sr-users August 2022

sr-users@lists.kamailio.org

37 participants
50 discussions

Via header force change protocol to TLS?
by Anthony Alba 30 May '24

30 May '24

I have kamailio behind a TLS termination proxy so the sockets are correctly deduced to be TCP. However the clients only talk TLS to the proxy and are confused when the top Via header added by Kamailio is TCP. Is there a way for Kamailio to forcibly pretend its protocol is TLS? Like advertised_address but "advertised_protocol" instead. (With pjsip testing: it has a flag use_tls which ignores TCP from Kamailio and continues to use the persistent TLS transport to proxy. Linphone fails because it tries to honor TCP in Via and is unable to establish TCP transport). BTW I am using t_relay_to_tcp so Kamailio will return traffic to the proxy as TCP even though the contact addresses specify transport=TLS.

4 10

Dialog and DMQ on restart
by Björn Klasen 25 Mar '24

25 Mar '24

Hi everybody, I'm just testing Kamailio 5.4.1 with dialog replication over DMQ. This seems to work very good. Dialogs are replicated without problems. When I'm restarting one node I would have expected, that all dialogs are synced again, just like in dmq_usrloc. But this does not happen. After a restart the nodes dialog-list is empty. Did I miss somethin? Is there a special parameter that I have to set? BR, Björn -- Björn Klasen, Specialist TNG Stadtnetz GmbH, Network Management (VoIP) Projensdorfer Straße 324 24106 Kiel Germany T +49 431/ 530530 F +49 431/ 7097-555 mailto: bklasen(a)tng.de http://www.tng.de Register: Amtsgericht Kiel HRB 6002 KI Executive board (Geschäftsführung): Dr.-Ing. Volkmar Hausberg, Sven Schade, Carsten Tolkmit, Dr. Sven Willert Tax-Id (Steuernr.): 2029047020, VAT-Id (USt-Id): DE225201428

4 9

Is Min-SE check broken?
by harneet singh 31 May '23

31 May '23

Hi All, I am facing an issue in understanding how the min_se should be working in kamailio. As per the SST documentation, it seems like if the min_se is configured as 500, then any value of Session-Expires OR MIN-SE if lower than 500, can be responded to by a 422. However, I strangely see the reverse happening. To investigate further, I looked in to the ki_sst_check_min() code in the master, and these seems like a potential issue. Ref Code: Inside ki_sst_check_min(), there is an if condition like below: if (sst_min_se < MIN(minse, se.interval)) { However, shouldn't it be the other way around? ie if (sst_min_se > MIN(minse, se.interval)) { because we need to send 422 if the received value(in INVITE etc) is smaller than the sst configure min_se value? I also found a different documentation, at https://git.sgu.ru/oldssu/ex-opensips/blob/cb9df8d59dbb254a9d862569fd5d11f6… where the check is as below? if (sst_min_se > MIN(minse, se.interval)) { Can someone confirm if this is broken, or my understanding is incorrect? Regards, Harneet -- "Once you eliminate the impossible, whatever remains, no matter how improbable, must be the truth" - Sir Arthur Conan Doyle

2 3

Re: [SR-Users] TOPOS (5.1.[23]) breaks PRACK
by Daniel Tryba 02 May '23

02 May '23

On Mon, May 07, 2018 at 04:44:14PM +0200, Daniel Tryba wrote: > Sure. Attached. Problem appears to be that the topos query can't find > callid-totag (from the response). > > I'll try the same scenario with the mysql backend to see if it behaves > different. Config works fine with mysql as topos backend. So the bug is restricted to topos-redis.

5 19

enable topology hiding on one side or dynamic ip in topoh module Contact and Via Header
by Patrick Karton 17 Feb '23

17 Feb '23

Hello , im using kamailio with two interfaces external and internal. i need a way either to : * enable topoh hiding only when outgoing interface is external ( mask contact and Via ip only when ougoing interface is external * or if it is not possible to enable it only in one direction.i want to know how to configure dynamic(for example in xavp or avp) ip to put in Contact and Via when topoh is enabled. i see that the 'mask_ip' parameter of topoh module is a string. so we can not set a dynamic value here unfortunately. Thanks

4 8

kamcmd autocompletion
by Antoine DEBARRE 24 Nov '22

24 Nov '22

Hi, I just installed kamailio v5.5 via deb.kamailio.org packages (debian 11). Seems that kamcmd autocompletion doesn't work at all. It is OK for v5.4 via official debian packages (packages.debian.org/bullseye/kamailio) Best regards, -- <https://app.livestorm.co/comdata-group/metaverse-what-will-cx-look-like-in-…>

3 3

Recommended openSSL version
by Igor Olhovskiy 19 Oct '22

19 Oct '22

Hello! Due to I still experience irregular Kamailio 5.4 crashes (like 1/month) related to SSL (using websockets and SIPS) I'm wondering, could openSSL upgrade change the situation? As of now in CentOS 7 I have 1.0.2k version. Does anyone have experience to fix crash-related to TLS problems with openSSL upgrade? Or maye some tuneup of TCP parameters can help here?My current setup is quite simple: children=4 enable_tls=yes tcp_accept_no_cl=yes tcp_connection_lifetime=600 tcp_max_connections=998976 # 1000000 - 1024, so we're leaving 1k for system reserve tls_max_connections=998976 Number of clients ~ 200 constantly connected to websocket. -- Best regards, Igor

