_domain.c:352]: ksr_tls_fill_missing(): TLSc<default>: verify_certificate=0 0(1021) INFO: tls [tls_domain.c:356]: ksr_tls_fill_missing(): TLSc<default>: verify_depth=9 0(1021) INFO: tls [tls_domain.c:359]: ksr_tls_fill_missing(): TLSc<default>: verify_client=0 0(1021) INFO: tls [tls_domain.c:714]: set_verification(): TLSc<default>: Server MAY present invalid certificate 6(1027) ERROR: tls [tls_server.c:1283]: tls_h_read_f(): protocol level error 6(1027) ERROR: tls [tls_util.h:42]: tls_err_ret(): TLS accept:error:141FC044:SSL routines:tls_setup_handshake:internal error 6(1027) ERROR: tls [tls_server.c:1287]: tls_h_read_f(): source IP: XXXXXXXXXXXXXXX 6(1027) ERROR: tls [tls_server.c:1290]: tls_h_read_f(): destination IP: XXXXXXXXXX 6(1027) ERROR: <core> [core/tcp_read.c:1498]: tcp_read_req(): ERROR: tcp_read_req: error reading - c: 0x7f2cbc1b3948 r: 0x7f2cbc1b3a70 (-1) so no segmentation fault but error in handling. Second one also with http_async_client loaded: 0(1059) INFO: <core> [core/tcp_main.c:4983]: init_tcp(): using epoll_lt as the io watch method (auto detected) 0(1061) INFO: rr [../outbound/api.h:52]: ob_load_api(): unable to import bind_ob - maybe module is not loaded 0(1061) INFO: rr [rr_mod.c:185]: mod_init(): outbound module not available 0(1061) INFO: tls [tls_mod.c:389]: mod_init(): With ECDH-Support! 0(1061) INFO: tls [tls_mod.c:392]: mod_init(): With Diffie Hellman 0(1061) INFO: http_async_client [http_async_client_mod.c:222]: mod_init(): Initializing Http Async module 0(1061) WARNING: tls [tls_init.c:784]: tls_h_mod_init_f(): openssl bug #1491 (crash/mem leaks on low memory) workaround enabled (on low memory tls operations will fail preemptively) with free memory thresholds 5242880 and 2621440 bytes 0(1061) INFO: <core> [core/cfg/cfg_ctx.c:595]: cfg_set_now(): tls.low_mem_threshold1 has been changed to 5242880 0(1061) INFO: <core> [core/cfg/cfg_ctx.c:595]: cfg_set_now(): tls.low_mem_threshold2 has been changed to 2621440 0(1061) INFO: <core> [main.c:2833]: main(): processes (at least): 10 - shm size: 67108864 - pkg size: 67108864 0(1061) INFO: <core> [core/udp_server.c:154]: probe_max_receive_buffer(): SO_RCVBUF is initially 212992 0(1061) INFO: <core> [core/udp_server.c:206]: probe_max_receive_buffer(): SO_RCVBUF is finally 425984 0(1061) INFO: tls [tls_domain.c:305]: ksr_tls_fill_missing(): TLSs<default>: tls_method=12 0(1061) INFO: tls [tls_domain.c:317]: ksr_tls_fill_missing(): TLSs<default>: certificate='/etc/kamailio/fullchain.pem' 0(1061) INFO: tls [tls_domain.c:324]: ksr_tls_fill_missing(): TLSs<default>: ca_list='(null)' 0(1061) INFO: tls [tls_domain.c:331]: ksr_tls_fill_missing(): TLSs<default>: crl='(null)' 0(1061) INFO: tls [tls_domain.c:334]: ksr_tls_fill_missing(): TLSs<default>: require_certificate=0 0(1061) INFO: tls [tls_domain.c:342]: ksr_tls_fill_missing(): TLSs<default>: cipher_list='(null)' 0(1061) INFO: tls [tls_domain.c:349]: ksr_tls_fill_missing(): TLSs<default>: private_key='/etc/kamailio/privkey.pem' 0(1061) INFO: tls [tls_domain.c:352]: ksr_tls_fill_missing(): TLSs<default>: verify_certificate=0 0(1061) INFO: tls [tls_domain.c:356]: ksr_tls_fill_missing(): TLSs<default>: verify_depth=9 0(1061) INFO: tls [tls_domain.c:359]: ksr_tls_fill_missing(): TLSs<default>: verify_client=0 0(1061) NOTICE: tls [tls_domain.c:1105]: ksr_tls_fix_domain(): registered server_name callback handler for socket [:0], server_name='<default>' ... 