Dear,
I use the address table to ENABLE UAC doesn't registererd in subscriber table just for emergency call then after the BYE to I remove it from the address table.
I 'd like to purge the UAC from address table BUT NEED to RELOAD in CACHE the address table.
To use the "kamctl address relaod" works BUT I want to reload the address table from my Kamailio.cfg (route).
I found the function "address_reload" ( https://kamailio.org/docs/modules/3.1.x/modules_k/permissions.html#id2528769)
but I have an error when trying to start kamailio.
Best regards,
--
Youssef BOUJRAF | Managing Director
Direct Line: +32 (0)2 880 33 30
Mobile: +32 (0)477 94 86 89
Dubai Mobile : +971 (0)55 9928871
Fax: +32 (0)2 318 82 21
Skype: y_boujraf
Email: yboujraf(a)by-research.be
Web : www.by-systems.be/
BY-SYSTEMS sprl| Avenue Charles Plisnier 13 | B-1070 Anderlecht | Belgium | TVA: BE 0819.832.617______________________________________________________________________________
This communication, issued by BY-SYSTEMS SPRL, is confidential and we do not waive confidentiality by mistransmission. If you have received it by mistake please notify the sender immediately by reply and then delete it permanently from your system without copying it, using it for any purposes or disclosing its contents to any other person. Thank you for your cooperation. Any views expressed in this message are those of the individual sender and may not necessarily reflect the views of BY-SYSTEMS SPRL. Emails are not secure and cannot be guaranteed to be error free as they can be intercepted, amended, lost or destroyed, or contain viruses. Anyone who communicates with us by email is taken to accept these risks.
Hello list,
I have kamailio 5.5.3 (x86_64/linux) configured as an SBC in front of asterisk to front end webrtc clients. Browser clients running JsSIP 3.7.0 connect to kamailio via webrtc and kamailio sends the traffic back to asterisk using SIP. rtpengine is configured to relay the RTP packets.
I need to send websocket pings every 10 seconds to the browser clients.
I have the following config in kamailio:
modparam("websocket", "keepalive_mechanism", 1)
modparam("websocket", "keepalive_timeout", 10)
modparam("websocket", "keepalive_interval", 2)
modparam("websocket", "keepalive_processes", 2)
modparam("websocket", "verbose_list", 1)
If my understanding of the documentation is correct, I do not need to do any additional configuration.
But looking at the websocket traffic, I do not see any ping packets in websocket. I am also using sipdump module to capture all packets sent and received by kamailio and the ping packets are not visible there either.
What could be wrong here? Do I need to do any additional config?
Thanks for every help!
X.
Have a need to strip out various parameters from the user portion of the RURI and/or the To (npdi, etc). Does anyone have any clever methods for doing so that don't involve just brute forcing through the individual parameters?
Confidentiality Notice: This e-mail, and any attachment to it, contains privileged and confidential information intended only for the use of the individual(s) or entity named on the e-mail. If the reader of this e-mail is not the intended recipient, or the employee or agent responsible for delivering it to the intended recipient, you are hereby notified that reading this e-mail is strictly prohibited. If you have received this e-mail in error, please immediately return it to the sender and delete it from your system.
Hi,
has anybody managed to connect to Zoom with Kamailio, ideally using
rtpengine?
I'm getting error 500 when I call them …
--
-- regards,
--
-- Matthias Urlichs
Hi,
We're currently testing Kamailio 5.5.3 on Debian 11 compiled with RADCLI
and we're experiencing an issue with radius authentication:
Feb 23 08:54:22 redacted /sbin/kamailio[817172]: WARNING: <script>: RADIUS
auth failed for redacted (IP:redacted:5060)
Feb 23 08:54:22 redacted /sbin/kamailio[817173]: radcli: rc_avpair_new:
rc_avpair_new: no attribute 1/1 in dictionary
Feb 23 08:54:22 redacted2 /sbin/kamailio[817173]: ERROR: auth_radius
[sterman.c:204]: add_cisco_vsa(): unable to add Cisco-AVPair attribute
I don't believe this is directly a Kamailio issue but enabling debug
logging hasn't revealed any clues ( The log lines remain the same without
additional info ) This was working previously on 5.5.X on Debian 9
Has anyone experienced this before or have any suggestions on where to
start looking?
Thanks
I'm testing with this kamailio version:
$ kamcmd version
kamailio 5.5.4 (x86_64/linux) 54c9df
on:
$ cat /etc/issue
Debian GNU/Linux 11 \n \l
with:
$ openssl version
OpenSSL 1.1.1k 25 Mar 2021
Whenever I start kamailio I get 3199 log lines like this:
2022-03-10T10:04:39.700676+09:00 lab002201-flip-server
/usr/local/src/git/kamailio-5.5/src/kamailio[261703]: CRITICAL: <core>
[core/mem/q_malloc.c:519]: qm_free(): BUG: freeing already freed pointer
(0x7f8eb57f7848), called from tls: tls_init.c: ser_free(323), first free
tls: tls_init.c: ser_free(323) - ignoring
I searched the issues at github and found:
https://github.com/kamailio/kamailio/issues/2560https://github.com/kamailio/kamailio/issues/2912
So I tried to start kamailio with
--atexit=no
but those logs remain.
With and without using --atexit=no there is no crash and all my tests are
OK.
But should I be worried to put this in production?
Hello
i try to fix one endpoint, it does neet do have a
a=rtpmap:116 telephone-event/8000
a=fmtp:116 0-15
sometimes i got:
a=rtpmap:115 telephone-event/8000
and sometimes:
a=rtpmap:114 telephone-event/8000
a=fmtp:114 0-15
so - should i use txtops and search for fmtp, and use
search_append_body ?
ifsearch_body(re) does not find 'a=fmtp:95' (95..127 - dynamic payload
here), or am I reinventing the wheel again ? Any hints?
--
Krzysztof Drewicz
Senior Infrastructure Administrator
CLUDO | ul. Grochowska 306/308, 03-840 Warszawa
t+48221223977
kdrewicz(a)cludo.pl | www.cludo.pl
Thanks for your time in advance!
When dealing with multiple headers in different formats, i.e.
Diversion: <sip:foo>, <sip:bar>
$hdrc(Diversion) returns 1 header instead of 2. Is this expected
behavior? What is the best way to manage all scenarios of possible
multiple header values? It seems currently there is no easy way to iterate
over ALL diversion headers, including scenarios like the following below:
Diversion: <sip:abc>
or
Diversion: <sip:abc>, <sip:def>
or
Diversion: <sip:abc>
Diversion: <sip:def>, <sip:ghi>
etc.
- Brandon