Hi All,
I was looking for a way where i could reverse the order of priority set on destinations in dispatcher file.
for eg:
if i have the following file:
1 sip:10.252.168.41:5060;transport=tcp 0 5 # (US)
1 sip:10.252.168.42:5060;transport=tcp 0 4 # (US)
1 sip:10.252.168.43:5060;transport=tcp 0 3 # (EU)
1 sip:10.252.168.44:5060;transport=tcp 0 2 # (EU)
I wanted to use top to bottom when in US region and bottom to top when in EU region.
One option is to make another set, however that will force Kamailio to send ping (OPTIONS) twice when probing.
Regards,
Adarsh Chauhan
Hello all,
We are trying to connect kamailio ims to a pcrf,
connection is successful. Whenever we register through bhoghe client , we
receive AAR on pcrf from kamailio ims(pcscf), so just need a suggestion can
we disable that till we receive invite from the soft phone?
Can anyone help on this?
Thanks,
Jyoti bansal
--
Confidentiality Notice and Disclaimer: This email (including any
attachments) contains information that may be confidential, privileged
and/or copyrighted. If you are not the intended recipient, please notify
the sender immediately and destroy this email. Any unauthorized use of the
contents of this email in any manner whatsoever, is strictly prohibited. If
improper activity is suspected, all available information may be used by
the sender for possible disciplinary action, prosecution, civil claim or
any remedy or lawful purpose. Email transmission cannot be guaranteed to be
secure or error-free, as information could be intercepted, lost, arrive
late, or contain viruses. The sender is not liable whatsoever for damage
resulting from the opening of this message and/or the use of the
information contained in this message and/or attachments. Expressions in
this email cannot be treated as opined by the sender company management –
they are solely expressed by the sender unless authorized.
Happy New Year 2022 Everyone. Wish you a lot of innovation this year!
I was just curious to know if any of us had handled the mid-call failures
using the Kamailio. I am writing a SIP Client to handle the failures by
using the DNS SRV based failover and Fallback approach where I am using two
Kamailio instances as Outbound Proxy resolved by DNS SRV lookup. Everything
is fine except for on-going calls. How to handle the mid-call failovers? Is
there any way in Kamailio like Call Preservation mode or something?
Any suggestions or ideas to handle midcall failover so that if a current
Outbound Proxy goes down then all the ongoing calls can be seamlessly
routed through another Kamailio (secondary).
Thanks and Regards
Varun
Hi,
We are using Asterisk as a PBX with users directly registered to Asterisk and
Asterisk registering to SIP trunks. We are now looking to put Kamailio in front
of Asterisk to handle SIP registrations from the SIP clients.
In a ‘typical’ architecture should we keep the SIP trunk registrations on Asterisk
or is Kamailio used for this? We want to keep Asterisk as the RTP proxy so we
don’t want a call setup by Kamailio with RTP then going direct between user agents.
Regards
Nauman
Hi all,
I've been banging my head on the table with this one and hoping someone has
some insight here.
I'm trying to use a variable as the host & port input in t_relay()
- t_relay(host, port)
This works fine if statically set:
t_relay("10.0.1.1", "5060");
But if I change the host or the port to a variable like this:
$avp(destip) = "10.0.1.1";
$avp(dstport) = "5060";
t_relay($avp(destip), $avp(dstport));
Then Kamailio fails to start, calling out the t_relay line:
kamailio: CRITICAL: <core> [core/cfg.y:3686]: yyerror_at(): parse error in
config file /etc/kamailio/kamailio-routelogic.cfg, line 62, column 35: bad
command
I get the same behavior with pseudovariables and vars as well:
$var(destip) = "10.0.1.1";
$var(dstport) = "5060";
t_relay($var(destip), $var(dstport))
Any tips or pointers would be much appreciated.
Thanks!
Nick
Hello
I would like to know all the feature lists of Kamailio as SBC.
Could you please send me the document? I cannot find it on the website.
Best regards
Nattha Vudhiprasittipol
Product Development Engineer
Creaturelab Network Solution Co.,Ltd
357 Charansanitwong Rd., Bang-Bamru,
Bangphlat, Bangkok 10700, THAILAND
Email: nattha.v(a)creaturelab.co.th
Website: www.creaturelab.co.th
Hi Team,
We were trying to test a call flow with Kamailio IMS that requires
preconditio.
Do you know any free or paid IMS softphones that support preconditio and
are compatible with Kamailio IMS.
--
*Thanks and Regards,*
*Ashay Matekar*
Associate Manager Engineering | +91 932446823
Great Software Laboratory | www.gslab.com
LinkedIn <https://www.linkedin.com/company/gs-lab> | Twitter
<https://twitter.com/_gslab> | Email Disclaimer
<https://www.gslab.com/privacy-policy/#email-disclaimer>
--
Confidentiality Notice and Disclaimer: This email (including any
attachments) contains information that may be confidential, privileged
and/or copyrighted. If you are not the intended recipient, please notify
the sender immediately and destroy this email. Any unauthorized use of the
contents of this email in any manner whatsoever, is strictly prohibited. If
improper activity is suspected, all available information may be used by
the sender for possible disciplinary action, prosecution, civil claim or
any remedy or lawful purpose. Email transmission cannot be guaranteed to be
secure or error-free, as information could be intercepted, lost, arrive
late, or contain viruses. The sender is not liable whatsoever for damage
resulting from the opening of this message and/or the use of the
information contained in this message and/or attachments. Expressions in
this email cannot be treated as opined by the sender company management –
they are solely expressed by the sender unless authorized.
Hey Kamailio Users,
I've written a TLS-UDP gateway. It works well, but I want to reduce the
internet noise it pushes through.
I have an idea on what I'd like to try. Wondering if it would be possible
to catch the Register 200 OK, store it and then when receiving packets it
future to then validate them against the data?
I've managed to capture a 200 OK, but the save("location") function says it
will return it's own 200 OK which isn't the plan since we just want to
capture the location.
Anyone done something similar and got some working example code? Is this a
bad idea for some reason?