0(1061) INFO: tls [tls_domain.c:711]: set_verification(): TLSs<default>: No client certificate required and no checks performed 0(1061) INFO: tls [tls_domain.c:305]: ksr_tls_fill_missing(): TLSc<default>: tls_method=20 0(1061) INFO: tls [tls_domain.c:317]: ksr_tls_fill_missing(): TLSc<default>: certificate='(null)' 0(1061) INFO: tls [tls_domain.c:324]: ksr_tls_fill_missing(): TLSc<default>: ca_list='(null)' 0(1061) INFO: tls [tls_domain.c:331]: ksr_tls_fill_missing(): TLSc<default>: crl='(null)' 0(1061) INFO: tls [tls_domain.c:334]: ksr_tls_fill_missing(): TLSc<default>: require_certificate=0 0(1061) INFO: tls [tls_domain.c:342]: ksr_tls_fill_missing(): TLSc<default>: cipher_list='(null)' 0(1061) INFO: tls [tls_domain.c:349]: ksr_tls_fill_missing(): TLSc<default>: private_key='(null)' 0(1061) INFO: tls [tls_domain.c:352]: ksr_tls_fill_missing(): TLSc<default>: verify_certificate=0 0(1061) INFO: tls [tls_domain.c:356]: ksr_tls_fill_missing(): TLSc<default>: verify_depth=9 0(1061) INFO: tls [tls_domain.c:359]: ksr_tls_fill_missing(): TLSc<default>: verify_client=0 0(1061) INFO: tls [tls_domain.c:714]: set_verification(): TLSc<default>: Server MAY present invalid certificate 0(1061) INFO: http_async_client [async_http.c:101]: async_http_init_sockets(): inter-process event notification sockets initialized 0(1061) INFO: http_async_client [async_http.c:84]: async_http_init_worker(): started worker process: 1 0(1059) CRITICAL: <core> [core/mem/q_malloc.c:501]: qm_free(): BUG: bad pointer 0x1 (out of memory block!) called from tls: tls_init.c: ser_free(323) - ignoring Segmentation fault this time, there is a segmentation fault. The above is a result of this minimal configuration: #!KAMAILIO ####### Global Parameters ######### /* LOG Levels: 3=DBG, 2=INFO, 1=NOTICE, 0=WARN, -1=ERR, ... */ debug=2 log_stderror=no memdbg=5 memlog=5 log_facility=LOG_LOCAL0 log_prefix="{$mt $hdr(CSeq) $ci} " children=2 tcp_children=2 auto_aliases=no alias="XXXXXXXXXXXXX" listen=udp:eth0 server_signature=no tcp_connection_lifetime=3605 tcp_max_connections=40960 tcp_accept_no_cl=yes enable_tls=yes listen=tls:XXXXXXXXXX:5061 advertise XXXXXXXXXXXX:5061 tls_max_connections=40000 enable_sctp=no ####### Modules Section ######## loadmodule "kex.so" loadmodule "corex.so" loadmodule "tm.so" loadmodule "tmx.so" loadmodule "sl.so" loadmodule "rr.so" loadmodule "pv.so" loadmodule "tls.so" loadmodule "http_async_client.so" #----------------- setting module-specific parameters --------------- #----- tls params ----- modparam("tls", "config", "/etc/kamailio/tls.cfg") #----- http client ---- modparam("http_async_client", "workers", 1) ####### Routing Logic ######## request_route { exit; } I used the above configuration to take out as much as possible my mistakes in the configuration, but with my full kamailio configuration, tls connections give the above errors but everything else works just fine (also http_async_client module functions which are used on INVITES) and calls are going properly (unfortunately tls is required). I found a couple of issues that are similar https://github.com/kamailio/kamailio/issues/2560 and https://github.com/kamailio/kamailio/issues/2466# but as far as I understood the issue 2466 is closed because fixes are already included. I tried in any case to compile from source a few older releases with the same result, changed also the certificate and private key (letsencrypt), moreover I have another kamailio (v5.3.4) running on ubuntu 18.04 (same configuration) without any issues. I saw that there is a different version of openssl version 1.0.. in ubuntu 18.04, version 1.1 in ubuntu 20.04, but the segmentation fault seems to happen after an error on free some memory. Have you some ideas? tell me if you need more info from me. Thanks Filippo

