Hi,
I wasn’t able to find an answer on the list previously, nor any trail of breadcrumbs in the docs: do any of the existing HTTP client modules support HTTP/2?
— Alex
--
Alex Balashov | Principal | Evariste Systems LLC
Tel: +1-706-510-6800 / +1-800-250-5920 (toll-free)
Web: http://www.evaristesys.com/, http://www.csrpswitch.com/
Hi,
I'm using rtpengine for RTP proxying with kamailio.
I use it just for audio.
But eventually some terminal reinvites offering video.
I don't want to refuse the request but just disable RTP proxying for video
as my employer has limited bandwidth and want to reserve it only for audio.
So I checked the rtpengine module documentation but it seems there is no
way to restrict RTP proxying to be performed only for m=audio.
I tried some things like
replace_body("^m=video [0-9]+", "m=video 0");
and
subst_body('/^m=video [0-9]+ /m=video 0 /');
and
msg_apply_changes();
but still the RTP proxying for video is set up.
Any hints on how to solve this?
Ok so making progress but still a little confused, hopefully this forum can shed some light on this behaviour.
Using the hints provided (thanks all so far) and the latency logging from the cookbook I have managed to isolate the issue down to RTPengine introducing the delay.
INFO: app_python3 [apy_kemi.c:1820]: sr_apy_kemi_exec_func(): alert - action KSR.rtpengine.rtpengine_manage(...) took too long [1003089 ms] (file:(null) func:(null) line:252)
What is confusing is, I don't believe this block should be being called.
when the BYE is triggered, it routes to ksr_route_withindlg
# handle requests within SIP dialogs
if self.ksr_route_withindlg(msg)==-255 :
return 1
from within the ksr_route_withindlg a check is done to see if any RTPengine work needs doing
# Handle requests within SIP dialogs
def ksr_route_withindlg(self, msg):
if KSR.siputils.has_totag()<0 :
return 1
# RTPEngine handling for UPDATES & reINVITES with sdp
if self.ksr_route_rtpengine(msg) == -255:
return 1
RTPengine is configured in a way to step in whenever there is an SDP present based on Content-Type: application/sdp
# RTPengine handle anything with SDP
def ksr_route_rtpengine(self, msg):
if KSR.textops.has_body_type("application/sdp"):
KSR.rtpengine.rtpengine_manage(
"RTP/AVP replace-session-connection replace-origin ICE=remove")
return 1
What I can understand is why is this being called and erroring introducing the delay when there is no Content-Type: application/sdp in a BYE ???
As a quick fix I have put this in which stops the problem (I am sure there is better ways to handle this but for now this works in a DEV environment)
def ksr_route_rtpengine(self, msg):
if KSR.is_BYE():
return 1
if KSR.textops.has_body_type("application/sdp"):
KSR.rtpengine.rtpengine_manage(
"RTP/AVP replace-session-connection replace-origin ICE=remove")
return 1
Can anyone see why this would occur? Why is sr_apy_kemi_exec_func(): alert - action KSR.rtpengine.rtpengine_manage(...) even being called for this BYE ? when there is no Content-Type: application/sdp
Lewis
Hi,
I'm trying to configure kamailio to register users over websockets, but i am not able to find any working configuration around, am new to kamailio.
as far as i understand now, xhttp will handle the HTTP GET requests, i am not sure how to configure xhttp port number, cannot find parameters in the module manual, i found multiple sample configs but none of them is working, am using JsSip client.
if someone can guide me with a link to a working config and that i can start from.
Hello,
I am trying to load app_python.so module in kamailio 5.6 and I am getting the following error, under debian bullseye:
ERROR: <core> [core/sr_module.c:573]: load_module(): could not open module </usr/lib/x86_64-linux-gnu/kamailio/modules/app_python.so>: /usr/lib/x86_64-linux-gnu/kamailio/modules/app_python.so: undefined symbol: LOG_
The app_python.so file exists, under that path. Same ERROR for app_python3.so.
I have tried updating some modules's Makefile LDFLAGS but didn't work so far; still searching. Any ideas?
Thank you,
Stefan
Hello!
It was accidentally noticed that the variable $fU gets the user part of
userinfo SIP URI (although it is logical and described in the document
RFC2543).
I got message below and my spam filter based on $fU passed it inside the
network, as $fU was test
From: <sip:test:test@1.1.1.1>;tag=123456
Sure I can filter it through a regular expression, but maybe it's worth
adding another core variable with the userinfo value?
SIP-URL = "sip:" [ userinfo "@" ] hostport
url-parameters [ headers ]
userinfo = user [ ":" password ]
--
BR,
Denys Pozniak
Hello,
For non-commercial support please address our sr-users list (added to CC).
Please look at the uac module, there a function uac_auth() for this particular scenario with example cfg.
https://kamailio.org/docs/modules/5.5.x/modules/uac.html#uac.f.uac_auth
Cheers,
Henning
--
Henning Westerholt – https://skalatan.de/blog/
Kamailio services – https://gilawa.com<https://gilawa.com/>
From: Keshav Kaushik <kdkaushik(a)gmail.com>
Sent: Sunday, August 28, 2022 1:34 PM
To: Henning Westerholt <hw(a)gilawa.com>
Subject: kamailio Trunk authentication
Respected Sir,
I am new to kamailio so not very familiar with config PV’s and transformations etc.
I have successfully authenticated the Twilio SIP phone via ACL.
But I also willing to authenticate the Twilio SIP via username and password.
For doing this I plan to modify the “proxy-authentication” header as blow:
if (is_present_hf("Proxy-Authorization")) {
$nonc=$sel(proxy-authorization.nonce);// not working
$has="kamailio:$ar:SdE-----------ADVpa";
$ha1=$(has{s.md5});
hat="$aa:$adu";
$ha2=$(hat{s.md5});
$resp="$HA1:$nonc:$HA2";
append_hf('Proxy-Authorization: Digest username="kamailio", realm="$ar", nonce="$nonc", uri="sip:+1650ZZZZZZ@XX.YY.7.195", response="$(resp{s.md5})"');
}
remove_hf("Proxy-Authorization");// remove original header
When I save the config file and restart kamailio, it does not start, may be due to some error in code.
Can you please help in authentication of a SIP trunk using user/passowrd.
Thanks in advance
Sent from Mail<https://go.microsoft.com/fwlink/?LinkId=550986> for Windows
Thanks Alex and Kaufman,
As you said there is an element of db blocking for accounting, but I don't see the same impact when the INVITE goes through and sets the accounting flags.
I will look to disable accounting and see if it improves things. If not, I will have a look at benchmark to try and pin it down. It is not causing any noticeable delay in the clearing down of the call to the end users but I want to try and optimise the cleardown if possible.
Once I have tested this I will report back. Thanks for your assistance.
Lewis