5 7

Siremis JSONRPC problem on Bullseye
by Joseph Goettgens 12 Sep '22

12 Sep '22

I am not sure what I have to look for and I didn't change the initial config files (except for the 666 mode for kamailio_rpc.sock). As far as Kamailio is concerned the socket files files do exist: root@deb11srv1-kamailio:/var/www/siremis-5.3.x# ls -l /run/kamailio/ insgesamt 4 srw------- 1 kamailio kamailio 0 7. Jun 11:37 kamailio_ctl -rw-r--r-- 1 kamailio kamailio 5 7. Jun 11:37 kamailio.pid prw-rw---- 1 kamailio kamailio 0 7. Jun 11:37 kamailio_rpc.fifo srw-rw-rw- 1 kamailio kamailio 0 7. Jun 11:37 kamailio_rpc.sock When I look at siremis/log/ERR.log I repeatedly get: '06/07/2022','09:43:29','ERR','ErrorHandler','socket_bind(): unable to bind address [2]: No such file or directory','' This disappears when I put the local file socket in /tmp: <UnixSockLocal name="unixsocklocal" address="/tmp/siremis_rpc.sock" timeout="3.0"/> which was probably done this way in previous versions of Siremis (before systemd private tmp config). In this case I get no error messages, but still no answers (as expected). The next step seems to get UnixSockLocal right.

2 1

Info: Kamailio World Conference Online 2022 - The Schedule
by Daniel-Constantin Mierla 08 Sep '22

08 Sep '22

The schedule for Kamailio World Conference Online 2022 has been published on the event website: - https://www.kamailioworld.com The event spans over two days, September 7-8, 2022, with presentations and open discussion sessions during 12:50-17:00UTC. With the main target to share the knowledge and connect the community, the conference has presentations covering use of Kamailio for 5G services, NAT traversal and integration with RTPEngine, TLS with WolfSSL, end to end testing testing, controlling SIP message content from KEMI and resources management for scalability. It is a good balance between established and new speakers at this edition of Kamailio World Conference. There is no registration required to join the event, the sessions will be presented in a live video conferencing room streamed to YouTube KamailioWorld Channel. A text chat room will be made available for posting questions and background discussions. Book the dates in your agenda and prepare for another amazing Kamailio World Conference! Keep the eye on the event website for updates! Cheers, Daniel -- Daniel-Constantin Mierla -- www.asipto.com www.twitter.com/miconda -- www.linkedin.com/in/miconda

1 5

slow timer too slow: overflow
by Denys Pozniak 05 Sep '22

05 Sep '22

Hello! After some time, Kamailio stops processing incoming messages. slow timer too slow: overflow messages appear in the log (I suspect that the problem is related to the rtimer module) Aug 29 14:19:17 kamailio[11320]: 2(11320) ERROR: {1 10 OPTIONS 2b45547f33f5203f-4091(a)10.10.10.10} <core> [core/mem/q_malloc.c:430]: qm_malloc(): qm_malloc(0x7f163b9f9010, 960) called from core: core/rvalue.c: rval_new_empty(246), module: core; Free fragment> Aug 29 14:19:17 kamailio[11320]: 2(11320) ERROR: {1 10 OPTIONS 2b45547f33f5203f-4091(a)10.10.10.10} <core> [core/rvalue.c:253]: rval_new_empty(): could not allocate private memory from pkg pool Aug 29 14:19:17 kamailio[11330]: 12(11330) WARNING: <core> [core/timer.c:936]: timer_handler(): slow timer too slow: overflow (62671 - 61648 = 1023) Aug 29 14:19:17 kamailio[11320]: 2(11320) ERROR: {1 10 OPTIONS 34618af41c3866bc-16408(a)10.10.10.20} <core> [core/mem/q_malloc.c:297]: qm_find_free(): qm_find_free(0x7f163b9f9010, 960); Free fragment not found! Aug 29 14:19:17 kamailio[11320]: 2(11320) ERROR: {1 10 OPTIONS 34618af41c3866bc-16408(a)10.10.10.20} <core> [core/mem/q_malloc.c:430]: qm_malloc(): qm_malloc(0x7f163b9f9010, 960) called from core: core/rvalue.c: rval_new_empty(246), module: core; Free fragment no> Aug 29 14:19:17 kamailio[11320]: 2(11320) ERROR: {1 10 OPTIONS 34618af41c3866bc-16408(a)10.10.10.20} <core> [core/rvalue.c:253]: rval_new_empty(): could not allocate private memory from pkg pool Aug 29 14:19:17 kamailio[11330]: 12(11330) WARNING: <core> [core/timer.c:936]: timer_handler(): slow timer too slow: overflow (62671 - 61648 = 1023) Aug 29 14:19:18 kamailio[11320]: 2(11320) ERROR: {1 10 KDMQ 1c18959d07113951-203309(a)10.10.10.30} <core> [core/mem/q_malloc.c:297]: qm_find_free(): qm_find_free(0x7f163b9f9010, 960); Free fragment not found! Aug 29 14:19:18 kamailio[11320]: 2(11320) ERROR: {1 10 KDMQ 1c18959d07113951-203309(a)10.10.10.30} <core> [core/mem/q_malloc.c:430]: qm_malloc(): qm_malloc(0x7f163b9f9010, 960) called from core: core/rvalue.c: rval_new_empty(246), module: core; Free fragment no> Please point me out where the source of the problem could be. version: kamailio 5.6.1 (x86_64/linux) -- BR, Denys Pozniak

2 2

2025

2024

2023

2022

2021

2020

2019

2018

2017

2016

2015

2014

2013

2012

2011

2010

2009

2008

2007

2006

2005

2004

2003

2002

sr-users August 2022