3 years, 9 months

Problems establishing SIP signaling between MsTeams and Kamailio

by Willy Valles Rios

Hello community, I am having trouble establishing SIP signaling between MsTeams and Kamailio. I currently have this configuration in my tls.cfg file [server: default] method = TLSv1.2 + verify_certificate = yes require_certificate = yes private_key = /etc/kamailio/certificates/private-key.pem certificate = /etc/kamailio/certificates/certificate.pem [client: default] method = TLSv1.2 + verify_certificate = yes require_certificate = yes private_key = /etc/kamailio/certificates/private-key.pem certificate = /etc/kamailio/certificates/certificate.pem My domain was certified with ssl through an authoritative certifier (GoDaddy), however I see these errors in the / var / log / messages of the Kamailio server. Jan 6 15:13:45 Kamailio-Server /usr/sbin/kamailio[32409]: INFO: tls [tls_mod.c:389]: mod_init(): With ECDH-Support! Jan 6 15:13:45 Kamailio-Server /usr/sbin/kamailio[32409]: INFO: tls [tls_mod.c:392]: mod_init(): With Diffie Hellman Jan 6 15:13:45 Kamailio-Server /usr/sbin/kamailio[32409]: INFO: tls [tls_init.c:722]: tls_h_mod_init_f(): compiled with openssl version "OpenSSL 1.0.2k-fips 26 Jan 2017" (0x100020bf), kerberos support: on, compression: on Jan 6 15:13:45 Kamailio-Server /usr/sbin/kamailio[32409]: INFO: tls [tls_init.c:730]: tls_h_mod_init_f(): installed openssl library version "OpenSSL 1.0.2k-fips 26 Jan 2017" (0x100020bf), kerberos support: on, zlib compression: on#012 compiler: gcc -I. -I.. -I../include -fPIC -DOPENSSL_PIC -DZLIB -DOPENSSL_THREADS -D_REENTRANT -DDSO_DLFCN -DHAVE_DLFCN_H -DKRB5_MIT -m64 -DL_ENDIAN -Wall -O2 -g -pipe -Wall -Wp,-D_FORTIFY_SOURCE=2 -fexceptions -fstack-protector-strong --param=ssp-buffer-size=4 -grecord-gcc-switches -m64 -mtune=generic -Wa,--noexecstack -DPURIFY -DOPENSSL_IA32_SSE2 -DOPENSSL_BN_ASM_MONT -DOPENSSL_BN_ASM_MONT5 -DOPENSSL_BN_ASM_GF2m -DRC4_ASM -DSHA1_ASM -DSHA256_ASM -DSHA512_ASM -DMD5_ASM -DAES_ASM -DVPAES_ASM -DBSAES_ASM -DWHIRLPOOL_ASM -DGHASH_ASM -DECP_NISTZ256_ASM Jan 6 15:13:45 Kamailio-Server /usr/sbin/kamailio[32409]: WARNING: tls [tls_init.c:787]: tls_h_mod_init_f(): openssl bug #1491 (crash/mem leaks on low memory) workaround enabled (on low memory tls operations will fail preemptively) with free memory thresholds 13107200 and 6553600 bytes Jan 6 15:13:45 Kamailio-Server /usr/sbin/kamailio[32409]: INFO: [core/cfg/cfg_ctx.c:598]: cfg_set_now(): tls.low_mem_threshold1 has been changed to 13107200 Jan 6 15:13:45 Kamailio-Server /usr/sbin/kamailio[32409]: INFO: [core/cfg/cfg_ctx.c:598]: cfg_set_now(): tls.low_mem_threshold2 has been changed to 6553600 Jan 6 15:13:45 Kamailio-Server /usr/sbin/kamailio[32409]: INFO: [main.c:2834]: main(): processes (at least): 25 - shm size: 67108864 - pkg size: 4194304 Jan 6 15:13:45 Kamailio-Server /usr/sbin/kamailio[32409]: INFO: [core/udp_server.c:154]: probe_max_receive_buffer(): SO_RCVBUF is initially 212992 Jan 6 15:13:45 Kamailio-Server /usr/sbin/kamailio[32409]: INFO: [core/udp_server.c:206]: probe_max_receive_buffer(): SO_RCVBUF is finally 425984 Jan 6 15:13:45 Kamailio-Server /usr/sbin/kamailio[32409]: INFO: tls [tls_domain.c:305]: ksr_tls_fill_missing(): TLSs: tls_method=22 Jan 6 15:13:45 Kamailio-Server /usr/sbin/kamailio[32409]: INFO: tls [tls_domain.c:317]: ksr_tls_fill_missing(): TLSs: certificate='/etc/kamailio/certificados/certificate.pem' Jan 6 15:13:45 Kamailio-Server /usr/sbin/kamailio[32409]: INFO: tls [tls_domain.c:324]: ksr_tls_fill_missing(): TLSs: ca_list='(null)' Jan 6 15:13:45 Kamailio-Server /usr/sbin/kamailio[32409]: INFO: tls [tls_domain.c:331]: ksr_tls_fill_missing(): TLSs: crl='(null)' Jan 6 15:13:45 Kamailio-Server /usr/sbin/kamailio[32409]: INFO: tls [tls_domain.c:335]: ksr_tls_fill_missing(): TLSs: require_certificate=1 Jan 6 15:13:45 Kamailio-Server /usr/sbin/kamailio[32409]: INFO: tls [tls_domain.c:342]: ksr_tls_fill_missing(): TLSs: cipher_list='(null)' Jan 6 15:13:45 Kamailio-Server /usr/sbin/kamailio[32409]: INFO: tls [tls_domain.c:349]: ksr_tls_fill_missing(): TLSs: private_key='/etc/kamailio/certificados/private-key.pem' Jan 6 15:13:45 Kamailio-Server /usr/sbin/kamailio[32409]: INFO: tls [tls_domain.c:353]: ksr_tls_fill_missing(): TLSs: verify_certificate=1 Jan 6 15:13:45 Kamailio-Server /usr/sbin/kamailio[32409]: INFO: tls [tls_domain.c:356]: ksr_tls_fill_missing(): TLSs: verify_depth=9 Jan 6 15:13:45 Kamailio-Server /usr/sbin/kamailio[32409]: INFO: tls [tls_domain.c:359]: ksr_tls_fill_missing(): TLSs: verify_client=0 Jan 6 15:13:45 Kamailio-Server /usr/sbin/kamailio[32409]: NOTICE: tls [tls_domain.c:1107]: ksr_tls_fix_domain(): registered server_name callback handler for socket [:0], server_name='' ... Jan 6 15:13:45 Kamailio-Server /usr/sbin/kamailio[32409]: INFO: tls [tls_domain.c:697]: set_verification(): TLSs: Client MUST present valid certificate Jan 6 15:13:45 Kamailio-Server /usr/sbin/kamailio[32409]: INFO: tls [tls_domain.c:305]: ksr_tls_fill_missing(): TLSc: tls_method=22 Jan 6 15:13:45 Kamailio-Server /usr/sbin/kamailio[32409]: INFO: tls [tls_domain.c:317]: ksr_tls_fill_missing(): TLSc: certificate='/etc/kamailio/certificados/certificate.pem' Jan 6 15:13:45 Kamailio-Server /usr/sbin/kamailio[32409]: INFO: tls [tls_domain.c:324]: ksr_tls_fill_missing(): TLSc: ca_list='(null)' Jan 6 15:13:45 Kamailio-Server /usr/sbin/kamailio[32409]: INFO: tls [tls_domain.c:331]: ksr_tls_fill_missing(): TLSc: crl='(null)' Jan 6 15:13:45 Kamailio-Server /usr/sbin/kamailio[32409]: INFO: tls [tls_domain.c:335]: ksr_tls_fill_missing(): TLSc: require_certificate=1 Jan 6 15:13:45 Kamailio-Server /usr/sbin/kamailio[32409]: INFO: tls [tls_domain.c:342]: ksr_tls_fill_missing(): TLSc: cipher_list='(null)' Jan 6 15:13:45 Kamailio-Server /usr/sbin/kamailio[32409]: INFO: tls [tls_domain.c:349]: ksr_tls_fill_missing(): TLSc: private_key='/etc/kamailio/certificados/private-key.pem' Jan 6 15:13:45 Kamailio-Server /usr/sbin/kamailio[32409]: INFO: tls [tls_domain.c:353]: ksr_tls_fill_missing(): TLSc: verify_certificate=1 Jan 6 15:13:45 Kamailio-Server /usr/sbin/kamailio[32409]: INFO: tls [tls_domain.c:356]: ksr_tls_fill_missing(): TLSc: verify_depth=9 Jan 6 15:13:45 Kamailio-Server /usr/sbin/kamailio[32409]: INFO: tls [tls_domain.c:359]: ksr_tls_fill_missing(): TLSc: verify_client=0 Jan 6 15:13:45 Kamailio-Server /usr/sbin/kamailio[32409]: INFO: tls [tls_domain.c:697]: set_verification(): TLSc: Server MUST present valid certificate Jan 6 15:13:45 Kamailio-Server /usr/sbin/kamailio[32422]: INFO: jsonrpcs [jsonrpcs_sock.c:443]: jsonrpc_dgram_process(): a new child 0/32422 Jan 6 15:13:45 Kamailio-Server /usr/sbin/kamailio[32424]: INFO: ctl [io_listener.c:214]: io_listen_loop(): io_listen_loop: using epoll_lt io watch method (config) Jan 6 15:13:55 Kamailio-Server /usr/sbin/kamailio[32425]: ERROR: tls [tls_server.c:1283]: tls_h_read_f(): protocol level error Jan 6 15:13:55 Kamailio-Server /usr/sbin/kamailio[32425]: ERROR: tls [tls_util.h:42]: tls_err_ret(): TLS write:error:14090086:SSL routines:ssl3_get_server_certificate:certificate verify failed Jan 6 15:13:55 Kamailio-Server /usr/sbin/kamailio[32425]: ERROR: tls [tls_server.c:1287]: tls_h_read_f(): source IP: 52.114.75.24 Jan 6 15:13:55 Kamailio-Server /usr/sbin/kamailio[32425]: ERROR: tls [tls_server.c:1290]: tls_h_read_f(): destination IP: 161.35.44.66 Jan 6 15:13:55 Kamailio-Server /usr/sbin/kamailio[32425]: ERROR: [core/tcp_read.c:1493]: tcp_read_req(): ERROR: tcp_read_req: error reading - c: 0x7f45242be028 r: 0x7f45242be150 (-1) Jan 6 15:13:55 Kamailio-Server /usr/sbin/kamailio[32426]: ERROR: tls [tls_server.c:1283]: tls_h_read_f(): protocol level error Jan 6 15:13:55 Kamailio-Server /usr/sbin/kamailio[32426]: ERROR: tls [tls_util.h:42]: tls_err_ret(): TLS write:error:14090086:SSL routines:ssl3_get_server_certificate:certificate verify failed Jan 6 15:13:55 Kamailio-Server /usr/sbin/kamailio[32426]: ERROR: tls [tls_server.c:1287]: tls_h_read_f(): source IP: 52.114.132.46 Jan 6 15:13:55 Kamailio-Server /usr/sbin/kamailio[32426]: ERROR: tls [tls_server.c:1290]: tls_h_read_f(): destination IP: 161.35.44.66 Jan 6 15:13:55 Kamailio-Server /usr/sbin/kamailio[32426]: ERROR: [core/tcp_read.c:1493]: tcp_read_req(): ERROR: tcp_read_req: error reading - c: 0x7f45242d9278 r: 0x7f45242d93a0 (-1) Jan 6 15:13:55 Kamailio-Server /usr/sbin/kamailio[32427]: ERROR: tls [tls_server.c:1283]: tls_h_read_f(): protocol level error Jan 6 15:13:55 Kamailio-Server /usr/sbin/kamailio[32427]: ERROR: tls [tls_util.h:42]: tls_err_ret(): TLS write:error:14090086:SSL routines:ssl3_get_server_certificate:certificate verify failed Jan 6 15:13:55 Kamailio-Server /usr/sbin/kamailio[32427]: ERROR: tls [tls_server.c:1287]: tls_h_read_f(): source IP: 52.114.14.70 Jan 6 15:13:55 Kamailio-Server /usr/sbin/kamailio[32427]: ERROR: tls [tls_server.c:1290]: tls_h_read_f(): destination IP: 161.35.44.66 Jan 6 15:13:55 Kamailio-Server /usr/sbin/kamailio[32427]: ERROR: [core/tcp_read.c:1493]: tcp_read_req(): ERROR: tcp_read_req: error reading - c: 0x7f45242be028 r: 0x7f45242be150 (-1) Could you help me identify the problem please. Cheers Saludos Cordiales -- *Willy Valles Rios* *Unified Communications Specialist* phone: +51955747343 em@il: willyvalles17(a)gmail.com

3 years, 9 months

Info: Upcoming online events - February 2021

by Daniel-Constantin Mierla

Hello, short note to announce a news article listing the upcoming online events where you can watch presentation related to Kamailio, respectively FOSDEM and ClueCon TGI. More details at: * https://www.kamailio.org/w/2021/01/upcoming-online-events-february-2021/ During this time where the travelling is under heavy restrictions, such events can be a chance to keep in touch with peers in the RTC space or learn new usefuk things. Cheers, Daniel -- Daniel-Constantin Mierla -- www.asipto.com www.twitter.com/miconda -- www.linkedin.com/in/miconda Funding: https://www.paypal.me/dcmierla

3 years, 9 months

Loop with unable to find dialog for xxx

by David VILLAUME

Hello, I got some time Ack packets looping on my servers during 4 hours if I don’t restart the system ( 4 hours is my dialog timeout). Jan 27 16:59:02 vma-2 kamailio[4544]: WARNING: { 1 # SDvl91b03-576e9e12b1569f0361fceb3625955037-agvh8j0020 * } dialog [dlg_handlers.c:1322]: dlg_onroute(): unable to find dialog for ACK with route param 'dc2.f24' [717:1071] and call-id 'SDvl91b03-576e9e12b1569f0361fceb3625955037-agvh8j0020' Jan 27 16:59:02 vma-2 kamailio[4545]: WARNING: { 1 # SDvl91b03-576e9e12b1569f0361fceb3625955037-agvh8j0020 * } dialog [dlg_handlers.c:1322]: dlg_onroute(): unable to find dialog for ACK with route param 'dc2.f24' [717:1071] and call-id 'SDvl91b03-576e9e12b1569f0361fceb3625955037-agvh8j0020' Jan 27 16:59:02 vma-2 kamailio[4545]: WARNING: { 1 # SDvl91b03-576e9e12b1569f0361fceb3625955037-agvh8j0020 * } dialog [dlg_handlers.c:1322]: dlg_onroute(): unable to find dialog for ACK with route param 'dc2.f24' [717:1071] and call-id 'SDvl91b03-576e9e12b1569f0361fceb3625955037-agvh8j0020' Jan 27 16:59:02 vma-2 kamailio[4544]: WARNING: { 1 # SDvl91b03-576e9e12b1569f0361fceb3625955037-agvh8j0020 * } dialog [dlg_handlers.c:1322]: dlg_onroute(): unable to find dialog for ACK with route param 'dc2.f24' [717:1071] and call-id 'SDvl91b03-576e9e12b1569f0361fceb3625955037-agvh8j0020' Jan 27 16:59:02 vma-2 kamailio[4545]: WARNING: { 1 # SDvl91b03-576e9e12b1569f0361fceb3625955037-agvh8j0020 * } dialog [dlg_handlers.c:1322]: dlg_onroute(): unable to find dialog for ACK with route param 'dc2.f24' [717:1071] and call-id 'SDvl91b03-576e9e12b1569f0361fceb3625955037-agvh8j0020' It generates approximatively 2 millions packets per loop. On the last occurrence I noticed a ‘SIP/2.0 200 canceling’ generated per Kamailio before the loop started (which seems uncomon on this host) Bellow is a screenshot of the beginning of the loop and may dialog and topos config. Has anyone encountered such behavour ? Regards, David [cid:image001.png@01D6F4E2.F68B5140] modparam("dialog", "dlg_flag", 1) modparam("dialog", "hash_size", 1024) modparam("dialog", "default_timeout", 14500) modparam("dialog", "event_callback", "ksr_dialog_event") modparam("dialog", "db_url", DBURL_DLG) modparam("dialog", "db_update_period", 15) modparam("dialog", "db_mode", 1) modparam("topos", "storage", "redis") modparam("topos", "dialog_expire", 14500) modparam("topos", "contact_host", "PUBLICIP") modparam("topos_redis", "serverid", "topos")

3 years, 9 months

websocket rd buffer size limit?

by Andrew Chen

Hey group, I was wondering if there is a way to control the websocket buffer size to support large SIP messages. I received the following error when sending content-length of 65000 2021-01-26T17:32:19.251408+00:00 sjomainkama50 kamailio[31871]: 109(32008) WARNING: websocket [*ws_frame.c*:482]: decode_and_validate_ws_frame(): message is too long for our buffer size (65535 / 66151) I am assuming this is controlled by the tcp_rd_buf params which I have set to 131k: *tcp_*rd_buf_size=131072 and this is my tcp_wr_buf params: *tcp_*wq_blk_size=131072 *tcp_*conn_wq_max=131072 Please advise. Thanks. -- Andy Chen Sr. Telephony Lead Engineer achen@ <achen(a)thinkingphones.com>fuze.com -- *Confidentiality Notice: The information contained in this e-mail and any attachments may be confidential. If you are not an intended recipient, you are hereby notified that any dissemination, distribution or copying of this e-mail is strictly prohibited. If you have received this e-mail in error, please notify the sender and permanently delete the e-mail and any attachments immediately. You should not retain, copy or use this e-mail or any attachment for any purpose, nor disclose all or any part of the contents to any other person. Thank you.*

3 years, 9 months

event_route[core:receive-parse-error] missing from docs

by Henning Westerholt

Hello, I noticed that the core "event_route[core:receive-parse-error]" was missing from the cookbook, so I have added it there. https://www.kamailio.org/wiki/cookbooks/devel/core#event_route Cheers, Henning -- Henning Westerholt - https://skalatan.de/blog/ Kamailio services - https://gilawa.com<https://gilawa.com/>

3 years, 9 months

2024

2023

2022

2021

2020

2019

2018

2017

2016

2015

2014

2013

2012

2011

2010

2009

2008

2007

2006

2005

2004

2003

2002

sr-users January 2021